justice,political dimensions, structural conditions, and ethical considerations, as well stakeholderunderstanding, values, and dynamics, which also aligns with ABET-EAC’s Criterion 3 StudentOutcomes. [5] By providing students an opportunity to learn from and about multidisciplinaryand multicultural elements present within engineering design considerations, they can develop,with this approach students will develop intercultural competence and be better prepared totackle wicked problems [10].The FEW Model builds upon the current literature and particularly the idea of the engineer’sresponsibility relating to social elements that even exceed traditional notions of engineeringethics as described with the Engineering for Social Responsibility
assignment, students worked in teams to create abasic version of an LCA including human impacts for their senior capstone design project andwrite an updated version of the Social, Environmental, and Ethics Considerations section for theircapstone report (Appendix B). This assignment presented an opportunity for the students toconnect their work in the Sustainable Resource Engineering and Design course to their capstonedesign project with the intention that they would provide greater depth and insight than they hadto date. Given that the students had previously used a structured approach to consider each phaseof the product life cycle in the Beyond the LCA assignment, they now had an opportunity to applythat knowledge to their capstone project. In
they capture ourrealities as faculty members. Finally, three of us live the similar experiences of beinginternational faculty. We all have an insider’s insight to all of our struggles. Hence, a sense ofsolidarity and mutual respect addresses the last component relational ethics in terms of thisresearch [18].5. Co-Authors' Narratives and ExperiencesGiven the diverse backgrounds of faculty, we have outlined different perspectives and experiencesof each faculty including a personal narrative focusing on specific challenges and experiences inU.S. academia. Exploration of cultural and linguistic assets and their role in the U.S. educationalcontext, followed by a discussion on transition challenges from different career stages in academia. A. Dr
/PSF13/Session/E1.413. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). Mathematical problem solving. Elsevier. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.elsevier.com/books/mathematical-problem-solving/schoenfeld/978-0-12-628870 -414. Martin, T., Rayne, K., Kemp, N.J., Hart, J., & Diller, K.R. (2005). Teaching for Adaptive Expertise in Biomedical Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 11(2), pp. 257-276.15. Martin, T., Rivale, S.D., & Diller, K.R. (2007). Comparison of Student Learning in Challenge-based and Traditional Instruction in Biomedical Engineering. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 35, pp. 1312–1323.16. Rayne, K., Martin, T., Brophy, S., Kemp, N. J., Hart, J. D., & Diller, K.R. (2006
our course values and pedagogical principles. These included activelearning, project-based learning, and smaller class sizes.Table 3. Identified KSAs (knowledge, skills, and attitudes) for the course series Knowledge Skills Attitudes • Design Process • Teamwork • Appreciation of coding, programming • Curriculum • Communication • Societal impact/sustainability • Resources • Time Management • Metacognition about strengths and • Learning Methods • Study Skills weaknesses • Ethics and Values • Comfort with failure • “I can do this” • Multidisciplinary
Paper ID #40685On the Importance of Spatiality and Intersectionality: Transgender andGender Nonconforming Undergraduate Engineering Experiences ThroughCritical Collaborative Ethnographic Site VisitsFinn Johnson M.A., Oregon State University Finn Johnson, M.A., is a transgender and queer doctoral student in women, gender, and sexuality studies at Oregon State University. Finn has extensive experience in transgender and queer research methodologies, legal studies, and feminist research ethics and is currently working on an engineering education NSF- funded study with the College of Chemical, Environmental, and Biological
-constructed with Validation with participants to ensure that research communities to build upon data represent participants’ existing work while remaining social realities on their own authentic to research participants? terms? Pragmatic Is the selected theoretical How meaningful are the study’s Validation framework a good fit for the results to the social reality under social reality under investigation (and other similar social investigation? realities?) Ethical Validation Is the study conducted Do the findings do justice to the social
DEIBinitiatives is influenced by individual factors, such as racial and ethnic identity, as well asinstitutional culture and available resources. To be ready for change, faculty must see that changeis necessary, that the needed change will occur, and that there will be positive outcomes from thechange [7], [30]. Faculty of Color often bear the additional burden of advocating for DEIBchange while simultaneously navigating the challenges of systemic racism and discrimination[9]. For instance, even though Black faculty had higher service loads than their peers, they tookon additional voluntary diversity service, like mentoring Black students and anti-deficit teachingstrategies [31]. McGee describes this mindset as an equity ethic. An equity ethic requires
course schedule (Table 3.1) includes preparation for professional andethical conduct in a clinical setting, opportunities for sharing and dissemination of experiences,training in engineering design cycle, prototyping, and module development for future work.Table 3.1: Weekly schedule for SIDE course. Course plan includes preparatory training forprofessionalism and professional conduct in a clinical setting, as well as reporting from clinicalexperiences, and integration of clinical experiences into the product development lifecycle. Week Content Reporting/Submissions 1 Introduction, Responsible Conduct in Research, Ethics CITI Certification
Paper ID #47581Contextualizing Engineering Education by incorporating Indigenous KnowledgeSystems (IKS) in the Curriculum DesignDr. Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University Brainerd Prince is the Associate Professor of Practice and the Director of the Center for Thinking, Language and Communication at Plaksha University. He teaches courses such as Reimagining Technology and Society, Ethics of Technological Innovation, and Art of Thinking for undergraduate engineering students and Research Design for PhD scholars. He completed his PhD on Sri Aurobindo’s Integral Philosophy from OCMS, Oxford – Middlesex University, London. He
as they work on programmingtasks. Students with extended error resolution times are perceived to display strugglingbehaviors. By tracking the duration and frequency of error corrections, instructors can gaininsight into students’ debugging strategies.Furthermore, by integrating unit tests with the keystroke analysis, the tool enables theinstructors to dynamically assess code correctness. The pass/fail rates of the unit tests areclear measures of students’ progress.5 Ethical ConsiderationsGiven the focus of this research on student data collection and analysis, the study adheres toestablished ethical guidelines in order to protect the students’ privacy and maintain datasecurity. This research has been approved by our University’s
senior designproject allowed the students to achieve the course learning objectives, including designing formanufacturing, learning modern manufacturing tools, and conducting ethical design/designingfor the environment.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Hunt and Hunt Ltd. for their generous support of this series ofsenior design projects.References [1] A. Chamas, H. Moon, J. Zheng, Y. Qiu, T. Tabassum, J. H. Jang, M. Abu-Omar, S. L. Scott, and S. Suh, “Degradation Rates of Plastics in the Environment,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, Vol 8, Iss. 9, pp. 3494-351, 2020, doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06635 [2] United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Facts and Figures about Materials, Waste
: The Effect of Summarizing a Research Article on Students’ Area of Robotics Interest1 BackgroundThe need for capable, ethical robotics engineers is growing with the industry valued at 32.32billion in 2021 with anticipated growth of 12.1% from 2022 to 2030 [1], and projected 17,900mechanical engineering job openings each year [2]. It is imperative that undergraduate andgraduate programs prepare engineers for industry positions in robotics, and that they includeand encourage diverse groups of students to enter the field.Additionally, diversity among engineers in general is limited, starting with bachelor’s andbeing further exacerbated when entering engineering professions. For example, 22% of engi-neering bachelor degrees in
. Ethics, vol. 20, no. 4,pp. 457–477, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10805-021-09415-3.[18] C. Guthrie, “Plagiarism and Cheating: A Mixed Methods Study of Student AcademicDishonesty,” Univ. Waikato, vol. Master of Social Sciences, Feb. 2009, doi: [Master of SocialSciences, Palmerston North, New Zealand].[19] N. Das, “Intentional or unintentional, it is never alright to plagiarize: A note on howIndian universities are advised to handle plagiarism,” Perspect. Clin. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 56–57, 2018, doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_140_17. 5
withwomen in the industry.43% of our male participants reported experiencing no efforts to promote awareness and mitigategender inequality in the classroom. The remaining 57% experienced the following efforts: (1)sexual assault training prior to attending college, (2) efforts to prevent sexual violence againstwomen, (3) posters in classrooms and buildings on campus, and (4) female empowerment speechesin class.4.4.3. Suggestions for Future Education Efforts (From Participants)Discussing topics in class that highlight gender equity was the most common response from ourfemale participants. It was suggested that professors discussing equity and ethics or discussingvaluable minorities and their contributions to the field is an excellent way to bring
Educator Expectations in University Degrees,” e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, vol. 14, no. 1, 2020.[11] ABET, “Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc.” Accessed: Apr. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/[12] J. F. Volkwein, L. R. Lattuca, P. T. Terenzini, L. C. Strauss, and J. Sukhbaatar, “Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 318–328, 2004.[13] A. K. Shenton, “Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects,” EFI, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 63–75, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.[14] “AERA Code of Ethics: American Educational Research Association
, however, could not be satisfied across all project so a newcourse, “EPICS LC Course”, was created. It covers the outcomes related to computing skills andawareness of the engineering disciplines. Some topics, such as ethics and teaming, were alsocovered by the new course as well as EPICS. The sequence is shown in Table 2.Table 2: First Year Sequence, Standard and Learning Community Fall Semester (credits) Spring Semester (credits) Standard Core Introductory Engineering I (2) Introductory Engineering II (2) LC EPICS LC Course (2) EPICS course (1) Sequence EPICS Course(1)Because the new course was unique to the LC, it could
, economic, environmental and ethical issues facing the development of nanomanufacturing and other emerging technologies. Her 1998 NSF Career Award is one of the first that focused on environ- mentally benign manufacturing. She also guides research on development and assessment of educational computer games where students explore environmentally benign processes and supply chains in manufac- turing. She has been recognized by Northeastern University, receiving a University-wide Excellence in Teaching Award in 2000, the President’s Aspiration Award in 2005, and a College of Engineering Excel- lence in Mentoring Award in 2015. An ELATE Fellow, Dr. Isaacs has served in numerous administrative leadership roles at Northeastern
HurricaneKatrina. Two readings covered: 1) the culmination of many decisions that led to segregation andinequity in New Orleans, and 2) the engineering failures of the levy system which lefthistorically black neighborhoods at risk. Class discussion began by acknowledging the sensitivityof these topics. The discussion focused on the convergence of the articles. This topic relates topower imbalances in both political institutions and engineering decision-making.Third, we asked students to select a scenario either local to the community the university is in ortheir hometowns that centered on public health, environmental, or ethical concerns related toinfrastructure or industry. Scenarios selected included historical sites, such as the Love Canal, tomodern
naturaldisasters and the impacts of agriculture on water resources. The series of seminars - thesociological perspective, research methodology and engineering research and ethics inengineering, and technical workshops on remote sensing guided students how to prepare scientificproject and posters. Three posters were presented at the 62nd Annual Geomatics EngineeringConference at California State University at Fresno focused on the Creek Fire, Flooding in ValleyCommunities, and Decrease of Farmland in the Central Valley.Spring 2022 were designed to expend value in understanding the world we live in, and share withothers, from many different perspectives so that cultural norms, as well as cultural bias, can bebetter understood. To make a connection to
, and a Distinguished Fellow of the Center for University Education Scholarship at the University of Arizona. His professional areas of interest include medical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and broadening participation and promoting servingness in engineering, biomedicine, and computing, particularly at land-grant and Hispanic Serving Institutions. Subbian’s ed- ucational research is focused on asset-based practices, ethics education, and formation of professional identities.Ann Shivers-McNairFrancesa Lopez ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Inclusive, asset-based instructional strategies in engineering design: empowering faculty with professional
series ofquestions asking if they feel that they would do better, same, worse, or are undecided withregards to grade (Q5) and achieving the following individual ABET learning outcomes [37] dueto the current emergency online learning environment compared to a traditional in-person class: Q6.Gain an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems; Q7.Gain an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors; Q8.Gain an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences; Q9.Gain an ability to recognize ethical and
streamlining student outcomes assess- ment processes and has been an invited presenter at the ABET Symposium on multiple occasions. He was named an ABET Fellow in 2021. Estell is also a founding member and current Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions. Estell is Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science at Ohio Northern University, where he currently teaches first-year programming and user interface design courses, and serves on the college’s Capstone Design Committee. Much of his research involves design education pedagogy, including for- mative assessment of client-student interactions, modeling sources
subcommittee chair on ABET’s Accreditation Council Training Committee. He was previously a Member-At-Large on the Computing Accreditation Commission Executive Committee and a Program Evaluator for both computer engineering and computer science. Estell is well-known for his significant contributions on streamlining student outcomes assess- ment processes and has been an invited presenter at the ABET Symposium on multiple occasions. He was named an ABET Fellow in 2021. Estell is also a founding member and current Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions. Estell is Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science at
of Engineering and Computer Science where she is studying retention of undergraduate engineering students. She has extensive experience using qualitative and mixed-methods research in Engineering Education. Before joining UTD in September 2020, Laura worked at the University of San Diego on their RED grant to study institutional change efforts and redefine the engineering canon as sociotechnical. She has a background in environmental engineering and received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Utah State University with a research focus on the ethical and career aspects of mentoring of science and engineering graduate students and hidden curriculum in engineering.Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan
] writes, “In the Nazi regimethe technology served both the purposes of the state and the ethical values of the technologicalprofessionals.” This brings Katz to the question, “how does an engineer know that the values[they] embod[y] through [their] technological products are good values that will lead to a betterworld?”The contemporary use of technologies such as facial recognition and predictive algorithms in thecontext of law enforcement and incarceration make Katz’s question both relevant and urgent.Software such as the predictive policing tool PredPol reinforces biases within U.S. lawenforcement [5]; as one study noted, “PredPol is a tool for that aids law enforcement as itcurrently exists, and around the country, law enforcement targets
Paper ID #33189 soybean crop yields in Dr. Kristina Wagstrom’s Computational Atmospheric Chemistry and Exposure (CACE) laboratory. For the past two summers, Thomas has worked two internships: the first as an en- gineering intern at Allnex in 2019, and the second as an Environment, Health and Safety Intern at Pfizer in 2020. Working at Pfizer especially developed Thomas’s work ethic and passion for chemical engineer- ing, influencing him to seek further related chemical engineering positions after graduation where he can apply the knowledge he has learned in school to the pharmaceutical or manufacturing industries. Thomas is now seeking a full-time position with an engineering firm starting summer 2021 where he can
reports simply called for even more modernengineers.Figure 1: A visual depiction of new competencies needed by engineers upon review of theGrinter Report (1995) and the Vision of the Engineer of 2020 Reports (2004 and 2005).Even from an accreditation perspective, in 1997, ABET released Engineering Criteria 2000which made it clear that engineering education needed to include these global, societal,economic, and environmental mindsets in future engineers [4]. The incorporation of what arecommonly termed “soft skills” in engineering curriculum, including teamwork, communication,ethics, and social consciousness, were soon considered a necessity. Engineering coursework hadalready garnered a reputation as being content-heavy, so innovative and unique
curation,(2) mathematical foundations, (3) computational thinking, (4) statistical thinking, (5) data mod-eling, and (6) communication, reproducibility, and ethics. The recursive data cycle of obtaining,wrangling, curating, managing and processing data, exploring data, defining questions, performinganalyses and communicating the results lay at the core of the bootcamp, [2-4].The topics covered included: • coding in python and BASH • coding in python and BASH • data preprocessing: Pandas • data exploration and transformation • feature engineering • filtering • wrapper and embedded methods • machine learning, Scikit-learn, TensorFlow • data storage: Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, AWS RDS • data warehouse server: Microsoft SQL
Paper ID #32355Penalized for Excellence: The Invisible Hand of Career-TrackStratificationDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director of Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership in university and workplace settings as well as ethics and equity in engineering education.Dr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a