together.Once students arrived at a topic, they were then asked to perform a literature search and identifyrelevant prior work. In particular, they were asked to determine whether their research questionhad already been answered (and, if so, how conclusively). They were also asked to identify themost relevant reference material from the prior work that is most closely related to their area ofresearch.Once the topic was refined through the literature search, student participants were asked todevelop a project plan, working with their faculty mentor. In most cases, these plans involvedthe development of a software system and its use for data collection to answer a researchquestion. A few relied upon existing systems and presented configuration and data
Technology programs. He is also member of AIChE and ASEE. Currently, he serves as director for ASEE’s Engineering Technology Council (ETC).Dr. Lisa Deane Morano, University of Houston Lisa Morano is a Professor of Biology and Microbiology at the University of Houston-Downtown (UHD). She is also the Director of the Center for Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (CUAS) at UHD. Her research has focused on the bacteria found inside plan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024A Student Experiential Learning Program – An Interdisciplinary Approach to Sustainability Vassilios Tzouanas1 and Lisa Morano2 1
Network Analysis (ENA)One possible strategy for analyzing the connections between these frame elements is ENA, amethod that uses coded data to find temporal connections between ideas within an individual orcommunity. Each of these codes are represented as a node in the network, and edges betweennodes represent the strength of an individual or community’s connection between those twocodes. For example, epistemic network analysis has been used to investigate how engineeringidentity emerges as students participate in a medical device company simulation [12], howstudents develop an epistemic frame when completing an urban planning simulation [13], andhow engineering values and epistemology emerge as students participate in a four-weekengineering
director, or they may have been the product of such a program. In neither case,however, is it possible for new directors to understand and learn every aspect of planning andstrategy. Even if the previous director desires to impart all that they know, it is possible that thereis knowledge or meta-knowledge that they, themselves, are unaware they possess.Another challenge is the lack of widespread understanding of the state of the art in diversity,equity, inclusion, and belonging from a practitioner standpoint. The community exists in a stateof functional dichotomy between those designated as researchers and practitioners. In addition,there are many members of the academic community who are not aware of either the currentstate of practice OR
situations, especially with communication and teamwork. Participating in co-curricular activities can be one solution for developing these required skills. uch of the existing literature displays these co-curricular programs in a positive light,Memphasizing the many benefits offered to students. Students can gain confidence in their major and beyond through hands-on learning experiences that supplement classroom instruction. tudents who engage in these programs have found higher employment rates, higher successSrates, larger profits and sales, and greater firm entry [6]. In addition, participating in innovation programs such as business plan competitions increases student discipline, industry knowledge, and business
, and Canvasas the Learning Management System (LMS). Additionally, E. Session 3: Final Preparations and Strategyparticipants learn how to interact with their IoT devices,including initial setup, connectivity, and basic programming. The final session before the marathon event allows teamsThis session ensures teams are equipped with the necessary to refine their strategies and address any remaining technicaltools and understanding for effective collaboration and project or conceptual challenges. Participants review their progress,management. Figure 3 finalize their project plans, and ensure all components are fully
with the rubric encouraged educators to internalize itsconcepts, making inclusivity a central consideration in their pedagogical planning and execution.In addition, the rubric was adaptively used in action research projects, underscoring its versatilityand applicability across various educational initiatives. Although it was not initially specified asa requirement for these projects, educators intuitively incorporated the rubric into their researchmethodologies. This spontaneous adoption highlights the rubric’s utility in structuring inquiriesinto inclusive practices, enabling educators to conduct meaningful investigations that contributeto the broader discourse on equity in STEM education.Through both its immediate application during the
in decision-making representation in decision- decision-making making Shared Funding • Undercompensating the • Provide fair & equitable • Set up a sustainable funding community partners funding to community for system for the future • No plan for long-term duration of project • Community can generate operations & • Funding is centered around value after the project has maintenance
in 2024. This camp is a two-week camp. During the first week, a group of HSTAteachers come to campus to learn about the activities with faculty, meet the mentors, and explorethe campus. The goal of this week is 1) to help teachers prepare to help teach the lesson plans ofthe camp to students, 2) build a database of activities that they can use in the future in theirclassrooms, 3) further their confidence in STEM. The second week students attend the campwhich is broken into three components: STEM activities, a team-building project, andexploration of the regional area.ChallengesRunning these summer programs requires year-round duties of a faculty member to prepare forthe summer months. Responsibilities for the organization of these camps fall
accrediting agencies, institutional influences of college missionsand resources, and unit-level influences of faculty, discipline, and student characteristics. Starkalso created the Contextual Filters Model that provides an overview of the various contexts thatinfluence course planning for college faculty (Lattuca & Stark, 2011; Stark, 2000; Stark et al.,1988). A study by Lund and Stains examines unique environments and contexts of departmentsin influencing STEM faculty’s teaching practices and finds that disciplinary differences exist andhave shown potential associations to level of adoption of evidence-based instructional practices(2015). Another study shows similar findings where faculty’s teaching practices differ based onthe contexts they
research on workload assess- ment. Dr. Pennathur has also been recently awarded two grants from the National Science Foundation in Engineering Education. In one of the grants, he is modeling how engineering faculty plan for their instruction. In a second grant, he is developing a model for institutional transformation in engineering which balances access and excellence. Dr. Pennathur is the author/co-author of over 100 publications in industrial engineering and human factors engineering. He is on the editorial board of the International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, among other journals.Priyadarshini PennathurProf. Nicholas A Bowman, University of Iowa Nicholas A. Bowman is the Mary Louise Petersen Chair in Higher
the first-year experience.Backward Design and the CAP modelThe backward design of curricular development starts with the basic idea of starting from the end, wherewe envision our students to be after the learning experience we are designing [4]. Its central premise isthat once the educational purposes (i.e., the learning outcomes) of a learning experience areconscientiously selected, the rest of the elements of the experience (i.e., the pedagogical activities, andcorresponding assessments) should be designed toward the achievement of those identified outcomes [5].Therefore, the three main stages of backward design are: (1) identifying desired results, (2) determiningacceptable evidence, and (3) planning learning experiences and instruction
at least they have a limitedunderstanding) what surveying engineering is. This has created enrollment challenges in manysurveying programs e.g., [4], [12], [27], [28]. It is worth mentioning that some surveyingprograms (undergraduate and/or graduate) that have developed online programs haveexperienced great success [29]-[31]. In our previous work we surveyed current students andalumni, focusing on the reasons why they selected surveying as a career and how they learnedabout surveying [12]. While the survey provided many insights that are useful in refining ourrecruitment plans, current surveying students and alumni provide half of the picture, becausethey have already selected surveying as a career. They were able to learn about surveying
Paper ID #36421External review letters for promotion and tenure decisions atresearch-intensive institutions: An analysis of the content of templateletters for bias and recommendations for inclusive languageProf. Cinzia Cervato, Iowa State University Cinzia Cervato is the lead PI of the NSF-funded ADVANCE Midwest Partnership project and Morrill Professor of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences. She has served as a faculty fellow for early career and term faculty in the Office of the Provost and faculty fellow for strategic planning in the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences. She earned a doctor of geology degree from the
engineering faculty from AGEP populations at CMU,JHU, and NYU. The goal of this NSF AGEP Faculty Career Pathways Alliance Model (FCPAM)is to develop, implement, self-study, and institutionalize a career pathway model that can beadapted for use at other similar institutions for advancing early career engineering faculty whoare: African Americans, Hispanic Americans, American Indians, Alaska Natives, NativeHawaiians, and Native Pacific Islanders.3. Project Descriptiona. Participating Institutions In 2017, after the College of Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) lostsome of its URM1 faculty, the college developed its first diversity strategic plan. Theimplementation of this plan strengthened existing partnerships with engineering
competencies and interest, 3)future plans, and 4) camp satisfaction. Listed in Table 2, these subscales were either developedby the research team to detect specific constructs (e.g., confidence describing industries), oradopted for use because they had prior evidence of validity and reliability (e.g., STEMSemantics Survey). All subscales were tested and found to be reliable and sufficient to cover theconstructs under study. This instrument was administered to all cadets prior to and uponcompletion of their JROTC camp experience (Academy or JCLC camp) as well as at the end oftheir spring semester of their senior year of high school. The instrument also includes open-ended response questions to help better understand the student experience in his/her
been a Visiting Associate Professor at the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Michigan State University. From 2014 to 2016, he has been a Visiting Professor with the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Missouri. Currently, he is As- sociate Professor with the Engineering Department, Colorado State University-Pueblo. He is the author of two book chapters, more than 73 articles. His research interests include artificial intelligence systems and applications, smart material applications, robotics motion, and planning. Also, He is a member of ASME, ASEE, and ASME-ABET PEV.Dr. Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University - Pueblo NEBOJSA I. JAKSIC earned the Dipl. Ing. (M.S
keeping into consideration, global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors.• Outcome 3 – Ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences.• Outcome 4 – Ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, with consideration for the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.• Outcome 5 - Ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.• Outcome 7 - Acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies.Course outcomes:1. The
stakeholder groups and the distribution of student performance dataat the course section level, disaggregated by race, were foundational to Wright College’s equity 3work. Wright College’s ongoing efforts, coupled with a data-informed commitment to continuousimprovement led to ongoing changes and reforms. By 2020, Wright College’s IPEDS completionrate was 26 percent. In 2020, Wright College published a formal equity plan, aligned with a newstrategic plan [17]. Under this work, the college collectively created an integrated equity actionplan that set the stage for enhanced intentional focus on equity, further employing equity analysisthroughout the activities
Education Experience (TEE). Rand is involved in multiple student organizations at TAMUQ, she is the President of the Palestinian Cultural Club (PCC) and Pi Epsilon Tau (PiET), and an active member in the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).Sara Hillman, Texas A&M University at Qatar Sara Hillman is an Assistant Professor of English in the Liberal Arts Program at Texas A&M University at Qatar where she teaches courses in foundations of English, intercultural communication, and multicultural education. Her research areas include language ideologies; language learner identities; language policy and planning in the Arabian Peninsula; Global Englishes and linguistic diversity; translingual pedagogies and
activities. They identify learningneeds, plan and implement the activity or curriculum, assess the learning outcomes, and makedecisions about how and to whom outcomes are reported, whereas the organization providessupport when needed or invited. Full community control demonstrates a great degree of equityand power sharing, with the community as the authority.Fourth, the community has agency over the outcomes, while acknowledging that educationaloutcomes are influenced by social, economic and structural factors. Thus, mature projectsinclude interventions also address social, political or economic barriers to participation. In suchprojects, community members collect and control their own data, and their own narrative, andthe data are used in ways that
from using concepts in kinetics and kinematics in an application that also trainsthem on business planning, cost analysis of new biotechnology and market analysis. There is a need tointroduce engineers to the entrepreneurial mindset which can help to engage students in the course materialand become more curious about the world around them. This paper aims to demonstrate how a semester-long human body motion analysis project can teach innovation and business skills in the engineeringclassroom through the use of an entrepreneurially minded learning (EML) module.IntroductionIt is valuable to implement entrepreneurial mindset in the undergraduate engineering classroom. Often,entrepreneurship courses are taught by business programs and do not focus
minutes on Mondays,Wednesdays, and Fridays. We collected data from 20 students over the first two years of ourengineering program: 15 students in the first year and 5 students the following year. Our sampleconsists of 4 female and 16 male students.Table 1. Intervention Plan. Day Activity Description 1 Pre-intervention measurements Students complete the first 12 questions of the Vandenberg MRT and create 3-view sketches of pipefittings. 2 Plexiglass activity Students create 3-view sketches of pipefittings and work in small groups to trace object edges for front, top, side-view on plexiglass. 3 Building
morestakeholders; the teams have learned from their experiences and adopted new strategies targeted atimproving inclusion and empowerment of constituents to solve specific problems they did not identify atthe outset of their projects. We find that teams establish shared vision with stakeholders throughappealing to a range of motivations, honoring what has come before them, engaging stakeholders viastrategies of co-orientation and integration, and sharing the labor of change. This workshop will helpattendees understand their own contexts and develop actionable plans to build shared vision into theirprojects.Sharing vision as a process is an equity focused strategy that can be used to create strong impact inmaking inclusion-focused change projects. The
coursework 9,10. These two research findings suggest that culturally responsive teachingin HSIs should necessarily involve both cognitive and cultural congruence, i.e., both theintentional deployment of culturally congruent learning situations where Latinx students feelthey are a validated part of the learning community, as well as active learning strategies thatboost students’ cognitive engagement with content and improve academic performance.The recent COVID-19 pandemic and the resultant online learning environment that many HSIswere forced to implement threw a wrench into the planning of even the most dedicated culturallyresponsive instructors. Especially concerning for HSI instructors was a trend that Latinx andURM learners are less successful
will also be explored during this Module. 2Module IV – ConclusionTo conclude this presentation, a summary of the three most significant lessons learned fromthe AAC&U TIDES initiative will be reviewed. Of particular importance is the inclusion of insightsinto which elements of TIDES can and should be adapted within other institutions’ settings.Additionally, in keeping with its interactive approach, this presentation will invite attendees tonot only ask questions, but to also share their individual experiences, successes, and challengesrelated to implementing culturally responsive undergraduate teaching strategies.A direct outcome of the Conclusion Module will be an agreed-upon plan for
Accreditation Commission of ABET, Inc. The Biomedical Engineering and Software Engineering programs are preparing for accreditation in the next review cycle. Also, a special interdisciplinary General Engineering program is offered that is not accredited. At SJSU, BS Engineering programs are treated as accredited, since all programs are designed with assessment and accreditation in mind. Rationalization for the Course Sequence: The 120 Unit Plan Discussions of reduction in units to earn a baccalaureate degree have occurred within the California State University (CSU) system since the 1990’s. Much progress was made to reduce programs in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s. By 2008 approximately 81% of degree programs met the 120-unit
retention aswell as graduation rates. However, students entering the college at the low end of themathematics spectrum, in particular, continue to be retained and succeed at a much lower ratethan first-year students in general. This cohort of students tends to have a higher proportion ofunderrepresented minority students and a higher portion of students with financial need. It hasalso been the fastest growing portion of the first-year student class for the past several years.This paper discusses past, current, and planned efforts to increase the success of incoming firstyear students at the lower end of the mathematical skill spectrum. Suggestions are welcomedregarding both specific interventions as well data that might be the most effective in
Paper ID #23786Work in Progress: Biomedical Prototype Design in Collaborative Teams toIncrease Students’ Comprehension and EngagementKiersten Lenz, University of New Mexico Kiersten Lenz is a graduate student at the University of New Mexico in Biomedical Engineering. She has previous experience as a secondary science teacher at the high school level. Based on her observations as both a teacher and a student, Kiersten believes that the most effective way to teach is through creative lesson plans paired with collaborative problem-based learning.Prof. Eva Chi, University of New Mexico Eva Chi is an Associate Professor in
strives to provide a clear “roadmap” to STEM degree attainment[10], [11], [12], [13]. Scholarship recipients will develop degree plans early in their academictrajectory and will meet quarterly with a dedicated STEM academic advisor to monitor andevaluate their progress towards the Associate in Science Transfer (AS-T) degree. Many WCCSTEM students intend to transfer to a nearby regional university, and the two institutions willpartner to provide a comprehensive transfer navigation strategy [14] and optional researchopportunities [15]. Table 1. Summary of Relevant CCSE Survey Report Data. Difference from comparison groups (2017