study whichhypothesizes that women and URM students who persist in engineering programs are morelikely to 1) enter with and acquire/develop various forms/levels of the social capital and 2)resolve conflicts between their CMES and the culture espoused by the program. The researchquestion we address in this paper is: Why do women and URM students switch from engineeringundergraduate majors to non-engineering majors?Theoretical FrameworksWe are guided by social capital and cultural model frameworks to gain an understanding of thesocial, cultural, and cognitive factors that impact the retention and degree attainment of womenand minorities in engineering. Supported by the highly disproportionate graduation rates of URMundergraduate and doctoral
STEMdisciplines. With less than 30% of STEM PhD’s entering the professoriate, we are intentionallyassuring that BD Scholars are also aware of the breath of opportunities that are available beyondthe professoriate.The goal of this preparing future minority Ph.D. researchers (PFMPR) BD Program is to preparea cohort of 12 LSAMP BD Fellows to persist in STEM Ph.D. programs at N. C. A&T. Threecore objectives include: (1) Enroll a cohort of 12 verified LSAMP scholars into STEM graduatedegree programs at N.C. A&T; (2) Implement a comprehensive program that prepares, retains,and enables BD Fellows to successfully undertake STEM doctoral programs; and (3) Providesupport to BD Fellows beyond BD funding in preparation for graduation and career. Thisprogram
andTolerancing (GD&T) in design and manufacturing helps to minimize the above issues byimproving manufacturing output, productivity, cross-departmental communication, partassembly, part interchangeability while reducing cost and shortening schedule time [1],[2].Although industry have been implementing GD&T for decades, lack of comprehensiveeducations in undergraduate engineering/technology curricula make the transition of graduatedengineers to industry a difficult period. It was suggested that GD&T should be taught for 60hours during two quarters or during one whole semester [3]. Literature survey indicates only fewinstitutions in the USA have engaged students with GD&T activities in undergraduate programswhile some programs even
aspirations and goals. Furthermore, the theory recognizes that social andenvironmental factors, such as family and cultural values, role models, and opportunities, impactcareer choices. The social cognitive career theory has broad implications for career counselingand development interventions. It highlights the importance of promoting self-efficacy beliefsand creating supportive environments for career exploration and decision-making.2.6 Time[1] investigated the factors that influence the development of students' calculus skills in CalculusI courses using a qualitative case study approach. They found that various factors affect thedevelopment of calculus skills, including instructor pedagogy, course structure, studentmotivation, and study habits
Programs Officer at the National Society of Black Engineers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Examining the impact of a summer engineering program on academic self- efficacyIntroductionThe economic future of the U.S. will depend on engineers, as they are critical in providingsolutions to the world’s environmental, medical, and technological challenges. However,fulfilling these roles will be challenging due to the lack of early access, STEM inspired educationfor underrepresented students, and the growing lack of interest in STEM careers [1], [2]. Thus, itbecomes immensely important to introduce students to these fields during their elementary andsecondary education, to
people learn and apply design thinking and making processes to their work. He is interested in the in- tersection of designerly epistemic identities and vocational pathways. Dr. Lande received his B.S. in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Me- chanical Engineering (Design Education) from Stanford University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Making Spaces to Supporting Formal, Informal, and Nonformal Learning Spanning a University's Makerspace Learning EcologyIntroductionThis cross-case case study [1] project aims to ascribe characteristics of differently orientedmakerspaces across the learning ecology [2] at a
EducationIntroductionTraditionally, Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs) have welcomed a homogenous body ofstudents with similar socio-economic, academic, and racial/ethnic backgrounds. Institutionalpolicies have prevented access and full participation of minoritized students leading to lowerretention and graduation. This has spillover effects into the workforce where there is animbalance in the representation of minority groups. As shown in a recent report from the PewResearch Center, Blacks and Hispanics make 27% of all employees but only 17% of the STEMworkforce [1].Despite this history, for the past few decades universities and colleges have seen an increase instudents coming from historically marginalized communities including Black students [2], [3], [4]. This new
were designed to permit flexibility of equipment access.Incorporating such laboratories in engineering education, however, also allows inclusivity,democratization, and participation [1, 2]. Information technology's affordance and fairnessbecome crucial when accessing laboratory equipment. While there is much research on howremote labs contribute to the overall learning experience, there is little or no investigation intowhether and how remote labs promote inclusion and equity in conjunction with instructionallaboratory experiences. In addition to that, ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology) proposed modifications to the general criteria for accrediting engineeringprograms, which states that the curriculum should also include
characteristic of integrating theory and practice,therefore, interdisciplinarity, research, and extension are fundamental steps for an integralformation of the engineer [1]. A. Ribas Neto, M. Fiorin and T. Dequigiovani [2] comment onthe importance of applying projects in building students' knowledge of the technologydegrees. When searching for these courses, it is possible to find a large list of courses thatcontain integrative projects in their curriculum so that students develop knowledge in anintegrated way and help in understanding what each course proposes to offer. C. CechellaPhilippi [3], defines an integrative project as an inter and multidisciplinary pedagogicalpractice that relates the topics and contents taught in the classroom
project-based learning.Additionally, survey results demonstrated that first-generation students may have additionalobstacles to their learning outside the classroom including family and work responsibilities.Finally, the survey results indicated that including a project focused on engineering researchincreased students’ knowledge of and interest in the research enterprise of the university.IntroductionPrior to the pandemic, the Mechanical Engineering department had begun a careful examinationof the retention of first and second year students and, in particular, underrepresented anddisadvantaged groups including women, underrepresented minorities, and first generationstudents [1]. In this work, it was found that retention of women to graduation
additional campuses:Villanova University, Drexel University, and Gallaudet University. While all of these sites areprivate universities, they each offer distinct contexts and circumstances.The LTM Project builds on two past NSF ADVANCE funded efforts at RIT going back fifteenyears. In 2008, RIT received an NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Catalyst award,Establishing the Foundation for Future Organizational Reform at RIT (#0811076), orEFFORT@RIT which identified career advancement barriers for RIT women faculty andestablished how well the university addressed issues in the recruitment, retention, andadvancement of women faculty. Results of a faculty climate survey [1] conducted as part of theproject, in conjunction with objective data review
acrossindividual faculty based on the type of assessment practices they choose to adopt in their courses.In addition to traditional formative and summative assessments, prior literature has identifiedother forms of assessment including standards-based, competency-based, mastery-based, andadaptive [1]. More recently, the practice of ungrading has become more prominent in thehumanities and social sciences and is slowly being adopted by engineering education. In coursesthat utilize ungrading, students are required to develop a portfolio of writing intensive or othertypes of projects in lieu of traditional assignments [2]. Students are expected to submit their workfor review, obtain feedback from the instructor, and implement that feedback over the course
require anappropriate level of personal disclosure to develop trust [1]. Many students often discuss theirfamilies and romantic interests with their peers, similar how to many of us might shareinformation about our spouses and children with our colleagues. These pieces of informationestablish points of commonality and difference that help us relate to each other, which facilitatesour ability to work together toward some common goal.For heterosexual, cisgender students in STEM, the routine disclosure of information that revealstheir gender identity or sexual orientation, like information about potential romantic interests, isquite benign [2]. However, LGBTQ students typically face pressures in STEM contexts to hidetheir sexual and gender
and NS BD training grants at FIU. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Exploring Institutional Retention Support Initiatives for Retaining Women of Color STEM FacultyIntroductionAlthough women’s representation has generally increased in some STEM fields in theprofessoriate [1], Women of Color (WOC) still face unique challenges due to unfavorableinstitutional climates [2], microaggressions based on race and gender [3], and hostiledepartmental climates [4]. As a result, WOC experiences chilly work environments [5],including isolation and tokenism [6]. While the literature on the challenges incurred by WOCSTEM faculty is significant, these challenges are
algorithm. Utilizing machine learning predictionswith personalized user profiles, the web application solution efficiently compiles relevant andnecessary product information for consumers to decide between products in a centralizedlocation. The user interface of the web application has also been designed with usability in mindto serve a broader audience. The application specifically considers individuals who are visuallyacute and impaired through font size, color contrast, screen reader compatibility, and keyboardaccessibility. Through conducting user surveys, the team found that 79.2% of users foundMatilda to be user-friendly and 87.5% of users were satisfied with Matilda’s recommendations.1. IntroductionSenior capstone projects are an integral
the bodybalanced [3,4].Figure 1 shows a schematic of the VS located in the inner ear. It includes the vestibular labyrinth,which houses three semicircular canals (SCCs), referred to as the anterior, lateral, and posterior,and the two otolith organs, the utricle, and the saccule. The three SCCs located perpendicular toeach other detect angular acceleration with respect to the three axes. For example, the lateral SCC,located horizontally, detects angular rotations of the head turning left or right. The posterior andanterior SCC’s detect left and right head tilts and head movements up and down respectively. Theutricle and the saccule detect linear or translational motion, in the horizontal and vertical directions,respectively [3,4
(Hadzigeorgiou et al., 2012) and math education (James, 2006) to the informalstudy of literature (Stewart, 2014). Increasingly, IE is seen as a promising approach to supportingengineering students’ engagement with content, both by connecting to students’ emotions and byfacilitating the conceptual transfer of key engineering design concepts (Ellis & Thornton, 2011).IE is grounded in the development of five different and increasingly complex types ofunderstanding that correspond to theorized stages of language acquisition. Associated with eachtype of understanding is a set of “cognitive tools” or mental devices that have been characteristicof human cognition throughout time (see Table 1).Transmedia storytelling (Jenkins, 2006) is another approach to
). Before deployment of this module,students were presented with a Likert survey (5-point scale with 1 being strongly disagree and 5being strongly agree) to gauge their comfortability (as a measure of self-efficacy) withexperimental techniques, experimental design, data analysis, and their ability to describeapoptotic mechanisms. Students then participated in a series of “wet” and “dry” lab exercises topromote TDA competency in tissue characterization by real-time RT-PCR. Afterwards, studentscompleted a post-lab Likert survey to assess outcomes. Based on our analysis, students expressedenhanced self-efficacy in performing real-time RT-PCR (2.9 vs. 4.1, p < 0.01), analyzing gene-expression data (3.1 vs. 3.9, p < 0.05) and explaining the
levels of thinking [1]–[5].While team-based design projects are widely used in first-year introductory engineering courses,implementing these team-based experiences can be logistically challenging. Introductory coursesoften have large class enrollments with constraints on the availability of faculty instructors,especially at large, research-focused universities [6]. Our institution uses a cadre ofundergraduate TAs to mentor student teams and facilitate small group discussions in our large-enrollment (ca. 700 students) introductory engineering course with a TA-to-student ratio of 1:25[7]. Teamwork in this course is structured around two summative interdisciplinary projects [8],[9]. We have previously identified the need to provide support to our
students who begin with Calculus I has slowly grown to around 24%.Please see Figure 1 for the trend of Calculus I enrollment over the last eight years.Figure 1. Enrollment in Calculus I over the past eight years 900 30.00% 800 25.00% 700 600 20.00% 500 15.00% 400 300
use in the world and equating knowledge of technology to knowledge of readingand writing from the past [1]. In contrasting appeals proponents have called to broaden the engineeringcurriculum to include more liberal arts, and in turn learn more engineering on the job or in graduateschool [2]. However, as we stand currently in 2023, we have not witnessed such extreme shifts in eitherdirection in a majority of programs across the United States. Instead and perhaps a more fortunatephenomenon that we have seen in undergraduate education is joint liberal arts and engineering programswhich have existed for a few decades now. For example, the Engineering Studies program at LafayetteCollege which was established in 1970 and brings together in its
disciplines. Translating these grading practices to the STEMfields may draw concerns from many faculty that the academic rigor will be reduced. Yet, whenthe focus of assessment shifts toward proficiency with the content and skills being taught,learning can actually be enhanced, not diminished. With mastery grading, rather than earningpoints, the students are assessed on their level of mastery on a variety of content outcomes.Mastery grading allows for learning to be student-centered and focuses on the understanding ofcourse content on the student’s timeline. Mastery grading promotes the growth mindset [1] andhighlights the learning process as a continuum rather than focusing on fixed high-stakesassessments.Making the switch to a non-traditional
Paper ID #36957Fortitude in frustration, failure: Exploring emotional responses withinan at-home elementary engineering program.Peter N. Knox, University of VermontAmber Simpson, State University of New York at Binghamton Amber Simpson is an Associate Professor of Mathematics Education in the Teaching, Leaming and Edu- cational Leadership Department at Binghamton University. Her research interests include (1) examining individual’s identity(ies) in one or more STEM disciplines, (2) understanding the role of making a.11d tinkering in formal and informal learning environments, and (3) investigating family engagement in and
1.Prior to the formation of GradWIE, we developed and distributed a pilot survey to all graduatestudents in the College of Engineering to gauge (1) the need for community and (2) studentinterest in creating a group for women who are graduate students in the engineering field. Ourprocess of assessing community needs prior to organizing within the community couldpotentially benefit the thousands of university student organizations in the United States.Students’ valuable time and energy during very challenging years at university [1] could bedirected towards creating more effective, meaningful outcomes of their extracurricular activities.Such experience may enhance professional appeal. Student organizations, especially thoseintended to support
how marginalization andinclusion in communication operates both at the level of students and teachers, but also through physicalclassroom settings and the larger educational context. However, there is still a need for further research tocreate more equitable STEM classrooms. To that end, our study seeks to gain firsthand insight fromwomen and gender-diverse students and faculty members regarding their experiences in academia.Participants share perspectives and strategies for overcoming experiences of marginalization and creatingmore welcoming and inclusive learning environments in introductory engineering courses. Thisqualitative study seeks to answer the following questions: (1) What types of marginalization do womenstudents experience while
application of sustainable platforms for the purification and detection of biomarkers. Has made research internships at the Michael Smith Laboratories at the University of British Columbia and the Water Center for Latin America and the Caribbean. In 2018 she was Coordinator at the Writing Lab of the Institute for the Future of Education. She is the co-author of 29 ISI indexed scientific publications, 1 book, 2 book chapters, and co-inventor of 4 intellectual properties. She is a member of the Mexican National System of Researchers. Her contributions in the field of sustainability have been in biotechnology, cereal sciences, energy efficiency; and active learning in education. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1568-4954Vianney Lara
Paper ID #38480Fostering Inclusive Department Climates: A Workshop for DepartmentChairs at the University of XDr. Shawna Vican, University of Delaware Shawna Vican is an Assistant Professor of Sociology and Criminal Justice at the University of Delaware. She received her Ph.D. in Sociology from Harvard University. As a scholar of gender and organizations, Dr. Vican’s work seeks to understand why gender inequality in the workplace persists and how orga- nizations can affect change, with three main research streams: (1) how organizational practices shape workplace gender inequality, (2) explaining heterogeneity in employer
and beyond” (Paris & Alim, 2014, p. 13). As such, FDP activities should enablefaculty to authentically design, develop, and implement intended outcomes that are intimatelyconnected to the multiple realities and worlds that faculty in engineering face (Mejia et al.,2022).In this full paper, five diverse Latiné/x 1 engineering faculty reflected upon their stories and howthey use their experiences to situate their existing in- and out-of-classroom practices for theirstudents. By sharing their stories, the authors were able to situate threads that weaved theirbackgrounds to suggest further refinements for FDPs that could include other minoritized groupsin engineering. Note that due to the narrative nature of this work, sections of the
they supportpersonal safety and public health, have an impact on socioeconomic development, provide accessto clean water and waste removal, and most importantly, enable building and industrial projectsto connect to all major utilities. With all 50 Democrats and 19 Republicans voting in favor, theU.S. Senate enacted a $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill on August 10 by a vote of 69 to30 [1]. The Act renews funding for ongoing initiatives and allows $550 billion in newinvestments in infrastructure projects around the United States. In addition to repairing watersystems, reconstructing the electric grid, improving broadband and internet access, and creating anetwork of electric vehicle chargers thus encouraging sustainable transportation
encounters was not statisticallysignificant.2 Introduction and Related WorkThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected many areas of life, and it has disproportionately affectedsome demographic groups. Racial minorities experience higher mortality rates [1][4]. Womenand racial and ethnic minorities are also more likely to report high levels of threat and fear ofCOVID-19 [9]. In certain professions, Black and Hispanic women are more likely to lose theirjobs [6]. The short-term effects of the COVID-19 disproportionately affect low-income, * equal contribution, name in alphabetical orderfood-insecure households [11]. These conditions have the potential to affect the mental health andperformance of students.Research has also linked the pandemic to trends