the average studentperforms 2% better than predicted and the distribution of this difference is negatively skewed (-0.64) indicating the bulk of the students outperform the prediction.Also notice in Figure 1 that no students were predicted to finish with above a 93%. This is likelydue to the fact that few students earn all A’s and A+’s in previous coursework, so very few havea GPA higher than 4.0. This prediction, therefore, fails to predict that students will score an A+in a future course. 100% 95% 90% Actual Performance (in CE300) 85% 80% 75
process and the team has demonstrated proper design methodology during the design process.Automotive Systems Capstone The ME492 (Mechanical Powertrains and Vehicle Dynamics) course provides much of the basicknowledge required of mechanical engineering majors to participate in the Society of AutomotiveEngineers’ BAJA SAE competition. In academic year 08 a new course director took over the course.This course director had served as a committee member for the academic year 07’s Baja-SAE team. InAY 07 it was quickly apparent that the Baja-SAE team lacked some basic knowledge required to properdesign of the vehicle. A review of the AY 07 ME492 syllabus revealed some of the underlying causes: Lesson
22Max Faculty professional development funding $125K $87K $75K 23Max #GA’s and RA’s offered per semester (credit hours) 1170 360 300 24Max Student professional development funding $65K $26K $25K 25Max Staff salaries (current average, all without Dean) $65K $61K $61K 26Max Session Chairmanships 42 24 21 27Max Tech-related expenditure (s/w, h/w, etc.) $4M $2.7M $2.0M 28Max # online courses offered/year
A Brighter Economic Future. National Academies of Sciences, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.4. ABET (2007). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. The Engineering Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. http://www.abet.org/.5. Goldberg, D.E. (2006), The Entrepreneurial Engineer. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey.6. Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions at IIT. http://ethics.iit.edu/codes/engineer.html (Accessed March 14, 2008).7. Freeman, S.; Matson, D.; Sharpe, G.; and Swan, C. (2006) “International Citizenship and Global Service Leadership – The Role of Interdisciplinary Teams in Engineering Education”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago IL
Education and Practice. 131:4, 218-222.7. Friesen, Marcia, K. Lynn Taylor, and M.G. Britton (2005) “A Qualitative Study of a Course Trilogy in Biosystems Engineering Design”. Journal of Engineering Education. 94:3, 287-296.8. Grigg, Neil S., Marvin E. Criswell, Darrell G. Fontane, Laurel Saito, Thomas J. Siller, and Daniel K. Sunada (2004) “Integrated Civil Engineering Curriculum: Five-Year Review”. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 130:3, 160-165.9. Light, Richard J., Judith D. Singer, and John B. Willett (1990) By Design, Planning Research on Higher Education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 296p.10. Newstetter, Wendy C. (2005) “Designing Cognitive Apprenticeships for
how well existing material will translate online, creating new approaches tocommunicating with students, and evaluating and rebuilding the course as problems arise.AcknowledgmentI would like to thank all the students that took part in the survey.Bibliography1. Charp, S. (1998). Any time, any place learning. T H E Journal, 25(8), 6.2. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1991). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduateeducation. In3. A. W. Chickering & Z. F. Gamson (Eds.), Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice inUndergraduate Education, New Directions for Teaching and Learning (pp. 63-69). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.4. Green, K. (1997). Drawn to the light, burned by the flame? Money, technology and distance
classroom). Each projector screen will cover two of the flat screen LCD monitors when inuse. Therefore, the visual system in the room can be operated in one of three modes: 1. Four projectors 2. Two projectors and four LCD monitors 3. Eight LCD monitorsThe instructor station is an Intel Quadcore PC with a quad-port video board, 1 terabyte of disk storage,and 4 gigabytes of memory. The instructor station is also equipped with two WACOM pen screensallowing the instructor to write on the computer screen. We chose the Synchroneyes software to controlthe student workstations. With this software the instructor can broadcast their screen(s) to all studentscreens or project any student’s screen to their own screen.The technology environment for
Career Choice Practical Figure 1.0: Schematics of Proposed StrategyEmphasis is placed on encouraging students to recognize the relevance of engineering to their own lives,as they now know it. Key points that would be highlighted in both examples include: • What led to the development of such principles? • How was society impacted then, as well as now? • Was there any technological/engineering advancement as a result of this? • Who were the key players? • How has or how can this be applied? • Example application(s)/events specific to each grade level. • Relevance to present day--making it personal. • Are the right connections being made? Putting it all together.It is
standard undergraduate courses of study.1. U.S. Green Building Council, LEED for New Construction and Major Renovations, Version 2.2, October, 2005.2. Kosmatka, S., Kerkhoff, B., and Panarese, W.; Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, 14th Edition, PortlandCement Association, Skokie, Illinois, 2002. 6
Statistics," College Student Journal, vol. 41, pp. 454-459, June.2007.[4] F. A. Conners, S. M. Mccown and B. Roskos-Ewoldson, "Unique challenges in teachingundergraduates statistics," Teaching of Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 40, 1998.[5] T. Franklin, J. Mayles, C. Liu and D. Chelberg, "Games and engineers in the science classroom: Acase study," in 18th International Conference of the Society for Information Technology & TeacherEducation (SITE), 2007,[6] C. Liu, "Second life learning community--A peer-based approach to involving more faculty membersin second life," in SLSS Educator's Workshop, 2006,[7] C. Liu, "Software project demonstrations as not only an assessment tool but also a learning tool," in2006 SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer
separate units of the course. Each person in thegroup is required to select a different reference(s) and draft the section individually; thegroup then evaluates the individual sections and combines them to create a single section,which they post to the class wiki. In addition to digital resources available to the studentsthrough Blackboard, I have placed several textbooks on reserve at the library.Student responses so far have been mixed. In addition to midterm and end-of-term surveysrelated to the effectiveness of this approach, I am tracking student usage of the digitalresources. A comparison of the class notes developed by individual students with thosedeveloped by the groups allows me to assess the contributions of the individuals and
how well existing material will translate online, creating new approaches tocommunicating with students, and evaluating and rebuilding the course as problems arise.AcknowledgmentI would like to thank all the students that took part in the survey.Bibliography1. Charp, S. (1998). Any time, any place learning. T H E Journal, 25(8), 6.2. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1991). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduateeducation. In3. A. W. Chickering & Z. F. Gamson (Eds.), Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice inUndergraduate Education, New Directions for Teaching and Learning (pp. 63-69). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.4. Green, K. (1997). Drawn to the light, burned by the flame? Money, technology and distance
] L.A. DaSilva, G.E. Morgan, C.W. Bostian, D. G. Sweeney, S. F. Midkiff, J. H. Reed, C. Tompson, W.G. Newhall, B. Woerner, “The Resurgence of Push-to-Talk Technologies”, IEEE Communications Magazine, January 2006[6] J.Q. Bao, L. Guo, W.C. Lee, “Policy-Based Resource Allocation in a Wireless Public Safety Network for Incident Scene Management”, MobiCom ‘06 Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking[7] Certified Wireless Network Administrator, Official Study Guide, Third Edition.BiographiesDr. Khaled Elleihty received the B.Sc. degree in computer science and automatic control fromAlexandria University in 1983, the MS Degree in computer networks from the same university in 1986,and the MS
unauthorized people (non-members) Provide means to add new members and to assign them to appropriate work spaces quickly. Allow the users to post files. To support reports and presentation slides containing many photos, a minimum of a 4MB file should be allowed4. Our system currently allows students to post up to a 10 MB file. Provide threaded discussions that are useful in configuration management, defect tracking, etc. Allow the users to search messages using a key word. This feature is extremely useful for a student working on an on-going project to find information left by the previous team(s). Show summaries of users’ activities. Allow instructors to see all messages posted by a
Education and Practice. 131:4, 218-222.7. Friesen, Marcia, K. Lynn Taylor, and M.G. Britton (2005) “A Qualitative Study of a Course Trilogy in Biosystems Engineering Design”. Journal of Engineering Education. 94:3, 287-296.8. Grigg, Neil S., Marvin E. Criswell, Darrell G. Fontane, Laurel Saito, Thomas J. Siller, and Daniel K. Sunada (2004) “Integrated Civil Engineering Curriculum: Five-Year Review”. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 130:3, 160-165.9. Light, Richard J., Judith D. Singer, and John B. Willett (1990) By Design, Planning Research on Higher Education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 296p.10. Newstetter, Wendy C. (2005) “Designing Cognitive Apprenticeships for
Career Choice Practical Figure 1.0: Schematics of Proposed StrategyEmphasis is placed on encouraging students to recognize the relevance of engineering to their own lives,as they now know it. Key points that would be highlighted in both examples include: • What led to the development of such principles? • How was society impacted then, as well as now? • Was there any technological/engineering advancement as a result of this? • Who were the key players? • How has or how can this be applied? • Example application(s)/events specific to each grade level. • Relevance to present day--making it personal. • Are the right connections being made? Putting it all together.It is
., Elliott, M.A., Koksai, F., Ortiz, G.M., DiGiano, F.A., and Sobsey, M.D., “Characterization of the biosand filter for E. coli reductions from household drinking water under controlled laboratory and field use conditions”, Water Science and Technology, 54(3), pp. 1-7, 2006.5. Ngai, T., Murcott, S., Shrestha, R.R., Dangol, B., Maharjan, M., “Development and dissemination of KanchanTM Arsenic Filter in rural Nepal Water”, Science and Technology 6(3), 2006. 5Biographical InformationBrittany Wright, Tufts University Ms. Wright is an undergraduate Mechanical Engineer who traveled with the team in 2007 and 2008. She serves as the team leader for 2008-2009. Her
22Max Faculty professional development funding $125K $87K $75K 23Max #GA’s and RA’s offered per semester (credit hours) 1170 360 300 24Max Student professional development funding $65K $26K $25K 25Max Staff salaries (current average, all without Dean) $65K $61K $61K 26Max Session Chairmanships 42 24 21 27Max Tech-related expenditure (s/w, h/w, etc.) $4M $2.7M $2.0M 28Max # online courses offered/year
separate units of the course. Each person in thegroup is required to select a different reference(s) and draft the section individually; thegroup then evaluates the individual sections and combines them to create a single section,which they post to the class wiki. In addition to digital resources available to the studentsthrough Blackboard, I have placed several textbooks on reserve at the library.Student responses so far have been mixed. In addition to midterm and end-of-term surveysrelated to the effectiveness of this approach, I am tracking student usage of the digitalresources. A comparison of the class notes developed by individual students with thosedeveloped by the groups allows me to assess the contributions of the individuals and
A Brighter Economic Future. National Academies of Sciences, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.4. ABET (2007). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. The Engineering Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. http://www.abet.org/.5. Goldberg, D.E. (2006), The Entrepreneurial Engineer. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey.6. Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions at IIT. http://ethics.iit.edu/codes/engineer.html (Accessed March 14, 2008).7. Freeman, S.; Matson, D.; Sharpe, G.; and Swan, C. (2006) “International Citizenship and Global Service Leadership – The Role of Interdisciplinary Teams in Engineering Education”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago IL
Education and Practice. 131:4, 218-222.7. Friesen, Marcia, K. Lynn Taylor, and M.G. Britton (2005) “A Qualitative Study of a Course Trilogy in Biosystems Engineering Design”. Journal of Engineering Education. 94:3, 287-296.8. Grigg, Neil S., Marvin E. Criswell, Darrell G. Fontane, Laurel Saito, Thomas J. Siller, and Daniel K. Sunada (2004) “Integrated Civil Engineering Curriculum: Five-Year Review”. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 130:3, 160-165.9. Light, Richard J., Judith D. Singer, and John B. Willett (1990) By Design, Planning Research on Higher Education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 296p.10. Newstetter, Wendy C. (2005) “Designing Cognitive Apprenticeships for
22Max Faculty professional development funding $125K $87K $75K 23Max #GA’s and RA’s offered per semester (credit hours) 1170 360 300 24Max Student professional development funding $65K $26K $25K 25Max Staff salaries (current average, all without Dean) $65K $61K $61K 26Max Session Chairmanships 42 24 21 27Max Tech-related expenditure (s/w, h/w, etc.) $4M $2.7M $2.0M 28Max # online courses offered/year
Career Choice Practical Figure 1.0: Schematics of Proposed StrategyEmphasis is placed on encouraging students to recognize the relevance of engineering to their own lives,as they now know it. Key points that would be highlighted in both examples include: • What led to the development of such principles? • How was society impacted then, as well as now? • Was there any technological/engineering advancement as a result of this? • Who were the key players? • How has or how can this be applied? • Example application(s)/events specific to each grade level. • Relevance to present day--making it personal. • Are the right connections being made? Putting it all together.It is
how well existing material will translate online, creating new approaches tocommunicating with students, and evaluating and rebuilding the course as problems arise.AcknowledgmentI would like to thank all the students that took part in the survey.Bibliography1. Charp, S. (1998). Any time, any place learning. T H E Journal, 25(8), 6.2. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1991). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduateeducation. In3. A. W. Chickering & Z. F. Gamson (Eds.), Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice inUndergraduate Education, New Directions for Teaching and Learning (pp. 63-69). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.4. Green, K. (1997). Drawn to the light, burned by the flame? Money, technology and distance
classroom). Each projector screen will cover two of the flat screen LCD monitors when inuse. Therefore, the visual system in the room can be operated in one of three modes: 1. Four projectors 2. Two projectors and four LCD monitors 3. Eight LCD monitorsThe instructor station is an Intel Quadcore PC with a quad-port video board, 1 terabyte of disk storage,and 4 gigabytes of memory. The instructor station is also equipped with two WACOM pen screensallowing the instructor to write on the computer screen. We chose the Synchroneyes software to controlthe student workstations. With this software the instructor can broadcast their screen(s) to all studentscreens or project any student’s screen to their own screen.The technology environment for
standard undergraduate courses of study.1. U.S. Green Building Council, LEED for New Construction and Major Renovations, Version 2.2, October, 2005.2. Kosmatka, S., Kerkhoff, B., and Panarese, W.; Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, 14th Edition, PortlandCement Association, Skokie, Illinois, 2002. 6
the average studentperforms 2% better than predicted and the distribution of this difference is negatively skewed (-0.64) indicating the bulk of the students outperform the prediction.Also notice in Figure 1 that no students were predicted to finish with above a 93%. This is likelydue to the fact that few students earn all A’s and A+’s in previous coursework, so very few havea GPA higher than 4.0. This prediction, therefore, fails to predict that students will score an A+in a future course. 100% 95% 90% Actual Performance (in CE300) 85% 80% 75
A Brighter Economic Future. National Academies of Sciences, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.4. ABET (2007). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. The Engineering Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. http://www.abet.org/.5. Goldberg, D.E. (2006), The Entrepreneurial Engineer. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey.6. Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions at IIT. http://ethics.iit.edu/codes/engineer.html (Accessed March 14, 2008).7. Freeman, S.; Matson, D.; Sharpe, G.; and Swan, C. (2006) “International Citizenship and Global Service Leadership – The Role of Interdisciplinary Teams in Engineering Education”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago IL
[1] ExScal Project, http://www.cast.cse.ohio-state.edu/exscal/, 2005.[2] Terminodes Project, http://www.terminodes.org/, 2005.[3] Roofnet Project,” http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/roofnet/, 2005.[4] Rendong Bai and Mukesh Singal, “DOA : DSR over AODV Routing for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, IEEE transactions on Mobile Computing, Vol. 5, No 10, Oct. 2006.[5] C.E. Perkins and P. Bhagwat, "Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers", Comp. Comm. Rev., Oct. 1994, pp.234-244.[6] S. Murthy and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, "An Efficient Routing Protocol for Wireless Networks", ACM Mobile Networks and App. J., Special Issue on Routing in Mobile Communication Networks, Oct. 1996, pp
Statistics," College Student Journal, vol. 41, pp. 454-459, June.2007.[4] F. A. Conners, S. M. Mccown and B. Roskos-Ewoldson, "Unique challenges in teachingundergraduates statistics," Teaching of Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 40, 1998.[5] T. Franklin, J. Mayles, C. Liu and D. Chelberg, "Games and engineers in the science classroom: Acase study," in 18th International Conference of the Society for Information Technology & TeacherEducation (SITE), 2007,[6] C. Liu, "Second life learning community--A peer-based approach to involving more faculty membersin second life," in SLSS Educator's Workshop, 2006,[7] C. Liu, "Software project demonstrations as not only an assessment tool but also a learning tool," in2006 SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer