the systems engineering tools to define the system concept and requirements,including a system project charter; risk, stakeholder, external, SWOT, internal, and value gapanalyses; customer and systems requirements; and a process scenario template.Teaching Methods and Instructional Strategies:Teaching methods are techniques that help motivate students to do what they need to do to learncourse material. Gentile (2016) categorized teaching methods into the following types: 1)information-providing, 2) inquiry-oriented, 3) active or performance-based, 4) cooperative, 5)mastery-based and 6) creativity-inducing. Information–providing type of learning typically useslecture and demonstrations to convey information (Gentile, 2016). Inquiry-oriented
interactions between all differentparties involved in the project into a process that collaboratively integrates the abilities andperspectives of all participants. This would ultimately lead to enhancing project results andmaximizing efficiency throughout all phases of design and construction [1]. DB, specifically, hasexperienced increasing popularity in the construction industry ultimately for its recognizedbenefits, including overall reduction of project cost and completion time, compared to traditionalDesign Bid Build (DBB) Project Delivery Methods (PDMs). The major differences between DBand DBB is that in a traditional DBB, owner first hires an architect to develop the architecturaldesign, and engineers to develop structural, electrical
include a small number of time points, a lack of a control group, minimalcollection of open-ended data, and software limitations.IntroductionThe addition of both engineering design and practices in the Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS) [1] has provided an opportunity for the development of curricula and new instructionalframeworks that integrates engineering into science classrooms. The development of suchcurricula and frameworks has been the call of many K-12 science education panels andcommittees [2], [3], including the Teachers Advisory Council, who proposed five benefits ofadding engineering in K-12 classrooms: 1) an increased learning in math and science, 2) anawareness of the work of engineers, 3) the ability to engage in engineering
Acosta Feliz, Utah State UniversitySandra Weingart c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 1 Argumentation in K-12 Engineering Education: A Review of the Literature Amy Wilson-Lopez, Christina M. Sias, Ashley Strong, Jared Garlick, Sandra Weingart, Angela Minichiello, and Jorge Acosta FelizWhile individual engineers address problems differently, one trait all engineers share is relianceon argumentation skills to make claims about their designs and solutions. Engineers understandthe need to persuasively communicate the attributes of their designs and solutions to a
. Entering the 2015-2016 academic year,program faculty envisioned a capstone design experience that would engage student teams in ayear-long, professional level design project sponsored by an industry client. The first two yearsof the capstone design program have been inarguably successful, and in this paper we identifyand reflect on the keys to our success. The intention for writing this paper is to ensure thesuccess of the program is repeatable, and to assist other programs, especially those residing insmall liberal arts universities, in starting or revising their own senior design experience.Our key factors in assembling a successful industry-sponsored capstone design program havebeen: (1) faculty buy-in and involvement, (2) engaged industry
), its first mixed-gender university [1]; its firstpublic women-only and the world's largest university for women, Princess Nora bintAbdulrahman University (PNU) [2]; and its first private women-only university, EffatUniversity [3]. In view of these initiatives, this paper serves as an extension of a previous study thathighlights the need in the kingdom for the participation of females in engineering highereducation [4]. The authors here present and justify engineering specializations where females areexpected to be most successful from both academic and career perspectives. First, an overview ispresented regarding the involvement of women in engineering higher education and the jobmarket in select countries. This is subsequently followed
faculty change andorganizational change toward innovation through use of EBIS in teaching and learning.IntroductionTo achieve more effective teaching and learning in undergraduate engineering educationprofessional development needs to promote change toward innovation of use of evidence-basedinstructional strategies (EBIS) in faculty beliefs and practice as well as change in organizationalattitudes and norms [1-4]. To develop an effective program, strategies for change need to beutilized and assessed at the individual level and the organizational level. Rogers Diffusion ofInnovation (DOI) is an individual change model which consist of five step of a progression towardsadoption of change such as sports, business or teaching [5]. The steps necessary
understanding of NOE aspects or improved them.Keywords: NOE, engineering design process, nature of engineering, secondary science teachers,NGSS, engineering design challenge, professional development, cognitive apprenticeshipIntroductionTo meet the demand of an increasing science and engineering workforce, teachers must beprepared to integrate engineering in their instruction. There are some attempts at policies andeducational reforms aimed at changing science and engineering education to improve students’understanding of engineering and to influence more students to study those degrees [1], [2].Teacher training programs in the US do not adequately prepare secondary science teachers tointegrate engineering in their curriculum and, in turn, to increase
, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” [page 42, 1]. Our teamof instructors exposes students to project management techniques at multiple levels within ourundergraduate ECE program. By learning project management early and practicing it often,students improve their teamwork efficacy in projects, courses, and in their future careers. Scrumis a cyclical project management technique commonly used in high-tech industries. Scrumprovides a framework that facilitates teamwork and project management through an adaptable,incremental process. We have tailored our variant of Scrum for students working on engineeringprojects in a higher-education environment. We intend to better understand student learning ofproject management and teamwork so that
that, materials development is often too slowin providing practical solutions for the current needs of technological advancement [1, 2, 3, 4].Given this, the Materials Genome Initiative (MGI) was announced by the White House in 2011;this initiative posed that the synergistic combination of experiments and simulations through aninformatics framework would speed up advancements in materials discovery and developmentutilizing big data [1]. Unfortunately, current materials science and engineering students oftenreceive minimal training in statistical principles and methods, computational analysis, andsophisticated programming. Likewise, students with stronger informatics-related skills arefamiliar with concepts and methods of engineering systems
the BOPPPSinstruction has produced. The assessment process for the BOPPPS Survey involves five different phases in thispaper: item generation, environment design, emotion analysis, validity testing and piloting of our protocol.During the environment design phase, we have adopted SunVote Classroom Response System (CRS), which isa kind of system capable of providing real-time classroom feedback. This stable wireless transmission system isshort and portable, thus is specifically suitable for active learning assessment. The keypad, radio transmitter anddrive software can be seen in Figures 1. This paper has evaluated the impact of using CRS on student-involvement from perspectives of both the instructor and students. Student participation with
civil engineers for nearly 20 years in support of its Policy Statement 465 -Academic Prerequisites for Licensure and Professional Practice. Policy Statement 465 (PS 465)was first adopted in 1998 and supported "the concept of the master's degree as the FirstProfessional Degree (FPD) for the practice of civil engineering at the professional level." [1]This policy created significant debate among members of the society and motivated ASCE toform the Task Committee for the First Professional Degree (TCFPD) in 1999. This committeewas tasked with developing a vision for the full realization of the policy and a strategy to achieveit. Based on this committee’s report [2] the ASCE Board of Direction revised PS 465 in 2001and softened the language of the
scope of individualengineering courses. However, there are some limitations regarding the applicability of theutilized survey instruments, thus requiring further research with larger amounts of data and amixed-methods approach to generalize the results.IntroductionTo remain competitive, today’s engineers must be equipped to produce innovative solutions.Thus, engineering educators strive to teach their students the tools and mindsets required formaking change. However, despite these efforts, there is conflicting research on whether theinnovation capabilities [1] of senior engineering students top those of undergraduate freshmen.For example, in open-ended design ideation tasks, seniors and freshmen were equally innovativewhen measured cross
interactions among the STEM disciplines, andinterest in STEM careers [1-6]. Many in-service STEM teachers have limited experienceand/or educational background in engineering and technology. These teachers havelimited confidence to incorporate engineering and technology in their classroom.At a professional development (PD) workshop, that is part of a National ScienceFoundation (NSF) funded engineering research project, teachers from different schooldistricts were invited to learn building automation and additive manufacturing at auniversity campus in summer 2017. The overall goal of the project is to increase thenumber of students on the STEM pathway. This work reports the findings of a study thatexplored the effectiveness of a teacher PD workshop
Bachelor of Science and Master of Science from the University of Arkansas, and a doctoral degree from the University of Kentucky, Dr. Corrie Walton-Macaulay is now a Geotechnical Engineering Assistant Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Bucknell University. He teaches the traditional geotechnical courses of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, but also teaches unsaturated soil mechanics, introduction to transportation engineering and mechanics of materials. HIs research area is in unsaturated soil mechanics, energy geotechnics, and transportation infrastructure resiliency. Address: 1 Dent Drive, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bucknell University, Lewis- burg
Perception and Learning OutcomesIntroductionCourses in a large majority of science and engineering curricula are often complemented bylaboratories which provide a learning environment different from a traditional lecture. Theselaboratories promote student engagement through problem-based learning, resulting in increasedstudent performance, increased student confidence in the subject material [1], and greaterenjoyment of the subject material by the students [2]. The lecture courses which theselaboratories supplement are often substantially different in size, with one lecture linked tomultiple smaller laboratory sections. The connection between these lectures and laboratories haslong been observed to play a vital role in the effectiveness of many
instilling theentrepreneurial mindset rather than starting business ventures.The Engineering Entrepreneurship Minor program is a 16 credit hour minor. The curriculum forthe minor consists of the following sequence of prescribed courses and practicums: Engineering Entrepreneurship Minor Curriculum (16 credits) EGEN 2100 – Creativity and Innovation (1 cr) EGEN 2200 – Opportunity Identification and Business Principles (3 cr) EGEN 2300 – Entrepreneurship Practicum I (1 cr) EGEN 3100 – Feasibility Analysis for Entrepreneurship (3 cr) EGEN 3200 – Product and Service Prototyping (3 cr) EGEN 3300 – Entrepreneurship Practicum II (1 cr) EGEN 3400
have addressed various aspects of the studentlearning outcomes which are: 1. Problem Solving – Students gain experience in the design process that includes innovative problem solving skills applied to the design and implementation of global projects in developing regions of the world in the context of real needs, constraints, and opportunities. 1 2. Global Engineering – Students demonstrate an appreciation for global aspects of engineering, including social and technical constraints related to design and the importance of sustainability. 3. Teamwork and Leadership – Students demonstrate effective teamwork and leadership skills and an appreciation for other
Development (USAID) has long supported programs to build capacity in higher education in Pakistan in the areas of energy, water, and food security. Recently, the Center for Advanced Studies (CAS) program was launched by USAID and the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (HEC) to strengthen a culture of applied research in Pakistan. The CAS program set up three centers: (1) Agriculture/Food Security at University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, in partnership with University of California, Davis, (2) Water at Mehran University of Engineering and Technology (MUET), in partnership with University of Utah, and (3) Energy at National University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, and University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, in partnership with
tocover the design of a multidisciplinary mechatronics system, requiring mechanical, electrical, andcomputer engineering. A multi-disciplinary approach has been popular in capstone courses 1 .Students in the course learn fundamentals of engineering design. Projects are assigned to studentsbased on availability of equipment and facility, as well as the technical interest of students. Class Figure 1: C1 Spider crawlerprojects require planning, proposal presentation, scheduling, engineering, implementation, andwritten and oral presentations of project results. The sequential nature of these assignments in thedesign-build-test model is common for capstone-project courses at elite universities 2 . Students’abilities
[1]. A contributing factor to theirdissatisfaction was found to be the manner in which engineering courses were taught. The factthat well-qualified students are leaving engineering has raised concern, and the need for changein engineering education, to retain more students and to better prepare them to face today’sengineering challenges, has been well documented [2-5]. In acknowledgement of the need forchange in the traditional methods of teaching engineering, calls for reform have been made bythe National Academy of Engineering [ 4], the American Society of Engineering Education [5]and the National Science Foundation [ 6]. Each of these organizations has recognized that thetraditional practice of educating engineers is failing its students
real-world hydraulic and pneumatic applications. Building on initial work [1], thepresent study adds indirect assessment for both courses, previously unavailable direct assessmentin Thermodynamics, and additional data points for indirect and direct assessment in FluidMechanics.Fluid-power based modules for Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics courses were developedfor potential continued future use that utilize active and collaborative learning (ACL), problem-based learning (PBL), and entrepreneurially-minded learning (EML) techniques to teach coreBSME content while also creating awareness and engaging students in the area of fluid power.Active learning requires that students participate and discuss issues or work problems in theclassroom
-Principal Investigator) Associate Professor and Head of Assessment, J. Murrey Atkins Library The authors are grateful for the collaborative support of UNC Charlotte’s William States LeeCollege of Engineering Office of Student Development and Success instructors: Don Blackmon,Chris McDaniel, Gwen Gill, Meg Harkins, Dan Latta, Kevin Lindsay, Bill Lindsey, and Sherman Mumford. This work was supported by funds provided by the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Program at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. 1 AbstractThis study
Paper ID #21258Assessment of the Impact of Summer STEAM Programs on High School Par-ticipants’ Content Knowledge and Attitude Towards STEAM CareersMr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. In addition to my teaching responsibilities, I am involved in the community engagement programs and activities of the department. I am the coordinator of three outreach programs 1) the NSF-ISE project ”Scientists for Tomorrow” which goal is to promote Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) learning in community centers in the
theperspective of the learner’s performance, behaviors, self-evaluation and finally expertassessments. The limitations and strengths of the various approaches are discussed. Finally,areas of future research in pilot studies and learning assessment tool capabilities are described.1 introductionDue to the exponential advancement of technology, rapidly evolving needs and increasingsystems complexity, it is even more challenging for educators to meet the growing educationaldemands for a workforce able to solve complex systems engineering problems [1-3]. Systemsengineering and technical leadership are multidisciplinary practices that are as much an art as ascience. While a traditional model of education can teach the fundamental body of knowledge, itis not
, Damla Turgut2, Edwin Nassiff2, Safa Bacanli2, Neda H. Bidoki2 and Jun Xu2 { Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2Department of Computer Science} 1 University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816-2362 AbstractAn approach is developed to integrate the complementary benefits of digitized assessments andpeer learning. The research hypothesis is that each student’s assessment data at the fine-grainedresolution of correct/incorrect question choice selections can be utilized to partition learners intoeffective peer learning cohorts. A low overhead approach is explored along with its associatedtool, referred to as Automated Peer Learning
ChulalongkornUniversity/Thailand. Cynthia holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the Uni-versity of California, Davis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Avenue-E: An Innovative Student Transfer Pathway Program Jennifer S. Curtis1, Beth Broome2, and Cynthia Murphy-Ortega3 1 College of Engineering, UC Davis, Davis, CA; 2Office of the Provost, UC Davis, Davis, CA; 3Chevron Corporation, Richmond, CAAbstractOver 68% of students in the California Community College system come from minoritybackgrounds, representing an opportunity to accelerate the diversification of STEM industries.However, according to a September 2017 report by the
ProjectAbstract A basic laboratory exercise was designed and implemented, for K-12 students, whichdelves into the measurement of basics of electrical circuit parameters, such as resistance, currentand voltage. This 2-3 hour lab exercise gives students a glimpse into basic electrical engineeringconcepts, which are covered in an undergraduate Sophomore level introductory Circuits-1 coursethat all Electrical Engineering majors are required to take. Laboratory participants cover thesame material, in a small amount of time that the undergraduate students cover in 2-3 weeks. Thelab exercise also includes an interactive exercise that helps students understand decimal to binaryconversion for unsigned and signed decimal numbers via a tool already being
classroom approach has increased in popularity for engineering and sciencecourses [1] [2] in part because the traditional lecture approach is perceived to be ineffective forteaching essential problem-solving skills [3]. Time spent in the classroom is thought to bebetter used when the instructor supports students working in groups on problem-solving andother active learning activities. While many variants of the flipped classroom approach havebeen described, the essential pedagogical aspects include 1) offloading the transmission ofinformation out of the classroom for consumption before class time; 2) use of class time foractive group learning; 3) pre- and post- class activities for students to further practice with theskills practiced in the
faculty on developing face-to-face, hybrid, and online courses. Janie also coordinates and provides training and support for the campus Learning Management System, Moodle, and Multimedia System, Panopto. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Beyond Drag and Drop: Balancing Experience and Innovation in Online Technical Communication Course DevelopmentOnline learning is increasingly part of students’ higher education experience. Recent reports,including the New Media Consortium Horizon Report [1] and The Babson Survey of OnlineLearning [2] report an increase in hybrid, online, and multimedia learning. Redesigning coursesfor these new environments gives faculty members opportunities to