be a basic requirement for scientific engineeringwork to be able to operate innovatively and efficiently. This is (with a look to the Europeanand in special case the German Situation) the only explanation as to why the EHEA(European Higher Education Area) has declared the fostering of these actions as the essenceof BA Courses of study (Cf. in addition the EU’s demand voiced in the program “New skillsfor new jobs”, which perceives the fostering of the previously presented skills as a keycharacteristic of BA-Courses of study [1]).So it is useful to understand, that BA-Courses have two functions (or that it is a duality). Page 21.36.2They must
the needs of employers and the profession. Developments from the 1996 review ofengineering education 1 changed the accreditation process from an input (content-based) approachto program development to an outcomes-based approach. This change allowed and encouraged adiversity of approaches to education, while attempting to ensure the same quality of outcome.Since that time, engineering programs throughout Australia have been attempting to implementthe new requirements, which have required the use of constructive alignment of learningoutcomes, learning and teaching activities and assessment. The recent ALTC-supported project“Engineers for the Future” 2 supported this requirement.Although some institutions have implemented the changed curriculum
‘culture’ in describing what it is to be interculturally competent9. The Author argues thatthis is where the challenge really begins. Definitions of culture range from those that are verydetailed and specific to those that are more general and all encompassing. Hofstede’s fivedimensions of culture is one such definition that is quite specific10: 1. Power/Distance: how inequalities in prestige, wealth and power are handled, within the family, education, work, politics, religion and ideas; 2. Uncertainty Avoidance: how uncertainty about the future is handled, with artifacts addressing the uncertainties of nature; laws (rules), the behaviour of others; and religion, what we do not know; 3. Individualism/Collectivism: what the
Page 21.40.5Science and Technology acting within the framework of the Inter-American Council for IntegralDevelopment (CIDI) of the Organization of American States (OAS). This assembly which tookplace in Lima, Peru in 12 November 2004 adopted the Declaration of Lima. Subsequently, theOffice of Education, Science and Technology (OEST) of the OAS [1] in response to theDeclaration and with the assistance of several major industrial partners sponsored the“Engineering for the Americas Symposium‖ on Capacity Building for Job Creation andHemispheric Competitiveness,‖ in Lima, Peru 29 November-December 2, 2005. The outgrowthof these efforts and subsequent meetings of the Ministers in Mexico (2008) and Panama (2011)is the current mandate for the OAS
students from all walks of life, generations, countries andcontinents, and cultural backgrounds.While Engineering and Engineering Technology (EET) departments have long adapted to thechanging societal needs and revised their curricula so that their graduates will possess relevantskills and knowledge vital to industry and other potential employers, another key question needsto be addressed: “Who is going to educate and prepare the next generation of engineeringeducators?”1 Although it may seem obvious that becoming a professional educator and obtainingthe relevant competencies and skills requires at least some amount of formal qualification,training and experience, current practice still does not sufficiently address the precedingquestion. In
the development of a collaborative learning activity framework andthe educational technology tool SPARKPLUS. In this paper we use exemplar activities todescribe the findings of these studies and demonstrate both the framework and the supportprovided by SPARKPLUS.IntroductionThere is an expectation by organisations that the professionals they employ, includingengineers, engage in ongoing learning in order to meet the demands of continuing change.Much of this learning is informal, learnt on the job through practice with peers.Recent writers on workplace learning 1, 2 argue that many traditional assumptions aboutprofessional learning are problematic in that learning has often been seen as something thatindividuals do, for example attending a
apply these systems to continually provide learningopportunities for workers who must adapt to rapidly changing conditions.REFERENCES [1] M. E. Auer, A. Pester and D.G Zutin, Open Source Portal for Online Laboratories, 2007. [2] http://icampus.mit.edu/ilabs/architecture, last visited 25.05.2009 [3] Resource Description Framework. URL: http://www.w3.org/RDF/ – Last visited in 03/2009. [4] D. Allemang ,J. Hendler, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL, Elsevier, 2008. [5] Dublin Core. URL: http://dublincore.org/ [6] Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata, IEEE-publication 2002 - URL: http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/ [7] SKOS – Simple knowledge Organization System. URL: http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos
. Page 21.50.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 U.S. WFEO ActivitiesIntroductionThe World Federation of Engineering Organizations (WFEO) was created in 1968 with thesupport of the United Nations Environmental, Scientific, and Cultural Organization(UNESCO).1 Its objectives, stated in its Constitution, are to work with Members: toencourage the application of engineering and technological advancement to economic andsocial progress throughout the world; to advance engineering as an equal opportunityprofession in the interest of all people; and to foster peace throughout the world.WFEO represents multi-discipline engineering organizations in more than 70 countrieswith a
, participated in the study. They were at the end of AP calculus course andhad completed such topics as application and computation of derivatives. The students wereinformed about the goal of the research and that the experiments would be conducted in theschool’s Teacher’s room, outside of regular calculus class time and that each session would last60-90 minutes.The simulated in the Second Live VE setting includes a pond with shallow water, surrounded bybushes and trees (Figure 1). Figure 1. Simulated in the Second Life VE SettingThe environment is programmed so that walking/running speed on land is twice as fast aswalking/running speed in water. There are two green small round platforms: one platform islocated on land near the
institutionsoffer their stakeholders 1 as it both determines and drives outcomes. Despite this, the most notableoutcome of a “review of the literature on curriculum in higher education in the UK, the USA andAustralia … [is that there] is the dearth of writing on the subject” 2. That literature which doesaddress higher education curricula assumes a common understanding of the term curriculum andtargets curriculum related issues such as ‘inclusive curriculum’, ‘learner-centered curriculum’,internationalization of the curriculum or it focuses on the design of individual courses – that is,single units of study 2.Accepting that an important aspect of our role as academics is “not to impart knowledge, but todesign learning environments that support knowledge
of thepresent day UAE towards an information-driven economy and sustainable energy society by theyear 2030, as outlined in the ambitious plan titled “Abu Dhabi 2030”1. This report outlines the motivation, standards and initial critical feedback on the start-upefforts to establish a multi-purpose chemistry laboratory to serve the needs of the BiomedicalEngineering Department faculty and students. The build-up of such a relatively broad laboratorycapability has several aspects that make the effort worthy of a critical look in respect to theglobal competence of KUSTAR engineering graduates2,3, such as:a. The hiring plans for Khalifa University, in general, and for the Biomedical Engineering Department in particular, focus on attracting
, 1 (2010).8 National Academy of Engineering. “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in theNew Century”, xi (2004).9 National Academy of Engineering. “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in theNew Century”, 35 (2004).10 National Science Foundation. “Research and Development: National Trends and International Comparisons”,Science and Engineering Indicators 2012, 4-5 – 4-6, (2012). Retrieved from11 National Science Foundation. “Academic Research and Development”, Science and Engineering Indicators 2012,5-5 (2012).12 National Nanotechnology Initiative. “Frequently Asked Questions”, Retrieved fromhttp://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/nanotechnology-facts on March 14, 2013.13 Feder, T., ʺJapan Aims to Internationalize Its
Engineering boards. Massood Towhidnejad is senior member of IEEE. Page 21.56.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Organizing the Graduate Reference Curriculum for Systems Engineering (GRCSE) for International RelevanceIntroductionThe Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKCASE) project1was initiated in 2009 by a university partnership under the Systems Engineering Research Center(SERC). The objective of the BKCASE project was to create two products for free use by theinternational systems engineering (SE) community: (1) a Systems
overwhelmingly positive about their advising experience, with 15 of 16 (94%) describing strong personal and professional benefits, while 1 respondent found time demands during preparation unexpectedly and undesirably demanding. About half of the participants indicated they would advise a colleague to advise off campus prior to tenure; the other half indicated that “it depends” on factors such as based on progress toward tenure. Off-campus project advisors described a wide range of benefits to teaching and advising, research, and the institution, as illustrated by the following quotes. o Understanding students: “I really learned a great deal about [student] abilities…I was able to connect with the students on a level which I
objectives into technologystrategies and create end-to-end solutions that help them reach more customers, run moreeffectively, spur innovation and grow. HP Institute was launched in mid-2012 to address theglobal IT expertise skills gap—preventing businesses from leveraging IT to createmeaningful business results. Figure 1 shows the gaps, thus the needs, of the IT professional. IT expertise gap—the new skill profile Business context End-to-end Hands-on awareness technology experience
. It is understood that institutions of higher education are expected to produce goodprofessionals, experts in a specific professional field. However today it is not enough: graduatesshould know economical and political processes, be able to evaluate pluses and minuses of realsituation and find optimal decisions in solving arising problems [1]. According to opinion polls, there is a list of characteristics that potential employersconsider to be the most important for effective professional activity and good adaptation oftechnical and technological university graduates. This list includes not only professionalknowledge and skills, but also personal traits. Among personal traits of an engineer employersmention diligence, devotion and
2030, urban areas will be the home for more than 60% of the world’s 8 billion people. Figure1 shows the projected world population. This will create tremendous pressures in the form of Figure 1: Projected World Population Growth23pollution, congestion, energy security, and traffic safety. This will also challenge a publicinfrastructure that is already struggling to meet the growing demand for transportation and basicservices. The megacities will be so dense that the space for the traditional car will rapidlydecline. With population increases, global warming, depletion of natural resources, and vastlyimproved connected networks, the transportation and automotive industries are currently seekingsolutions to these
semester began first, with Colorado’s a close second,and Germany starting third in mid-October. Figure 1 shows a simplified schedule as well as eachUniversity’s semester dates and overlap.The overall project schedule was based on the University of Colorado’s Senior Design Coursetimeline, which encompasses an entire project experience over the span of 2 semesters. Theproject is divided into two phases, in sync with the CU semester schedule. The first semester, orphase of the project course, is focused entirely on design, analysis, and prototyping. The secondphase of the project encompasses the manufacturing, integration, and testing aspects. Eachcomponent must be manufactured, tested at a subsystem level, integrated to the system level, andtested
price of $300. Jain’s agronomists determined thesystem must be able to deliver 25,000 L/acre/day to support thirsty crops such as wheat andcotton. Their power systems engineers said such a system would require a 1 hp pump, that withsolar cells would account for 80% of the system cost. The irrigation engineers identified that90% of the pressure drop in the system occurs over the drip emitters. And the productionengineers noted that low-density polyethylene is the cheapest material they work with, and thatother materials, such as silicone, significantly drive up the cost of the drippers. It took thiscompany-wide engagement to realize that the largest opportunity to reduce system cost was byreducing pressure in the system, to reduce pumping power
from CMC members, a totalof 20 competencies associated with the attributes of a global engineer emerged. These are:1. Demonstrates an understanding of engineering, science, and mathematics fundamentals2. Demonstrates an understanding of political, social, and economic perspectives3. Demonstrates an understanding of information technology, digital competency, and information literacy4. Demonstrates an understanding of stages/phases of product lifecycle (design, prototyping, testing, production, distribution channels, supplier management, etc.)5. Demonstrates an understanding of project planning, management, and the impacts of projects on various stakeholder groups (project team members, project sponsor, project client, end- users, etc
procedures. The frameworkpresented for risk assessment and control gives student a basis for quantifying risks, focusingdesign activities on high risks, and documenting improvements to safety. Lesson materials aredownloadable without cost for use by others.Lesson 1: Why Prevention through Design?The first lesson seeks to prepare graduates with a safety consciousness and a competence indesigning for safety in a business context (i.e., beyond the classroom). In this lesson, studentsdiscuss the types of hazards that can exist in the biomedical workplace, common sources ofaccidents, and ways to address them. They discover that prevention through design is the bestalternative for reducing workplace accidents and injuries. They also learn the roles of
needs 1-6. VLEs are used as supplements incourses or in the engineering curriculum as a whole to improve students’ understanding offundamental concepts, and increase student interest and performance.MatLab Marina, developed by the first author at Armstrong Atlantic State University(Armstrong) is a framework of virtual learning modules dedicated to the improvement of studentlearning of programming concepts using MATLAB. Currently the VLE consists of ten learningmodules with a total of 56 multimedia tutorials. Each learning module consists of a set ofmultimedia tutorials that present a balanced, dual approach to algorithm development andprogramming using MATLAB. A pilot study (Fall 2011 and Spring 2012) showed that thesetutorials have been used
and otherMatLab toolboxes students have used in previous courses and will use in the initial analyticaland numerical activities proposed in this study. Page 23.1396.4 Course Hardware:The MCU board proposed for this study is a Dragon 12 Plus 230 (Figure 1) runningCodeWarrior31 with a 16 bit, 24 MHz CPU, 256K Flash EEPROM, 12K RAM, serialcommunication, 10 bit A/D, timer channels, pulse width modulation (PWM), and discrete andinterrupt I/O. Input devices include eight dip switches, 4 momentary switches, [16 key] keypad,IR proximity sensor and photoresistor. Output devices include 2 16-digit LCDs, single-rowLEDs, 4-7 segment LEDs and a Piezo
-level class, with twenty-eight survey responses, highlights of the surveyinclude the following: Constrained-response: the questions asked in this category are shown in Table 1. A quarter of the students who responded indicated they did not watch any of the recorded videos at all, leading to an average of only 2.74 videos (out of the thirty available videos) watched by each student. One reason for their failure to do so could be that the instructor stopped sending out weekly reminders that the videos were available for them to watch after the third week of instruction. For those who did watch, about 55% of the students watched the lecture videos in their entirety, while the rest watched only part(s) of the videos. None
: Cardiovascular Simulation and ExerciseThe model we present is adapted from the cardiovascular pressure/flow model presented inHoppensteadt and Peskin.5 The model divides the vasculature into two types of vessels:compliant, such as larger arteries, and resistive, such as capillary beds. The Simulink model isshown in Figure 1 for the systemic circulation from the aortic valve to the systemic capillaries. Page 23.1399.2This graphical model demonstrates the flow of blood through the system and captures thedynamics of the circulation, including the systemic arterial pressure. If we indicate the time-varying systemic arterial pressure as P, the compliance of
with consortium institutions in the U.S., Canada and Mexico(Table 1). The aim is to increase understanding of alternative healthcare delivery systems and toenhance the development and technology transfer of new scientific tools and techniques, medicaldevices, and related biomedical research.Documentation - MOU and IRB: Representatives from each of the consortium institutions meton two occasions to draft the memorandum of understanding (MOU). This MOU documents thetuition waiver (tuition to be paid at the respective home institution), student fees (travel, visaprocessing fees, room and board, books, and additional university fees), travel awards, refundpolicy, transfer credit evaluation and award, recruitment process, admission standards
workshops for engineeringfaculty involved with new or existing LTS efforts at their institutions. A total of 36 participantsfrom various academic institutions and with various employment levels attended workshops inHoughton, MI (August 2012) and Boulder, CO (September 2012). Workshop participantselection was partially based on the LTS activity that they proposed to implement/enhance attheir institution. Workshop design consisted of three connected components – 1) LTS grounding,2) preliminary development of an LTS effort, and 3) exploring future options for a national LTScommunity. Exercises used in the grounding component explored participant’s knowledge ofLTS and their existing experiences and/or beliefs on the relevance of LTS to
. Thethree major reasons for not seeking dual-level accreditation were 1. not necessary, nomotivation/advantage to becoming accredited; 2. increased workload, with no benefit; and 3.limits flexibility/accreditation process is too rigid and will stifle the innovation that is thehallmark of graduate-level education. These reasons were consistent across the survey andinterviews. Many of the department chairs expressed frustration with the accreditation processfor their bachelor’s degrees and are unlikely to take on the additional burden of accrediting theirmaster’s degrees without a clear benefit.IntroductionPolicy Statement 465, which was unanimously adopted by the Board of Direction of theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in 2001, describes