Assessment Program, 2003.[2] C. R. Pace and G. G. Stern, “An approach to the measurement of psychological characteristics of college environments,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 269–277, Oct. 1958, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0047828.[3] P. T. Terenzini and E. T. Pascarella, “Twenty Years of Research on College Students: Lessons for Future Research,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 1991.[4] C. Kandiko Howson and F. Matos, “Student Surveys: Measuring the Relationship between Satisfaction and Engagement,” Education Sciences, vol. 11, no. 6, Art. no. 6, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11060297.[5] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering
careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?” Gender and Education, 17(4), pp. 369–386, 2005.[2] R. Suresh, “The relationship between barrier courses and persistence in engineering.” Journal of College Student Retention, 8(2), pp. 215–39, 2006/2007.[3] T. Armstrong, Neurodiversity: A Concept Whose Time Has Come. Da Capo Press. 2010. p. 3.[4] T. Armstrong “The Myth of the Normal Brain: Embracing Neurodiversity.” AMA J Ethics.17(4): pp. 348-352, 2015. doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.4.msoc1-1504.[5] C. L. Taylor, A. Esmaili Zaghi, J. C. Kaufman, S. M. Reis, and J. S. Renzulli, “Divergent thinking and academic performance of students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder characteristics in engineering
Paper ID #38459Work in Progress: Engineering Identity Development after Two Years ofUndergraduate EducationJanet Aderemi Omitoyin, Janet Omitoyin is a PHD student in the Department of Curriculum and Instructions, University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). An astute scholar, Janetˆa C™s quest for a solution to the problems of mathematics learning based on her experience as a student andDr. Renata A. Revelo, The University of Illinois, Chicago Renata Revelo is a first-generation college student, migrated from Ecuador to the United States as a teenager with her parents and sister. She is the first in her family to obtain a
., examining the nuance in January and Srihari’s disability identities whenconsidering engineering and US cultural stigma regarding mental health disabilities). Bydeveloping a greater understanding of the ways student narratives intersect with their culturalformation as engineers, we can contribute to an engineering education culture that not onlyaccepts, but invites students to freely and simultaneously construct their personal andprofessional identities.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNumbers 2114241 and 2114242. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National
past chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and a deputy editor for the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Examining the Unique Experiences of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Students in a Pre-College Engineering CourseIntroduction Very little research on transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) students inengineering has been undertaken to better understand the experiences of this underrepresentedand largely ignored population. Pawley et al. 's [1] review of published articles in
success variables, college grades a (i.e., first year GPA) and creativity.Preliminary findings suggest that specific college experiences have a greater influence on first-year GPA and that students with ADHD are more likely to self-report high levels of creativity.We also plan to conduct the analysis for resilience, a less-common measure of collegiateacademic success that may be relevant for students who have ADHD.Table 2. Model components, constructs, and survey items from the HERI instrument [32], [33]. Components and constructs of our model Item(s) from the HERI instruments Precollege characteristics & experiences Gender Gender of respondent; Survey choices: Female, Male Sociodemographic
had been highly rated at the time of original review. Inpart because of this and in part because it is an important part of proposal review, our reviewerswere asked to closely read the current program description and calls for proposals and evaluatethe proposals with respect to how well they matched the current call. This allowed for apotentially greater range of quality evaluations, with the understanding that there would be amismatch between the current call and the call the original proposals responded to. The callsused in this training were the Preparing Future Engineers: Research Initiation in EngineeringFormation (PRF: RIEF), Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering & Math (S-STEM),and the Faculty Early Career Development
/translating-theory-on-color-blind-racism-to-an-engineering-educatio n-context-illustrations-from-the-field-of-engineering-education.[10] S. Johnston, A. Lee, and H. McGregor, “Engineering as Captive Discourse,” Society for Philosophy and Technology Quarterly Electronic Journal, vol. 1, no. 3/4, pp. 128–136, Oct. 1996, Accessed: Jul. 06, 2021. [Online].[11] M. G. Eastman, M. L. Miles, and R. Yerrick, “Exploring the White and male culture: Investigating individual perspectives of equity and privilege in engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 459–480, Oct. 2019.[12] E. Rap and M. T. Oré, “Engineering Masculinities: How Higher Education Genders the Water Profession in Peru,” Eng. Stud., vol
chemical engineer before, and mentorvideos and interactions helped them meeting with professional chemical engineers and seeingtheir future in them.Future WorkWe had collected both qualitative and quantitative data during three semesters ofimplementation. All data was cleaned, organized, coded individually and as a group. This data iscurrently being analyzed.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported through the National Science Foundation’s funding under a PFE: RIEFGrant No. (2024960). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the National ScienceFoundation’s views. We wish to thank survey and interview participants for their participation inthe
; less than 28% of the total IT workforceand only 12% of engineers are female [2]. By the time students reach college, 1 in 5 young menplan on majoring in engineering or computing while only 1 in 17 young women declare the same[3]. Since 1990, the percentage of female computing professionals dropped from 35% to about24% today, and if that trend continues, the share of women in the nation’s computing workforcewill decline to 22% by 2025 according to Girls Who Code [4]. These statistics provide themotivation for a program called Project-based Work Studio (PWS) developed at a mid-sizedAppalachian primarily undergraduate university supported by an NSF S-STEM grant to build amore proportionate female workforce in computer science, engineering, and
Foundation under Grant No.EEC 2144213. References[1] N. Hillman and T. Weichman, "Education deserts: The continued significance of “place” inthe twenty-first century," American Council on Education, Washington, DC, 2016.[2] M. Reyes, A. Dache-Gerbino, C. Rios-Agular, M. Gonzalez-Canche and R. Deil-Amen, "The“geography of opportunity” in community colleges: The role of the local labor market instudents’ decisions to persist and succeed," Community College Review, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 31-52, 2019.[3] F. S. Laanan and D. Jain, "Advancing a new critical framework for transfer student research:Implications for institutuional research," New Directions for Institutional Research, vol. 170, pp.9-21, 2017.[4] S. S
found a noticeable but insignificant difference in scores. All calculations wereperformed using Microsoft Excel. Table 2. Summary of results. Mean Standard Shapiro-Wilk Mann-Whitney Result Duration (s) Deviation (s) Normality U test Normal Pre-COVID 149 84 Statistically (p>0.05) U=329 significant
Revolution to Industry 4.0: A Literature Review,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jun. 2020, p. 35318. doi: 10.18260/1-2--35318.[4] S. R. Brunhaver, R. Korte, S. Barley, and S. Sheppard, “Bridging the Gaps between Engineering Education and Practice,” in U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy, University of Chicago Press, 2018, pp. 129–163. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.001.0001.[5] K. Tonso, “Teams that work: Campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 25–37, 2006.[6] A. C. Loignon, D. J. Woehr, M. L. Loughry, and M. W. Ohland, “Elaborating on Team- Member Disagreement: Examining Patterned Dispersion in Team-Level Constructs
materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. References[1] Council of Graduate Schools, “Ph.D. completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline data from the Ph.D. completion project,” Council of Graduate Schools, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.[2] C. Wendler et al., “The path forward: The future of graduate education in the United States,” Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2010.[3] J. M. Jones, “The dual pandemics of COVID-19 and systemic racism: Navigating our path forward,” School Psychol., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 427-431, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1037/spq0000472.[4] C. Davies, C. A. Arbeit, and M. Yamaner
interactions. After analyzingthe results of Phase 2, we have been constructing a series of narratives to present findings fromboth Phases related to pertinent themes.The participants in this study included seven individuals who were enrolled in STEM programsseeking a master’s and/or doctoral degree(s) at universities with varying levels of research2 Multidimensionality is an analytical framework for understanding how the interdependentsystems of oppression and privilege interconnect, compound, conflict, and overlap in a person’sexperience afforded by the convergence and divergence of the individuals’ socio-culturalcategorizations, capital, and community cultural wealth.3 AFAB is an acronym used in the queer community to describe people who were
objectives and cognitive load. Literature is also silent on howmany learning objectives are pursued in a typical laboratory activity.Consequently, relating laboratory activities to cognitive load requires more work. Theoreticaland qualitative work can define better categorizing features of a laboratory, and ensure thosefeatures predict learning and perceptions of difficulty. Quantitative work can probe theunsupported relationships in the logic model. Finally, specialization is probably a widespreadbehavior, and more work qualitative and quantitative should document stories of specialization,the conditions that create specialization, and how specialization affects learning.REFERENCES[1] E. Byrnes, Y. A. Mahsud, S. Rosen, and M. Spencer, “A Survey
, girls were found to draw male scientists three times more often than female scientists[31]. Similar trends were found in Capobianco et al.’s [23] study. About 40% of the engineersthat first grade girls drew were female and about 30% were male, but when examining thedrawings of fifth grade girls, just under 60% drew male engineers and about 30% drew femaleengineers. Given the age of the participants, previous research suggests it is likely that theywould draw male engineers.The study took place in the context of a Girl Scout troop environment. This may have influenced theparticipants’ conception of engineers for several reasons. First, the national Girl Scout organizationrecently began a significant focus on STEM opportunities within the
insight into how well this framework impresses on them. The sum of thesefindings will provide the foundation for scaled infusion of EOP throughout the curriculum andpotential adoption of this approach across many engineering and design programs.REFERENCES[1] N. A. of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. 2004.[2] “Engineering for One Planet,” Engineering For One Planet, 2020. https://engineeringforoneplanet.org/.[3] United Nations, “The 17 Sustainable Development Goals,” sdgs.un.org, 2015.https://sdgs.un.org/.[4] I. S. Rampasso, R. Anholon, D. Silva, R. E. Cooper Ordóñez, O. L. G. Quelhas, and L. A. D. Santa-Eulalia, “Developing in engineering students a critical analysis about
material is based upon work supported by the United States Agency forInternational Development (USAID) under Grant No. USAID-Egypt NFO:72026318RFA00002. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect USAID's views.References[1] J. Yang, C. Schneller, and S. Roche, The role of higher education in promoting lifelong learning. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning in Hamburg, 2015.[2] B. Karleuša, A. Deluka-Tibljaš, N. Ožanić, and S. Ilić, "The Role of Higher Education in Developing Awareness about Water Management," in 11th International Symposium on Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering-WMHE 2009, 2009.[3] S. S. Ashraf, S
large response rates (i.e. not skip logic based). Thisrestricts the number of responses used for analysis as well as the ability to test the surveyinstrument’s factor structure in its entirety. This means that there may be larger underlyingthemes that we cannot pull out or important themes present in these opt in items that will beoverlooked. References[1] S. Lipson, E. Lattie, & D. Eisenberg, “Increased rates of mental health service utilization by US college students: 10-year population-level trends (2007–2017),” Psychiatric Services, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 60-63, 2019.[2] S. Lipson & D. Eisenberg, “Mental health and academic attitudes and expectations in university
University for reviewingthis paper and providing constructive feedback.References[1] W. Zhou and X. Shi, “Culture in groups and teams: A review of three decades of research,” Int. J. Cross Cult. Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–34, 2011.[2] A. S. Tsui, S. Nifadkar, and A. Y. Ou, “Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations,” J. Manage., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 426–478, 2007.[3] S. Wei, D. M. Ferguson, M. W. Ohland, and B. Beigpourian, “Examining the cultural influence on peer ratings of teammates between international and domestic students,” in the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[4] J. Wang, G. H.-L. Cheng, T
, 2007.[2] L. L. Bucciarelli, Designing Engineers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1994.[3] M. T. H. Chi, S. Kang, and D. L. Yaghmourian, “Why Students Learn More From Dialogue- Than Monologue-Videos: Analyses of Peer Interactions,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 10–50, 2016.[4] M. D. Koretsky, D. Gilbuena, S. B. Nolen, G. Tierney, and S. E. Volet, “Productively Engaging Student Teams in Engineering: The Interplay between Doing and Thinking,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 2014.[5] S. Michaels and C. O’Connor, “Talk Science Primer,” Terc, pp. 1–20, 2012.[6] M. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald, Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People, 1st ed
[NSB], “Science & Engineering indicators 2018 (NSB-2018-1),” National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA. Accessed on: Aug., 20, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/nsb20181.pdf. [3] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [NASEM]. “Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century,” The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA. 2018. Accessed on: Aug., 20, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/25038. 2018. [4] S. K. Gardner, “Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high-and low-completing departments: A qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution.” The Journal of Higher
, "Depoliticization and the Structure of Engineering Education," in International Perspectives on Engineering Education, S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham and B. Newberry, Eds., New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2015, pp. 203-216.[7] M. Nelson, G. D. Hoople, J. A. Mejia and S. M. Lord, "Work-in-Progress: What is Energy? Examining Engineering Students' Conceptions of Energy," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, QC, Canada, 22-26 June 2020.[8] G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, S. M. Lord, L. A. Gelles, F. Bilow and J. A. Mejia, "An Integrated Approach to Energy Education in Engineering," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 21, 2020.[9] R. Rincon, "SWE Research Update: Women in Engineering by
Pendulum System,” IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Vol. 3, pp. 1804–1809, 2009. 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, April 6-7, 2018 – University of the District of Columbia2 K. Lai, Jin Xiao, Xiaoguang Hu, Jianxin Fan, Bing Wu, “Modeling and Control for Stability and Rotation Velocity of a Rotary Inverted Pendulum,” 2015 IEEE 10th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), 2015, pp. 955–960.3 Y. Kim, S. H. Kim, and Y. K. Kwak, “Dynamic analysis of a nonholonomic two-wheeled inverted pendulum robot,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2005, pp. 25– 46.4 S. Awtar, C. Bernard, N
. 28 References[i]Bennett,J.&Hogarth,S.(2009).Wouldyouwanttotalktoascientistataparty?Highschool students'attitudestoschoolscienceandtoscience.InternationalJournalofScience Education,31(14),1975–1998.[ii]Britner,S.L.(2008).Motivationinhighschoolsciencestudents:acomparisonofgender differencesinlife,physical,andearthscienceclasses.JournalofResearchinScience Teaching,45(8),955–970.[iii]Brotman,J.S.&Moore,F.M.(2008).Girlsandscience:areviewoffourthemesinthe scienceeducationliterature.JournalofResearchinScienceTeaching,45(9),971–1002.[iv]Miller,P.H.,Blessing,J.S.,&Schwarz,S.(2006).Genderdifferencesinhigh-school
. June 2016. Paper ID #16370.2. Ragusa, G., Mataric, M. (2016). “Research Experiences For Teachers: Linking Research toTeacher Practice and Student Achievement in Engineering and Computer Science,” 2016 ASEE123rd Annual Conference and Exposition. New Orleans, Louisiana. June 2016. Paper ID #17351.3. Trenor, J., Yu, S., Grant, D., Salem, H. (2009). “Participation in a Research Experience forTeachers Program: Impact on Perceptions and Efficacy to Teach Engineering,” 2009 ASEE 116thAnnual Conference and Exposition. Austin, Texas. June 2009. Paper ID #AC 2009-786.4. Klein-Gardner, S., Johnston, M., Benson, L. (2012) “Impact of RET Teacher-DevelopedCurriculum Units on Classroom Experiences for Teachers and Students,” Journal of Pre-CollegeEngineering
engineering looks like foryoung children in a family learning context and how early experiences with this topic can shapethe ongoing learning pathways of children and their parents.ReferencesAlexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Leibham, M. E. (2015). Emerging individual interests related to science in young children. In K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 261–280). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: The teacher’s experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X
perspectives and cross-cultural skills such as the InterculturalDevelopment Inventory (IDI) [8], Miville Guzman Universality Diversity Scale (MGUD-S) [9],and the Engineering Global Preparedness Index (EGPI) [10]. The global perspectives ofengineering students in this study was measured via the Global Perspective Inventory (GPI) [11].This instrument was used because it closely aligns with global perspective constructs the studyaims to measure. The GPI is also a validated instrument and widely used for a basis forcomparison against non-engineers. Additionally, a number of studies have used the GPI toexamine the impact of study abroad experiences with consistent results and strong statisticalreliability and validity [11, 12, 13]. Given the expansion of
- ing Education and the Algae Biomass Organization. Dr. Shuman served as Chair for the ASEE Energy Conversion and Conservation Division last year. She received a Dipl.Ing. degree in mechanical engineering from Belgrade University in 1992, an M.S.M.E. from the University of Washington in 1994 and a Ph.D. from the University of Washington in 2000.Dr. Gregory Mason, Seattle University Gregory S. Mason was born and raised in Spokane Washington. He received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. degree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digital controls, from the University of