Asee peer logo
Displaying results 1081 - 1110 of 8077 in total
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stella A Quinones, University of Texas, El Paso; Benjamin C. Flores, University of Texas, El Paso; B. Lush, University of Texas, El Paso; Gabriel Della-Piana, Evaluation Consultant ; Denise Carrejo, Ph.D., University of Texas, El Paso Center for Institutional Evaluation, Research, and Planning
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees
evaluation workshop for field workers in India. Has over 85 refereed publications and 75+ reports and presentations. Conducted evaluation and program development in language literacy (across subject disciplines); various forms of mediated instruction across subject disciplines in science, mathematics, and literacy; mathematics, science, and technology; parenting (mothers and underachieving middle school female students); homeless education; a planetarium production; training of teachers of teachers; and writing assessment.Denise Carrejo, Ph.D., University of Texas at El Paso Center for Institutional Evaluation, Research, and Plan-ning
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver; Jong-Hoon Kim, Washington State University
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing
., & Kidd, J., “Implementing Peer-Review Activities forEngineering Writing Assignments”, in Proceedings of the 2017 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference, Columbus, Ohio, 2017. Available:https://peer.asee.org/28483AppendixTable A. Lab 5 Report Assessment Rubric Your lab report score (130 max) = (AA score + CCT score + TC score)×5 + 70 Novice (1) Competent (2) Proficient (3) Exemplary (4) Audience The writer establishes The writer is The writer mentions The writer clearly outlines Awareness no purpose or clear somewhat effective objectives of the report the objectives of the report (AA
Conference Session
Technical Session 2 - Paper 3: Increasing Academic Success for Underrepresented Minority PhD Graduate STEM Students Through Self-Advocacy Education
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Carmen M Lilley, The University of Illinois at Chicago; Gregory V Larnell, University of Illinois at Chicago
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
health disordersand decreased physiological health is well known [1-3], evidence-based practices of supportsystems specifically for minoritized graduate students to reduce the effects of climates ofintimidation are not common. Indeed, researchers have found that minoritized students “wouldbenefit if colleges and universities attempted to deconstruct climates of intimidation [4].” In a comprehensive study of Latinx graduate students in STEM at a Hispanic Servinginstitution found that “Faculty mentors played a greater role in their success compared to theirnon-Latino peers. In addition, Latinos/as were also more likely to use support services on campusthan their non-Latino/a peers” [5]. The same researchers also found that it was of
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chrysanthe Preza, The University of Memphis; Stephanie S Ivey, The University of Memphis; Craig O. Stewart, University of Memphis
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
compriseundergraduate and graduate students at different stages of their studies, and all participatingstudents are graded and receive credit toward their degree for at least two years. Students choosefrom a wide variety of VIP teams based on personal interest. Participation in VIP teams providesthe time and context for students to [5]: • acquire in-depth experience and insights within their field of study; • learn and practice research and professional skills; • make substantial contributions to real-world projects; and • experience different roles on large, multi-disciplinary teams.The VIP structure provides opportunities for students to develop leadership and collaborationskills through peer support and peer management, which provide students
Conference Session
First-Year Design Experiences
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Tonya Peeples; Julie Jessop
that help the teams in studying the issues of housing designinclude a guest lecture by the CEO of PEER Consultants, P.C. (an international civil andenvironmental engineering consultancy), brainstorming sessions to generate ideas for the design,a virtual building assignment using Energy-10 software to evaluate the energy efficiency of avariety of building materials, and lectures on oral and written communications of technicalmaterial. Teams of four first-year students write a proposal for the design of a low-cost shelterand then build and test a prototype of the structure using a basic kit provided to them. Thedesigns are demonstrated during the final week of classes in a poster session where students,faculty and staff are invited to view the
Conference Session
NSF Grantees' Poster Session
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James P. Abulencia, Manhattan College; Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University; David L. Silverstein, University of Kentucky
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
andreading, the reflective writing of peers can be an effective method for producing conceptualchange in college students (Zhang, 1999). There are several elements common to these approaches to conceptual change. Initially,students make a prediction about a given situation. Then, either through direct experience,simulation, reading, or discussion, they engage with the outcome from that situation. Then,through reflective writing, peer or faculty discussion, or adaptive computer interface, they revisittheir original prediction and reassess their thinking in light of the new experience. Key to theeffectiveness of these processes are that: a) students must experience conflict, in which they seetheir previous conception fail, b) they must deeply
Collection
2001 Annual Conference
Authors
Jack Lesko; Eric Pappas
needto grow in concert with these technological changes in order to adjust to, and have someinfluence on, what may well be a new social order. It seems likely that we are at the threshold ofyet another period of unparalleled growth and change, and our engineering curricula need toprepare students not simply for the technical work they will do, but for the engineering lifestylethey will live. For some time now, engineering educators have recognized the practicalities of teachingpersonal skills that allow young engineers to practice their craft in a complex work environment.Instruction in ethics, 1,2 management skills,3 critical writing skills, 4,5 problem solving,5 andvalues clarification6 have begun to take their legitimate place in
Conference Session
Design, Assessment, and Curriculum
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Betsy Aller; Andrew Kline
demonstratedesign knowledge, students recognize the faux nature of these assignments. 3, 4, 5 Numerousstudies have concluded that students execute communication activities with greater motivationand meaning when situated in actual industry settings. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Further, recent quantitativeresearch on the actual writing practices and values of working engineers suggests that the typesand nature of documents most often assigned in typical design courses—proposals and reports—do not accurately reflect current industry practice, and do not fully prepare students for theirwriting tasks after graduation. 9 Thus, both the writing contexts and the writing assignments aresubstantially different in the design course reviewed, and include summaries, meeting
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrew L. Gillen, Virginia Tech; Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Gary R. Kirk, Virginia Tech; Holly Larson Lesko, Virginia Tech; Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Director for the VT PEERS (Partnering with Educators and Engineer- ing in Rural Schools) program at Virginia Tech. This NSF funded program is housed in the Engineering Education Department and provides contextual, culturally relevant engineering curriculum and support in partnership with educators and local industry in three targeted rural schools systems in Virginia. Ms. Lesko leads the implementation team for VT PEERS and facilitates relationships with the educational and industry partners in the project. Her past research focus on rural and vulnerable community development through art and collaborative narrative praxis and influences her current engagement and practice. She has worked to address policy needs in
Conference Session
Engineering Technology Division (ETD) Technical Session 8
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Thomas Lucas, Purdue University; Bhavana Kotla, Purdue Polytechnic Institute, Purdue University; Lisa Bosman, Purdue University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology Division (ETD)
, and (3)benefitting from peer feedback. The study aims to supplement traditional teaching techniqueswith an entrepreneurial and multidisciplinary-minded project that helps students reinforce skillsthat are relevant for the globally connected world. The results indicate that the interventionsuccessfully motivated students to develop their communication and collaboration skills. Thefindings of this study showcase the effectiveness of entrepreneurially minded andcommunication-focused projects that engineering instructors should consider integrating intomid-level discipline specific engineering coursework.1. Introduction1.1 Problem Identification The global connectivity offered by modern technology brings numerous advantages toadvanced
Conference Session
Aligning Graduate Programs with Industrial Needs
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Teresa J. Didiano, University of Toronto; Lydia Wilkinson, University of Toronto; Jonathan Turner, University of Toronto; Mark Franklin, University of Toronto & OneLifeTools; Jason H. Anderson, University of Toronto; Markus Bussmann, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Julie Audet P.Eng., University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
, University of Toronto, and holds the Jeffrey Skoll En- dowed Chair. He joined the FPGA Implementation Tools Group, Xilinx, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA, in 1997, where he was involved in placement, routing, and synthesis. He became a Principal Engineer at Xilinx in 2007 and joined the university in 2008. His research interests are all aspects of tools, archi- tectures, and circuits for FPGAs. He has co-authored over 90 peer-reviewed research publications, 4 book chapters, holds 29 U.S. patents, and was Program Co-Chair for FPL 2016, Program Chair for ACM FPGA 2017, and is General Chair for ACM FPGA 2018. He is Co-Founder and Chief Scientific Advisor of LegUp Computing Inc.Prof. Markus Bussmann, University of Toronto Dr
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 5
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Sumudu Lewis, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Susan Thomson Tripathy, University of Massachusetts Lowell
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
perspectives.Quantitative Data:To triangulate the qualitative data collected through journal entries and open-ended surveyquestions, we collected and analyzed quantitative data regarding the students’ perceived impactof the DEI sessions. In the online post-survey, using a Likert-style scale, we asked students torank eight aspects of the RAMP program with regard to the following two questions: 1) Howsatisfied were you with the following RAMP program activities? and 2) What have youaccomplished by participating in the RAMP program?For the first question, the RAMP program activities ranked included the following: Calculus class,Calculus tutoring, Introduction to Engineering, Industry partner meetings, Near-peer mentors,Writing computer programs, DEI sessions, and
Conference Session
Alternatives to Traditional Assessment
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Lauren Singelmann, North Dakota State University; Enrique Alvarez Vazquez, North Dakota State University; Ellen M. Swartz, North Dakota State University; Mary Pearson, North Dakota State University; Ryan Striker P.E., North Dakota State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
value. Each of the three components are discussed in depth. Successfulstudents using this model have produced peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations,awards, new businesses, and grant funding. To quantify what students are learning, what makessuccessful students, and how this type of learning can be supported, learning objective data from28 students were collected during a semester to explore the different pathways that studentschoose. This work defines the learning objective creation process, explains how it is used forassessment in a cardiovascular engineering course, and suggests how to implement thisassessment strategy in other courses. Example learning objectives from a variety of students arepresented and discussed, as well
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering in Silico
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew W Liberatore, Colorado School of Mines; Charles Russell Vestal, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
from 32 years of work in the oil industry and has returned to his roots at Colorado School of Mines as a Lecturer in the Chemical Engineering Department. Page 22.1344.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Student led development of engineering estimate problems based on YouTube videosAbstractYouTube Fridays devotes a small fraction of class time to student-selected videos related to thecourse topic. The students then write and solve a homework-like problem based on the events inthe video. Five recent pilots involving over 400 students have developed a
Conference Session
T1A: Readiness 1
Collection
2019 FYEE Conference
Authors
Natalie C.T. Van Tyne P.E., Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
Diversity, FYEE Conference - Paper Submission
differentenvironments, cultures and other phenomena, which may or may not be easily understood oraccepted. Reflection is a form of mental processing, according to Moon [1], which can bedirected at a specific outcome, such as building knowledge of a different culture in order torespond with intercultural competency [2]. Participants also develop meaning by comparingtheir new experiences to prior ones, and recognize that other ways of life are no less worthwhilethan their own. This last realization arises from reflection, according to Kember, McKay,Sinclair and Wong, who considered reflection as a re-examination of beliefs [3].Moon proposed a framework for reflection consisting of four stages, from descriptive to highlyreflective writing, where the final stage
Conference Session
Training and Mentoring of Graduate Teaching Assistants
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tershia A. Pinder-Grover, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
“somewhat successful” or “very successful” with theirimplementation. Those respondents who did not use active learning were unsure how to usethese methods in their specific class, believe that their teaching responsibilities did not allowthem to use these approaches, or did not feel as though active learning was necessary. Thispaper examines these responses further to determine whether or not their teachingresponsibilities, their confidence with a variety of teaching-related tasks (e.g., lesson planning,working with students, etc.), and use of teaching peer mentors influence their decisions toincorporate active learning into their teaching practice. Recommendations for faculty supervisorsand TA training program organizers are provided.1
Conference Session
Workshop, Program, and Toolkit Results
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Allen Estes; Ronald Welch
Peer Self Student • Good use of textbook in • I use material in the • I actually used the class. textbook every lesson. textbook more in your I cite and write on the course than in others. chalkboard equation numbers and figures.Assign design teams. In the real world engineers do not get to pick and choose who they want towork with. The professor should assign the teams based on some parameter(s) (background ofcourses, surveyed skills, in-class observations, etc.).27 The assignment of
Conference Session
Faculty Perspectives of Active Learning, Inequity, and Curricular Change
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Aliye Karabulut-Ilgu, Iowa State University; Dana AlZoubi, Iowa State University; Evrim Baran, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
students to write a summary of what has been covered in the lectureto asking them to collaboratively work on real-world problems and projects. The effectiveness of activelearning strategies compared to the traditional lecture approach, when implemented well, has beenempirically validated and documented in engineering education literature. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore engineering faculty’s use of active learning strategies in their teaching in aMidwestern university’s college of engineering context. Data sources included a survey about the facultyknowledge and use of active learning strategies and follow-up semi-structured interviews that aimed togather an in-depth understanding of their implementation of active learning
Conference Session
ETAC/ABET RELATED OUTCOME BASED ISSUES
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daniel K. Jones P.E., SUNYIT; Mohammed Abdallah, SUNYIT
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
mid-semester and final oralpresentations provided additional insight. However, the peer-assessments were student biased,and so instructor’s evaluation involved some speculation. An additional teamwork assessment isrecommended in other classes. Also, a single final report was submitted by each group, and so itwas not possible to assess the individual performance for written communication. A more validapproach would be to assess writing skills for individual laboratory reports from other classesduring the senior year. The new rubrics would be much more effective if used in a variety ofcourses.ConclusionA pilot study has been conducted for three new rubrics to assess communication and teamworkskills. Results have been summarized and evaluated
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Rufus Carter; Claudia Milz
A Case-Study of Assessment in Materials Laboratory Claudia Milz, Rufus L. Carter University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 / Marymount University, Arlington, VA 2220 Materials engineering students are often ill prepared to enter the workforce upongraduation. While students master the content knowledge they often lack critical skills forsuccess. Our industry feedback of internship students indicates weakness in the areas of:technical writing, critical thinking, professional attitude & teamwork, analysis, reasoning anddecision making. We have examined the effectiveness of new teaching and assessment methods in theMaterials
Conference Session
IT-based Instructional Technologies
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edward Gehringer, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Information Systems
carried out online in a lab, or usinglaptops. A “scavenger hunt” gets students to work in pairs to surf the Web for answers toquestions posed by the instructor. In another kind of exercise, students can be assigned to comeup with new examples, or exercises, for the text, and then submit to an online peer-reviewsystem, where their work is reviewed by others, and the best work selected to be presented tofuture classes. Another strategy is to have students prepare resources to share with the class.They post these on a wiki, and the lectures become class meetings with an agenda posted on thewiki. The instructor moderates the meeting, and a student takes the minutes, and posts them onthe Web. Peer assessment is used for all contributions. The paper
Conference Session
Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Poster Session
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
). The tenth week is devoted to work on projects, typically a filter design using SMDand/or microstrip techniques. Weekly lab activities include: characterization and modeling ofSMD components; using TDR response to determine line properties (2 weeks); examiningreflections using TDR and VNA; designing and testing λ/4 and single-stub matching circuits;two-port measurements on VNA; deembedding of fixtures. During the 9th week students areasked to watch a webcast on a technical topic and write a summary. During the term studentsalso work on two simulation assignments which utilize Agilent ADS software.The second quarter deals primarily with active circuits, including: passive power combiners;active devices, gain, and stability; design for gain and
Collection
Middle Atlantic ASEE Section Spring 2021 Conference
Authors
Sushobhan Sen, University of Pittsburgh; Jeffery R Roesler, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign
conceptual design in Deliv-erable 1, they were required to write a minimum one-page literature review on developments inAV technology related to their deployment on roads, with a specific requirement to cite five ormore references, which could be articles in magazines/websites, peer-reviewed journal articles,articles from conference proceedings, reports, or any other source. Successful completion of thistask would expose students to the variety of thoughts and approaches being used in research forAVs and setup a general set of assumptions that they would make about the performance of AVson roads. While wider public consultations was not possible within the limitations of this course,this task would also equip students to use feedback from such
Conference Session
Improving the Teaching Skills of Graduate Students
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Erin Crede, Virginia Tech; Maura Borrego, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
an academic career. The GTFprogram currently being assessed was designed to combine elements from other successful Page 14.975.3programs into a holistic approach to graduate student training that focuses on the integration ofteaching, research and service. The research questions will be investigated using the concept of a community of practice11, 12 to address the mentoring and teaching communities, as well as the social and academicinteraction of the fellows with their mentors and peers. The final question concerning thepreparation of fellows for faculty careers will be addressed using the model of a “steward of thediscipline
Conference Session
Instrument Design and Development
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Clifton L. Kussmaul, Green Mango Associates, LLC; Patricia B. Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates; Maria Torres-Demas, Westminster College of Salt Lake City; Chris Mayfield, James Madison University; Helen Hu, Westminster College of Salt Lake City
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
differentresults. For example, the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) [19]–[21] includes25 elements grouped into “Classroom design and implementation”, “Content”, and “Classroomculture”, each rated on a scale from 0 (never occurred) to 4 (very descriptive). The TeachingDimensions Observation Protocol (TDOP) [22], [23] identifies observed activities every twominutes, using codes such as “Lecturing while writing” and “Lecturing from pre-made visuals”.The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) [24] was adaptedfrom TDOP, and includes Peer Instruction practices such as “individual thinking/problemsolving” and “discuss clicker question in groups”. The Science and Engineering ClassroomLearning Observation Protocol (SEcLO) [25
Conference Session
Technical Session 5c
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Deana R. Delp, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section
assist ASD students, however somestudents will sign up for this assistance, while others do not. Beyond the college resources theinstructor must fill in the gaps to ensure student success. First, the instructor must recognize theASD student’s learning style. The needs of the student and the learning styles vary by individual.For freshman year instructors it may be difficult to determine these needs in a timely manner,since most students do not self-disclose their disability. Observation and communication with thestudent are key in this step. Many first year engineering courses utilize individual and groupwork with both written assignments and “hands-on” projects including writing, drawing,problem solving, scheduling, budgeting, and craftsmanship
Conference Session
Aerospace Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
presenting it to the class. f. The Special Topic handout was sufficient to 3.22 prepare for the exam questions. g. Writing multiple choice questions that would be 3.39 used on the exam was a good approach to identifying key information with our topicCATME was used to pick teams and to provide student peer-to-peer feedback but the students didnot feel that was CATME was effective. Part of the disconnect lies with the author’s inexperiencewith the software and the lack of peer-to-peer comments. The peer-to-peer feature has since beenadded to the current version of CATME and will be used in the future. The introductory lessons assessment, shown in Table 2, did
Conference Session
Best of the NEE
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laurie S. Garton, Texas Engineering Experiment Station
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
seminars on preparing students for academia, and post-doctoralworkshops on grantsmanship. This paper summarizes these grantsmanship development eventsin the form of lessons that junior engineering faculty can apply when constructing an entireproposal.Each proposal contributes to a faculty member’s reputation and must be approached withthoughtful attention to this end. Common struggles in proposal development include: setting andmaintaining a timeline to the proposal deadline, creating goals and objectives and using them toorganize a proposal, writing a proposal to sell an idea to a funding agency and not as amanuscript for publication, and focusing text to address review criteria, especially the NSFbroader impacts review criterion. Carefully
Conference Session
Engineering in High School
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tammy VanDeGrift, University of Portland; Sheryl Burgstahler, University of Washington; Richard Ladner, University of Washington; Annemarie Poginy, University of Portland
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
about15 hours using a computer per week. Her career interests before attending the Game of Lifeworkshop included publishing and editing, since writing came naturally to her. She knewtechnology would be a part of her life in terms of email, word processing, correspondence, butshe had no desire “to work in front of a computer all day long”. She rated herself as average to abit higher than average when assessing her confidence in using technology before attending theworkshop as compared to her peers. She was also sure that college would be part of her future.She says, “Overall, my experiences with DO-IT were good, but I found many of the classes andactivities were not as useful to me as they could have been. The experiences of livingindependently in
Collection
2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Authors
Chan-Jin Chung, Lawrence Technological University; Joshua E Siegel, Michigan State University; Mark Wilson, Michigan State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
publishingconcepts, mentored in designing and testing hypotheses, and then involved in two challengesrelated to self-driving and networked vehicles. Two teams of 4 designed, implemented, testedvarious self-drive and V2X algorithms using real vehicles on a test course, analyzed/evaluatedtest results, wrote technical reports, and delivered presentations. After the summer program wasover, the technical reports were published in peer reviewed conferences and journals.Survey results show that students attained significant & real-world computer science skills inautonomous vehicle development leveraging real vehicles available. The programs alsoProceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section ConferenceCopyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering