for the European Society of Engineering Education. Further information can be found on her website: www.sociologyofengineering.org.Dr. Andrew Danowitz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Andrew Danowitz received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University in 2014. He is currently an Associate Professor of Computer Engineering at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. His engineering education interests include student mental health, retention, and motivation. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Engineering Students Coping with COVID-19: Yoga
Paper ID #33934A Low-cost Materials Laboratory Sequence for Remote Instruction thatSupports Student AgencyDr. Matthew J. Ford, Cornell University Matthew Ford received his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering and materials science from the University of California, Berkeley, and went on to complete his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at North- western University. After completing an internship in quantitative methods for education research with the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), he joined the Cornell Active Learning Initiative as a postdoctoral associate. His teaching
continued success of incoming graduate students in an era of uncertainty, anxiety, anduneasiness. The piloted virtual orientation program ran in a variety of digital platforms,asynchronously and synchronously, and included several best practices and strategies for asuccessful graduate student orientation (Almanzar et al., 2016), e.g., exploration of relevantresources (academic platforms, health and wellness, communities of support, etc.), social events,career discussions, and departmental advising and mentoring. This new program also integrated acomprehensive teaching assistant (TA) training component for those students who would beassigned teaching assignments.LiteratureGraduate Student Orientation: Research on transition to college is largely
learning goals fit within the theory'smotivation spectrum. Performance goals exhibit controlled motivation characteristics becausepeople are motivated due to external factors. Learning goals exhibit autonomous motivationcharacteristics because people are motivated by an internal value of the work [12]. Likewise, thebenefits of multiple goals are closely related to Integrated Regulation, a subcategory of controlledmotivation that shares characteristics of both control and autonomous motivation [12]. Another factor that affects the motivation of individuals is the complexity of the work andthe relatedness they feel with the work they participate in [16]. An example of task complexityaffecting motivation is the research by Vos et al., where
in basic humanneeds. Additionally, it is important to implement these innovations through social entrepreneurship andleadership efforts for achieving the desired societal impact. To apply the above principles effectively,students (especially the Gen-Z students) need to have a skill set in understanding the role of engineeringinnovations in a globalized society with an attitude of leadership to serve society [16], which was themotivation behind this class. Selected successful social innovations across the world were studiedthrough the lens of fundamental science and engineering along with the societal impact. At the sametime, students also reflected on how the innovators applied/integrated leadership skills/approacheswith social
integrating collaborative educational technologies likeMicrosoft Teams, Slack, and Discord into the class to promote group work outside of class.Students are using these features anyway and they can be a great way to increase peer-to-peercommunication in the class. Professors should go above and beyond to establish and encouragepersonal communications between students and teachers, whether via email, message board, orother channels. Facilitating group work during class meetings is vital to information retentionand helps to foster relationships between students and the professor, even though the class isonline. Professors should also make an effort to be reliable and consistent throughout the class;they should post information in a timely manner, keep
Paper ID #33328Redesigning a Summer Math and Engineering Bootcamp for VirtualInstruction During the COVID-19 PandemicDr. Zahrasadat Alavi, California State University, Chico Dr. Zahrasadat Alavi, an Assistant Professor at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at California State University Chico, received her PhD in Electrical Engineering from University of Wiscon- sin Milwaukee in May 2015. She received her B.Sc. and M.Sc. from Amirkabir University (Polytechnic of Tehran) with honors in 2007 and 2009 respectively, and another Master of Science from University of Wisconsin Milwaukee (UWM) in Electrical
course is centered onrealistic contractual conditions and project deliverables (i.e., medical ventilators) to a medicalsupplier, whereas the team is assumed to emulate a global automotive manufacturer. Theprojects are organized into student teams for realistic implementation and to meet a societalneed. The course underpins students with exposure to concepts of acquiring intellectualproperty, from the design of an embedded system including the human machine interface (HMI),to testing and validation. An in-depth study of assembly lines, lean manufacturing,determination of production capacity, sequential operations, and economic calculations arepresented. Students are presented with urgent societal needs and learn to address designrequirements and
about the role of ethics in their professions. He also served as Dean of Leadership, Service, and Character Development for Rhodes Scholars. He is currently working with the Wake Forest Department of Engineering to integrate character into the undergraduate curriculum and leading a university-wide program to educate ethical leaders.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University Dr. Olga Pierrakos is Founding Chair and Professor of the new Department of Engineering at Wake For- est University - a private, liberal arts, research institution. As one of the newest engineering programs in the nation, she is facilitating the realization of building an innovative program aligned with the university mission of Pro Humanitate
role of lab safety manager and lab manager Apply – Create – Translate (ACT) 5 activities aligned with the research and goals of the program. Examples include: Modules ₋ Participate in STEM program for underrepresented groups ₋ Participate in K-12 outreach activities ₋ Technology commercialization activity through university programs or NSF I- CorpsTo achieve these goals, graduate students are integrated into interdisciplinary research teams, where theyactively and collaboratively work on important scientific and societal challenges in a rigorous manner.Our vision was to deliver this program in an
equitable engineering environments.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research characterizes front-end design practices across the student to practitioner continuum and studies the impact of developed front-end design tools on design success.Dr. Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan Lisa Lattuca, Professor of Higher Education and member of the Core Faculty in the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. She studies curriculum, teaching, and learning in college
broader world and toward the future),making connections (e.g., integrating knowledge from multiple sources), and creating value (e.g.,understanding stakeholders and seeking opportunity) [8].This paper describes a group project created for an introductory thermal sciences course taken bysecond-year engineering students at University of San Diego. A significant amount of theoreticalcontent is covered in the course, and typical example and homework problems have fairly weakconnections to real-world problems. Because concepts presented without contextualization orapplication have little meaning to students [9], the project was developed to provide ameaningful student-centered learning experience, which has been shown to better anchorknowledge and
1 Use of Student Surveys to Improve Efficacy of Lab Experience and Guide Lab Development Robert W. Williams, Salam F. Rahmatalla Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of IowaAbstract One way to refocus the importance of hands-on education is to allow students to haveownership of their lab experience so that, in time, the lab curriculum is tailored to their needs andwants. This paper discusses the use of student surveys to help improve the efficacy of labexperience for undergraduate Civil &
Education, 2021 CSUN Data Science Program with Career Support and Connections to IndustryData Science Program with Career Support and Connections to Industry, supported by NSF DUEIUSE, is an interdisciplinary workforce training program that encompasses a summer bootcamp,year-long research projects, biweekly seminars, and career support. Our program has had twocohorts, one in 2019-2020 and the other in 2020-2021. This paper discusses how to design, imple-ment, manage, and assess a data science program for undergraduates.California State University Northridge (CSUN). CSUN is a federally designated Hispanic ServingInstitution (HSI) and Minority Institution (MI). It is among the largest single-campus
Paper ID #32311Understanding Factors of Engineering Student Persistence UsingPredictive ModelingDr. Daniel P. Kelly, Texas Tech University Dr. Daniel P. Kelly is an Assistant Professor of STEM education at Texas Tech University in the De- partment of Curriculum and Instruction. He earned his doctorate in Technology Education from North Carolina State University where he also served on the faculty. Previously, he worked as a middle and high school science, technology, and engineering teacher in North Carolina. Dr. Kelly serves as the Associate Editor of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal and Editor-in-Chief and
, many engineeringstudents struggle to connect these experiences to the work they will do after graduation [54].Rather than nurture adaptability, they may just reinforce or evaluate students' existing adaptivetendencies. More research to clarify how we define, measure, and understand adaptability isneeded before engineering educators can effectively teach it.The past two decades have seen the integration of several other “human skills” [4] [55] intoformal engineering curriculum (e.g., ethics, communication, and societal and global issues),partly in response to changes in accreditation standards [5]. Other studies show that, whilehuman skills can be acquired in an experiential learning environment, they are best learned whenexplicitly taught and
, the experiences of underrepresented undergraduate engineering students and engineering educators. In addition to teaching undergraduate engineering courses and a graduate course on entrepreneurship, she also enjoys teaching qualitative research methods in engineering education in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program at ASU. She is deputy editor of the Journal of Engineering Education.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information and Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical and Biological Engineer- ing Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA
individual student and the institution. At the institutional level it is understoodas a mechanism that contributes to reducing attrition rates and enhancing recruitment plans butthere is a scarcity of empirical research related to PhD programs to understand this phenomenon.Contemporarily, Di Pierro [15] conceptualized doctoral mentoring as part of an institution’spragmatic retention plan to counter economic losses, potential loss in Carnegie classification, andvoids in research. Thus, mentoring should not be thought of as a disjointed obscure process, butone that is integrated and benchmarked as part of an institution’s best practices particularly forunderrepresented populations. For individual students mentoring often times is described as akey
Paper ID #34297Virtual Reality Laboratory Experiences for Electricity and MagnetismCoursesProf. Raluca Ilie, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Prof. Ilie is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her primary research is the development and application of high-performance, first principles computational models to describe and predict the conditions in near- Earth space leading to geomagnetic storms. Prof. Ilie’s focus is on developing new approaches to study the dynamics of plasmas and electromagnetic fields in the geospace
Incorporated into Machine DesignIn the freshman and sophomore years of a mechanical engineering program, the student learnsthe tools of fundamental mechanics and design. In the junior and senior year, the student learnshow to apply these tools to solve complex problems. An example of a complex problem wouldbe the two design projects assigned in machine design. In these projects, several fundamentalmachine elements (components) are needed to form integrated subassemblies, and these areassembled into the final system. Principals of machine design and strength of material areimplored. For the past two decades, machine design has been structured to include typical end-of-chapter homework problems, in-class quizzes, two exams, and two design projects. The
Research (SOAR) Center as Senior Project Specialist evaluating and assessing the impact of educational outreach programs and other education-related projects.Dr. Melissa J. Guynn, New Mexico State University I am a cognitive psychologist with a primary research interest in human memory.Dr. Patti Wojahn, New Mexico State University As past Writing Program Administrator and current Interdisciplinary Studies Department Head, I have worked closely with academic departments interested in supporting the writing, communication, and aca- demic abilities of students. For many years, I worked with Integrated Learning Communities for at-risk, entry-level engineering majors, overseeing development and use of a curriculum adapted
upon teaching strategies; (5) lack of established“teaching tips;” and (6) an observed lack of transfer of knowledge of engineering basics fromone professional development workshop to the next. These early realizations were useful forthinking about how to design teacher professional development and set the stage forinvestigating actual teacher practice. Capobianco [8] delved into this problem in a collaborative action research study of asingle fifth grade classroom, exploring the challenges of integrating engineering into scienceteaching in meaningful ways. A recent publication by Capobianco, DeLisi, and Radloff [9]described the development of an instrument to document and characterize teaching done byinservice elementary teachers as
represent male student perceptions of their role in the femalestudent experience.BackgroundTeam-based design courses are an integral part of engineering education. First-year designcourses, specifically, are foundational to introduce students to the field to increase interest andmaintain retention (Brannan & Wankat, 2005). With a shared emphasis on developing technicaland professional skills, first-year design courses also give students an opportunity to practiceskills that are necessary to the profession, within an authentic project context. However,gendered behavior can be present among student teams, which can negatively impact theexperience for female students. Analysis of gendered task assignment and female perspectivesare commonly
more specifically technical writing skills - through either specific courses or lessons (e.g.[19]) or by integrating technical writing into an already established course or project (e.g. [20]).Research-Based Teaching Practices 1. Scaffolding Scaffolding as an educational tool is used to reduce the complexity of tasks and helpstudents focus their practice and build component skills [21], [22]. Scaffolding involves breakingdown large learning outcomes into smaller tasks that students complete in succession. Thesesmall tasks are meant to build and refine component skills necessary for the achievement of thelarge learning outcomes. Scaffolding has been shown to be successful in improving studentlearning at multiple education levels and
Paper ID #34344Measuring the Impact of a Study Abroad Program on Engineering Students’Global PerspectiveMr. Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and an M.S. student in Indus- trial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech (VT). Tahsin holds a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and has worked as a manufacturing professional at a Fortune 500 company. As an Engineering Education researcher, he is interested in enhancing professional competencies for engi- neering workforce development in academia
Paper ID #34546A Grounded Theory Analysis of COVID-19 Information and ResourcesRelayed Through University Webpages: Implications for a More InclusiveCommunityDr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri, McGraw Hill Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri is an Engineering Educator and People Researcher. She currently heads Global People Research and Analytics at McGraw Hill, where she leads research leveraging employee data to generate data-driven insights for decisions impacting organizational Culture and Talent. Her research interests include assessing the impact and effectiveness of inclusion initiatives as well as employing in- novative, ethical and inclusive
BSMEprogram moved from the now defunct ABET Student Outcomes a-k to the new ABET StudentOutcomes 1-7 for the 2019-2020 academic year. The new Measurement Systems course wasidentified as an appropriate course to assess ABET Student Outcome 6 that states that studentswill have “an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpretdata, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions” [5]. This outcome differed slightlyfrom the previous Student Outcome b; thus, a new assessment was developed.A final significant factor in the course development was the multiyear effort at LTU toincorporate entrepreneurial education throughout the engineering curriculum [6, 7, 8]. As apartner school in KEEN, LTU uses the KEEN framework to
average velocities; whileother groups considered factors such as “ease of assembly” and “preliminary indicators ofperformance” during the evaluations. Groups distinguished several problems with the initialdesigns of the OneCar including “a distinct issue with staying straight” as well as “weightreduction” being another area for potential improvement. Additionally, in other groups reported alack of friction between the wheels and ground as an integral problem; which caused slippingresulting in loss of motion. These undesirable characteristics, among others, were keyconsiderations for the groups during the re-design process. To address the flaws identified duringthe product evaluation, groups sought to improve the chassis, wheels, and position
development [14]. Development is complex,moving forward several steps, then stabilizing in times of integration; it is also personal, asstudents develop along varied dimensions. Second, identity provides a framework for dealingwith dynamic staged processes, such as are encountered during the transformative experiencesthat typically characterize the undergraduate journey. Third, identity provides insight intomotivation, making it a useful construct for understanding retention. The cumulative effect ofthese characteristics suggest that identity is an effective framework for understanding studenteducation. In fact, the case has been made that engineering education is— by definition—engineering identity formation [15
Sectional Conference 2METALLIC WAVEGUIDE EXPERIMENTSThe experiments mentioned so far would be relevant today if the curriculum and its objectivespermitted. B the 1980 s and be ond, engineering students needed to be prepared for theirprofessional lives by going beyond experimental studies that dealt only with improving studentunderstanding of the basic engineering science. At some universities basic electromagneticsexperiments were introduced in prerequisite physics courses, and such experiments still existtoday. To meet the demands of the engineering profession, the laboratory in engineeringelectromagnetics added basic transmission line experiments in the