. One significant observation was the difference in the level ofstudents’ exposure to robotics, which ranged from basic introduction to robotics to moreadvanced levels, wherein the school students have worked with some advanced kits and havetaken part in competitions. This range of exposure showed that a wide gap exists among the areahigh school students which needed to be addressed. One of the ideas put forth was to design a hands-on project for the school students whichwill enable them to learn and program a scaled-down robot incorporating different features. Thisproject was undertaken by two of the students as part of the graduate Intermediate Robotics classproject in Spring 2022. © American Society for
Paper ID #33234Taking Control of Control Systems: A Student Developed, Multimedia andSimulation Tool for Control Systems EducationMatilda Ho, University of Texas at Dallas Matilda Ho completed this capstone project for a BS in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Dallas. She is currently continuing her education at The University of Texas at Dallas for an MS in Systems Engineering and Management. Upon completion, she hopes to work in industry with a focus in sustainable business.Ms. Maria Fernanda ValdezCasey HatfieldMs. Jieun KimTaylor Carlile Beach American
classroom accommodations. A typicalfreshman engineering class will utilize teamwork on large design projects. Teamwork can bedaunting for a student with ASD in terms of the social aspects and the organization of a largeassignment with multiple due dates. However, many ASD students are visual learners and dowell with “hands-on” projects, and may just need assistance keeping track of assignments.Faculty members should have direct communication with the students and provideaccommodations with guided group work, a consistent format for assignments, breakingprojects in to smaller assignments, and making slides/lectures available before class.Currently, a freshman engineering class has implemented these adjustments andaccommodations. This work in
of projects. Craemer [1] identified Introduction toEngineering as a pivotal course in the curriculum at Dartmouth for generating interest amongstudents, especially those who identify as women.Building on the study by Craemer [1], faculty teaching Introduction to Engineering haveadministered pre- and post-course surveys to further assess students’ interests and self-efficacyrelated to engineering, among all students but among those who identify as women in particular.Self-efficacy refers to an individual’s belief that they can do certain things [2], in this case thebelief that they can succeed in engineering. Results of these surveys as well as a description ofthe course and of the projects and problems addressed by student groups are
- IMPRESS-C) – First Year Progress ReportAbstract:Recognizing the State of Ohio and regional need for a highly trained computing workforce with4-year degrees, the Choose Ohio First – IMProving Retention and Student Success in Computing(COF-IMPRESS-C) project provides financial support and an ecosystem of high-impact curricularand co-curricular activities to increase the success of academically talented students. The COF-IMPRESS-C team will leverage student-centered strategies and academic support, such asundergraduate research, faculty/peer mentoring, and academic success sessions to enhanceacademic and personal success. The project will facilitate the recruitment, retention, andmatriculation of scholarship recipients, provide them with access to a
been re-designed to have project-based components, highlighting the engineering uses of chemistry, such as using chemistryknowledge to evaluate material properties for an engineering application. Alongside moretraditional chemistry exams, students complete a set of smaller individual projects and asemester-long team-based design challenge. In the design challenge they use the design processto develop a solution to an environmental or health issue of their choosing. While completing theindividual projects, students apply their chemistry knowledge to engineering situations. The teamdesign challenge incorporates the same engineering design process as used in the first yearengineering design course, which many students take concurrently. Prior to
, where I have enjoyed playing sports, music, and being involved in my church community. I have a passion for invention and engineering design, as well as works of fiction. My favorite hobbies are playing the piano, computer programming, and writing fiction.Michael R. VanDusen American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Development of a Virtual Reality Flight Simulator to Assist in the Education of Aircraft Design Engineers (Work in Progress)ABSTRACTThe ongoing development of a Stewart platform-based flight simulator that incorporates virtualreality has provided ample opportunities for exciting project-based
presented, were invited to answerquestions. For class periods when neither tapes nor lectures were presented, avariety of activities were planned. These included small group dis-cussion, demonstrations, lab experiments, a panel discussion and exams.In addition, students were required to work in small groups on projectsrelated to novel and innovative uses of wood as an engineering material.Students were occasionally given short periods of time to work on pro-jects during class time, but were expected to do the major portion oftheir projects as homework. The last two class periods were set asidefor project reports. Students were required to submit a written projectreport at the end of the semester. Those students not enrolled forcredit were
County Adult Proba- tion Department, coordinated and executed the research and program evaluation for a large Department of Justice Second Chance Act grant. These efforts included monitoring, assessing, and evaluating the impacts of program outcomes. Since joining the UOEEE in 2015, Dr. Cook-Davis has led research and evaluation activities for over 50 separate grant-funded programs or initiatives funded by the National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Agri- culture, National Institutes of Health, and The Kern Family Foundation. These projects have focused on the evaluation of student success, outreach impacts, innovative learning techniques, and STEM
publicly accessible. We will describe a few open sourcehardware products and identify in which courses they can be used. Senior design courses inComputer Engineering are also ideal to utilize Open source hardware and we will show someexamples. We describe the design course project selection, hardware selection technicalchallenges, design, testing, challenges in using Open source hardware and documentation. TheOpen source RISC-V processors can be used in Computer Organization courses. RISC-V are opensource processors which are freely available as soft core and they can be used in FPGA basedEmbedded Systems courses. The microprocessor board designs can be taught using the Opensource hardware such as Arduino. An Embedded systems course outline is
IoT CourseAbstractThis work-in-progress paper discusses the laboratory setup and delivery of a pilot course on thefundamentals of Internet of Things (IoT). Hands-on laboratory experiments and project-basedexperiences are adopted to introduce and reinforce IoT-related concepts. The laboratoryexperiments introduce the students to (a) the collection of data using temperature and motionsensors (b) program the microcontroller, and (c) to communicate between WiFi-enabledmodules. Rather than using the hardware and software tools from an established vendor in theareas of IoT, we chose to design and assemble our laboratory experiments and projects withsimple, cost-effective, off-the-shelf components. The project activities focused on system designand
took ME 100L prior to the redesign and many students who took ME 100L afterthe redesign. This presented a unique opportunity to examine the long-term impact of theredesign on student performance in subsequent courses, where some of the skills they acquired inME 100L can be utilized. Surveys were administered to students in select junior- and senior-level courses to determine whether students who took the redesigned ME 100L transferred theirskills to other courses. For example, prior to the redesign students typically learned aboutmicrocontrollers for the first time in their senior year. However, there are ample opportunities forstudents to utilize microcontrollers in class projects in their junior-level courses as well. Theauthors also compare
and Doctor of Engineering degree in electrical engineering from Technical University of Budapest in 1952 and 1960, respectively. Dr. Karady was appointed to Salt River Project Chair Professor at Arizona State University in 1986, where he is responsible for the electrical power education and performs research in Power Elec- tronics, High Voltage Techniques and Electric Power. Previously, he was with EBASCO Services where he served as Chief Consulting Electrical Engineer, Manager of Electrical Systems and Chief Engineer of Computer Technology. He was Electrical Task supervisor for the Tokomak Fusion Test reactor project in Princeton. From 1969 to 1977 he worked for the Hydro Quebec Institute of Research as a Program
senior project informationcan be found at the bottom of the page. The navigation includes links to other sections anchoredon the page and to the following pages: Standards and Patents, Writing AIAA / Citation Help,and Get Help from a Librarian.MethodsTwo researchers recruited six undergraduate aerospace students to participate in Krug’s model ofdo-it-yourself usability tests, simple testing with minimal time, energy, and resources6,7.Because Krug’s testing methods do not attempt to scientifically prove a generalizable hypothesisor create a comprehensive list of website usability problems, only three participants per roundare needed. For the first round of testing, one undergraduate humanities major who works in thelibrary assisted with pre
teaching and learning.Dr. Maria Jane Evans, Penn State BrandywineDr. Ivan E. Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Ivan E. Esparragoza is an Associate Professor of Engineering at Penn State. His interests are in engi- neering design education, innovative design, global design, and global engineering education. He has introduced multinational design projects in a freshman introductory engineering design course in col- laboration with institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean as part of his effort to contribute to the formation of world class engineers for the Americas. He is actively involved in the International Division of the American Society for Engineering Education and in the Latin American
/nano) at Stevens. He has been awarded the NSF CAREER award, the ASEE Mechanics Division Ferdinand P. Beer and E. Russell Johnson Jr. Outstanding New Educator Award, and the 2009 Outstanding Teacher Award from the Stevens Alumni Association.Dr. Susan Lowes, Teachers College, Columbia University Dr. Susan Lowes is Director of Research and Evaluation at the Institute for Learning Technologies at Teachers College, Columbia University. She has conducted research at both university and K-12 levels, with a focus on STEM learning and on the impact of different technologies on teaching and learning. She has directed evaluations of multi-year projects funded by the U.S. Dept. of Education and the National Science
instrumentation model demonstration. Using a Research Center (LTRC), and out of state transportationpedagogical model developed during the project, the former research organizations. The three essential questions posedSubunit is implemented in two classes of a structural by the survey were: the current perceived importance ofanalysis course whereas the latter Subunit is implemented FMM; the future perceived importance of FMM; and thein two classes of a reinforced concrete design course. The
EducationAbstractThe Electromechanical Engineering Technology program at Alfred State College requires asequence of two courses in embedded systems. Embedded Controller Fundamentals andEmbedded Controller Applications. Both courses involve hands-on, project oriented laboratoryexercises. For the embedded controller courses, students are required to purchase a specified low-cost microcontroller evaluation system instead of a textbook. A reasonable priced reference text isrecommended, and students are strongly encouraged to use extensively the online manualsavailable from the microcontroller manufacturer. Among the many benefits that we have identifiedby requiring students to buy their own microcontroller system is that they learn to be more carefulwith safety
Laboratories with the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering of Purdue University since July 1999. He received his PhD in 1998 from the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering of Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. He teaches Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) design, advises senior design project teams, supervises teaching assistants in several laboratories, develops computer engineering laboratory curricula, manages design automation software for instruction and research, and is chair of an ECE committee for instructional innovation. Dr. Johnson served as proceedings chair for Microelectronic Systems Education 2003, program chair for Microelectronic Systems
AC 2008-969: ULTRA-HIGH TEMPERATURE MATERIALS FOR LUNARPROCESSINGPeter Schubert, Packer Engineering Dr. Schubert conducts research into alternate energy, space-based manufacturing, and engineering education at Packer Engineering in Naperville, IL. He is Senior Director, and has served as PI on projects from DOE, NASA and the GSA. He has published 51 technical papers, has 26 US patents, and is an instructor with the Society of Automotive Engineers. Prior experience includes 21 years in automotive electronics with Delphi Corporation, where he was a Technical Fellow. His doctorate in EE from Purdue was sponsored by a GM Fellowship. His MSEE is from U. of Cincinnati on a Whirlpool
positions at John Deere and Amkor Technology. Her research interests are in the area of quality, productivity improvement, supply chain, lean manufacturing and engineering education. Dr. Bonilla consults, instructs, and collaborates on quality improvement projects with representatives from healthcare, as well as traditional manufacturing operations. She is an ASQ certified Six-Sigma Black-Belt.Leonard Perry, University of San Diego Leonard Perry is an Associate Professor of Industrial & Systems Engineering at the University of San Diego. He has research interests in the area of system improvement via quality improvement methods especially in the area of applied statistics, statistical
, he was founder and President of Xeragen, Inc., a San Luis Obispo-based biotechnology startup company. He has also served as an Assistant Professor at Milwaukee School of Engineering and was employed by McDonnell Douglas Space Systems Company, where he was a lead engineer and Principal Investigator on projects to develop technology evolution plans for the Space Station.Kurt Colvin, California Polytechnic State University Kurt Colvin joined the Cal Poly faculty in January 2000. He completed a Ph.D. in industrial engineering at Oregon State University in 1999, preceded by a Master's degree in 1997. He has worked as Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) development engineer at Festo
aerospace students. Several examples of current “grand projects”are considered, and progress towards them is summarized. Several ideas and proven strategiesfor nurturing such talents in formal curricula are considered.IntroductionWhen asked how to define and differentiate aerospace engineering, the best answer used to be:“Aerospace engineers turn the dreams of Humanity to reality through science and engineeringinnovation”. This is hard to remember in an age when air travel has become less pleasant than avisit to the dentist, working for airlines and aerospace companies seems to be a perpetualscramble to stay aloft in a downdraft, and we are under constant pressure to bring “cost reality”to squelch the enthusiasm of students and “focus on realistic
, Page 13.1177.2restricting teachers' and administrators' desires and resolve to expend time and money ontechnology based educational “novelties.”It is to address these issues that the “Camp Robot” idea was proposed. This paper outlines thefoundational elements which led up to the idea of Camp Robot, the demographics served, and theresults observed. Unique elements included non competitive strategies; focus on problemsolving, not on the specific technology, role reversal between teacher and student, and servicelearning for the college student participants.Geographic and Student Educational NeedThe region served by this project included four educational jurisdictions and two post secondaryinstitutions. The region served was Western North Carolina
engineering projects through presentations or the observation ofothers performing research. This approach may give the impression that teachers are capable ofdeveloping curricular materials, but only engineers are capable of solving authentic engineeringproblems. This “look but don’t touch” model potentially only reinforces the belief, “if I can’t dothis, my students sure can’t.” With this RET model, participants are likely to gain a limitedperspective on authentic engineering practices and less likely to able to convey to their studentswhat engineers actually do.Figure 1: Models of RET sitesWe believe that our RET site has been successful because we have focused on directly linkingthe teachers’ summer engineering research experience with their K-12
Page 14.928.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Online Working Drawing Review and AssessmentAbstractThis paper describes the development and implementation of an online working drawing reviewvideo and online assessment tool. Particular attention was paid to dimensioning and ASMEANSI Y14 standards with the goal of improving the quality of the working drawings required infinal design project reports. All members of freshmen design teams in the fall 2008 semesterwere required to watch this video and pass an online assessment before they could turn in theirfinal design project reports. The School of Engineering maintained scanned copies of designproject reports for the fall 2006 and 2007 semesters. A separate
Design (PtD) National Initiative. He continues to work on PtD through a project that brings PtD principles into engineering textbooks as they are being updated.Donna Heidel, NIOSH Donna Heidel is a certified industrial hygienist with over 25 years' experience in the health care industry. Ms. Heidel received a B.A. from DeSales University and an M.S. from Temple University. She has spent the last 15 years of her career building a world-class, global, integrated occupational toxicology and industrial hygiene program at Johnson & Johnson, a decentralized company consisting of 230 operating companies in 57 countries. At J&J, she developed and implemented their global health hazard and control
transducers. A complete set of lab exercises enable students to build robots as a class projectwithout requiring any background in electronics or programming. The course also introduces thefundamentals of embedded systems and hardware/software co-design to sophomore students.INTRODUCTIONComputer Engineers must have proficient knowledge of both computer hardware and softwarewhich has produced the fundamentals of this course. In this course, a sophomore becomesknowledgeable on how software can interact with hardware, and how real world problems aresolved by employing both hardware and software. As a result, students establish strongeducational foundation which eliminates the difficulties on an actual project that they encounterin their professional
groups from seniordesign classes are utilizing the lab for FC design projects. It is anticipated that the currentdevelopment of the new laboratory will have a direct impact on undergraduate education bycreating a focal point for interdisciplinary learning, a balance between theoretical and hands-onexperience in undergraduate teaching, and application of these educational tools in a vibranttechnology sector. The evaluation plan for the course materials focuses on three general areas.The first focus is on the assessment of the course modules. The second focus is related tostudent-identified strengths/weaknesses of the course/modules. Finally, the third focus is todocument the course/curricular refinements resulting from the evaluative data
, difficulties in sharing coursematerial, and challenges involved in mapping course requirements to the local resources available at eachcampus. This paper outlines the project underway to build an efficient multi-media network with the 19campuses via Internet to communicate, distribute, and acquire curriculum related multimedia informationfor the first-year design course. This network would provide access to course material currently used at thecampuses as well as to resources that will enhance the future course content. The network will also providevideo-conferencing capabilities and on-line “chat” capabilities to collaborate with industrial partners.Introduction The 19 campuses of the Penn State Commonwealth Education System provide an