changethe market dynamics of CAD design through revitalization of the design curriculum. Thoughuniversities currently exhibit full design cycles across a variety of courses spread out in differentsemesters, it could be of major benefit for universities to integrate student extracurricular designteams as a part of the engineering curriculum. The ingrained collaboration required in designteams, as well as the cross-disciplinary interaction of students, academic mentors/advisors andindustry sponsors, is the most realistic analogue to the full end-to-end design cycle currentlypresent in an academic setting. In addition, since the competitive aspect of design competitionsto create superior designs push students to explore new/creative design avenues
, and learning as socio- culturally organized phenomena. A major strand of his research explores the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilem- mas encountered by students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories. He is co-editor of a 2010 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Learning Research as a Human Science. Other work has appeared in Linguistics and Education; Mind, Culture, and Activity; Anthropology & Education Quarterly, the Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science; the Journal of Engineering Education; and the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. His teaching interests
commercially available parts.None of the authors were involved in manufacturing the turbine. A total of 22 students, 14 boysand 8 girls, participated in this program. The team had a Team Leader, a girl, and four TeamCaptains. The team was trained by one of the authors on all science and engineering aspects ofwind turbine. Another author trained them in blade carving and aerodynamics. One of theteachers from the high school kept a watchful eye for day to day activities of the students, mostlyfor safety reasons. Hugh Piggott’s book on the subject was given to the students as a guideline.Final product was a 30’ tall tower with three 8’ diameter pine wood turbine and 12 NeodymiumIron Boron permanent magnets. The system also included 1200 Watt Whistler
Paper ID #30777Fostering inclusion and teaching equity in a Modern Physics forEngineers courseDr. Jessica R Hoehn, University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Jessica R. Hoehn is a postdoctoral researcher at University of Colorado Boulder. She received her PhD in Physics Education Research from CU, studying ontological, epistemological, and social aspects of student reasoning in quantum mechanics. Dr. Hoehn’s current research interests include connections between epistemology and group work in learning physics, the role of writing in lab classes, and students’ epistemological views about experimental physics. Generally, Dr. Hoehn
composition course” (p. 2). As a new engineering school that is not weighted down by 100+ years of traditionalcurricular design, Rowan is in an ideal position to create an innovative, comprehensive, andintegrated approach to engineering communication. The small size of the Rowan student body(15-35 students in each entering class and 66-140 students total) undoubtedly makes integrationeasier, but this paper demonstrates strategies for engineering-communication collaboration thatcan be applied in any context. It is also worth noting that, unlike several of the innovativeprograms that have emerged over the years, the program at Rowan is still going strong.2010 Papers: Greater Awareness of Published Research and Building on the Intellectual
identification of burnout as an occupational risk for educators [13] is not a newdiscovery, however. Recognizing the negative impact exhaustion, cynicism, and inefficacy couldhave on teachers as well as their students, Maslach and Leiter [14],[15] have researched itextensively for more than 20 years. Unlike college professors who are motivated and energizedby students [16], Maslach and Leiter [15] described individuals suffering from exhaustion asbeing characterized as depleted, fatigued, and lacking energy. Not surprisingly, studies havereported negative correlations between emotional exhaustion and job satisfaction [11], [17], [18].While the impact that burnout and low levels of job satisfaction have on faculty includes avariety of subpar performance
Paper ID #23041An Experiential Learning Framework for Improving Engineering Design,Build, and Test CoursesMr. Jackson Lyall Autrey, University of Oklahoma Jackson Autrey is a Master of Science student in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma from Tulsa, Oklahoma. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and is currently involved with research into assessment methods and pedagogy in engineer- ing design education. Following completion of his Master’s degree, Jackson plans to pursue a PhD. in Engineering with a focus on engineering education.Ms. Shalaka Subhash
that: Traditionally, students have been expected to make these sorts of connections on their own, outside the classroom. However, more teachers are finding that most students’ interest and ability in academics improve dramatically when they are helped to make the connection. ... Students’ involvement in schoolwork increases significantly when they are taught why they are learning concepts and how these concepts are used outside the classroom. And most students learn much better when allowed to work cooperatively with other students. (p. 31)Contextual learning has been endorsed by a number of other researchers[3],[4],[5] as well as aneffective process for education. Expanding the use of contextual learning in the
Science: Collaborative Explorations, vol. 16, no. 1, p. Article 3, 2020.[11] V. Piercey, R. Segal, A. V. Filippas, T. Chen, S. Kone, R. H. Hargraves, J. Bookman, J. Hearn, D. Pike and K. Williams, "Using Site Visits to Strengthen Collaboration," Journal of Mathematics and Sciences: Collaborative Exploration, vol. 16, no. 1, p. Article 4, 2020.[12] B. Poole, L. Turner and C. Maher-Boulis, "Designign a Student Exchange Program: Facilitating Interdisciplinary Mathematics-Focused Collbaoration among College Students," Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, vol. 16, no. 1, p. Article 13, 2020.[13] J. Bowers, B. D. Poole, C. Maher-Boulis, A. Schwartz, A. Bloomquist and E. Slate Young, "The Roles and
reasoning including skillssuch as classification, sequencing, planning, and comparison. Creative thinking involves creatingand generating something new or original. It also involves the skills of brainstorming,modification, attribute listing, and originality. The purpose of DFA creative thinking is tostimulate curiosity among students and promote product structure simplification. Bloom'sTaxonomy provides a useful structure in which to categorize DFA learning objects whenassessing student learning outcomes. Asking students to think at higher levels is an excellent wayto stimulate student's thought processes. In DFA learning process, the purpose of writing
affirming stories,but also institutionally realized leadership catalysts. By making four types of EL developmentcatalysts explicit, we provide engineering educators with authentic, industry-embeddednarratives to support their programing. This project is significant to the ASEE LEAD divisionbecause it provides us with a way of scaffolding leadership development opportunities for all ourstudents, even those who may resist the notion of engineering as a leadership profession.Keywords: career paths, engineering leadership, situated workplace learning, leadership narrativesIntroductionThe majority of engineers working in industry encounter supervisory or managerialresponsibilities within four years of graduation [1-4], yet research suggests that many of
that affects their participation in the sciences. These differences are seen aseither innate or socialized by gender or cultural norms and include goals, behaviors, and workingstyles. Conversely, the deficit model, “posits the existence of mechanisms of formal and informalexclusion of women scientists. Women as a group, according to this model, receive fewerchances and opportunities along their career paths, and for this reason they collectively haveworse career outcomes. The emphasis is on structural obstacles, legal, political and social, thatexist … in the social system of science.”13The following research is in line with the deficit model and sees the stated obstacles andresulting negative experiences as major contributors to the
informative, age or class appropriate experiments, demonstrations, and mediaso the participants can sample and explore structural dynamics from basic to advanced conceptsusing a “hands-on” approach. These shake tables must provide some overall, measurable contri-bution through outreach to the general public and young students, through instruction to under-graduate classes and through collaborative efforts of multiple universities’ development of theexperiments.Distribution of surveys to conduct the program evaluation will be performed through the internet.The web page is designed to insert all relevant information into a database for direct compilationand quantitative analysis of the responses. Qualitative analysis will also be conducted through
providing a value-added component for technology-oriented universities toextend the curriculum experience by providing both undergraduate and graduate students aresearch experience3 with real-world problems, opportunities and applications. The authors of this paper present a comparative analysis of technology and innovation-oriented centers. To gain an understanding of such centers, the authors focused on recognizedcenters to examine their mission, goals and objectives, research focus, business model,competitive perspectives, growth anomalies, principles of specialization, and innovationcapabilities. Based on this comparative analysis, the authors developed a set of relevantconclusions and recommendations for technology innovation centers
activities and integrating technology into science classrooms. Technology Enhanced Communities (TEC) funded by the Minnesota Office of Higher Education is an online learning community developed in collaboration with graduate students David Groos and Joel Donna for middle school science teachers in Minneapolis Public Schools working to integrate technology into their classrooms. TEC will be extended to include teachers on the White Earth Reservation. Page 14.288.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Bridge Design on the Reservation: A Study of Curriculum
paradigmoffers many advantages in terms of effectiveness by aligning with faculty identities and theprinciples of cooperative learning. This paradigm also promises greater sustainability as itfundamentally targets the creation of cultures and identities that will sustain engagement andpractice beyond the life of the program. We expect that this program will lead to many newavenues for research on faculty development as well, opening doors to learn about how facultylearn through collaboration and for tracking how faculty beliefs about teaching and learningchange over time.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the College of Engineering at Midwest University and the NationalScience Foundation under grant XXX-XXXXXXX. The opinions, findings, and
, which impact the members’ ability to create authentic collaboration that will impact the social change needed to broaden participation in engineering. However, all members report cautious optimism regarding the work ahead for the Alliance.1 IntroductionIn the field of engineering education in the U.S., Black/African Americans, Hispanic Americans,American Indians, Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, and Native Pacific Islanders represent adisproportionately small number of those graduating with engineering degrees. In 2020, only20% of students seeking bachelor’s degrees, 10% of master’s degrees, and 6% of doctorates self-identified as Black/African Americans, Hispanic Americans, American Indians, Alaska Natives,Native Hawaiians, or
deliver projects. Collaboration represents a key component in interdisciplinarycourse delivery for successful interdisciplinary student experiences in team-based learning (TBL)strategies. The goal of TBL strategies is to help students understand the advantages of interdisciplinarycollaboration skills [15]. TBL strategies are suitable for interdisciplinary education to cultivate a culture ofcollaboration among students [16]. In TBL, cooperative learning groups of students working in teams isone of the most common forms of collaboration that interdisciplinary course design adopts. Here, studentsengage with a learning attitude that promotes learning reflection and improves their performance [17].Bailey et al. [15] identified that members of the same
students/year) and are enrolled by a wide variety of science,engineering, and design majors at the University of Minnesota (a large public research university.)Three key adaptations from these two courses show potentially lasting promise. The first isutilizing individual projects where students collaboratively support each other’s projects (fromideation to implementation). The second is the use of static, responsive, and teleconference- basedvideo submissions for project check-ins, reports, and design reviews. The final is using onlinecommunications tools, including Learning Management Systems (LMSs) and particularly theDiscord service.Student ratings of teaching, comments, usage reports, and self-reflections are analyzed. While thedata are far
as not alwaysattentive to queries. Such a disparity in experience and support may dissuade female studentsfrom pursuing an engineering profession after graduation, given the crucial opportunityinternships provide for students to learn and practice key skills for their future employment [57]. The findings of this study also suggest that the role of female supervisors in the civilengineering workplace is critical for Asian women to share their concerns about difficulties andaspire to be like them. This study found that female supervisors were particularly helpful fordeveloping career interests. Previous research suggests that in order to be inspired by a rolemodel, one must be able to identify one's future self with that role model [33
Paper ID #11490Project-based learning in a high school pre-engineering program: Findingson student achievement (RTP, Strand 3)Todd France, University of Colorado Boulder Todd France is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Colorado Boulder. He is part of the Graduate STEM Fellows in K-12 Education Program and helps teach and develop curriculum at a high school STEM academy. His research focuses on pre-engineering education and project-based learning. Page 26.1265.1 c American Society for
andensure that balanced learning objectives are met. Governance of the Consortium is broadlydefined by the following: 1. Cal Poly actively solicits interesting industrial applied research projects for individual and student teams at both the undergraduate and graduate level. 2. The MEDITEC Consortium provides a mechanism to match the project needs of industrial participants with the interests and capabilities of Cal Poly students. 3. Industrial funding of the Consortium is in the form of an annual donation to the Biomedical and General Engineering Department. Funds are used to provide student stipends, project related expenses (consumables, etc.), and general MEDITEC
improve their competitiveness in the market[3,4,5,6,7]. Whereas, the higher education institution may see the value-added source of grantto conduct their research. However, for a typical non-research U.S. senior design capstoneproject, the industry funding amount is usually low [20,22], like $5,000.00 or less per semesterproject. This may be one of the reasons why faculty is not too motivated to coach undergraduatesenior design project.For industry, it is common to charge client with $20,000 per single management consultant for aweek (not included airline ticket, rental car, hotel, and food) a decade ago. Obviously, anycapstone project student would not be eligible to work 50 hours a week, nevertheless, it dependson what value that one could
unsuccessful participation of industry practitioners in academia describedabove, this research details an innovative teaching model in which the industry practitionersare integrated in the classroom to teach chapters of classes that take part of the curriculummandatory for students to graduate. The process of selection of the industry practitioners, andtheirs and students’ feedbacks on this model are assessed. This teaching model was applied ina newly founded Construction Management program at the University of Wyoming. Theprogram developed this teaching model as a supplementary feature for attaining AmericanCouncil for Construction Education (ACCE) accreditation status by Spring 2022. Thoughsome changes would be required, the model is expected to be
changing faculty) is being explored in an NSF-supported project “Changing Faculty throughLearning Communities.” The project employs four mechanisms to promote change in facultymembers: speakers, workshops, faculty learning communities (FLC), and matching grants tosupport women students. Specifically, the project aims to catalyze changes in the way facultythink about four concepts that are tightly linked to the concept of gender diversity: 1) mentalmodels, 2) development and invitation, 3) personal vision and commitment, and 4) the culture ofengineering and science. The following paper describes change mechanisms, highlighting FLC,and four changes that learning community participants report. Participants a) shifted fromsearching for external
of accreditation andquality assurance bodies, the lack of practical and laboratory activities to train students in theappropriate skills that are required in engineering practice.Almhaidib (2013) stated that, in today's globally competitive world, the contribution ofengineering colleges in the technical development of each country is considered significant. Thisdevelopment takes place through involvement in a wide range of economic development projectsby utilizing intellectual property development and creating partnerships with industry, which alsocreates opportunities for research and students training. The author further adds: “The general philosophy of engineering education is to produce graduates with high academic standing
be the ancillaryskills of written and oral communication? Certainly, ensuring that students learn therequisite fundamentals of engineering and its mathematical and scientific underpinnings isalready a daunting challenge. In answering this question, the Engineering AccreditationCommission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) developedan outcomes-based accreditation initiative called Engineering Criteria 20001 (EC2000). Oneof the EC 2000 criteria (Criterion 3 under “Program Outcomes and Assessment”) is thenecessity for engineering graduates to demonstrate the ability to communicate effectively.While considered progressive and innovative, EC2000 was not without its critics. Funded bya National Science Foundation
into two main categories based on Bloom’s Taxonomy verbs tounderstand which competencies might be: 1) Taught in classrooms – referring to competencies that utilize Bloom’s Taxonomy verbs in levels 1 through 3; and 2) Supplemented by experiential learning – referring to Bloom’s Taxonomy levels 4 through 6. Category 2 is not meant to supplant the teaching of these competencies in the classrooms, but provides an opportunity to explore how students and the curriculum might benefit from industry collaboration and inclusion for competencies that require higher levels of learning, according to employers.The verbs were categorized into Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives sixcognitive levels [17, 18], whereby
they have on student learning. In particular,assessment methods, perhaps both qualitative and quantitative, that can elicit studentperceptions of the classroom environment are needed. As previous studies havesuggested, authority and disciplinary practices are among the issues at stake when facultyfrom different disciplines collaborate on writing instruction. Team-teaching in all itsforms should continue to provide rich ground for exploring the relationship of writing tospecific disciplines such as engineering.References1. J. Newell, A. J. Marchese, R. P. Ramachandran, B. Sukumaran, and R. Harvey, “Multidisciplinary design and communication: A pedagogical vision,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 15, 1999.2. R. Harvey, F
cooperation and collaboration between engineers, life scientists, andmedical doctors required to forge a successful biomedical engineering program. Part of thisproject involves a collaboration of life scientists and engineers at the University to create a newintroductory experience for all science and engineering students.The Biomedical Engineering program is to be associated with the College of Engineering andwill offer baccalaureate degrees in Biomedical Engineering. Because Biomedical Engineering issuch a demanding field of study, a traditional four-year degree program will not, in all cases,provide enough time for students to attain the engineering excellence that is expected of Cal Polygraduates. Therefore, the program will have a strong