the proposed company founder(s) and to participate in alengthy question and answer period. At the end of this program, each reviewer fills out aquestionnaire and scorecard for the company which is then used to decide the admission of theapplicant company.3.2 Step 2 - Streamlined Licensing and Contracting ProcessesOnce selected, the licensing and contracting phase begins. In this phase, the company enters intoagreements with the University to license any applicable intellectual property (IP) and to licenseVA mentor services. The contacts stipulate the type of services provided, as well as the equityand fees associated with the contracts. In general, the equity earned by VA is significantly largerthan would be earned through licensing alone.As
organizations, including co-investigators, federal and stateregulatory agencies, and the IRB(s) overseeing the research may receive yourinformation during the course of this study. Except when required by law, studyinformation shared with persons and organizations outside of Stevens will notidentify you by name, social security number, address, telephone number, or anyother direct personal identifier.Confidentiality of Your Study InformationYour study records include information that identifies you and that is kept inresearch files. We will try to keep this information confidential, but we cannotguarantee it. If data from this study are to be published or presented, we will firsttake out the information that identifies you.Retention of Your Study
Page 12.1472.9Technology programs in 2007 and was generated from responses to the spring 2007 METsurvey. The 2007 MET survey added four additional questions to the 2005 survey. One of theadditional questions asked MET programs to list their perceived strength(s), particularly thosestrengths attracting new students. We hope these strength data provide information about whattype of manufacturing curriculum attracts students to MET programs. A question pertaining tograduate level degrees was also added to the survey, as the 2005 survey did not specifically askprograms if a M.S. in Manufacturing Engineering Technology was offered.The graduate starting salary question was modified from a two-part question where a yes/noquestion was followed by a
with the coaches of various sports who acted as the client(s),recruited a group of faculty advisors in each of the home departments who were willingto supervise the individual students, helped arrange support from the university facilityservices (blue prints, topographic maps, utility information, etc), and helped provide theresources beyond the ability of the students to obtain, such as real pricing from actualconstruction companies, clearance for issues such as candidate sites for projects, andrealistic budget. They also often made public announcements, and arranged for studentsto present one of the projects to the Lehigh University Board of Trustees, and helpedarrange for a truly broad audience that included upper-level facilities staff
students having the sameprogramming language, let alone a uniform programming experience. To complicate mattersfurther many of our students took their introductory programming course at regional communitycolleges. It has been observed that anyone foolish enough to make a programming assignmentalmost surely risks lowering their course evaluation. Borrowing an idiom “the more computingchanges, the more the introductory programming course remains the same.” Can theintroductory programming course be changed to render it more beneficial both to the studentsand the faculty? Can we identify a rationale that allows us to create a more relevant computingexperience? In this paper we make several s regarding the computing experience for engineersand suggest
,consumers, food safety and the environment. Rome: FAO, 2001.6 Fox, M.W. Bringing life to ethics: global bioethics for a human society. Albany, NY: State University of NewYork, 2001.7 Nottingham, S. Eat your genes: how genetically modified food is entering our diet. New York Stephen Nottingham, 2003.8 Lurquin, P.F. High tech harvest: understanding genetically modified food plants. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2002.9 Fleddermann, C. B. Engineering Ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc., 2004. Page 12.854.1210 Clancy, E. A., P. Quinn, and J. E. Miller, “Assessment of a Case Study Laboratory to
specialist for the MEDB Women in Technology Project since 2004, lending her writing skills to WIT¹s broad range of programs statewide. As President and Owner of HomCreative, a creative marketing company, she knows firsthand the challenges and rewards of a women-owned business. She holds a B.A./Journalism from the University of Hawaii and an M.A./Journalism from the University of Oregon.Jenilynne Gaskin, Maui Economic Development Board Ms. Gaskin joined the MEDB Women in Technology Project in November 2003 as a program manager for student outreach. Since 2004, she serves as the manager and logistical coordinator for the Excite Camp program. She holds a baccalaureate degree in Business and
, S.K., Hanneman, L. F., Guardiola, R. & Brumm, T.J. (2001). Development of Workplace Competencies Sufficient to Measure ABET Outcomes. Conference Proceedings of Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition. Albuquerque, New Mexico.17. Bloom, B. S. (1984) Taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.18. Besterfield-Sacre, M. E., Shuman, L., Wolfe, L. & McGourty, J. (2000). Triangulating Assessments: Multi-Source Feedback Systems and Closed Form Surveys. Conference Proceedings of Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition. St. Louis, Missouri.19. NSF DUE Award Abstract #0206630 (PI McGourty): http://nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=0206630
Conference, pp. 112-121.4. Chewar, C. M., Huggins, K. L. and Blair, J. R. S. (2006). Avoiding the Pratfalls of Program Assessment. In The SIGSCE Bulletin, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp 29 – 33.5. Halpern, D. F. and Hakel, M. D. (2003). Applying the Science of Learning to the University and Beyond. In Change, July/August, pp, 36-41.6. Sanders, K. E. and McCartney, R. (2003). Program Assessment Tools in Computer Science: A Report from the Trenches. In Proceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education, pp. 31-35.7. Soundarajan, N. (2001). Objectives, Outcomes, and Assessment Mechanisms for CS Programs. In Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. T2A17-T2A22
Press. 2004.7. D’Cruz, Carmo and T. O’Neal: “Turning Engineers Into Entrepreneurs” Proceedings of the ASEM National Conference. Tampa, Oct 2002.8. NCIIA. Advanced E-Team Proposal Guidelines. 2005. www.nciia,org.9. Marken Communications. Engineer to CEO: The Development of Balance - Mar 1997 http://www.markencom.com/docs/01mar19.htm10. Whittaker, John. “Engineers, Entrepreneurs and the Commercialization of Technology” – PICMET 01 Conference Proceedings, Portland, OR. July 2001.11. Gibb, Allan. “Entrepreneurship, Enterprise and Small Business: State of the Art ?” ed. Bohman and Pousette, Smaforetagsforskning 1 Tiden, 4th Nordic SME Research Conference, Umea Universitet, June 198612. Staub-French, S. “Entrepreneurship and Engineering
Proceedings, Portland, OR. July 2001.11. Gibb, Allan. “Entrepreneurship, Enterprise and Small Business: State of the Art ?” ed. Bohman and Pousette, Smaforetagsforskning 1 Tiden, 4th Nordic SME Research Conference, Umea Universitet, June 198612. Staub-French, S. “Entrepreneurship and Engineering Management” – Engineers in Law and Business Development – February, 200413. Kao, John J., The Entrepreneurial Organization (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1991).14. Edwards, Robert. Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond (New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991)15. Palmintera, D., J. Bannon, M. Levin and A. Pagan. “Developing High Technology Communities: San Diego”. Report produced under contract to Office of
, J.L., Seignort, H., and Goldman, E., (1997) “ Encouraging Engineering Students to Become Teachers”, Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,June 1997.[19] Sanders, M., Lohani, V., Loganathan, G.V.,,and Magliaro, S., (2004) “Engineering Education: Bridges and Opportunities for Technology Education and Engineering at Virginia Tech”, Annual Conference of the ITEA, Albuquerque, NM, March 2004.[20] Baum, Dave, Definitive Guide to Lego-Mindstorms, APRESS, 2000.[21] Asimov, I., I, Robot (Runaround), Gnome Press, 1950[22] Doppelt, Y., (2005) “Assessment of Project-Based Learning in a MECHATRONICS context”, Journal of Technology Education, Vol. 16, No. 2, Spring 2005.[23] Nagchaudhuri, A., and
country’s export procedureswhich are the key part of delivery logistics. Figure 5 is one of the export operationprocedures from our students’ practice which are adopted by this US Company. Export Operate Procedures 5. Pick empty container to factory and vanning Container Shipper Yard 6. Deliver loaded container to Terminal ShangHai – Los Angles 1. Fax S/I, Inv, P/L
-0.0140 T-Value -1.84 -1.91 -2.07 P-Value 0.069 0.059 0.041 Activity No. 0.089 0.086 T-Value 1.78 1.74 P-Value 0.078 0.086 Group Category -0.081 T-Value -1.53 P-Value 0.128 S 0.556 0.550 0.544 0.540 R-Sq 7.03 10.03 12.80
. TIOBE's index on thepopularity of various programming languages can help businesses and schools make strategicdecisions regarding which language(s) to use.2 Scriptol.org provides a comparison table that listspopular programming languages, each with reasons why one should consider using it. 3Regardless of the actual language or tool selected, CIT's methodology for teaching concepts isalso different than that found at many other institutions. For example, as much as possible,programming assignments are geared towards solving business problems. If nothing else, theseassignments help familiarize CIT students with the jargon found in the business world. As statedearlier, most of these courses require an end-of-semester team programming project
& their • system losses design contributions • timeline of • multiplication • measurement • rate concepts • multiplica- • measure- • measurementconcepts scientific and • measurement • multiplication • complex tion ment • recovery %’s Math technological • graphing • division dimensions • large/ small advancements numbers • powers of
from the Boss?” Dave did look away from his screen. Theother three created a sound of clicking fury in the cubical area as they checked their email inunison. The email read as follows:To: Axle, Dave, Jeff, and CatalinaFrom: Bob CaudilloSubject: New ProjectI got this one handed down from above; we have a problem. Our consumer electronics division just received 1million temperature sensors for our company’s new digital thermometers that display degrees Celsius! Youneed to find a way to modify these temperature sensors to output Fahrenheit.Bob CaudilloSaved by the Bell, Inc.Lead EngineerM/S: GG75(702) 555 - 5555“Hey, I did this once before in school,” said Axle, “There is an equation to convert betweenCelsius and Fahrenheit. I’m going to Google
://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/tables/tabb-9.xls 8. Sullivan, Kieran, "Educational Assessment," a presentation by Dr. Sullivan at the NSF Workshop on Improvingand Assessing the Impact of Programs to Encourage Girls to Pursue Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM), available online at the workshop website: http://www.scu.edu/SCU/Projects/NSFWorkshop99/.9. Tabachnick, Barbara G. and Fidell, Linda S. Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th Edition. Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon . 2001. 10. Willemsen, Eleanor, "Motivating Girls to Persist in EMS," a presentation by Dr. Willemsen at the NSFWorkshop on Improving and Assessing the Impact of Programs to Encourage Girls to Pursue Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM
, 2001. 1[6] Dorf, R. C., and Byers, T. H., Technology Ventures – From Idea to Enterprise, McGraw-Hill Higher Education,2005.[7] Wolfe, H., “Issues in teaching entrepreneurship to heterogeneous groups of students,” In Proceedings of the2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.[8] Kingon, A.I., S. Markham, R. Thomas, R. Debo, “Teaching high-tech entrepreneurship: does it differ fromteaching entrepreneurship? (And does it matter?),” In Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference and Exposition.[9] Nichols, S.P., N. Kaderlan, J.S. Butler, M.A. Rankin, “An interdisciplinary graduate course in technologyentrepreneurship,” In Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for
other students with similar backgrounds and interests Page 12.1451.13Bibliographic Information1. National Science Foundation. (2004). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved September 15, 2006, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/race.htm2. Davis, S., Jenkins, G., & Rameck, H. (2002). The Pact. New York: The Berkley Publishing Group. .3. Grose, T. K. (2006). Trouble on the horizon. PRISM, 16(2), 26-31.4. U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics (2007). Bachelor's degrees conferred by degree-granting institutions, by racial/ethnic group and
Middle School Parents 0.3 0.2 High School Parents 0.1 0 se r Fr e ep r Fa r S er R ing nd Te ild he he
to the community and society outside of IIT of this IPRO project changed since the beginning of the semester? Why or why not? What might be the counter argument to your view of the overall importance of the IPRO (i.e. the IPRO has no importance outside of IIT)? Can you be sure either argument is correct? How or why not?Reflections 3 1. Ethical issues in IPRO are of two types: those involving behaviors within the IPRO team and those involving the eventual application of IPRO output to the larger society. Please outline the most important ethical problems the team has encountered over the entire semester. What was the issue and what was the outcome? From your experience(s) this semester
ABET accreditation.1 Lohmann, J., “EC2000: The Georgia Tech Experience”, Journal of Engineering Education, July 1999, pp. 305 –310.2 Bailey, M., Floersheim, B. and Ressler, S., “Course Assessment Plan: A Tool for Integrated CurriculumManagement,” Journal of Engineering Education, October 2002, pp. 425 -434.3 Felder, R., and Brent, R., “Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria,” Journal ofEngineering Education, January 2003, pp. 7 – 25. Page 12.1314.13
Page 12.26.11Class Topic(s) In class Out-of-class assignment assignment1 & 2 Introduction of Syllabus; Make an appointment My Career Planning Situation for a one-on-one Questionnaire; resume critique with Information for resume writing Career Services (course experiences, during the week of software/hardware experience); September 5 – 12; Companies who have hired BSEMET Resume must be
Challenges to Engineering , New Jersey: Prentice Hall (2000).3. Lovins, A., Lovins, L., and Hawken, P., A Road Map for Natural Capitalism, Harvard Business Review, Reprint 99309 (May-June 1999)4. Beder, S., The New Engineer: Management and Professional Responsibility in a Changing World, South Yarra, Australia: MacMillan (1998).5. Lau, A.S., “Teaching Engineering Ethics to First-Year College Students,” Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 10, Issue 2, April 2004, pp. 359-368.6. Barad, J., Robertson, E., The Ethics of Star Trek, New York: HarperCollins Publishers (2000).7. Kidder, R., Shared Values for a Troubled World: Conversations with Men and Women of Conscience, New York: Jossey-Bass (1994).8. “Academic Integrity: The Bridge to