. ABETassessment results demonstrate that the students are not only meeting expectations for the coursebut also for several key “ABET Criterion 3. Student Outcomes” through the exploration andstudy of real-world engineering and technological problems. The course addresses ABET criteria(c), (d), (f), (g), (h), and (j); recent assessment results will be presented for (c), (f), and (h), whichare emphasized in the course. The impacts of the course on the students’ attitudes towardsengineering are being assessed with a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches,including the administration of a survey each semester at the beginning (pre survey) and at theend of the semester (post survey). A qualitative analysis of student responses to a pre- post
Paper ID #36215Measuring Entropy in Sleep EEG to Examine Complexity and Level ofBiological Activity in Different Sleep StagesEdgar Canario, New Jersey Institute of Technology I am an undergraduate researcher working in a medical imaging laboratory at the New Jersey Institute of Technology American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Measuring Entropy in Sleep EEG to Examine Complexity and Level of Biological Activity in Different Sleep Stages By: Edgar Canario, Donna Chen, Bharat
AC 2008-1616: INTEGRATING ENGINEERING ETHICS EDUCATION INTO AMULTI-DISCIPLINARY SEMINAR COURSE: MAKING THE “SOFT”OUTCOMES RELEVANTDavid Cottrell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte DR. DAVID S. COTTRELL is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He graduated from the United States Military Academy in 1978 and retired in 2000 after more than 22 years of service with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Studies at Texas A&M University resulted in an MS Degree in Civil Engineering in 1987 and a PhD in 1995. He is a registered Professional Engineer and has taught courses in statics, dynamics, mechanics of materials, graphic
Software Engineering2004 (SE2004) report developed by the joint IEEE-CS/ACM task force which presented detailedcurriculum guidelines for software engineering undergraduate degree programs, SWE educatorshave had the luxury of much needed guidance about what our curricula should look like. Theicing on the cake took the form of Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET)accreditation of software engineering programs by the Engineering Accreditation Commission(EAC); we finally made the cut and were being recognized as real engineers by the engineeringaccreditation commission, but at what price? SE2004 did an excellent job of elucidating theunderpinnings of all engineering disciplines including software engineering. It also identified
inengineering education by integrating instructional design techniques, transforming theclassroom into a cooperative learning environment, and incorporating the use ofinformation technology in the teaching/learning process. One of the major outcomes ofthat work is a conceptual framework for assisting faculty in transitioning from moretraditional instructional modes to more collaborative modes of instruction. Drawingheavily on a typical engineering process, this framework maps concepts readilyunderstood in the engineering design world to the development of instructionalexperiences. This paper outlines that framework and discusses our efforts to export thisframework to faculty beyond Bucknell through a pair of national workshops conductedlast summer
Virginia Tech Engineeringand Education faculty, K-12 educators, corporations, and policy/decision makers throughoutVirginia in order to improve engineering education. The specific objectives are to: (i) develop anew Masters/Technology Education Teaching Licensure Option for engineering graduates; (ii)create a contemporary framework for undergraduate engineering pedagogy, beginning withfreshman engineering experiences; and (iii) initiate the “Virginia Engineering /EducationCollaborative” to ensure stakeholders’ ownership of project outcomes.A number of initiatives are currently underway to create the proposed contemporary curriculumframework. These initiatives can be classified into following categories: • Collection and analysis of data
leading to adegree in engineering are substantially equivalent and that the accredited programs of bothparties satisfy the academic requirements for entry to the practice of engineering at a professionallevel.The first of these agreements was signed in 1980 by the CEAB and the EngineeringAccreditation Commission (EAC) of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology Page 7.474.3(ABET) in the United States of America. This agreement was updated and ratified by bo th “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society for Engineering
AC 2012-4810: AN AUTOMATED APPROACH TO ASSESSING THE QUAL-ITY OF CODE REVIEWSLakshmi RamachandranDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University Ed Gehringer is an Associate Professor in the departments of Computer Science and Electrical & Com- puter Engineering at North Carolina State University. He received his Ph.D. from Purdue University and has also taught at Carnegie Mellon University and Monash University in Australia. His research interests lie mainly in computer-supported cooperative learning. Page 25.154.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 An
course? Please check all types of questions you ask on you exams: Please check all types of technology that you incorporate in your Engineering Economy course: Please check all of the following teaching methods that you use in your Engineering Economy course: Figure 1: Quantitative Survey Questions. Page 22.58.3Survey Results for Instruction The survey results from the Instruction section give an indication of who is teaching theEngineering Economy course across U.S. classrooms. According to the participants’ responsesto the highest degree they have
- dren and adults, including creative language use. ¨ E. Okudan-Kremer, Iowa State University of Science and TechnologyDr. Gul G¨ul E. Kremer received her PhD from the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engi- neering of Missouri University of Science & Technology. Her research interests include multi-criteria decision analysis methods applied to improvement of products and systems. She is a senior member of IIE, a fellow of ASME, a former Fulbright scholar and NRC Faculty Fellow. Her recent research focus includes sustainable product design and enhancing creativity in engineering design settings.Prof. Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma Zahed Siddique is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at
on several projects funded by the National Science Foundation, including ”Engineering Sustainable Engineers,” which is the focus of this paper.Dr. Benjamin Afotey, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Benjamin Afotey hails from Ghana, West Africa. He completed his secondary education at St. Peter’s Secondary School and Ghana National College. He graduated from the University of Science and Tech- nology, with a bachelor’s of science degree in chemical engineering in June 2000. During his final year, he worked as a student intern at Cocoa Processing Company, Ghana. Afotey completed his master’s in civil/environmental engineering from the University of Texas, Arlington, in Dec. 2003. During this pe
is in chemical engineering education with a focus on process safety, lab instruction, and student engagement.Dr. Heather Chenette, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Heather Chenette is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her professional interests include leveraging qualitative methods to understand and enhance student learning in the classroom and creating opportunities for students to learn about polymers, membrane materials, and bioseparation processes through research experiences.Dr. Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Matthew Cooper is a Teaching Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North
monitors and teaching assistants. Listed both as CprE 370and Mat E 370 under the ISU course catalog, the TWT program was designed “to offer atechnology class aimed at students, particularly education majors, who are in non-technical fields but want an appreciation for the technological innovations that surroundthem.” (TWT website) Additionally, students taking the class should emerge equippedwith resources to effectively incorporate technology into their future classrooms. All ofthe students enrolled in the TWT program courses are education majors and the onlynon-education majors in that room are staff personnel.THE TWT STAFFDr. Larry Genalo, professor in the Materials Science and Engineering department,supervises the TWT program with the
Associate Professor of Mathematics at the New York City College of Technology in Brooklyn, NY. He completed his Ph.D. in 2011 at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign under the supervision of A.J. Hildebrand. Before coming to NYCCT, he worked at the United States Military Academy in West Point, NY. His main research interests are in number theory (analytic and combinatorial) and its applications. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Curricular and Strategic Changes in Mathematics to Enhance Institutional STEM Education Sandie Han1 , Boyan Kostadinov1 , Janet Liou-Mark1 , and Johann Thiel1
Keeping an Engineering Economy Course In-line With the Practice of Engineering William R. Peterson, PhD, and Guanghsu Chang, PhD Department of Automotive and Manufacturing Engineering Technology Minnesota State University, MankatoAbstract:This paper addresses a perceived gap between the use of spreadsheets in the application ofengineering economy concepts and tools in the classroom and in the workplace. Of particularconcern is the use of tables in teaching the material and their absence from the workplace. Thepaper i ba ed on he a hor e perience in he orkplace a prac icing engineer /engineermanagers and in the classroom teaching engineering economy at
AC 2007-1829: DEVELOPING A BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING FOCUS WHILEMAINTAINING A STRONG ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMTimothy Bigelow, University of North Dakota Timothy A. Bigelow Department of Electrical Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202 USA Page 12.476.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Developing a Biomedical Engineering Focus while Maintaining a Strong Electrical Engineering CurriculumAbstractThere is a growing need to train talented engineers that can develop technology at the boundarybetween the biological/medical sciences and engineering. Engineers that
residents were asked to reduce the amount of bathroom water used. The reservoir came within one day of having no usable water supply, and the student’s university came close to shutting off the water supply to all dormitories. Luckily, a substantial rainfall event avoided this situation. Anticipating future droughts, City and University administrators asked local engineering firms to develop a plan to reduce the amount of water used by businesses in the area and the dorms serving the students at your university. These plans are to be implemented by the year 2020. Failure to implement these technologies results in stiff financial fines.After reading this description, the students answered questions outlined in Table 2. Thesequestions were designed
Paper ID #6524Engineering Management Creating Individuals with a Mind for Business anda Heart for EngineeringDr. Saeed D. Foroudastan, Middle Tennessee State University Saeed Foroudastan is the Associate Dean for the College of Basic and Applied Sciences (CBAS). The CBAS oversees 10 departments at Middle Tennessee State University. He is also the current Director for the Master’s of Science in Professional Science program and a professor of engineering technology at MTSU. Foroudastan received his B.S. in civil engineering, his M.S. in civil engineering, and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Tennessee Technological
Peer-Mentoring among Female Biomedical Engineering Students can be Extended to Other Engineering Disciplines Semahat S. DemirJoint Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Memphis & University of Tennessee 330 Engineering Technology Building, Memphis TN, 38152-3210, USA Adjunct Faculty of Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Işık University, Istanbul, Turkey Email: sdemir@memphis.edu Abstract— Mentoring is significant personal and professional assistance given by a moreexperienced person to a less experienced person during a time of transition. Transitions fromhigh school to
Session 1260Engineering Education and Curriculum as an Extension of Engineering Discourse in the Post-Williams Era. Josef Rojter, Department of Mechanical Engineering Victoria University of Technology Melbourne MC PO BOX 14428, VIC Australia Page 3.245.1 1ABSTRACT It is nearly 10 years since the Williams inquiry into discipline of Engineering inAustralia. Like its earlier British counterpart, the Finniston inquiry, the Williams reportbecame the landmark in the study of
GC 2012-5639: EFFECT OF WOMEN IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT OF FEMALE ENGINEERING STUDENTSDong Ik Kim, Kunsun UniversityProf. Myongsook Susan Oh, Hongik University Myongsook Oh is a professor of Chemical Engineering Department at Hongik University in Seoul. She obtained a B.S. degree in chemical engineering from the University of California at Berkeley, and Sc. D. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Before joining Hongik University, Dr. Oh was associated with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Texaco, Inc in the U. S. Starting from her Sc. D. thesis on softening coal pyrolysis, she worked on the conversion of fossil fuels for over 30 years. She has continued working on the
Session 2342 Involving Industry in the Design of Courses, Programs, and A Systems Engineering and Engineering Management Department John V. Farr and Dinesh Verma Stevens Institute of TechnologyABSTRACTOn July 1, 2000 Stevens Institute of Technology created a new Systems Engineering andEngineering Management (SEEM) department. Through a unique partnership with industry andselected government agencies in the area of short courses, graduate programs, and appliedresearch, the department has grown to over 60 masters and 30 PhD students in one year. Interms of revenue from
Session 2515 MIT’s Master of Engineering Degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering--a first professional degree E. Eric Adams, Rafael L. Bras Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyIntroductionEngineering is one of the few disciplines in which professional status is claimed with only afour-year undergraduate degree. It is becoming evident that such a model is not sustainable inan increasingly complicated and technological world. Employers have responded byeffectively requiring a masters as entry level degree for
through progressively leadingsmall teams, medium teams and larger teams. Secondly, because there are fewer mid-levelemployees, less-experienced engineers are frequently stretched into leadership roles beyond whatwould typically be given them.Interviews with several technology executives estimate that nearly 80% of projects led by thesewell motivated, but raw, chiefs fail in achieving many of the key objectives of the project, at bestcreating a non-optimal product; at worst something unworthy of taking to market.Adding to the difficulty of developing engineering leadership is distilling the difference betweenmanagement and leadership. Developing engineers perceive career growth in the technicalspace as capped or limited and that eventually they
overlook how they influence our lives. Pearson and Young 1 discussthis paradox to emphasize the importance of increasing technological literacy of everyone. Priorstudies of people’s (children and adults) perceptions of engineering describe peoples’ ability tonotice the visible aspect of engineering created by civil (buildings, bridges), mechanical (cars,machines) and electrical engineering (electrical energy that runs our machines). An examinationof their descriptions of engineering, however, often contains misconceptions. If teachers are partof the solution to develop students’ awareness of engineering, then we need to better understandtheir abilities to identify engineering within the world and to talk about it with their students. Ourstudy
Paper ID #17708Integration of Engineering Capstone within a Makerspace EnvironmentMr. Luis Javier Martinez, New Mexico State University, Department of Industrial Engineering Luis J Martinez is a MS graduate student in the Department of Industrial Engineering at New Mexico State University. His current work involves the integration of capstone projects from the College of Engineering of NMSU with the Aggie Innovation Space (the university maker space) with hopes of transitioning these projects to a Technology Acceleration process with the Student Technology Incubator of the University. Luis is involved in the Institute of
at the Faculty Electronics and Information Technology over the periodof the last 12 years. The following remarks must be taken into account when analyzing thepresented data:− The regular full-time students who received their degrees in 1988, 1992, 1996 and 2000 are considered.− The data refer to the 5-year program leading up to the M.S. degree – the traditional model of engineering education in Poland and the predominant model of studies at the Faculty for students who graduated in 1998 or before. Only for 2000, the students who completed the 4- year program leading up to the B.S. degree are also considered. It must be noted that since the introduction of the two-stage system of studies (B.S. – M.S.) in 1994, only good students
Session 2793 The Role of Engineering in Pre-College Education Sheryl A. Sorby, Beverly J. Baartmans Engineering Fundamentals/Mathematical Sciences Michigan Technological University Houghton, Michigan 49931IntroductionAs engineering educators, we often complain about the lack of preparation in math and sciencethat our students exhibit when they first arrive on campus. Many who have been on the engineer-ing faculty for a long time remark that the situation is worsening with time (or maybe it’s just asign of aging
examined 40 lesson activities from a website that provides teachers withover one thousand free activities. This website was chosen because it is NSF-funded, acollaborative effort from several well-respected universities, and a top hit when searching for“K-12 Engineering Activities” on Google. It is also one of the only sites that provides completeunits, as opposed to stand-alone activities, at no cost.A search was conducted within the website to limit the focus of this research, which includedlooking at complete units under “Science and Technology” that cover the Engineering DesignStandards for grades 3-5. All lesson activities were coded by two of the researchers, using acodebook that was developed with the “practices matrix” in the NGSS. The
Palma, Universidad de Piura Professor at the University of Piura Martin Palma is in the Academic Program of Industrial Engineering. Dedicated to operations management and sustainable development projects, Palma has conducted research on skills training in Engineering for many years.Mrs. Susana Vegas, Universidad de Piura Page 23.715.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013Improving Generic Skills among Engineering Students through Project-Based Learning in a Project Management CourseAbstractThe speed of technological change, the increase in social exigencies, and