course, tenured or tenure-leading, and/ora professor of practice), reasons for conducting the research, and the procedures involved should they meetthe requirements of the program. The 11 instructors were affiliated with six academic departments in thecollege.B. Procedures Selected observers were invited to an informational orientation session. The session covered thepurpose of the study including a discussion on SETs, number of expected observations, required COPUStraining, and post-program commitments. Following the orientation, faculty and graduate student observersattended a 1.5-hour training on using the COPUS. The training included participant introductions, exerciserationale, protocol and code introductions. Several guided
, students needed to recall and understand all main components of the IoT architecture,apply their knowledge to design a complete IoT system, analyze and evaluate the system toensure it satisfies all requirements, build the design, and test it to evaluate its effectiveness.Finally, when defining EM for students, professors should emphasize those who think aboutinnovation and continuous improvement and not limit it to startups, which can help them viewcontinuous improvement within the discipline as a form of innovation.6. Conclusion6.1 Response to Research ObjectiveThe problem is that engineering students’ exposure to practicing soft skills, such as problem-solving, critical thinking, innovation, and creativity, is often limited to capstone courses
the Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering department. His research interests include machining, effective teaching and engineering mechanics. Before coming to academia, he was a design engineer, maintenance supervisor, and plant engineer. He is a registered professional engineer.Robert O. Warrington, Michigan Technological University Robert O. Warrington is currently Director of the Institute for Leadership and Innovation, which houses the Enterprise program and the new Pavlis Institute for Global Technological Leadership at Michigan Technological University. Dr. Warrington was Dean of the College of Engineering from 1996 to 2007 and was the founder and Director of the Institute for Micromanufacturing at
. Robinson, “Is it time for academic preparation of future regulatory affairs professionals?,” J Med Device Reg, pp. 18-23, May 2006.[2] K. Cardinal, “A case-study based course on ‘Device Evaluation and FDA Approval’,” in Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA , USA, 2008, pp. 13.10.1-13.10.6.[3] R. H. Allen, S. Acharya, C. Jancuk, and A. A. Shoukas, “Sharing best practices in teaching biomedical engineering design,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1869-1879.[4] B. Perlmann and R. Varma, “Teaching engineering ethics,” in Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2008, pp. 6.940.1 – 6.940.11.[5] H. Miller, “The blessings and benefits of using
turned in significantnumbers to the codification of best practices and ethical priorities. That burst of ethics-writingactivity was followed by others through the twentieth century, Davis explains, usually instigatedby moments of great growth in the profession or of notable outside pressures for self-regulation.1,2 Codes of ethics have customarily mandated rigorous, honest, and disinterestedengineering practice and depending on the sub-field, also more specific instructions regardingpertinent materials, technical processes, and commercial relations. These instruments are Page 26.1723.3essentially optimistic in projecting a desired future
confronting issues related to inclusion. The department undergoes annual review byexternal evaluators Inverness Research. The 2019 review revealed instances where students didnot feel included. These situations involved faculty, staff, and students. Since becoming aware ofthe situations, the department has spent considerable time addressing inclusivity. All facultyattended microaggression and inclusion training (see below). Inclusion training has been addedto the new vertically integrated design project courses (see below) that will be required of allstudents. One faculty piloted a syllabus that includes a policy on microaggressions andharassment. The Department has prompted University’s Center for Teaching and Learning tolead the establishment of a
to be beyond the level necessary for entry into professional practice andwould be attained through post entry level experience or education. The committee created threenew pathways to attainment for both the cognitive and affective domains, which did not appearin BOK2, namely: Post Graduate Education (PG) - a replacement for the Master’s or P”lus 30” designation in BOK2 that indicates formal education beyond the baccalaureate degree; Mentored Experience (ME) - experience gained under the mentorship of an engineer who has already satisfied the BOK requirements for entry into professional practice; and Self Directed (SD) - a program of learning initiated and pursued by the
Paper ID #17026Engineering Together Sustainable Communities: Sustainability Engineeringin ActionDr. Noe Vargas Hernandez, Carnegie Mellon University Noe Vargas Hernandez researches creativity and innovation in engineering design. He studies ideation methods, journaling, smartpens, and other methods and technology to aid designers improve their creativ- ity levels. He also applies his research to the design of rehabilitation devices (in which he has various patents under process) and design for sustainability.Dr. Heidi A. Taboada, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Heidi A. Taboada is an Associate Professor in the
Learning: Research and Practice, 15:2, pp.126-138, 2018.[9] R.M. Felder and R. Brent (2017) Learner-Centered Teaching: How and Why? LearningAbstracts (League for Innovation in the Community College), 20(5), May 2017[10] P. G. Koles, A. Stolfi, N. J. Borges, S. Nelson, and D. X. Parmelee, “The impact of team-based learning on medical students' academic performance.,” Acad Med, vol. 85, no. 11, pp.1739–1745, Nov. 2010.[11] M. L. Epstein and G. M. Brosvic, “Students prefer the immediate feedback assessmenttechnique,” Psychol Rep, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 1136–1138, Jun. 2002.[12] E. Haase, B.N. Phan, and H.R. Goldberg (2017), Molecules and Cells: Team-based andMulti-modal Learning Improves Comprehension and Increases Content Retention, 2017 ASEEAnnual
-Milwaukee.Dr. April Dukes, University of Pittsburgh April Dukes (aprila@pitt.edu) is the Faculty and Future Faculty Program Director for the Engineering Educational Research Center (EERC) and the Institutional Co-leader for Pitt-CIRTL (Center for the Inte- gration of Research, Teaching, and Learning) at the University of Pittsburgh. April studied at Winthrop University, earning a BS degree in Chemistry and BA degree in Psychology in 2000. She then completed her PhD in 2007 at the University of Pittsburgh, studying oxidative stress in in vitro models of Parkinson’s disease. During her prior graduate and postdoctoral work in neurodegeneration, April mentored several undergraduate, graduate, and clinical researchers and
ElectricalEngineering, and six in Mechanical Engineering. All of these students should certify within theirmajor in the next year and have joined their peers as successful students in engineering.In this paper, we present an in-depth view of the program as well as evaluation results from thefirst two years of the program. We also showcase best practices and lessons learned in supportingat-risk students in engineering.STARS ProgramRecruitment and SelectionSTARS enrolls approximately 32 students from low socio-economic backgrounds each year ateach university. To qualify for the program, a student must be Pell Grant-eligible, graduate froma Washington high school with thirty percent or more of the students receiving free- or reduced-priced lunches, and express
year 2. Goal 5: Develop an adaptable model for implementing a STEM guided pathways approach at other community colleges. Study the effectiveness and impact of implemented strategies. Broad dissemination of project findings and best practices.STEM Success and Orientation Course Development and ImplementationHow do we teach STEM Identity?While the nuances of the development of our cohort course will be summarized below, it isimportant to begin by noting that the initial course in which SEECRS scholars were placed wasspecifically designed to develop STEM identity. This focus on identity development utilizeddiscourse based identity theory to help students envision themselves as belonging in STEM.Discourse
Instructor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Dunwoody College of Technology in Minneapolis, MN. He has a broad background of industry experience in New Product Development, Mining, Manufacturing, Defense, Biotech, and Research & Development. Peter received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Boston University. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Balancing the Disciplines—RecalibratedAbstract:This complete paper is a continuation of the work reported in the work-in-progress paper by theauthors in the 2021 conference. Balancing the Disciplines is an interdisciplinary design projectfor use in
Education at Purdue University. She received her Bachelor’s degree in Biological Engineering, with a concentration in Pharmaceutical Pro- cessing Engineering. Currently, she is pursuing her Master’s degree in Industrial Engineering. Tiantian has significant research experience in instrument development and validation analysis. Her research in- terests lie in developing reliable and valid measures for assessing complex engineering competencies, such as systems thinking skills. More particularly, she’s interested in assessing engineering students’ socio-technical systems thinking skills during their design process. In addition to her work on instrument development, Tiantian is also passionate about exploring the
have shown that both graduate student (Ong et al.,2011) and faculty (Hurtado et al., 2012) women of color in STEM report frequent experiences ofgender and racial/ethnic bias. For example, Black/African American women face the stereotypeof being "aggressive" (McGee, 2016) and express low levels of feelings of belonging withinSTEM fields (Ong, 2005), factors that ultimately negatively impact mental health (McGee,2020). However, insight into disparities based on intersectional identities in STEMentrepreneurship requires research designs that integrate these broader contexts ofentrepreneurship and STEM higher education. Further, scholars have called for additionalquantitative studies that address intersecting social identities in entrepreneurship
Postdoctoral Researcher Award at the University of Michigan; and serves as a PI/Co-PI on multiple projects funded by the National Science Foundation. He currently serves in editorial capacity for the Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, and Journal of International Engineering Education.Jeff Knowles, Oregon State University Dr. Jeff Knowles is an engineering instructor at Oregon State University who began teaching courses in 2015. His current pedagogical research is related to barriers associated with implementing Evidence-Based Instructional Practices (EBIPs) in STEM-related courses and determining what affordances can be granted to overcome
animportant aspect of the engineering profession. Accreditation boards across North America havecalled for engineering educators to equip engineering graduates with leadership capabilities toallow engineers to take on a more prominent role in technological, societal and businessadvancement [1], [2]. As a result, there has been increased focus and research aroundengineering leadership, both in terms of defining what it is (for example, [3], [4]), as well asidentifying the associated skills and effective pedagogical practices for teaching it [5]–[7].Engineering educators are working on closing the gap between the leadership needs of industryand the capability of engineering graduates. However, for particular sectors such as engineeringconsulting, given
curriculum below.1. Vertically integrated design project courses (VIDP). Our program has a strong senior designcourse sequence where seniors work for an entire academic year in teams on real projectssponsored and mentored by industry. Real industry design experience, however, was missing inthe first three years of the program. Hence, a separate design course sequence, where freshmen,sophomores, and juniors come together each spring to work on authentic design projectsmentored by practicing engineers, was added to the curriculum. In this new VIDP sequence,integrated teams consisting of freshmen, sophomores and juniors learn practice skills such asdesign principles, team dynamics, project management, communication, etc., throughexperiential learning
many categorized the course as EE despite it being required for both majors. Thisperception may reflect the disciplines of the instructors, who were primarily affiliated with EE.However, since 12 of 14 focus group participants were MEs, that would not explain the differentratings across WI and WOI sections. The differences across sections are not generalizable due tolow sample size (WI n=7; WOI n=7).Research Question 1. When interpreted narrowly, RQ1 results in a list of classes students notedas including elements of social justice or social impacts of engineering. Within our four focusgroups, this list included NHV, Senior Design, Engineering Practices—Introductory CourseSequence (EPICS), Circuits, classes associated with the Humanitarian
the United Statesmust bring added value and higher-level skills including innovation, a problem solving approach,and leadership to garner higher salary jobs in U.S. companies. The call from various technicalreports on engineering education demands that U.S. higher education institutions produce thiskind of engineers. Accordingly, there is an urgent need for reforming and enhancing engineeringeducation to address these needs. This reform effort is best served through a merging of engi-neering education with best practices in educational psychology. Traditional curriculum in engineering education involves deductive instruction in whichthe instructors lecture on general principles with limited application of the principles to real
, 2003.[4] A. Shekar, “Projects-based learning in engineering design education: sharing best practices,”2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014.[Online]Available: https://peer.asee.org/22949. [Accessed February 12, 2023].[5] W. L. Stone and H. Jack, “Project-based learning integrating engineering technology andengineering,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, USA, June 24-28,2017. [Online] Available: https://peer.asee.org/28770. [Accessed February 12, 2023].[6] L. Albers and L. Bottomly, “The impact of actively based learning, a new instructionalmethod, in an existing mechanical engineering curriculum for fluid mechanics,” 2011 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver
AC 2012-4732: ONLINE DELIVERY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERINGLABORATORY COURSESDr. Yacob Astatke, Morgan State University Yacob Astatke completed both his doctorate of rngineering and B.S.E.E. degrees from Morgan State University (MSU) and his M.S.E.E. from Johns Hopkins University. He has been a full-time faculty member in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department at MSU since Aug. 1994 and currently serves as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies. He teaches courses in both analog and digital electronic circuit design and instrumentation. Dr. Astatke has more than 10 years of experience in the development and delivery of synchronous and asynchronous web-based ECE courses in the USA and abroad
the research team to investigate the impact of theseinterventions on different student populations. The researchers chose to administer theinterventions into four courses, all of which are designed to prepare students for more complexengineering design and problem-solving skills associated with upper-level engineering courses.Western Washington University:Western Washington University (WWU) is a public master’s-granting institution withapproximately 15,000 students, 160 academic programs, and a vibrant campus community.Western offers the focus on students access to vital academic choices, resources, multiculturaldiversity, and various curricular and extracurricular activities to grow and thrive. Westernstudents participate in a variety of
AdaptableModules, we design modules for the existing cybersecurity curriculum where the determined newAI material will be supplemented or substituted into the existing curriculum. Specifically, wefocus on natural language processing (NLP), which is the subfield of AI that focuses on enablingcomputers to understand and use human language. Importantly, the study of language naturallyleads to topics that appeal to social, cultural, and humanistic concerns, which have been shown tohave more appeal to minoritized groups. Luring students with this premise provides anopportunity to draw more explicit connections to the impact of cybersecurity globally, but also totheir specific communities. We think that NLP can serve as a topical bridge that engages abroader
Michigan. Her educational research interests include conceptual understanding of electrical engineering concepts and assessing the impact of curriculum changes. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Incorporating Giving Voice to Values (GVV) into an Engineering Ethics CourseAbstractThe Department of Engineering and Society instructors at the University of Virginia recentlydeveloped a new course on Engineering Ethics aimed at second- and third-year students. Unlikeprevious courses in the department, the mid-level course emphasizes micro-ethics and employsthe Giving Voice to Values (GVV) framework. The emphasis on micro-ethics is timely andappropriate
students’ motivational orientations and feltneeds in a course, particularly in contrast with the needs provided by their general learningcontext. This type of research can better inform teaching practice and its consideration ofcontextually-dependent principles versus more globally applicable ones. Page 24.551.8AcknowledgementsThe Division of Undergraduate Education of the National Science Foundation (NSF DUE-1140554) provided financial support for this work. We would like to thank the instructors ofComputer Engineering I for allowing us to try our autonomy-supportive course design in theircourse and study their students. We would also like to thank
Paper ID #14811Dialogues Toward Gender Equity: Engaging Engineering Faculty to Promotean Inclusive Department ClimateJ. Kasi Jackson, West Virginia University Dr. J. Kasi Jackson is an Associate Professor of Women’s and Gender Studies at West Virginia University. Her research covers supporting women faculty in STEM, STEM education, gendered impacts on animal behavior research, and the representation of science in popular culture. She completed her PhD in biology, with a focus on animal behavior, and graduate certificate in women’s studies at the University of Kentucky. She is a Co-Investigator on a National Science
, Virtual Reality Technologies were researched, and design commenced. In1960, the term “virtual reality” officially appeared in many research papers and in 1963, Hall andMiller described the first virtual reality head-mounted display (HMD) [3]. By the 1990s, VirtualReality Technologies entered the consumer market as emerging gaming devices. Products such asNintendo Virtual Boy and Sega VR-1 supplied users with a full view gaming experience throughimmersive sight and sound. However, the products failed to provide a quality experience at anaffordable price. For example, Nintendo Virtual Boy was priced at $180 with graphic colors ofonly red and black and was difficult to control in a comfortable position [4]. Despite some failuresin gaming market
teamwork among students.A detailed exploration will be presented for each outlines subject, shedding light on itsintricacies and unveiling unique assignments. What sets this course apart is its continuous threadof connection to AI, illuminating the relevance of advanced technology at every step.Automotive Engineering stands as an elective course, drawing an annual cohort of approximately25-30 students during the spring semester, comprising both undergraduate and graduate-levelenthusiasts of automotive engineering. The course attracts individuals genuinely passionateabout delving into automotive engineering concentrations. With a focus on the intersection oftheoretical knowledge and practical industry applications, each assignment within the
Clemson University. Broadly, her research interests include self-directed learning and motivation, learning within communities of prac- tice, the cultural influence on informal and formal learning, and intergenerational learning. Abby currently works as a graduate assistant for the General Engineering Learning Community, which supports freshmen engineering students in building effective learning strategies that are transferable to the workforce, includ- ing collaboration, self-regulation, and reflection. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: Strategic, Translational Retention Initiatives to Promote Engineering SuccessAbstractThis Work in