and McTighe (2005) identified three stages: (1) Identify desiredoutcomes and results, (2) Determine what constitutes acceptable evidence of competency in theoutcomes and results, and (3) Plan instructional strategies and learning experiences that bringstudents to these competency levels. They posit this approach will help faculty designinstruction that promotes understanding and fosters student engagement.Another important approach to curricular reform that called for improvement throughoutundergraduate education has been in service-learning pedagogy. Service-learning is a teachingmethod in which students participate in organized service activity for academic credit that meetsidentified community issues, and that reflection done by the
an important aspect in the development ofmodeling strategies.Barnes et al.24 suggests that many of the exercises presented to students are in the form of“elegant solutions” which present essentially one single obvious modeling approach. Fortunately,even very simple parts such as those presented in standard graphics texts can be modeled usingdifferent strategies. In planning a part model, the designer must decompose or “featurize” thepart to be created in the solid modeling system. Two common strategies for modeling simpleparts involve decomposition into features based on either additive or subtractive approaches.30Metrics for Evaluating Solid Model Part ComplexityIt is important to choose parts for CAD instruction that present increasing
University uses the inverted classroom approach. Thestudy should be expanded to the entire first year engineering program to determine if there areany differences due to the different populations, different course content, different contact timeavailable, and different class sizes.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honorsinstructional staff for their assistance in developing materials used in this course andadministering the survey to collect data. Also, the authors would like to thank Dr. DebGrzybowski for her valuable input and guidance in the planning stages of this study.References1. J.F. Strayer. “How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task
practices faculty describe (including coaching, role modeling,being pushed to explain plans and decisions), they also tend to place more emphasis on therapport they are able to develop with their mentors and the encouragement and affirmation theyreceive, but may be less aware of the ways in which faculty mentors seek to protect studentsfrom both project failures and learning failures. The findings thus provide rich insights into howstudents experience teaching and learning in design environments, what they value about thoseexperiences, and, perhaps most importantly, what dimensions of mentoring are more and lessvisible as meaningful supports.By better understanding students’ experiences and perceptions, the findings from this study canhelp design
and our future plans. During the first year of thecollaboration each team has invested effort into building research capacity, coordinating thecollaboration, creating working relationships and an understanding of working habits betweenteams, and exploring the theoretical underpinnings of productive disciplinary engagement. Page 24.1137.3We begin by discussing our overarching theoretical framework, productive disciplinaryengagement. Next we describe the four contexts of the four different research teams represented(Washington - high school students, Oregon - undergraduate engineering students, Finland - highschool science students, Australia
Paper ID #9847Subscribing to WII-FM: When will we Begin to Function as a Team?Dr. Andrew E. Jackson, East Carolina University Dr. Jackson serves as a Tenured, Full Professor in the Department of Technology Systems at ECU. He is a senior faculty member in the Industrial Engineering Technology (IET) program where he teaches a variety of IET courses, including: Production Systems Engineering and Production Planning, Engineering Economics, Human Factors Engineering, and Risk Assessment. His career spans 40 years in the fields of aviation, aerospace, defense contract engineering support, systems acquisition, academics, and
graduating in the spring of 2014 he plans on pursuing a career in mechanical engineering with a strong focus on consumer electronics and new product design to help make the world that much more entertaining. Page 24.1170.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Teaching Robotics by Building Autonomous Mobile Robots Using the ArduinoIn recent years I have been teaching a project-based Robotics course within our quarter-based Mechanical Engineering program using the Stamp microcontroller. Students workin teams to complete a number of weekly lab exercises
statements. Based onthe feedback of both review groups and the psychometric analysis of the pilot data, we madechanges to the instructions, the scenarios, and the items. For example, a rating statement mighthave been reworded to make it clearer. We included additional items for each scenario so wecould see how the items performed, with the plan to reduce the number of items using the pilotdata. As a result, the scenarios of Version 2 of the instrument had 16 – 24 items each whichincluded additional items for each schema that is required for scoring. It was administered to175 participants.Results from the Version 2 pilot identified several items that did not perform as well as orsimilarly to other items in the same schema. In Version 3, these items
benefits?Offering mixed gender programs and all-female programs meant that approximately 70% of thestudents accepted into our summer enrichment programs were female. This and a markedincrease in applications from 4th and 5th grade boys prompted the addition of two all-maleprograms during the summer of 2012. The programs were identical to the fourth and fifth gradeFEMME programs and the 4th and 5th grade mixed-gender programs. Each of the programsaccepted 23 to 25 students; across all six programs there were 141 students.EvaluationA semi-qualitative and objective evaluation was planned to examine differences in classroomclimate, changes in students’ attitudes toward STEM, increases in content knowledge andchanges in students’ perceptions of what
Paper ID #10543The Influence of Internship Participation on Construction Industry HiringProfessionals When Selecting New Hires and Determining Starting Salariesfor Construction Engineering GraduatesDr. Kathleen M Short, University of the District of Columbia- CC, Workforce Development and LifelongLearning Kathleen Short earned a PhD in Environmental Design and Planning and a Master of Science in Build- ing/Construction Science and Management from Virginia Tech. She also earned a Bachelor of Social Work from Concord University. She is currently the Project Director for the Construction Academy and the Hospitality Academy in the
and development manager at Kennametal. Bill is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Illinois College and a Bronze Tablet graduate of University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign where he received a Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering.Dr. Robert M. Bunch, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Michael Wollowski, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Michael Wollowski obtained his undergraduate degree in Informatics from the University of Hamburg, Germany. He obtained M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science from Indiana University in Bloom- ington, IN, USA. He studied under Jon Barwise and as part of his dissertation developed a diagrammatic proof system for planning in the blocks world of Artificial Intelligence. Michael is
planned to be completed across the Fall 2013 and Spring 2014 semesters; at theMarch 2014 conference proceedings submission deadline, only limited data was available for theFall 2013 portion of the study. Additional data will be collected in Spring 2014 and presented atthe 2014 ASEE Annual Conference.2. MethodsA number of different course-streamlining options available to UO instructors were incorporatedinto two large (~140 students total) junior and senior-level chemical engineering UO courses atthe university level, namely: CATME – web-based assignment and evaluation of student teams using CATME.org17-19 Paperless grading – digital submission, grading and feedback for laboratory reports using Turnitin.com Experiment
. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.16. Ferguson DM, Cawthorne JC, Ahn B, Ohland M, editors. Engineering innovativeness. ASEE 2012International Conference on Engineering Education; 2012; San Antonio, Texas American Society of EngineeringEducation.17. Creswell JW. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and QualitativeResearch. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2008.18. Gladwell M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. ISBN 0-316-31696-2 ed:Little Brown; 2000.19. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. LosAngelos, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2006.20. Lincoln YS, Guba EG
gained from working with the undergraduates in the summer program,” as illustrated by thisresponse from one high school student: High School Student: I didn’t know much at all about what being an undergraduate student was like or what it involved. I thought it was very interesting how much freedom they were given in their studies. It was helpful to be able to see thing through their perspectives instead of just my own. Echoed another high school student: High School Student: I was able to see what being in a college lab is like and am able to use this experience to plan my future in school. Second, the REU students felt that having someone showing the high school students apractical, interesting
goal/plan analysis of buggy Pascal programs. In Soloway, E., & Spohrer, J. C. (Eds.), Studying the Novice Programmer (pp. 355–399). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0102_4[17] Soloway, E., and Spohrer, J. C. (Eds.). 1989. Studying the novice programmer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.[18] Winslow, L. E. 1996. Programming pedagogy–A psychological overview. SIGCSE Bulletin 28(3), 17–22. doi:10.1145/234867.234872 Page 24.1280.12
• Perceived value of Skill • Quality of Activity Reflection Skill Assessment • Open-ended reflection on • Collection and evaluation of learning outcomes and added student products from every value of the activity activity Figure 3: TESP Evaluation Plan Page 24.1281.10reflection. Finally, for every activity, samples of student work, including mind maps, inventiondisclosures, and publications are collected and analyzed to
always result inan intentional change.18 He further stresses the importance of providing an environment thatfosters individual change, and that programs should “plan education aimed at helping peopletranslate their intentions into action.” 18 Our goal is to understand the values of our students so asto foster an environment where students can work toward alignment of behaviors and goals. Page 24.1290.3Values SurveyTo identify a set of values related to the behaviors of individuals when working as a part of anengineering team, the research group utilized existing surveys and literature in the area of teamroles. Key sources used during this
Amazon just announced their delivery service plan using drones (UAV). There were six teams chose this category. 4) Desktop virtualization is also a ubiquitous phrase and there is abundant marketing information on the Internet. Since most desktop virtualization is provided as a service, it is difficult to find a particular system with enough in-depth technical information. Three teams chose this category. Although network virtualization concept was introduced in 2009, there is very little implementation technical information on the Internet and no team chose this sub-category. 5) Supercomputers were chosen by 13 teams due to their abundant technical information and there were six No. 1 supercomputers to
planning and most important implementation all though theuse of active learning styles will help reinforce the theory given in lecture and should lead thestudent to be a more engaged.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 The creation and use of undergraduate research as alaboratory experience can affect career decisions leading to graduate school and relieve themonotonous aspects of learning while instilling a sense of accomplishment.6, 7, 8, 10When a student is required to formulate the experiment himself/herself from a set of open-endedparameters innovation happens. In the context of the course “open-ended” was defined as usingthe existing tools, either hardware or software, assigned to create and demonstrate to the rest of
). The design of Energy Efficiency” report by National Renewable Energybuilding envelopes continued on the previous integrated ventilation systems Laboratory (NREL), 11 parameters influence energy efficiency of(e.g. desiccant wheel and energy recovery wheel systems with variable air the building design are building envelopes, site analysis, orientation,volume). Data analysis and simulation results (e.g. contour plot, response configuration, space planning, ventilation, heating, cooling, lightingsurface plot) indicated energy reduction more than 16.6% along with the and appliances, water heating and waste management [4]. In
. THEORETICAL CONTEXT OF THE STUDY maturity, efficient production needs to be emphasized as a part of the organizational strategy. Technology related products are important because ofefficient production as the supply and demand needs to areas concerning education is an appealing notion. Thebe balanced in order to maintain profitability. [19] A plan of accumulating various applications in one productcase example of a technological product manufacturer, is primarily focused on efficiency and cost reduction,using “make-to-order model” for managing the supply whereas, the use of 3d
detection, path planning and 2 20 89 48navigation, reconfigurability and rescue operation. 3 17 129 54 In this paper we describe a human rescue task and 4 14 176 63compare the results with increasing the number of robots 5 10 210 72in the swarm. To conduct this experiment we built smallarena and initially robots placed randomly in the arena. A 7 VII. CONCLUSION
technology (IT), project planningexecutive committee. His affiliations including ASEE, ASME, Sigma Xi and and management. The value of adapting IT for thethe Engineers Club of the Lehigh Valley. management and planning required by these advancedWeb site: http://www.lehigh.edu/~inmse/kg03.shtml technology products was highlighted. Computer Aided Design978-1-4799-5233-5/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEE(CAD) and Numerically Controlled (NC) machine tools were appropriate Section structures and provided conferences,much sought after. The Society of Manufacturing Engineers publications and supporting events.spun off a special
roll angles for each individual cell. The control algorithmdistributed control algorithms across the entire system. The uses a hierarchical design where the higher level handles theclassical form of centralized decision making is restrictive for path planning and the lower level determines how to generatemany of the highly sophisticated processes used in modern the motion required to follow the path. Similar distributedsystems. LSANs provide robust and reliable performance
GAGs density, were repairing.not statistically significant for the strength of Collagen-GAGmatrix in 3D rendering. However in 2D rendering, a significant A. Collagen Geometryfactor found was the radius of collagen in matrix for the GAGsdirected to orthogonal plane of Collagen-GAG matrix. Between Collagen is a highly structured hierarchical protein [2]. Thetwo cross-section selected from Collagen-GAG matrix model, the basic unit of collagen, tropocollagen(TC) molecule, isplane cross through collagen fibrils was symmetrically configured as a right-handed triple helical structure. TC isdistributed but the peak located at orthogonal plan was deducted approximately 1.5nm in diameter and
authors1,2,3,4,5,6. This has been an on-going process for seven years,and has made SOEC an agile “incubator”. The emphasis upon “Agility” in engineering andsoftware development was signaled by the Agile Manifesto in 2001. Seventeen industry softwareengineers declared a change in the software development process. Thomas, one of the group ofseventeen, became a noted Ruby on Rails evangelist and publisher8. Rails invites agility. Agilesoftware development, unlike the rigid, sequential “waterfall” model for software development,consists of development methods based on incremental and iterative steps. In agile development,project requirements and solutions evolve through collaboration between cross-functional teams.It facilitates adaptive planning, development
National Research Council (NRC) Government-University-Industry Roundtable (1997-98); NRC Committee on ”Standards for Technology Education,” (1997-98); National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Academic Advisory Board (1998-2002); NAE ”Engineering of the Year 2020” Planning/Steering Committee (Co-Chair of Planning, 1999-2000; Member of Steering; 2002-2005) and Executive Committeee, Digital Media Innovation Initiative, University of California System (2000-2001), Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory of the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST; 2004- 2005), JPL/Cal Tech Engineering Advisory Board (2003-2005), National Academies Board on Science Education (BOSE, 2005-2007) and the Women in Academic Science
analysis Product planning Cost model Business risk Interpersonal relationships Profit model Business uncertainty Vendor relations Moveable weights, meter sticks, Material samples, angle brackets, Bicycle, blue tape, paint stir stick, Page 24.996.6Lab jeweler’s scale tube scale tube scalesAs used in the pilot deployment, each case study was accompanied by a three-page worksheetthat
, leadership, and communication beforethey enter the workforce is key.15,16,17Communication of ideas in engineering takes theform of lab reports, technical papers, researchpapers, and oral presentations. Thecommunication of ideas in written and oral Figure 1. Engineering Design Processformat is a culmination and demonstration of thedepth of conceptual and process level understanding of STEM concepts and the engineeringdesign process.18,19III. Chosen ReformAs there are many options when designing an engineering learning experience, choosingappropriate reform measures must be done with careful thought and logistical planning. At RU-SOE, we assessed the traditional introductory course, examined logistical constrains, and chosereform measures for