augment existing course material for approximatelya two-hour lecture environment. The development of each module attempts to follow similarformats using the standard development sequence outlined in Table 1. The modules includepresentations in PowerPoint format and instructor notes in Word format. Both formats mayinclude links to online content that has been identified as relevant and vetted by the academicreview team. The graphics contained in each module reflect real world applications and havebeen approved for public domain. Recommended lab activities are also included as a part of theinstructor’s notes. Current and planned technical content is outlined in Table 2.Lab kits have been introduced with the newest grant and lab exercises are
close with some discussion of alternatives to outcomes-based education thatmight better support change in engineering education.Introduction – EC 2000This paper is part of a session that seeks to continue an ongoing conversation about accreditationand liberal education, that has taken many forms over the years, and was most recently taken upby historians at the 2011 ASEE conference.1 My particular concern here is to bring critiques ofoutcomes-based education (OBE)2 from critical scholarship in Education to bear on our ownversion of OBE in engineering in the U.S. – EC 2000. This is very much a work in progress,drawing on discussions among Liberal Education/Engineering and Society Division members in
credential. The 15 technical college credits can be used by workers as creditbearing stackable credentials. They provide education and training for defined skill setsneeded by employers as well as convenient “stops” along the way to an A.S. Degree.Details of the ET Degree specialization tracks, college credit certificates, as well as Page 25.142.2colleges which offer the various programs can be found on FLATE’s “Made in Florida”web site, http://madeinflorida.org/engineering-technology-degree/e-t-overview/ andhttp://www.fl-ate.org/projects/Stackable-Credentials-Aligned-Certificates.html. (1, 2).MSSC Certified Production TechnicianThe MSSC Certified
determined thatgraduates of the university systems were looking for some basic guarantees and opportunities: 1. Top salaries for engineers (competitive for market conditions) 2. Job security 3. Health and savings benefits 4. Work-life balance 5. Technical challenges and growth opportunities 6. Leadership development programs 7. A constant learning and growth environment 8. Mentoring for technical, management, and career advice 9. Community service programs 10. Opportunities to lead early in one’s career 11. Tuition reimbursement programs for advanced degree pursuit (MS and MBA)The recent graduate from the university setting today has great expectations centered on self,concentrating on personal growth and development, while
defining a problemand developing solutions to that problem. The education and engineering courses have contentthat needs to be part of what happens, so the problem and community based work reinforces andamplifies the course content, and has the potential to offer unique insights or experiences thatcourse content alone can not.. This illuminates the tension between goals of the community workand the goals of the courses.ModelsThe courses used three different models that defined how students interacted with thecommunity: 1. a problem embedded in a specific context; this model gets to the challenges of complexity without formal partner relationships, interactions with community/end users are ad-hoc (partner interactions are theoretical
, not realizing thatin today’s world high school physics classes most closely resembles mechanical engineeringpractice, not modern theoretical physics.Many students respond in a reasonable way to this uncertainty - by seeking admission inthe undeclared category and hoping to decide on their ultimate path once at the university.But, of course, most of their first courses will consist of required background material inscience and math - not engineering. And the danger here is that students may opt out ofthe engineering track before they have really had a chance to experience it.Thus our departments face a two-fold challenge with regard to lower division students. Thefirst is that of retention ([1], [2]), motivating newly admitted students to
be challengingto the most veteran student and especially difficult for new freshman. Any type of tool that mayaid them in this endeavor is most certainly welcomed by not only the students, but also facultyand administrators. One such tool is a learning management system (LMS) and is the focus ofthis particular study at an urban institution. Page 25.146.2But what exactly is a learning management system? Carliner (2004)1 explains that an LMS“refers to software that performs administrative tasks.” The LMS can also perform severalfunctions for both face-to-face and online courses as well as administrative duties such as“registration, testing
introductory ECEclass. An appropriate laboratory exercise may support this concept and spark student interest inthe subject matter. A logical choice is to present a “wireless” project as it naturally includes theconcept of complex impedances.Building a basic radio receiver on the protoboard is a challenge due to instability of the RF low-noise amplifier within an unpredictable protoboard environment. Our numerous attempts to buildan AM station receiver on the protoboard have indicated the following difficulties:1. The circuit can be built by the instructor and by those skilled in the field from the class, but not by all class students.2. The design is difficult to debug; sometimes the flawless circuit simply does not function.3. One critical point
accreditationstandards focus more and more on the assessment of measurable learning outcomes, the C-DECcore curriculum provides an opportunity for the engineering programs within the college toaddress and assess, in part, student learning in a wide range of areas that are relevant to theABET “a-k” learning outcomes (ABET’s “Criteria 3: Student Outcomes”5). Specifically,students completing the five-course C-DEC core curriculum are assessed by the college todetermine if they attain the following seven core learning outcomes. 1. An ability to collaborate on multidisciplinary teams 2. An ability to describe the value of different problem solving and decision making styles 3. An ability to identify the unique contributions and limitations of specific
other programs. As one of the fastest growing areas,computer networks is experiencing a dramatic need of professionals with solid foundations andpractical hands-on experience. This need has been reflected, to some extent, into the curricula ofcomputing degrees such as Computer Engineering, Computer Science, Information EngineeringTechnology, and others, where computer networks is now unquestionably included. Forexample, the curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in InformationEngineering Technology of ACM and IEEE Computer Society consider networking as a pillarfor any modern program 1. Page 25.149.2Despite these recent
% Other 54.5% 53.1% Total students completing the survey 22 32 Table 1: Self-reported demographicsDemographics of the College Algebra sectionsThe students took a survey within the first few weeks of class that contained questions about Page 25.150.6their background. The survey was adapted from a student pre-survey used on a project entitled,“Developing statistical indicators of the quality of undergraduate mathematics education,”headquartered at the Office for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
programsdeveloped through the ESE Institute, at both graduate and undergraduate level, address societaland scientific needs for a greater understanding of environmental issues. Recognizing thecomplexity of environmental issues, a holistic approach was taken which connects energy(particularly alternative energy for Illinois), foundational and applied environmental science,with societal and policy issues. The strategies are twofold: 1. to train people in a broad-based environmental studies curriculum that complements our existing focused programs 2. to strengthen our research in environmental and alternative energy issuesThe program will produce graduates prepared to meet these challenges via careers in industry,small business, federal, state and
Cycle Analysis of a product. It is anticipatedthat life cycle analysis tools such as the Okala Life Cycle Analysis Calculator will be used inassessing sustainability of manufactured products in fall 2012/spring 2013 semesters.MethodologyIn these classes, the impact of human activities on the environment is used to initiate discussionsabout sustainability and sustainable development. To aid the discussions, slides of Figures 1-4are shown to the students. Page 25.152.3Figure 1. Deforestation in Atlantic Forest Rio de Janeiro - Brazil. This hill was deforested inorder to use its clay in civil construction in Barra da Tijuca.8Figures 2a and 2b
, laboratory experiences, laboratory exercises, hands-onlearning opportunities, undergraduate student teamIntroductionThe technical information presented in many undergraduate engineering courses is emphasizedand solidified by using laboratory experiences. In his paper, entitled “Tell me, I’ll forget; showme, I’ll remember, involve me, I’ll understand;” Eastlake states, “Engineering without labs is adifferent discipline. If we cut out labs we might as well rename our degrees AppliedMathematics.”1 Although there isn’t much discussion about removing labs from engineeringeducation, this statement does help emphasize the importance of laboratory experiences inengineering curricula as a key method for promoting student learning. Also, many students
scores. Figure 1 shows a screenshot of a review rubric from Expertiza. Some examples of projectFigure 1: Screenshot of a review rubric from Expertiza, which review rubrics used incontains textboxes for students to write out text reviews and Expertiza are listed indropdown boxes for scores. Tables 1 and 2. Table 3 lists
presented by year, providing a context to understand the historicalpath to the current manufacturing education efforts. The approach is three fold; 1) Gather a database ofpapers, presentations and related works that address manufacturing education over the past two decades;2) Conduct a comprehensive assessment of the collected material in order to identify the major themes inmanufacturing curriculum and methods in manufacturing education; and 3) Determine what lessons areevident in the development of manufacturing education and how such lessons can inform current practicesand help identify and define future opportunities.1. IntroductionManufacturing industries and education are now emerging from a decade long slump in social andpolitical support
interviews yielded substantive Page 25.156.4information. To complement and corroborate the qualitative data obtained from the interviews, abrief three-item survey was administered to a larger population of recruiters, approximately 165,visiting the RHIT fall Career Fair. With the exception of Executive Recruiters (not present at theCareer Fair), the larger group contained similar demographics to face-to-face interviews.The quantitative aspect of this endeavor asked participants to answer the following questions: 1. Do you know the difference between Engineering and Engineering Technology Baccalaureate Degrees (e.g. Mechanical Engineering vs
evidence from this studysuggests that, construction project management students have a strong preference for andagainst active-like and passive-like teaching methods according to their capability andfamiliarity. In relation to active-like teaching methods, the survey results showed thatconstruction project management students highly rated class discussions/group discussions.IntroductionAccording to the National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) 1, learningstyles are categorised as affective, cognitive and psychological behaviours that designate howindividuals perceive, interact and respond to the learning environment. Learning can bedefined as the attainment of or depending on your theoretical viewpoint, the construction
: Figure 1: The Six Core Knowledge Stems in Manufacturing Engineering1 Decisions were made quite early in the program’s history that instruction should beintegrated -- i.e., that separate courses ought not to be offered for separate elements of the coreknowledge stems, but that fundamental concepts should be integrated throughout the curriculum.This attitude led directly to an orientation towards a concentration on relevant aspects ofengineering -- i.e., based on the fundamental characteristics of engineers as problem-solversand designers of products and processes. The result was a focus on four basic aspects ofmanufacturing engineering … product engineering; process engineering; quality engineering;production engineering.2 This was quickly
results presented in this work show an improvement in student modelingabilities as well as high student satisfaction with the described experiment. Master levelstudents, already exposed to the concepts of modeling and optimization, were slightly lesssatisfied than bachelor level students that have never been exposed to the same concepts. Both,master and bachelor level students showed an improvement in their modeling abilities.JustificationMorse and Kimball (1951)1 defined Operations Research (OR) as "a scientific method ofproviding executive departments with a quantitative basis for decisions regarding the operationsunder their control". OR follows a scientific approach to analyze problems and to support anydecision making process. OR
perspective by means of a survey, and from the teacher’s perspectivethrough a qualitative assessment of observed strengths and limitations. We analyzed some ofthe results obtained from implementing both approaches and reach some conclusions on howto improve our reflection method.1. INTRODUCTIONThere are three common ways in which ‘reflection’ is used and understood 9. The first one isthat reflection happens between the learning process and the representation of that learning.The second is that reflection has an implying purpose, i.e., we reflect consciously with theaim of attaining a useful outcome. And the third one is that reflection emerges when pro-cessing issues for which there is no obvious solution.John Dewey, an American philosopher
theory to positionstudents in situations that model unfamiliar ethical tensions characteristic of sustainabilityproblems, such as the Tragedy of the Commons. In this approach, students can only advancetheir own grade at the ultimate expense of other students. Whereas the Nash Equilibrium in ourgames predicts systemic collapse of student grades, the actual grade outcomes aligned withegalitarian ideals, despite evidence of conflict in on-line student communications.Introduction Sustainability is increasingly gaining the interest of professional engineering societiesthat consider adherence to the principles of sustainable development a fundamental ethicalresponsibility [1]. However, exactly what those principles are and how to teach them
between these two audiences.The CDIO Skyscraper ExerciseThe Skyscraper Exercise was created by engineering educators from Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology and United States Naval Academy and it contains all the major components of theconceive, design, implement and operate (CDIO)pedagogical approach in a exciting format1. The historicalpremise is based on the highly competitive expansion ofvery tall structures such as the Chrysler Building (NewYork City) in the early part of the 20th century (figure 1).This expansion was enabled by new structural materials andbuilding processes. The exercise is to design, build andtest a model skyscraper using a variety of foam blocks andpencils as the fasteners. Each size of foam block is pricedsuch that the
experiments, data analysis,and engineering design. An assessment plan will measure student mastery of learning outcomesspecific to the field of biomaterials science and those set forth by ABET for undergraduatechemical engineering programs.Keywords: pH Responsive Hydrogels, Oral Insulin Delivery, Diabetes, Controlled Drug DeliveryINTRODUCTIONDiabetes is a disease which affects millions of people around the world. It is classified into twomajor types. Type 1 Diabetes is an auto-immune disease in which, insulin-producing beta-cellswithin the pancreas are destroyed, resulting in insufficient insulin production by this organ. Withtype 2 diabetes, the body has developed a rejection to insulin and that glucose uptake cannot beregulated within a
made to extend the implications to other remote laboratories.Furthermore, the performance of the LabVIEW dll approach to experiment control is comparedwith a previous approach using the NI DAQmx library.KeywordsiLab, Adobe Flex, operational amplifier, realistic interface, RIAs, DFSI. IntroductionPhysical experiments are indispensable for developing skills to deal with physical processes andinstrumentation 1. Experimentation has therefore long been an integral part of engineering Page 25.164.2education, due to the fact that it bridges the gap between theoretical and practical knowledge.Students perform experiments to verify the theories
Ftotal = k f 2We find empirically that k ranges between 6 and 9 for the College of Engineering and Science atLouisiana Tech university for each year starting in 2000. Figure 1. shows the f-index for 2007-08, here k =6. Page 25.165.3 f-index for 2007-08 14 12Number of Students 10 8 6 4 2 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
theinstructor would board a small bus at 8am to visit at least one of the sites. The sites were selectedso that we could make the visit in a single day – typically returning mid-to-late afternoon. Theexception was one visit when we left late Thursday afternoon after classes, stayed overnight nearthe first site, visited three facilities and returned late Friday evening.Typically we would arrive at the site, spend 30-45 minutes getting an overview from the facilitypersonnel of what was to be seen, then split up into smaller groups to visit the site. After 1-2hours visiting the facility we would then return to a central location to answer any generalquestions which may have come up during the tours.Assignments - In order for this course to be more than
creditrequired course and its corresponding 1 credit required lab for the Food Engineering program atUDLAP. Approximately 10-12 students are enrolled in per semester. Food analysis (theory andlab) courses major goal is to help students think about the way a food analyst does. Thus,students are involved in understanding key subjects while achieving the following outcomes: beable to use the laboratory techniques common to basic and applied food chemistry and analysis,be able to select the appropriate analytical technique when presented with a practical problem,and understand the principles behind analytical techniques.The fundamental concepts of the courses are, therefore, the chemical composition of food and itsrelation with available techniques for
as maturebut can be inspired to become more serious. With an encouraging preparation in theFundamentals course, more of the maturing students can be motivated to excel in their junior andsenior level courses. With some nurturing, it is possible to engage that deeper latent talent of allambitious engineering students. The objectives of the course are: 1. to prepare students for their future engineering courses, 2. to introduce students to the various engineering disciplines, 3. to use the electronic spreadsheet as a tool for solving engineering problems, and 4. to prepare students for the business world of engineering. Most engineering curricula do not include courses on how to use the spreadsheet. Thegeneral
recently developed separation processes (pressureswing adsorption, pervaporation, gas permeation). Within the module, case studies are used todemonstrate the superior performance of hybrid systems coupling these conventional and morerecently developed separation processes. Page 25.169.3Overview of Separations Course at Mississippi State UniversityThe junior level separations course is taught on a traditional semester. The text used isSeparation Process Engineering: Includes Mass Transfer Analysis [20]. Topics included in thecourse are shown in Table 1.This course is taught on a 14.5 week semester, so covering the given topics is a