emphasized in the traditionalcurriculum. Student reflection and exit survey data examined student learning experiences alongwith the challenges of implementing skills they have learned. Students described the benefits oflearning an effective socially engaged design process to plan their projects, engaging withstakeholders to gather important information regarding their needs, learning recommendedpractices in idea generation, and creating prototypes before coding. On the other hand, studentsdescribed perceived challenges including lacking experience in socially engaged design skillsthat may impact their ability to implement skills from the workshops effectively, identifying andconnecting with stakeholders who could provide meaningful information, and
Seaperch programaligned with the department's interests, and a plan for collaboration was put forth.The county’s involvement occurred in two parts. 1. Develop a challenge that would be relevant to solving current environmental problems that are occurring in the same area where the campers live. 2. Assess success and provide support during the completed project demonstration.A presentation consisting of information pertaining to the challenge was developed by PWC. Itincluded information about the important roles freshwater mussels have in their environments,several engaging videos, an outline of our goal, and the parameters of the challenge. Informationwas provided at an accessible level and was engaging enough to have campers excited
pursuing graduate education was discussed in the interviews (Figure 4). When asked if they planned on pursuing graduate level education, nine participants indicated yes, one participant indicated that they were unsure, and one participant indicated that they were not interested in pursuing graduate education. When asked if they planned on pursuing future research opportunities, all eleven participants indicated that they would be pursuing more research opportunities in the future (Figure 4). When asked if the altREU program provided an accurate representation of the research process, all seven participants indicated that they felt the altREU program accurately represented research (Figure 4). This question was added during the
Paper ID #43816Development of an Innovation Corps-Modelled Bioengineering Course to PromoteEntrepreneurial Engagement Among Undergraduate StudentsAmanda Walls, University of ArkansasThomas Hudnall McGehee, University of Arkansas Thomas ”Hud” McGehee is an undergraduate student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering. While Hud’s primary research focus is on nanocomposite biomaterials for orthopedic applications, engineering education prevails as another area of interest. Hud plans to pursue higher education by utilizing his engineering background in his future career in veterinary medicine via research and development in
wassubmitted and awarded to enable the ESP to support additional students at FCC and enable themto take longer than the planned completion time of two years to finish their pre-transfer courses.The supplemental funding impact also extended to support scholars at the local four-yearuniversity, California State University-Fresno (CSU-F), where the majority of scholars transferred.DemographicsFCC is two-year, Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI) and an Asian American and Native AmericanPacific Islander-Serving Institution (AANAPISI) located in Fresno, California. The city of Fresnois one of the most racially and ethnically diverse areas in California. Of the more than 500,000residents of Fresno, many face challenges of concentrated poverty [1], with 30.0
purposes of soliciting feedback from others in our region. MethodologyFirst, for the benefit of the students, our faculty instructors engage with area industry by organizingclass field trips to chemical engineering industrial facilities and also bringing industry speakers tothe students. Our department strives to provide separate field trips to area industry sites for eachyear in the students’ academic career, and plans these visits for different classes that cover all levels Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference WestTexasA&MUniversity,Canyon,TX Copyright 2024, American Society for Engineering
was part of the planning committee for the environmental engineeringprogram).”By 2009 or so, faculty could see the need and the potential for an official, standalone college ofengineering. Proposals were created for degrees in mechanical, civil, and electrical engineering(“the holy grail,” as one long-time faculty member put it) plus the official creation of a Collegeof Engineering. The then-UGA president (and BAE Dept head) waited for the right time politi-cally to present these proposals to the state of Georgia’s Board of Regents. Finally, in late 2010,these proposals were approved. The Board of Regents vote was tied 8-8, so the Board Chairmade the deciding vote. Ironically enough, this person was a Georgia Tech grad and caught someflak for
(scores between 2.0 and 3.0), and notably, no negative These findings provide valuable insights for educational institutions metrics used in this study, including their components, calculation The study provides a framework for evaluating student readiness for AI, methods, and corresponding scales. These metrics include the AI responses were recorded. planning AI integration initiatives, suggesting thatoffering actionable insights for educational institutions planning AI Knowledge Index, Sentiment Score, Educational Impact, and
, withone phase finished by one group and handed off to another group for continuation. Students thenprepare a brief written proposal, and a memorandum of understanding (MOU) is signed by boththe faculty advisor(s) and student(s). A second one-credit course is taken in the spring semester of the junior year when studentsdo a deeper dive into the relevant literature, develop a detailed plan for executing the projectduring their senior year, and prepare a poster on their project that is presented at a symposium.Two faculty members co-taught this course, with the symposium poster and written proposalcounting for 50 percent of their grade. This grade is given by the faculty advisor(s) who havesigned the MOU with students. In the senior year
mindsetwithin the greater engineering community. “Open to everybody, but who is actually going to use that room? Leave a building specifically to be in that room? It’ll be the people around it and using it that create its culture. So open to everyone, and the people supporting diversity form its culture.” -4th year Mechanical Engineering studentFocus Group Theme #3: Develop a student advisory board to plan and implement currentstudent programs.In all three focus groups, students voiced support for a student advisory board to help plan andimplement programming for current students. Historically, the only mechanism for student voicein programming has been via the women in engineering program student staff.A 4th year Industrial
Creation in Figure 1.On July 13, facilitators presented their lessons to other members of their team and the educationand engineering faculty mentors and solicited their feedback. The facilitators then modified theirlesson plans based on the ensuing discussions. This is referred to as Feedback Round 1 in Figure1. This phase of the PD resulted in the creation of four NGSS-plus-5E lessons, whose details areprovided in Table A.1 in Appendix A.Phase II – Teacher PD: Participants for Phase II, labeled as the teacher PD, were selected from agroup of NYC teachers who had previously attended a LEGO robotics related PD at NYU Tandon.Potential participants (≈45) were contacted by email and informed of the opportunity four monthsbefore the start date of the
respective engineering disciplines, and their interests in sustainability topicsto address the challenges. The three chosen project topics were: • Growing & Greening: Enriching the City of London Using Rooftop Gardens • Transit & Living for a Kind and Sustainable London • Sustainable Development in London Using Local Climate ZonesThe sustainability plans were developed as recommendations to the City of London and werepresented to the Directors in the Environment and Infrastructure Division, and Acting Mayor ofthe City of London. The learning experience demonstrated an opportunity for knowledgesharing, engagement with stakeholders, mentorship by experts, collaboration in teamenvironments, transdisciplinary thinking and
came prepared to discuss the module content,regardless of whether they overtly responded to the questions in the forum, it seemed to be areasonable decision to eliminate the “mandatory” nature of the forum post activity. This wasreinforced by participants’ feedback that indicated they saw these written posts as “make work”tasks.To better serve the needs of the GTA participants, the Nature of Learning module (T1M2) inthe original professor PD program was divided into two parts. Part A focused on lessonintroduction and the first 5 minutes whereas Part B emphasized lesson planning and creatingeffective learning outcomes. It should be noted that the concept of a lesson plan and a lessonplan template were provided in the program orientation session
it and implementing it in the right way... it can also be ... a172 barrier... for students... But I think, when done and used and implemented173 correctly, I think there is a huge possibility for technology to be helpful.”174 Interactive Digital Tools - For this study, interactive digital tools are digital tools that adapt to175 and/or provide personalized information to students based on the information that they input.176 Many of the tools discussed were degree planning and degree audit tools. Most of these types of177 tools are local solutions, homegrown by institutions and systems. Peyton, a national organization178 director, identified a digital degree planner, part of a guided pathway, created by the
a long-term United States national agenda forrenewable energy development, use and deployment.The single most common response from participants regarding what most directly influences theeducational pathways and the education of technicians in Germany is the existence of theEnergiewende itself. What makes the difference, wrote one, is “Germany’s long-range outlookon energy planning, whereas in the U.S. our plans are typically based on short-term market Page 26.1330.12forces.”17 This same sentiment was restated often by others: “The most striking thing is thatGermany actually has national energy goals with strategies and policies designed
within and across school districts. PD sessions includedtime for teachers to develop lesson plans, explore resources, and reflect on their learning.We used a mixed methods research design to investigate the impact of the PD program onteacher self-efficacy and classroom pedagogy with a focus on cultural relevance and engineeringdesign. Quantitative pre/post data was collected using three survey instruments: TeachingEngineering Self-Efficacy Scale (TESS), Culturally Responsive Teaching Self-Efficacy Scale(CRTSE), and Culturally Congruent Instruction Survey (CCIS). Qualitative data includedvideotaped classroom observations, individual teacher interviews after each design task, andteacher focus groups and written reflections during the summer and
created an introductory journal to support incoming first-year students. The journal incorporated organizational tools, information about the university,and available student resources. The journal’s intention was not only to help students hone theirorganizational skills but also to improve learning, prioritize responsibilities, and assist studentsin allocating time to connect with each other.Project ApproachThroughout the planning stages of the journal, the research team, comprising a faculty member,a staff member, and three undergraduate researchers, considered three main features: ● Provide organizational tools such as weekly calendars to help students track their assignment deadlines and other important dates ● Inspire healthy habits
Engineering Technology) program isfour in the year of 2022. This capstone project was created in Spring 2022, and it was concludedin Fall 2022. During the summer semester, there was no official capstone activity. For TexasA&M University at College Station, the mode of operation was already back to the mode of in-person learning. The team had regular weekly in-person meetings with the faculty member. Thename of this capstone project team was Mosqui-Tech. Although this capstone project wasconcluded in Fall 2022, further development and testing are planned to be continued.III. Mosquito Breeding Environment Testing Instrumentation A conceptual block diagram of the mosquito breeding environment testing instrumentation isshown in Figure 1. The
I would want to for future career plans? If pursue graduate school. I learned this from the so, what did you learn? industry mentors and graduate mentors. Do you think the industry 7 I do believe it will be helpful as I can seek their connections you made will advice when time goes on about making a change be helpful in future? If so, from one job to another or trying to learn about how? opportunities and also seek their advice in general when it comes to changes academically or career wise.In conclusion, students were well-pleased with the
information about civil engineering programs, such as skillsfreshmen as possible. required, curriculum, degree plan of the program, and career The high school students came from the Mississippi Summer opportunities. Senior students from the CEE department alsoTransportation Institute(MSTI). For the last ten years, JSU has come to the class to share their experiences with freshmen.offered the MSTI through a Mississippi Department ofTransportation (MDOT)/Federal Highway Administration The introductory lecture for high school students is given(FHWA) grant on campus to expose minority high school during the three-week residential summer program
. Professor, Kennesaw State UniversityAbstractIn this paper, the design and development of Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) by a team ofinterdisciplinary undergraduate students is discussed. The project spans over the period ofseveral years. In this working paper, the research goals are discussed, student participation andbreakdown are highlighted. The key emphasis is on the value of this project-based course offeredto undergraduate students at all levels and engineering disciplines. Dissemination plan, studenttasks and schedules, and student perspectives are discussed. Learning objectives and assessmentare reviewed. Student perspectives and the value of this research-based course are highlighted.Additionally, some results obtained from this research are
available tothe participants, coaches, and sponsors. Example topics include: • Articulating complex technical points of view and solutions • Technical leadership branding • Building social technical eminence (internal and external) • Building “soft” skills such as (leadership, negotiations, communications • Networking across the enterprise and externally • Career advancement planning • Identifying and correcting derailing behaviors that could delay career progression • Discovering passions and purpose for both personal and professional • Understanding dimensions of diversity, equity, and inclusion, unconscious bias© Copyright IBM 12IBM Pathway
site is guided by two of the grand challenges of the National Academy of Engineering:personalized learning and scientific discovery. Specifically, this project trains students toconduct cutting-edge research as well as how to communicate their research findings to thebroader community. The project focuses on recruiting students who are currentlyunderrepresented in the STEM workforce.The focus of our REU-PATHWAYS Site is to provide not only appropriate and exciting researchexperiences for community college students planning to continue their academic studies inengineering, but additional learning opportunities for students to expand their career thinking andskills. These supporting activities enhance the research experience of participants
, including Institutions with LSAMP and McNair programs. In addition to local campus visits, the CIE plans recruitment “circuits” in other parts of the country, including Maryland (University of Maryland, Baltimore County, College Park, and Eastern Shore campuses; Morgan State University) and Puerto Rico (University of Puerto Rico university system). These visits include a CIE staff member, a University faculty member, and a graduate scholar. The teams are assembled based on the majors/research interests of the students to whom we will present, which not only increases attendance but also enthusiasm for applying to the REU program. ● Dissemination of Electronic Recruitment Materials: The CIE REU Program Manager
actual mini-projectsconducting secondary data analysis over the summer. This work kicked off in a virtualworkshop in February 2022. Following the workshop, two mini-projects were scoped out andthese researchers (Zastavker and Kajfez on one project and Delaine, Jordan, and Young onanother), together with the project team (Case, Paretti and Matusovich) and other expertresearchers (Benson and Lord) came together in-person for two days in May 2022 to plan out themini-project work, as well as emerging collaborative outputs. The project work and article write-up took place over the Summer 2022, and was reported out at a check-in meeting in September2022. During January 2023, the researchers met in-person to focus on writing up findings andinsights
communityapproach, iRIDE gauges middle school students’ interests in STEM activities. Therefore, thispaper aims to evaluate iRIDE’s community approach with two guiding research questions: 1.How are student participants’ voices utilized to align engineering activities with their grade-levelcurriculum and future career plans? and 2. How do the facilitators engage the students inprogram activities to ensure a community-based approach?Literature Review Allowing students to bring their experiences into school-based educational activities iscritical in fostering their interest, especially in STEM careers. Various schools nationwide haveprograms that aim to pique students’ interests in STEM, such as Engineering for All and I AMSTEM [5,6]. Such programs
URM students placing lower onaverage than the median student on admission and placement tests [18].The result can be that URM students are more likely to be admitted to pre-engineering programsor institutions with open enrollment. The assumption is that they will need to take remedialcourses before taking courses required for an engineering major.Ten ABET accredited programs were evaluated to see whether a student unprepared for theregular course plan could finish in four years. Random civil engineering programs were selectedsince the author was familiar with the curriculum. Twenty percent had no room for additionalthree-credit courses without overloading. The majority of programs had room for one coursewithout becoming overloaded, and a
benefits of engaging with engineering technologies.ContextIn Fall 2020, we worked with two western US rural mountain middle schools. Due to schooldistrict pandemic regulations, teachers Eva and Sean (Pseudonyms) taught four days in-person(one-hour long sessions) with one day for asynchronous learning and lesson planning. Membersof the research team provided remote/virtual curriculum resources, research instruments, andongoing support in the form of weekly video calls and other communication. We designed a 3Dprinting curriculum using an instructional design approach called storylining [6], to promotecoherence, relevance, and meaning from the students’ perspectives by using students’ questionsto drive the lessons. Students solved the question: “How
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Online COVERAGE (Competition Of VEX Educational Robotics to Advance Girls Education) (Research-to-Practice, Strand: Other)IntroductionThe major objective of the COVERAGE (Competition Of VEX Educational Robotics toAdvance Girls Education) project is to increase female West Virginia middle school students’interest in Computer Science and STEM. As the original plan of the COVERAGE project, GirlsRobotics Clubs would be organized in three counties of West Virginia, including Kanawha,Fayette, and Lincoln Counties, to prepare female middle school students for a regional roboticscompetition at the end of 2020. The Covid-19 pandemic started soon
Cunningham [5],encouraged a natural engagement in the design process, presented in Figure 1 below, whichmeant that children may communicate their design and even do so as they created their solutionsin lieu of drawing a plan. Students communicated their thinking even as they synchronouslyplanned and created. Similarly, children could change their designs to improve traps as they werein the creation stage, in order to “promote creativity and a solution” that best suited the problem[5]. This model is representative of skills students need for 21st century jobs and is intentional asa nonlinear model of problem-solving and is open-ended at each stage of the design process. Figure 1. Engineering Design Process based on Engineering is Elementary