Prototyping Lecture 9 Ethics Lecture 10 Intellectual Property and Patents Lecture 11 Project Debriefthe work status. The weekly status report was also utilized to evaluate individual student’scontributions and to provide written feedback to student(s). Progress of the project wasconstantly monitored using the reporting tools presented below. ● Gantt chart: Each team was required to submit a Gantt chart for the project. The purpose of the document is to help the team lead to have an advance plan for the project execution and keep track of the work progress. ● Weekly status report: The teams are asked to submit the weekly status reports using the provided template (see
assumptions about their intellect and identity in the forms of bias, derogatory remarks,toxic stereotypes, and microaggressions [16]. Due to their assumptions about minoritizedstudents, they often interacted with them assuming that they had poor work ethic or lack inacademic ability [22]. Discrimination includes stereotypes, biases, isolation, unwelcomingcultures, and many of the other factors examined in this review.Advisor and Faculty SupportMinoritized students’ relationships with their advisor and faculty can prove to be a double-edgedsword that can have a negative or positive influence on retention [12]. Graduate students cannotprogress through their respective programs without the constant support of their advisor. Thistype of mentorship
for both SLP and ME programs. As part of a goal-scenario framework,SLP students functioned as clinicians and were tasked with coming up with the fundamentalpurpose and design of custom therapeutic devices. ME students worked with SLP students todefine functional requirements and to develop specific solutions. ME students were also taskedwith defining an expedient and economic manufacturing method to realize the designs. Theproject was developed as part of a curriculum that supports ABET student outcomes:c. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,restructurability, and sustainability.d. An ability to
address research question 1, while a regression model was calculated to predictterm grades, addressing question 2.For the qualitative portion of the study, conducted in 2019 only, students were asked in the PBsurvey to consent to a follow-up interview. Students who spent more than seven days of the fallbreak on campus were invited to participate in a 30-minute interview. This portion of the studywas conducted as a phenomenology [15], seeking to understand the shared experience of thereading break for students who did not return home. These data were used to address researchquestions 3 and 4.1 University of Waterloo Office of Research Ethics #40032ResultsThe surveys relied on student perception and self-reporting of how they spent their time
, this class focused on approaches to equip studentswith better understanding of design process and product development. Some of the key featuresof this course were17 : 1. Learning and implementing the skills/approaches used in designing 2. Plan and organize data related to projects 3. Informing students with importance of analysis, evaluation and synthesis in designing 4. Use of important and fundamental concepts of work environment 5. Focused on inculcating ethical values related to work 3.2. Survey Instrument:The survey instrument used in this study comprises of two questionnaires, to measure andanalyze empathy in students of junior year in mechanical engineering. Junior year students indesign methodologies class
the same professor / instructor in JIT.JIT is in the process of being launched. Included in this paper are class listings for year 1 and theJIT newsletter containing launch status.Jefferson Institute of TechnologyClasses / Lesson Plans - Year 1, Trimester 11.1.1 Introduction to the Jefferson Electronic Manufacturing (JEM) Center Includes, 1.1.1.1 Introduction to Civics 1.1.1.2. Organizational & Personal Ethics in an Engineering and the Production Team Environment1.1.2 Anatomy of an Electronic Product and an Introduction to the Assembly Processes1.1.3 Basic Economic Theory and its Application in the Electronic Product Production Business1.1.4 Calculus 1.0 and its Application in High Tech
: Projects8 Review and Catch-up Chp. 2, 3 and projects Midterm Exam (100 min., March 16)9 Spring Break Catch-up time10 Gathering Information Chp. 5.1-end Lab: Projects11 Concept Generation Chp. 6.3 and 6.4 Lab: Creativity and Innovation tapes12 Concept Generation Chp. 6.5-end Lab: Software use (MathCAD)13 Review and Catch-up Chp. 5, 6, software use and Exam-3 (100 min., April 20) projects14 Decision Making and Concept Selection Chp. 7-end Lab: Projects15 Legal and Ethical Issues in Design Chp. 17 Project
communication science. Dr. Fraustino’s work has been recognized with top research paper awards at national/international conferences yearly from 2013-present. Additionally, she was named a national 2017-2018 AEJMC Emerging Scholar, earned the 2018 Doug Newsom Award for Research in Global Ethics and Diversity from the AEJMC PR c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #31050 Division, was the 2017 Reed College of Media Faculty Research Award recipient, was a 2016 national Frank Public Interest Communications Research Prize award winner, received a 2015 Most Promising Professor Award
mechatronics and robotics and also has a deep interest in promoting STEAM education rounded with professional skills and ethics. She earned her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Florida International University, MS in Mechanical Engineering with Bionengineering from Florida Atlantic University, and a BS in Electrical Engineering from Florida Atlantic University. She has industry experience with the Ford Motor Company of Europe and the Sensormatic Corporation. She also has experience at the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Florida Polytechnic University, and automotive and robotic companies in the Detroit area.Dr. Xiaopeng Zhao, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Dr. Xiaopeng Zhao is a professor of mechanical
of different backgrounds, and discovering topics that couldhelp impact the world. It helped me develop the skills that are needed in graduate school byshowing commitment, interest in learning, construct and developing plans on how to researchand do a specific topic, curiosity, work ethic, and reliability to the potential graduate schools thatI am ready for their research and to help impact the world positively. All the aside, in order forme to be able to do what I truly want to do, the career requires me to get a graduate degree.Student Experience: Isabel Bojanini, University of California, BerkeleyDuring my sophomore year at PCC, I joined the research group of Dr. Khuloud Sweimehthrough the Pasadena City College Early Career Undergraduate
time to reflect on the event and had a similarlyhigh response rate.1 This study has received approval from the University of Waterloo Office of Research Ethics, ORE # 19224 andORE# 21031.3 Program ImplementationsAs of this writing, seven Engineering programs at the University of Waterloo have implementedsome version of an Engineering Design Days event in first year: Mechatronics Engineering(Tron Days), Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE Days), Mechanical Engineering (MechDays), Management Engineering (Case Days), and Systems Design and Biomedical Engineering(Design Dayz). One program has implemented Engineering Days in second year: CivilEngineering (Civ Days). The discussion that follows will concentrate on Tron Days, ECE Days,and
graduation age is comparable to that of other STEM fields, it is in stark contrastto average graduation ages in fields such as education (38.3) and humanities (34.2), where it ismore common for students to return for a degree after working in the field for several years [8].Though there is limited research on returners at the doctoral level in engineering, research onreturners generally in a number of fields suggests returning students may have distinct strengthsand challenges. In addition to the rich applied work experiences they can bring to their doctoralwork [3], returners may be more mature, goal-oriented, and motivated, and possess strongteamwork skills and a high work ethic [9] - [11]. However, returners can also face challengestransitioning
personnel responsibilities in the organized deployment of IBBME Discovery Position Roles and Responsibilities Faculty Supervisor ● Overarching program vision and progression ● Acquisition and administration of funding ● Liaison with IBBME director and high school/school board administrations in support of Graduate Student Head ● Correspond on research publication and ethical research approvals ● Oversee graduate student skill development and facilitation of graduate professional skills (GPS) designation Graduate Student ● Overall supervision of program operation Head ● Liaison between
4 Learning ethical conduct 5 5* student reported her confidence is at 5 for her NASA research, but 3.5 in generalShe also responded to some open-ended questions for the pre-survey:Why did you want to be involved with this research/apply to NASA Space Grant? “After going to AISES [American Indian Science and Engineering Society] nationalconference and seeing Native Americans presenting high-level research I made it my goal to oneday present there. I really admired researchers presenting science they were passionate aboutand hope to be like that one day.”What are your expectations from this year? “I hope to learn a lot and grow as a scientist. Instead of just studying
, causeslearners to appreciate the contribution of engineering in our culture, assists learners inrecognizing the ethical and moral values that engineers need to demonstrate, and aids in theteaching and learning of engineering instruction. However, NOE teaching is not an easy task,and a lack of NOE understanding also raises many issues and obstacles for science teachers toincorporate NOE in science instruction. Science teachers need training to fulfill the requirementsdescribed in the NGSS and to inform teachers about NOE aspects. To meet this goal, weprovided a professional development that focuses on NOE and the engineering design processduring summer 2017 in a southwestern research institute. Using the cognitive apprenticeshipmodel, secondary science
Huang is a Lecturer in the National University of Defense Technology. His main research interests include global engineering education, ethics of education, and philosophy of Science and technology. He received his BS degree in public manage and PhD degree in philosophy of science and technology both from National University of Defense Technology (China). He is a visiting scholar of National University of Singapore and the Member of the International Association for Continuing Engineering EducationI- ACEE.Mrs. Zhang Jianing, Changsha SunVote Limited, China Jianing Zhang is an Engineer of Changsha SunVote Limited,China. She received her B.S.(1995), M.S.(1998), in Circuit and System from Tianjin University, China. She
practices, environmental, ethics and humanitarian engineering, and non-traditional knowledge transfer. Homero has been recognized as a Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Dr. David B. Knight, Virginia Tech c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #22387David Knight is Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in the De-partment of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of International Engagementin Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. Hisresearch tends to be at the
feedback are presented.Introduction and Course DescriptionThe College of Engineering (CoE) seeks opportunities to enhance its program curriculumhelping students become more successful after graduation. As of October 2017, the CoE’smission is as follows:“The mission of the College of Engineering is to develop team-oriented engineeringprofessionals from diverse backgrounds who are prepared to ethically apply industry-currentreal-world skills to achieve value-added solutions in a dynamic world.”During 2017, CoE successfully received an ABET re-accreditation with no interim reports for sixyears for the BSEE and BSCE undergraduate programs. During the accreditation process, oneissue ABET visitors posed a question to CoE paraphrased as: where does the
drug [Topol, 2004].Using these back stories, we created a series of scenarios along with questions. We framed eachquestion so as to obscure its origin while potentially allowing the student to draw out and discussa decision error of systems engineering. Why not simply give students descriptions of the failuresand the findings we discussed and have the students evaluate them? First, we wanted to eliminatebias due to students being familiar with a particular failure. For example, the Space ShuttleChallenger accident is a frequent topic in engineering ethics lectures. A learned, in-context,response from a previous exposure would not give us an indication of their abilities in systemsengineering. Second, the point of framing a question around a
and engineering (CLOs 1-2, 5-7)(b) Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (CLOs 2- 5)(c) Ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturing, and sustainability (CLOs 3-5)(e) Ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems (CLOs 1-7)(g) Ability to communicate effectively (CLO 5)(h) Broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (CLO 5)(k) Ability to use techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice (CLOs 1-7
inteams, and critically explore the ethics and values of their work; yet, the current curriculum ispopulated by traditional engineering courses that follow the typical formula of lectures, close-end homework problems, and exams. Pathways in and out of the program are also scarce,influenced primarily by an assortment of required courses that fill much of student check sheets.In our plan to enact change to diversify the ECE department in terms of student make-up andconcentrations to choose from, identifying critical points in the student’s trajectory towarddegree completion was made the first course of action.To adopt a frame through which we can examine the curriculum, the idea of threshold conceptsproved to be an attractive foundation for the
final project in a senior level class on global industrialmanagement. The course focuses on teaching how the practice of engineering changes in globalindustrial settings. It addresses elements such as political and regulatory constraints (import andexport tariff and quotas), foreign currencies, applicability of foreign legal systems, working inmulticultural environments, resolution of emerging ethical issues, and the impact of internationalstrategies to the practice of engineering. The course had 80 students; approximately 60 studentsmajored in Industrial Engineering and the rest of the students majored in Packaging Design,Biological Systems Engineering, or Mechanical Engineering.Teams. Students were randomly assigned to twelve teams of six or
diverse individuals and more in alignment with current research on decision-making. With a focus on qualitative research methods, she is working to better understand the ways in which undergraduate engineering students experience design and ill-structured problem solving. Her interests also include neuroscience, growth mindset, engineering ethics, and race and gender in engineering. In general, Dr. Dringenberg is always excited to learn new things and work with motivated individuals from diverse backgrounds to improve engineering education.Amena Shermadou, Ohio State University Amena Shermadou is an Engineering Education graduate student at The Ohio State University. She received her Bachelors and Masters in Biomedical
coursework,Rebecca sought to achieve the best performance in relation to others.However, in Rebecca’s view, being the “best” reflected a conscientious and unrelenting work ethic ratherthan an innate intellectual talent. Indeed, she expressed disdain when people attributed her success oraccomplishments to raw intelligence: I feel like smarts don’t really have anything to do with it. It’s just your time management, your willingness to work hard, your willingness to get your stuff done, not be lazy or give excuses. . . You know if you’re any student, I feel like those are expected of you. It’s a major, and so your job is to do your job.Thus, Rebecca’s overall expectations for herself were highly informed by comparison to the
international teaching assistants In engineering evaluate undergraduate writing,” in 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 2002.[11] N. Hayes and L. D. Introna, “Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning,” Ethics Behav., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 213–231, 2005.[12] J. Zhou, “What is missing in the international teaching assistants training curriculum?,” J. Fac. Dev., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 19–24, 2009.[13] D. Trebing, “International teaching assistants’ attitudes toward teaching and understanding of United States American undergraduate students,” ProQuest, 2007.[14] E. Arshavskaya, “International teaching assistants’ experiences in the US classrooms: Implications for practice,” J
undergoingevaluation. As mentioned above, here national studies such as the NAE Grand Challenges aremore likely to serve as inspiration for local action.There is also a considerable extent to which institutions model what they do based on initiativesthat are already taking place at “peer and aspirant institutions.” Many universities in fact engagein the routine practice of assembling study teams when launching a new initiative, and theseteams are almost always welcomed at the colleges and universities that have alreadyimplemented successful programs. Academic traditions of openness appear to contribute to ageneral ethic of sharing. In addition, accreditation visits themselves serve as an importantmechanism for faculty to see what peer institutions are doing