grading. This first-year course for engineering and technology students at acommunity college emphasizes working in teams to complete hands-on activities using EXCELand structured programming with MATLAB.Initial assignments involve using EXCEL to display and analyze data from Ohm’s Law and thespeed of sound in air. The next assignment requires distance measuring with ultrasound anddesigning an ultrasonic range-finder. In the remainder of the assignments over the final three-quarters of the semester, MATLAB is used as a structured programming language to first controlthe movement of a stepper-motor rotor and then to identify different translucent materials fromtheir visible light spectra as measured by a spectrometer. A final project combines the
Paper ID #16323The Doctorate Journey: Mapping Perceptions of the Ph.D. ProcessDr. Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Stephanie Cutler has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her dissertation explored faculty adoption of research-based instructional strategies in the statics classroom. Currently, Dr. Cutler works as an assessment and instructional support specialist with the Leonhard Center for the Enhance- ment of Engineering Education at Penn State. She aids in the educational assessment of faculty-led projects while also supporting instructors to improve their teaching in
: jose.fontan1@upr.edu http://cem.uprm.eduDr. Omar I. Molina-Bas, University of Puerto Rico - Mayaguez Campus Omar I. Molina Bas, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Unit Coordinator Construction Engineering and Man- agement Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez Campus email: omar.molina1@upr.edu http://cem.uprm.edu/molina.htmlProf. Tim L. Mrozowski, Michigan State University Tim Mrozowski A.I.A., LEED R AP BDC, is the Program Leader and a Professor of Construction Man- agement, in the School of Planning, Design and Construction at Michigan State University. He conducts research on construction management, sustainability and energy. Recent research and outreach projects include
Closing Picnic Research Report #9, #10Figure 2: Slide projected to introduce students to research competition. Figure 3: Research question slide displayed to start the competition. Figure 4: Discussion prompts for post-activity debriefing.Results92 total students participated in this ethics exercise during the 2015 EnSURE(EngineeringSummer Undergraduate Research Experience) program at MSU. The students were divided into24 teams, which were randomly formed on the first day of the summer research program andworked together throughout the professional development seminar series. Each of the 24 teamsturned in a written report (sample in Appendix A) of the activities they completed
first-time student enrollment in the College of Engineering for cohort years 2010-2013, theoverall percentage of African American students declined each year as the first-time studentenrollment for White American students increased over the same period.Summer Bridge Program Overview/ GoalsIn existence for more than twenty years, the MSU Summer Bridge Program is designed to provideincoming URM engineering students five weeks of intensive coursework in Pre-Calculus/CollegeAlgebra, Chemistry and Physics. Students also receive instruction in technical communication,personal development, and real world engineering projects, teambuilding, and study skillsdevelopment. The program is held the summer prior to students’ first semester enrollment
and Family in the American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014), which was funded by a fellowship from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Her current research project, ”The Ethics of Extraction: Integrating Corporate So- cial Responsibility into Engineering Education,” investigates the sociotechnical dimensions of CSR for engineers in the mining, oil and gas industries and is funded by the National Science Foundation.Dr. Carrie J. McClelland P.E., Colorado School of Mines Carrie J McClelland is an Associate Teaching Professor at Colorado School of Mines. Carrie is a regis- tered professional engineer with a passion for teaching the next generation of engineers to be well-rounded professionals who consider
identification (BID) systems identifya person among a set of people whereas biometric verification (BV) systems accept orreject a person’s claimed identity. Five biometric systems are considered in this project,namely, face, speech, iris, signature and fingerprint. Although fingerprint recognitionforms the largest share of today’s market [15], there are practical tradeoffs with othersystems as given in Table 1 [15]. This exemplifies the need for further research andeducational activities pertaining to a variety of biometric systems. Face-based andspeech-based recognition systems are particularly promising as their accuracy isimproved. Ease of User Ease of System Accuracy Use
generation IP protocol. Wemeasure IPv6 adoption through eight adoption metrics gleaned from eleven datasets. Datacollection covers a two year period from January 2014 through December 2015.In addition, we address the implications of the sudden uptick in IPv6 adoption, as it continues ona path of accelerated expansion. The long awaited transition from IPv4 to IPv6 has implicationsfor all organizations who will soon be making the change; many of which may not be preparedfor how to systematically approach such an undertaking. Factors such as project planning, IPv6saturation, infrastructure assessment, policy redesign, and network continuity are discussed askey areas that will need to be addressed as organizations begin to adopt IPv6.Key words: IPv6
organizations such as the Institute of Industrial Engineers (IIE), Society for Engineering Management (SEM), Project Management Institute (PMI), Society for Health Systems (SHS) and Association of Technology Man- agement and Applied Engineering (ATMAE). He is also a member of Alpha Pi Mu and Phi Kappa Phi Honors society.Dr. Coray Davis, Virginia State University Chair and Associate Professor for Engineering TechnologyDr. Ben U. Nwoke, Virginia State University Dr. Ben U. Nwoke is a certified manufacturing engineer and a certified project manager. He is a professor at Virginia State University in the Department of Technology, Petersburg, Virginia. c American Society for Engineering Education
students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related
evaluations, resource CSP mentors and peersresearchdesign requirements, and initial design process, Participate in a summer industrial, including requirement and verification clinical, or research internshipcapabilities development. Students develop project (student’s choice) proposals suitable for either their senior Year Course Description (credit hour) Activities and Development capstone course. Continue research throughout yearYear 4: BIOE 435 (2 credit hours) and 436 (2 credit Interact with
important for learning: clear goals, lessons that can be practiced until mastered,monitoring learner progress and adjusting instruction to learner level of mastery, closing the gapbetween what is learned and its use, motivation that encourages time on task, personalization oflearning, and infinite patience. These are incorporated into an ongoing research project alongwith other research on computer based learning and what has and has not worked, including itsuse in student design projects [10-20].The research project uses a video game, PlanetK (see figure 1), as a tool to improve studentlearning of digital systems concepts which is uniquely tailored to the nature of today’s student,who has perhaps been affiliated with video games since childhood
contribution to integration social justice inengineering curricula. 1. How well does a course help engineers listen contextually to diverse users and actors so the ways in which the social context shapes (and is shaped by) the technical becomes visible? How effectively does the course help engineers and other stakeholders listening to discover more about criteria 2-6 below? 2. How thoroughly does the course help engineers and other stakeholders identify structural conditions so legal, historical, political, economic, and other social structures that serve as real or potential project-related barriers and/or opportunities to users, key actors, or engineers become visible and are openly acknowledged in the
attitudes in students are developed using structuredlectures, laboratory session, and projects. For most of the students, it is very difficult to see theconnection between topics covered in the lectures or in the course. Thus, there is an urgent needfor focusing student attention towards the fundamental or core ideas related to the topic underdiscussion as take away points. We implement a teaching approach with “thought bubbles”,commonly used in arts and cartoons, to present core ideas to students as discussion questions.“Thought bubbles” (aka clouds) are used to pose as introductory questions for initiatinglecture/discussion and as concluding thoughts. This approach helps student to be attentive and tograsp what will be covered during the session
fellowships at the University of California, San Diego, at the Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies and in the Department of Ethnic Studies. Fluent in both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies, her research uses theories from interdisciplinary sources including cultural studies, critical race, gender and feminist theories. Central to her work are questions of culture, power and inequality. She is affiliated faculty with the Department of Ethnic Studies, Women’s and Gender Studies, and Latin American Studies.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 20 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a
research stories and II.becoming an engineering education researcher. This paper will report on section one whereparticipants were asked to submit three photos or images that they felt were good representationsof: (1) themselves before participating in the workshops, (2) where they see themselves presentlyand (3) where they hope to be in the future.Of the 21 participants that were interviewed for the follow-up to the RREE project, 18 providedthe solicited photos/images and discussed their rationale for their choice when prompted in theinterviews. The photos/images spanned the range of personal life events or interests to career andresearch endeavors.In this paper we will describe the common themes associated with the photos/images in terms ofhow
served as Director of the South Carolina Advanced Technological (SC ATE) Center of Excellence since 1994, leading initiatives and grant-funded projects to develop educational leadership and increase the quantity, quality and diversity of highly skilled technicians to support the American economy. Currently serving as Principal Investigator, Mentor-Connect: Leadership Development and Outreach for ATE; Co-Principal Investigator, SC ATE National Resource Center for Expanding Excellence in Technician Education; and Co-Principal Investigator, ATE Regional Center for Aviation and Automotive Technology Education Us- ing Virtual E-Schools (CA2VES). The SC ATE Center is widely known for developing and broadly shar- ing
,University of Dayton and Shanghai Normal University have been developing and operating a3 + 1 joint degree program since 2006 [10]. The first three years of the program are taughtand managed by the university in China, then students transfer to the university in the U.S. toget an undergraduate degree in engineering. On the other hand, Worcester PolytechnicInstitute sends their students to a university in China during a summer for global project [11].As shown in the table, there are variety of programs in terms of types, characteristics andparticipants of the programs. Table 1. Survey of Global Academic Program between the U.S. and ChinaUniversity in US University in China Type of Major(s) Year Remarks
exploration for divergent and convergent thinking.The rhetoric of curriculum advocates the development of student creativity and problemsolving capabilities1. The development of these capabilities is hampered in schools by thedominance of exam performance. Lee and Todd argue that in the current climate of academicperformance does not always include innovation and creativity2. Assessment is said to bedriving the methodology of teaching4. In schools dominated by exam performance, howstudent’s creative problem solving abilities are being nurtured and developed is questionable.It has been highlighted that design is being taught through design projects assessmentcriteria2. Due to assessment criteria and ad hoc approaches to design processes, cognitive
- grams. She has numerous chapters, articles, and papers on technology-supported teaching and learning as well as systems-change stages pertaining to technology adoption.Dr. Kathy Ann Gullie Ph.D., Evaluation Consortium University at Albany/SUNY Dr. Kathy Gullie has extensive experience as a Senior Evaluator and Research Associate through the Eval- uation Consortium at the University at Albany/SUNY. She is currently the principal investigator in several educational grants including an NSF engineering grant supporting Historically Black University and Col- leges; ”Building Learning Communities to Improve Student Achievement: Albany City School District” , and ”Educational Leadership Program Enhancement Project at Syracuse
Physics in 2010 and M.S. in Science and Technology Studies in 2011, both from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. After that, he taught high school Physics in Newark NJ. He is currently a Ph.D student at NYU in Science Education, working on multiple projects which focus on urban science education. Colin’s interested in studying urban science education around issues of equity, learning in and out of school, teacher preparation and students from multiple lenses.Dr. Jennifer B. Listman, New York University Dr. Jennifer Listman is the Assistant Director, Program Development and Evaluation, Center for K12 STEM Education, New York University Polytechnic School of Engineering. As the Center’s resident re- search scientist, she
Paper ID #16796Promoting School Earthquake Safety through a Classroom Education Grass-roots ApproachDr. Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego Van Den Einde is a Teaching Professor in Structural Engineering at UC San Diego. She incorporates education innovations into courses (Peer Instruction, Project-based learning), prepares next generation faculty, advises student organizations, hears cases of academic misconduct, is responsible for ABET, and is committed to fostering a supportive environment for diverse students. Her research focuses on engagement strategies for large classrooms and developing K-16
conceptual designs; 2) a case study of a long-term project by a professionaldesigner; and 3) analyses of award-winning products. Design Heuristics were identified throughanalysis of sketches showing transitions from one concept to another over time39. Each heuristicwas observed multiple design concepts, by multiple engineers and designers, and in solutions formultiple design problems. Accumulating evidence across studies resulted in 77 unique DesignHeuristics applicable to a wide variety of products. Past research has demonstrated theeffectiveness of the Design Heuristics tool in facilitating concept generation for engineeringstudents1, 2, 6, 7, 37, 38, 42, 43 and professionals39, 40.Research MethodThis paper investigated how engineering educators
modifications and testing,students completed an analysis of the project and using guiding questions such as: what wentwell, what didn’t go well, challenges they faced, contribution to group projects, how they wouldchange the product to improve it? The design process stated was created using various parts ofdifferent models to best fit the classroom and implemented structure of inquiry as well as tocomplement the scientific method already taught. Design worksheets were then graded using arubric created specifically for the engineering process stated. According to Sale11, rubrics“provide a guiding frame for focusing attention on the key elements/constructs (performancecriteria) of the assessment area and summary descriptors of a range of performances”. I
students. Barbara uses applied psychology and art in her storytelling methods, to help students and leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a projects - from the early, inspirational stages to reality. Founder of the Design Entrepreneuring Studio, she is the author of,”Working Connection: The Relational Art of Leadership;” ”Entrepreneurial Leadership: A Balancing Act in Engineering and Science;” and ”Designing for Social Participation in the Virtual Universe.” With her students in ME 378, she co-authored, ”The Power of First Moments in Entrepreneurial Storytelling.” Barbara makes productive partnerships with industry and creates collaborative teams with members from the areas of engineering, design, psychology
students and collecting survey data from multiple institutions.IntroductionWriting is an important skill for engineers, but it is not necessarily thought about or taught as an“engineering skill.” Because of this, and despite ABET accreditation criteria directly related towriting,1 the inclusion of writing in engineering programs varies widely from program toprogram and course to course. While writing in engineering practice varies in scope frominformal emails and memos to large scope reports and proposals, writing in engineering coursesis often limited to formal laboratory or project reports, if it is included at all. This often causes adisconnect, leaving engineering graduates lacking in writing knowledge and skills, including asrelated to
M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). The center provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global agility and leadership. His research and teaching interests in- clude developing global agility, globalization, leadership, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many places
including fire protection reports, code equivalencies, and general code consulting for many projects across the nation and abroad. Additionally, she has valuable technical knowledge in smoke control analysis including the commissioning of smoke control systems.Ridge Reid, Oklahoma State University Ridge Reid, GSP, is a Associate Safety Engineer for the Valero Meraux Refinery. He is a highly orga- nized and independent worker who is capable to effectively coordinate tasks to accomplish projects with timeliness and in line with the goals of the organization. Ridge earned his Bachelor of Science in Engi- neering Technology in 2015 from Oklahoma State University with a major in Fire Protection and Safety Engineering. During
to formally systemize acceptable approximations ofthe unit impulse function, perhaps by assigning appropriate weights for each of the widelyknown assessment activities, such as exams, homework assignments, quizzes, and projects, aspart of modeling the learning assessment process.Finally, it is suggested that the modeled knowledge assessment/sampling system could becomplemented by two other systems, one preceding it, designated as the student learning system,and another one following it, and called the learning evaluation system. More importantly, theknowledge assessment system could be used to close the learning loop of the student, who mayuse the assessment output to “correct the error” between the desired engineering knowledgesignal and
production 2. Lawbooth Makes legal consultation easy with an online platform 3. GoodEats Meats Brings local, high-quality, smoked barbecue to our Boulder and beyond 4. Innate Introduces information display to your bathroom mirror 5. Kitables Puts all of the components for your next DIY project in one, organized container shipped to your door 6. Pallas, Inc. Mitigates hair loss in chemotherapy patients with a novel cold cap technology 7. Surya Conversions Produces hybrid conversion kits for auto-rickshaws in developing countries 8. Vektor Tech Automates the