education that is explicitly socio-technical in nature.We plan to develop a transformative, inclusive approach to teaching energy as a model for howto adopt culturally-sustaining pedagogies within engineering. We have selected energy, as it is afoundational topic across multiple engineering disciplines, relevant to students’ lived 2experiences, and has important social ramifications. We are targeting a class in the second yearto provide students with a grounding in CSP early in their engineering education so that theymight use these mindsets moving forward. Many students often first see energy concepts in“Introduction to Thermodynamics.” With its grounding in 18th century power cycles and
- and Long-term Education Reform and Development Plan(2010-2020)’ has identified ‘adhering to the people-centered approach and promoting quality-oriented education’ as the ‘strategic theme’ of China’s educational reform and development[1].” “‘Quality’ refers to the relatively stable psychological quality gradually formed byinternalization of knowledge through influences of education and social environment on thebasis of human nature [2].” “Quality-oriented education is designed to promote students’comprehensive development and improve China’s national educational level by enhancing thequality of each educated person, who would accept education in ideology, morality, culture,science, professional skills, as well as physical and mental quality [2
students experience work in diverse teams. Concurrent with the 2016presidential election and during the collection of interview data as a part of this larger study, ashift occurred in the national discourse around diversity. As such, we sought to understand howthis shift in the national discourse did or did not influence engineering students in STEMclassrooms. As a part of acknowledging the changing sociopolitical discourse occuring on anational scale in our own research, we included additional interview questions related to studentsattitudes about recent national events while conducting our planned research on students’attitudes about diversity. We felt that this shift in the research plan was warranted to capture howstudent attitudes may be
with each instructionalclass periods consisting of 45 minutes of one-sided discourse with the instructor teaching from aPowerPoint presentation, followed by up to 5 minutes of multiple choice iClicker questions onthe material just covered (as a note, instructional class periods are considered any class periodnot devoted to examinations or group presentations). The significant time, effort, and planning required to restructure an entire course fromtraditional lecture-based to “flipped” can be prohibitive (or at least discouraging) for someuniversity instructors who may already have a full workload [15], [18]–[21]. In a “flipped” or“inverted” class, instructional content is delivered to students out of class (typically throughvideo
influenced theoutcomes for students, and that international experiences tended to be more intense [23]. In ourcomparison, the China program provided more cultural intensity, but both programs seem tohave provided research intensity (i.e., opportunities to be challenged and develop). However, thecultural experience may have outshone the research challenges for the China participants, as theycertainly focused more on those topics during their interviews.Both IRES programs have several more years remaining, and we plan to continue collecting datafrom both programs. As we build up a larger pool of participants across years, we will alsoexplore the results of the pre/post surveys for cultural intelligence that we have administered. Weare curious to see
social capital, and 6. Insufficient collaborative space. 1. Supportive academic advising at UC DavisOne theme that emerged from the focus groups was the helpfulness of department academicadvisors at UC Davis. The positive impact of these advisors was brought up on five uniqueoccasions throughout the three focus groups. The students described that the advisors werehelpful for staying on track for course and university requirements. UC Davis departmentadvisors work with only one to three majors, and therefore have the knowledge to suggest coursesequences and help plan degree requirements. In one of the focus groups, a student shared howtheir advisor guided them through the process of appealing a grade with an instructor andprovided useful
sessions suchas panels, round tables, workshops and training sessions such as Safe Zone training. The ADChas a vision, mission and published strategic plan, [2] and is an entity to which authors candirectly submit papers.The development of, and institutionalization of the Best Diversity Paper award within ASEE wasa major undertaking that required drafting of the process for soliciting and identifying bestpapers, judging them on a consistent rubric, and disseminating the top papers. The ASEEDiversity Committee crafted a proposal, vetted it internally, worked with ASEE IT staff tocustomize the paper handling system, Monolith, and then vetted with the ASEE Board ofDirectors. The ASEE Board of Directors approved the award and institutionalized it as
general plan as was used for Calculus I. We then present the results ofapplying the full toolkit to the new Calculus II course. Pass rate and GPA improvements inCalculus II were evident immediately after scale up in the spring of 2016. Sufficient time hasnow passed so that we can apply the full set of assessment tools built for Calculus I to measurethe effectiveness of the Calculus II transformation on academic performance in post-requisitecoursework and on student retention in STEM. Page 1 of 151.0 IntroductionThe grade earned in mathematics courses is critical when considering student retention inengineering and in STEM majors. For example, the work by Budny
United States Military Academy with a B.S. in Environmental Engineering and obtained an M.S. from both the University of Missouri at Rolla in Geological Engineering and the University of Texas at Austin in Environmental Engineering. Most recently, he graduated with his Ph.D. from the Colorado School of Mines in Civil and Environmental Engineering. He teaches Water Resources Planning and Management, Environmental Science, and Environmental Engineering Technologies.Col. Jeffrey A. Starke, United States Military Academy COL (Ret) Jeff Starke served as a Military Intelligence officer with command and staff experiences at the battalion, brigade, joint task force and combatant command levels. His most recent operational experi
describe the CONSIDER system; as we noted, the systemevolved through a series of versions and we describe some of these steps as well. In Section 4,we present our research questions, the research design, and the results obtained. In Section 5, weconsider the lessons learned thus far and our plans for further revision and refinement of the systembased on these results.2 Theoretical FrameworkSocio-cognitive conflict, a key concept underlying the CONSIDER system, originates in Piaget’sclassic work [19] on children’s learning. The idea is that socio-cognitive conflict, i.e., disagree-ments with other learners’ conception of the same problem or topic and interaction with peers toresolve the disagreements is fundamental to the learner’s grasp of new
enhancing services with motivational affordancesto invoke gameplay experiences and further behavioral outcomes. The main motivation is toimprove the involvement of individuals and increase their interest, engagement, andefficiency 21. People who enjoy game-based learning only exhibit an increase in satisfaction,enjoyment, and relevance to the job 22. According to the study conducted by Michele D.Dickey23 (2007), there are elements within the design of multiple online role-playing gameswhich foster intrinsic motivation while requiring players to think, plan, and act critically andstrategically. Sung and Hwang24 (2013) studied learning attitudes, motivation, and self-efficacy and found improvement in all three areas, as well as student confidence, by
following sections.Implementations to Realize the Overall StrategyThe development of the Freshman Engineering Program Honors Innovation classes is the basisfor two prongs of the three-pronged approach we have taken to provide an authentic STEMexperience to the Engineering Curriculum.CoE Freshman Engineering Program Honors Innovation ClassesThe Freshman Engineering Program (FEP) was established by the College of Engineering at theUniversity of Arkansas during the fall of 2007 for the purpose of increasing student retentionfrom the first year to the second year. FEP provides proactive support to FEP students throughorientation, academic advising, peer mentoring, and professional development workshops. Allincoming freshman students that plan to major
Discussion Orthographic Homework assignments CAD Labs using CATIA TA assistance in the lab and eventsIt is important to note that faculty at each institution could include additional questions to thesurveys to gather information from students related solely to their particular course and/orinstitution. The additional questions were not used for this research project.Challenges and Next StepsAs this is a WIP research, the researchers are planning to keep collecting more data throughout therest of this academic year and during the next academic year to ensure a representative sample andto draw inclusive conclusions about the data and the approach. The focus of this work to date wason conducting a literature review, development of the
2007as the recession began, understood the need to maintain its student population and worked veryhard to be relevant to a larger population of the US. As the State of South Carolina began toclimb out of the recession in 2010 (one of the first states to suffer in the recession), The Citadel’sPresident developed a strategic plan that included growth in all areas to include increasedretention of students at all academic ranks. Unfortunately, the School of Engineering wasexperiencing marginal enrollments and reporting poor retention numbers (on average 50-60%retaining to sophomore year).A 360o assessment of engineering in fall 2011 highlighted the need for increased recruitment andretention efforts. A six-year strategic plan set goals for overall
don't detract from the learning topicsFinally, we added other elements of fun that aren't directly related to learning but that don'tinterfere with learning. Adding music to the game isn't related to the learning topics, but itdoesn't interfere with them and it increases the sensation game pleasure. Likewise some of themore whimsical and fantastic elements of the game (such as talking magpies and some visualaspects of the museum rooms) add to a sense of fantasy and sensation.We haven't yet incorporated the game pleasures of fellowship and expression into the design ofMagnitude Museum, but those game pleasures can make the game more fun without interferingwith the educational aspects.Future workIn the future we plan to make a multiplayer version
is unexpected. 2. Generate hypotheses - Once the unexpected finding is recognized and documented, a team with diverse perspectives and expertise meets to discuss the finding and ideate potential explanations for why the unexpected finding might have been observed. This involves discussing potential theories (often from other fields or disciplines) that could resolve on the unexpected finding. This stage should be treated like ideation in design processes; variety and volume are desired. 3. Test a promising hypothesis with extant data or plan a follow-up study - Once one or more promising hypotheses (i.e., adaptation of current theory) have been identified, the team develops a plan to test these
computational study”, OR Spektrum, 18, 131-44, 1996.[22] T. Gau and G. Wascher, “CUTGEN1: a problem generator for the standard one-dimensional cutting stock problem” , European Journal of Operational Research, 84, 572-9, 1995.[23] S. Wongprakornkul and P. Charnsethikul, “Solving one-dimensional cutting stock problem with discrete demands and capacitated planning objective,” Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, v 6, n 2, p 79-83, 2010.[24] A. Seth, P. V. Rajendra and K. G. Ramamurthy, “A heuristic approach to the one-dimensional cutting stock problem,” Source: Opsearch, v 23, n 4, p 235-243, Dec. 1986.[25] H. Stadtler, “One-dimensional cutting stock problem in the aluminium industry and its solution,” European Journal of
both West Point and RISD studentsthe opportunity to better understand the challenges associated with a dense urban operatingenvironment.Background The term ‘design’ is used in a wide variety of contexts such that it is often unclear what onemeans by design, even when the context is relatively clear. There have been numerous bookspublished in the last decade on design thinking e.g., [7]–[9], usually in a business context.Engineers apply a design process to engineering problems [10]. Industrial designers apply adesign process to a variety of problem types. Even the United States Army has taken up a designprocess in service to operational planning [11]. Then there is architecture, graphic design,fashion, organizational design, and so forth
undergraduate research proposals for NASA's Zero Gravity Program17 . Both proposals were accepted and for the first time in the program's history two teams from the same community college participated simultaneously in the Zero G flights with their experiments built and tested by themselves. Three of the participating students were my mentees. Two previous ASEE papers 18, 19 described anew partnership, called “Re-Energize,” that isexpected to help several two-year colleges developtheir own research capabilities in renewable energy incollaboration with Texas State University. One teamof students developed a project to researchhydroponics methods of growing plans and anotherone developed a solar electric car and the next year ahydrogen fuel cell
light and touch then move on to attachingthe circuits to buggies which will then move either toward or away from the stimulus. Studentsshould be allowed to design their own circuits and execute their plan with some direction fromthe instructor.Learning Outcomes • Define and describe the nervous system • Identify the basic components of a neuron • Describe how neurons function within the body • Explain and understand how neurons communicate • Apply knowledge of the nervous system and neurons to an electronic circuit • Identify the major components of a circuit and the similarities to the nervous system • Recognize the differences between neurons and NeuroBytes • Troubleshoot the circuit by working in teams and understanding how
camp.ConclusionThe results of this research suggest two things. First, a single-sex engineering camp model canhave positive effects on the self-efficacy of the young women who attend and participate. Theco-ed camp model has similar effects on the male participants. However, a co-ed camp modelmay not be the ideal model for fostering women’s interest in engineering. This understanding isimportant when planning engagement opportunities, especially those engagement opportunitiesthat are marketed to women and other minorities in engineering. Planning activities with realworld applications and stories as well as activities that encourage participants to use art are twosuggestions for future programming. A better understanding of how all engineering camps
team.Does our research do justice toall stakeholders? • Discussed with entire team which individuals would like to take part in transition theory work and moved forward with creating research pairings based on interest in project participationProcess Reliability The data needs to be collected and recorded in a dependable way.How can the research process • Background activity and data analysis plan documents that outline allbe made as independent as steps of the research processpossible from random • Created a separate data file that just contains questions of interest forinfluences
Paper ID #22569Using Concept Maps to Assess Student Learning in a Multi-Section Introduc-tion to Engineering CourseDr. Kristen L. Sanford Bernhardt P.E., Lafayette College Dr. Kristen Sanford Bernhardt is chair of the Engineering Studies program and associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College. Her expertise is in sustainable civil infrastructure management and transportation systems. She teaches a variety of courses including sustainability of built systems, transportation systems, transportation planning, civil infrastructure management, engineering economics, and Lafayette’s
expectation(diversity within a peer network) is often established in first-year courses where diverse teamsare created to address the new ABET Criterion 3, Objective 5 (replacement of old Criterion 3,Objective D) of developing students with, “an ability to function effectively on a team whosemembers together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment(emphasis added by authors), establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.” [4] Creating aninclusive engineering and educational environment is critical to engineering’s continued success.Antonio’s findings demonstrate that if engineering education encourages and providesopportunities for meaningful interactions between diverse engineering students, engineeringeducation can
Dr. Elise Barrella is an Assistant Professor and Founding Faculty Member of the Department of Engineer- ing at Wake Forest University. She is passionate about curriculum development, scholarship and student mentoring on transportation systems, sustainability, and engineering design. Dr. Barrella completed her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Georgia Tech where she conducted research in transportation and sustain- ability as part of the Infrastructure Research Group (IRG). In addition to the Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University. Dr. Barrella has investigated best
this technology Provide any additional feedback you Free response haveIn this initial module deployment, collection of student feedback was somewhat limited in aneffort to keep the module similar in workload and structure to the other software options. Notwanting to deter interested students during the pilot test of this module, the feedback wasrestricted to a single online survey at the conclusion of the module. In future semesters,instructors plan to survey students both before and after completing the module (weeks 1 and 4)to investigate changes in perceived knowledge and attitudes about the technology. In addition,students will be asked to complete a short reflection about their experience during the module,whether they consulted
, integrating knowledge, collaborating, and synthesizing learning into one’s own narrative as a portfolio [9]. Figure 5. Entangled Learning Design EL principles guided program design decisions, such c2017 Paul Treuer & Clemson University as planning for initial community-development and workshop programming during an initial Early FallMove-In period, as well as the structure and assignments of the study skills course.Our analysis involved a mixed methods approach to understanding students’ success. We usedquantitative data to evaluate utilization of services to support academic
level college students who have just taken a course on vector analysis. They havesat through a lecture on vectors and vector arithmetic, but have had little practice with this concept.Considering the fact that K-12 students have been exposed to computers and e-learning 13, weassured that the students have excellent familiarity in working with computers. We planned thetutor with these assumptions in mind.The two main things we were concerned about this tutor were: appearance and functionality14.When the students first approach the tutor, the appearance of the user interface has to be pleasingso the students feel comfortable interacting with the software and learning conceptsmeaningfully15. We made the student interface plain and simple, while at
2 objects 20% (a, x0), etc zero input parametersConclusionsExperiential learning uses transferrable knowledge to understand a mechanism beyondassociative learning in support of casual reasoning. Future studies could include an investigationof the transition from causal reasoning to analytical reasoning based on several mechanisms, etc.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank Alexei Kisselev for demonstration support and Eric Cheung MD UIC MedicalCollege Psychiatry Department for neuroscience discussion. 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, April 6-7, 2018 – University of the District of ColumbiaReferences1 City University of New York A Plan for Experiential Learning 2016, http://www1.cuny.edu
the Committee on K-12 Engineering Education in the National Academy ofEngineering and National Research Council Center for Education) on her report to Congress1,have been implemented in a program designed for teacher enrichment using optics and cosmicray projects. A teacher usually has a tight lesson plan calibrated to the requirement of a StateEducation Board and/or SAT/ACT requirement nationwide. The challenge of asking a teacher totrain a student’s mind for the development of an engineering mindset is not an easy task. Amongthe high school subjects, physics could be one of the subject that is amenable for modification interms of exposing students to design related to science knowledge. Given that physics is arequired subject for most