duration of the ten-week program. REFERENCES[1] L. Hong, and S. E. Page, "Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers," Economic Sciences, vol. 101, no. 46, pp. 16385-16389.[2] A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy," in Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol. 4, V. S. Ramachaudran Ed. New York: Academic Press, 1994, pp. 71-81.[3] A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifiying theory of behavioral change," Psychological Review vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191-215, 1977.[4] A. Bandura, "Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales," Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 307-337, 2006.[5] R. Scherer and F. Siddiq, "Revisiting teachers
-visual applications.References[1] M. C. Linn and A. C. Petersen, “Emergence and Characterization of Sex Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-Analysis,” Child Dev., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1479–1498, 1985, doi: 10.2307/1130467.[2] D. F. Lohman, “Spatial Ability and G.” 1993.[3] J. Buckley, N. Seery, and D. Canty, “Investigating the use of spatial reasoning strategies in geometric problem solving,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 341–362, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10798-018-9446-3.[4] N. S. Newcombe, “Picture This: Increasing Math and Science Learning by Improving Spatial Thinking,” Am. Educ., vol. 34, no. 2, p. 29, 2010.[5] H. B. Yilmaz, “On the Development and Measurement of Spatial Ability,” Int. Electron. J
, no. 2, pp. 189–214, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10956-019-09794-8.[5] D. Weintrop et al., “Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms,” J Sci Educ Technol, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 127–147, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5.[6] M. L. Martínez, O. Lévêque, I. Benítez, C. Hardebolle, and J. D. Zufferey, “Assessing Computational Thinking: Development and Validation of the Algorithmic Thinking Test for Adults,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1436–1463, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1177/07356331211057819.[7] M. C. Linn, H.-S. Lee, R. Tinker, F. Husic, and J. L. Chiu, “Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science,” Science, vol. 313, no. 5790, pp. 1049–1050, 2006
of inferior educationalopportunities through organizing and activism in the U.S. Southwest primarily [1-3], educationaloppression and school failure for Latinos/as/xs has been marked by institutional processes thathave led to detrimental outcomes – particularly deficit thinking [4-6]. Even though deficitthinking has not been widely explored in engineering education research, there is a growing pushfor asset-based perspectives [7-9].Despite the resistance of the Mexican and Mexican American communitie in the U.S. Southwest(one of the areas with the largest proportion of Latino/a/s students) against unfavorable policiesthat have negatively impacted their educational attainment, the borderlands continue to have “thelongest and most pronounced
, International Journal of Science Education, 41:2, 248-279, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1548788[7] Streiling, S., Hörsch, C., & Rieß, W. (2021). Effects of Teacher Training in Systems Thinking on Biology Students—An Intervention Study. Sustainability, 13(14), 7631. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13147631[8] Smith, S. (2020). Obstacles to and progress toward the vision of the NGSS. Horizon Research, Inc.[9] Coppola, P. (2019) Preparing preservice elementary teachers to teach engineering: Impact on self‐efficacy and outcome expectancy. School Science and Mathematics;.119: 161– 170. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12327[10] Webb, D, LoFaro, K. (2020). Sources of engineering teaching self‐efficacy in a STEAM methods
connecting students, faculty, and staff with NGOˆa C™s around the world for technical projects as part of immersions, teaching, and scholarly activity. She also is thDr. Amy Anderson Amy Anderson is the Associate Provost for Global and Intercultural Affairs and Executive Director of the Center for International Programs (CIP) at the University of Dayton. The CIP provides coordination, strategic planning and administrative support forElizabeth GenerasMrs. Marjorie Langston LangstonSharath Krishna ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Towards an Understanding of the Impact of Community Engaged Learning Projects on Enhancing Teachers’ Understanding of Engineering and Intercultural
, Virtual Online, 2020.[3] E. Davishahl, R. Pearce, T. R. Haskell and K. J. Clarks, "Statics Modeling Kit: Hands-On Learning in the Flipped Classroom," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[4] E. Davishahl, T. Haskell and L. Singleton, "Feel the Force! An Inquiry-Based Approach to Teaching Free-body Diagrams for Rigid Body Analysis," in 127th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual Online, 2020.[5] E. Davishahl, L. Singleton, T. Haskell and L. G. O'Bannon, "Hands on STEM Learning at Home with 3D-Printed Manipulatives," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021.[6] R. Gorska and S. Sorby, "Testing Instruments for the Assessment of 3-D Spatial Skills
Stokes Alliance Impact Report 1992-2015 (2012 and 2015) [2] Vernon, Julieanne., and Brathwaite, Claude., “Authentic International Research Experience: Program Model in Cartagena, Colombia” in the Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper ID # 15025, New Orleans, June, 2016. [3] Vernon, Julieanne., and Brathwaite, Claude., “GlobalCUNY: The NYC Louis Stokes Alliance Model for International Re- search Experiences for Minority Students” in the Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper ID 26211, Tampa, June, 2019. [4] Boyd-Williams, A,. Bigsby, S., Gloster, C., Sowells-Boone, E., Melton, M., Preparing Future Minority Faculty for the Professoriate (Experience)” in the Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual
(accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[2] “Citation report - 728 - Web of Science Core Collection.” https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/citation-report/8c75c603-7be4-4c44-a972- 0c3425970bd1-72586299 (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[3] M. E. Thompson, “Grade Expectations: The Role of First-Year Grades in Predicting the Pursuit of STEM Majors for First- and Continuing-Generation Students,” J. High. Educ., vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 961– 985, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2021.1907169.[4] J. Bastiaan and R. Bastiaan, “Increasing the Interest of Elementary School Girls in STEM Fields Through Outreach Activities,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 32961. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32961.[5] D. P. Holland, S
a better understanding of the subject and the ability to use and apply it [11].A Survey conducted by Poçan, S., Altay, B. & Yaşaroğlu, C [1] showed the effects of using appson the success and motivation of 73 students in a high school algebra class. The findingsrevealed that mobile technology applications positively impact the learning process. Fabian,Topping, and Barron [2] explored the effects of mobile technology on the attitudes andachievements of 52 elementary school students. They found that mobile technology results inpositive student responses, improving their performance. Yussop, Annamalai, and Salam [3]investigated to find out the effectiveness of a particular mobile application. They found that byusing the app, students
comparison to nationalenrollment data for civil engineering. It was not the intent of this study to further investigateadditional demographic influences.The authors are interested in pursuing additional research questions by using the same data setsupplemented with additional years. In particular an additional study looking at the availableelectronic copies of student essays using keyword search software would assist in understandingspecific reasoning behind student motivations.The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theofficial policy or position of the United States Military Academy, Department of the Army, DoD,or U.S. Government.References[1] Zahorian, S., Elmore, M., and Temkin, K. J., Factors
Jared Markunas who assisted in the development of the survey that will inform the engagementguide prototype.References[1] D. R. Fisher, A. Bagiati, and S. Sarma, “Developing Professional Skills in Undergraduate Engineering Students Through Cocurricular Involvement,” J. Stud. Aff. Res. Pract., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 286–302, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/19496591.2017.1289097.[2] G. Young, D. B. Knight, and D. R. Simmons, “Co-curricular experiences link to nontechnical skill development for African-American engineers: Communication, teamwork, professionalism, lifelong learning, and reflective behavior skills,” in 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, Madrid, Spain, Oct. 2014, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/FIE
-9304- 92. K. S. McClain and A. Perry (2017) "Where Did They Go: Retention Rates for Students of Color at Predominantly White Institutions," College Student Affairs Leadership: Vol. 4: Iss. 1, Article 3.3. F. A. Freitas & L. J. Leonard (2011). “Maslow's hierarchy of needs and student academic success.” Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 6(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2010.07.0044. T. L. Strayhorn (2019). College students' sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, pg. 4.5. S. Al-Qudah, J. Davishahl, E. Davishahl & M. Greiner (n.d.). “Investigation of sense of belonging to engineering in undergraduate
; Frost, G. S. (2012, June), "Gamifying"a Library Orientation Tutorial for Improved Motivation and Learning, Paper presented at 2012 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas.[11] Gulotta, J. A., & Parisi, N. S., & Bodnar, C. A. (2016, June), Leveling Up by Gamifying FreshmanEngineering Clinic, Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans,Louisiana.[12] Dyrud, M. (2006, June), Industrial Ethics Training: A Look At Ethics Games, Paper presented at2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois.[13] Streiner, S. D., & Burkey, D. D., & Young, M. F., & Pascal, J., & Cimino, R. T., & Bassett, L.(2021, August), Workshop: Gamifying Engineering Education - A Playful
. Wiebe, “Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving,” Memory & Cognition, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 238–246, May 1987.[6] D. H. Jonassen, “Toward a design theory of problem solving,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 63–85, 2000.[7] S. E. Dreyfus, “Five-stage model of adult skill acquisition,” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 177–181, 2004.[8] M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, and M. J. Farr, The nature of expertise, 1st ed. 1988.[9] E. E. Miskioglu et al., "Situating Intuition in Engineering Practice," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 418-444, 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20521.[10] K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J
Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases," Journal of College Teaching, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 14-20, 2007.[5] T. Ruutman and H. Kipper, "Teaching Strategies for Direct and Indirect Instruciton in Teaching Engineering," in Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, Slovakia, 2011.[6] A. Poulsen, K. Lam, S. Cisneros and T. Treust, "ARCS Model of Mtivational Design," November 2008. [Online]. [Accessed December 2014].[7] S. Bjorklund, J. Parente and D. Sathianathan, "Effects of Faculty Interaction and Feedback on Gains in Student Skills," Journal of Engieering Education, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 153-160, 2004.[8] P. Hsieh, J. R. Sullivan and N. S. Guerra, "A Closer
student resourceutilization could consider materials beyond textbooks (e.g., open educational resources) by usingdifferent methods, such as student and instructor-facing surveys.Our methods study the presence of certain keywords, but this does not quantify the importance orfocus of terms to a particular textbook. For instance, Moran et al. 14 mention “cost,” but this is inthe context of “cost rate balance for turbine(s)”—hardly a major consideration of this textbook.Future work could further develop the methods used here to provide a finer resolution of topicfocus across textbooks.Reserve lists across institutions are potentially useful beyond the focus of the present study. Asnoted above, a reserve list reflects faculty decisions; thus, a
cowling. These results from Ansys Polyflow are very similar in appearance to thesequence of pictures of the thermoforming process as shown experimentally in Figure 6b). Weobserve that the draping process is almost completed after 0.13 s and that the change in thicknessup to 0.6 s is minor and mostly occurs around the base of the cowl. In Figure 7c) is the drapingprocess for the creation of the instrument panel shown. The thickness of the plastic sheet on topof the instrument panel does not change from the thickness of the original undeformed sheet. Thecircles on the instrument panel are clearly developing over time and at 1 s the circles are fullydeveloped.Figure 7b) Thickness contour plots during draping process for the cowl.Figure 7c) Thickness
, and areas of improvements. Total Number of Responses Table 1: Survey Question Responses S. Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree S. Agree Do you feel the E-Dragster was a challenging 0 0 3 1 4 experience? Do you feel the E-Dragster project is a "real-world" 0 1 1 3 3 project for a STEM Learning Environment? Question Topic Commonly Reported Themes Positive Experience Following a Design
O. Barambones, "A Multidisciplinary PBL Approach for Teaching Industrial Informatics and Robotics in Engineering," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 21-28, 2018, doi: 10.1109/te.2017.2721907.[3] H. G. Denton, "Multidisciplinary team-based project work: planning factors," Design Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 155-170, 1997.[4] J. K. L. Leung, S. K. W. Chu, T.-C. Pong, D. T. K. Ng, and S. Qiao, "Developing a Framework for Blended Design-Based Learning in a First-Year Multidisciplinary Design Course," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 210-219, 2022, doi: 10.1109/te.2021.3112852.[5] B. Tiwari, P. Nair, and S. Barua, "Effectiveness of Freshman Level Multi-disciplinary Hands
besensitive to mechanical stresses and help explain the experience of motion sickness. The superiorvestibule was modeled and analyzed as the head is rapidly turned. It was found thatcomputational fluid dynamics can be utilized to observe the desired flow characteristics of thesystem.Nomenclaturedt = time step (sec)CFL = Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy Numberρ = air density (kg/m! )u = x-component (cm)v = y-component (cm)w = z-component (cm)U-velocity = fluid velocity in the x- direction (cm/s)IntroductionThe vestibular system is responsible for spatial orientation, maintenance of balance, andstabilizing vision [1]. The middle ear (ME) contains three semicircular canals, which sense headrotations and angular
short betweenthe 11.3V supply and the IRFP460’s gate, turning on the MOSFET. When the MOSFET turns on,its gate voltage is at 11.3V and the 2N3904 turns off due to a lack of biasing from its base voltage.To turn off the MOSFET, the LMC555’s output goes low causing a voltage difference betweenthe PNP transistor’s (2N3906) emitter and its base leading to current flow and a short between theIRFP460’s gate and the ground of the circuit; this short discharges the MOSFET, turning it off.After the MOSFET is discharged, there is no longer a voltage difference between the emitter andbase of the 2N3906 so it returns to being an open circuit. This circuit is a trade-off betweenefficiency and quiescent power loss. To reduce the efficiency and decrease the
to each meeting. Sample discussion topics andsuggestions for meeting structure were also included in the training materials. All protégé s andmentors were encouraged to establish short, medium, and long-term SMART goals (Specific,Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Timebound).Separate trainings were established in late August/early September for both mentors and protégésbased on best practices for mentoring relationships15,16. Of the 50 students who had previouslyexpressed interest, only about 10 signed up for the trainings despite multiple outreaches. Thereasons for the drop-off in first-year student interest are not clear. One hopeful possibility is thatstudents found other commitments around campus (e.g., student organizations) to which
. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.Byars-Winston, A., & Dahlberg, M. L. (2019). The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM. Consensus Study Report. National Academies Press. 500 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001.Eby, L. T., Rhodes, J. E., & Allen, T. D. (2007). Definition and evolution of mentoring. The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach, 7-20.Fisher, D. R. (2013). Educating engineers for the 21st century: a framework for skill development through co-curricular and extracurricular involvement (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).Fisher, D. R., Bagiati, A., & Sarma, S. (2014). Fostering 21st
question is “Whichphase(s) are present at point G and in what fractions?” A figure would be included in this questionin which students interpret and use to answer the question.In the traditional class, there were three high stake exams which means a student’s final gradein the class relied heavily on these exams. The percentage of each test in the traditional classcontributed to 75% of total grade, 25% for each of the three exams. Figure 4 shows thepercentage of incorrect questions according to type, split up by the three different exams fromthe traditional class. When observing the total percentage of questions wrong, Figure 4 showsthat students struggled the least with Exam 1, the second least with Exam 2, and the most withExam 3. Figure 4
mechanism; diameter of thedriven wheel at left is 3 inches.Exploring Standards Access and Education in Engineering Technology ProgramsPaul B. McPherson and Margaret Phillips, Purdue UniversityBackgroundAccessing and using technical standards is crucial for engineering technology students.Standards impact the design, testing, manufacture, and maintenance of products and systemsacross all industries. The significance of standards in ET education is evident in ABETEngineering Technology Accreditation Commission’s (ETAC) Criterion 5 (the curriculum must“include design considerations appropriate to the discipline ... such as: industry and engineeringstandards and codes…”) and several of the ETAC program criteria, such as‘Electrical/Electronic(s
Engineering Education PhD Program Quality [Work-in-Progress] Le Shorn S Benjamin PhD, Jerrod A Henderson PhD William A. Brookshire Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Houston This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant # EEC-2127509 to the American Society for Engineering Education AbstractDoctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree programs occupy the apex of the academic hierarchy. This ismainly because graduates are required to extend the bounds of existing knowledge. In the recentdoctoral discipline of engineering education, students are
, #RecallRatherThanRecognition, #flexibility, #NotMinimalist, #NoErrorRecovery, etc.,) 5. In a paragraph explain the user’s goal/s using the product, the required procedures for users to reach their goal/s, and why you think the product fails to satisfy users’ needs. You should also refer to any human factors’ goals (enhancing performance, safety, and satisfaction) that the example may fail to satisfy. 6. Up to a paragraph, suggest or propose your solution/s. It can be simple or technical. (Try to find an innovative solution for improving the design, redesigning, or changing the procedures--you can be simple but creative)Instruction for contributing to other students’ cases: 1. Each student is required to read all other students' cases
women in engineering, though this type of study can enhancealready existing research. The capitals men and women utilize should be observed forresearchers to gain a better understanding of the different ways these demographics succeed inengineering.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1734347. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Additionally, this work is partially supported by the Clemson University CreativeInquiry program.References[1] S. L. Dika and M. M. D'Amico, “Early experiences and integration in the persistence
and programs to identify gaps or areas where the microcredentials could offer a unique value proposition to veterans. (d). Evaluating the resources available at the HEI to support microcredentials, including faculty expertise and technology infrastructure. (e). Mapping out a plan for marketing and promoting the microcredentials to veterans and relevant employers; a crucial and most important step to ensure the success of the program(s) offering MC to veterans. Rather than engaging digital marketing firms, institutions that develop and offer microcredentials should identify the most effective direct communication channels to reach employers and veterans. For example, reaching out to organizations