students will enroll inthe same section of MATH 124 and PHYS 161 to preserve the cohort structure, and they willadditionally take a 2-credit seminar taught as part of the regular teaching load by a rotating groupof faculty. The theme underlying the seminar course is “socially responsible engineering”, andthe course will include reading and discussion on such topics as ethics, societal “grandchallenges” in engineering [10], and recent technological progress in addressing thosechallenges. Engineering topics with obvious societal benefits have been shown to improverecruitment and retention of traditionally underrepresented groups in engineering, such as women[11]. In addition, the seminar curriculum includes practice with spatial visualization, as
similar work ethic. Questions 2 and 7 wereused for certain projects to ensure important skills (e.g. mechatronics, FEA) were represented onthe team. Question 7 was additionally used to balance the other skills on a team (e.g. planning,writing, CAD, manufacturing). Question 8 was used to ensure known personality conflictswouldn’t interfere with team dynamics. Question 9 was used to keep certain students together(often by moving them from a popular project). Question 10 was used for the popular projects,to refine the final team membership. Question 6 relates to certification for using certain machinetools, and was not used for team-forming. The process took about ten hours to form 22 teamsacross three different lab times.Student-Formed TeamsIn
engineering curricula, design projects provide opportunities for students todemonstrate understanding of their technical knowledge through solving a complex problem [1].Additionally, project-based learning allows students to acquire and apply valuable non-technicalskills such as teamwork, systems thinking, communication, ethics, and creativity [2, 3]. Industrydemands that students be able to engage effectively in the practice of engineering, whichincludes not only technical knowledge but also the ability to apply that knowledge to new andcomplex situations in the real world [3, 4]. Therefore, the teaching of engineering should focuson getting students to think independently, rather than simply asking students to replicate theexisting knowledge of
objectives including: 1. explain and contend with selected professional regulatory,legal, and ethical issues associated with biomaterials testing and development, and 2. describethe current state of the art in orthopedic and cardiovascular implants, and identify thebiomaterial-related challenges associated with these applications. The laboratory assignmentreinforced the learning objective that the students should be able to “demonstrate anunderstanding of laboratory techniques used in biomaterials and biomechanical engineering”.Overall, these assignments appear to positively reinforce the concepts emphasized in each of thecourses described.Challenges and Future DirectionsThe authors acknowledge that the varying backgrounds of these students (juniors
Press.Maskell, D. (1999). Student‐based Assessment in a Multi‐disciplinary Problem‐based Learning Environment. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(2), 237-241.Matthew, R. G. S., & Hughes, D. C. (1994). Getting at deep learning: a problem-based approach. Engineering Science and Education Journal, 3(5), 234-240. doi:10.1049/esej:19940510Maudsley, G. (1999). Do we all mean the same thing by" problem-based learning"? A review of the concepts and a formulation of the ground rules. Academic Medicine, 74(2), 178-185.McGee, E. O., & Bentley, L. (2017). The equity ethic: Black and Latinx college students reengineering their STEM careers toward justice. American Journal of Education, 1124(1), 36.National Science
result of this course a student will be able to: 1. Demonstrate the ability to use various engineering tools in solving design problems, including MATLAB, Inventor, and physical prototyping 2. Demonstrate proficiency with implementing an engineering design process, a. Collect, analyze, represent, and interpret data a. Use systematic methods to develop solutions for problems b. Identify all relevant stakeholders, constraints, and needs 3. Communicate engineering decisions to technical managers, 4. Contribute effectively to an engineering team. 5. Evaluate ethical implications of engineering solutionsBoth courses were offered in sections of no more than 32 students. In the 2018-2019 academic year
what the dress code is for each event, if it's okay to ask alumni for their contact information, if it's okay to bring resumes, etc.Theme 4: Standing OutA final theme from the interviews and focus groups was that for students who succeeded atovercoming each of the three challenges already described, there was still a hurdle associatedwith standing out in a pile of very similar applications. Students expressed concerns about theirability to clearly explain why they would be a uniquely strong candidate when the other 200+students in their graduating class all had similar experience. They also expressed concerns aboutthe limitations of a resume and cover letter when it came to demonstrating qualities liketeamwork skills, work ethic, and
community representatives based on a rubric, including creativity, presentation, detail and application of engineering. Suggestions and constructive criticism given. Reflection on collective learning.Service-learning benefits both the students participating and the community. Service-learning projects help students to establish connections between the concepts learned andthe real life; promote team work; teach professional ethics and social responsibility; and Page 12.662.2provide opportunities for professional communication. In addition, basic economics willalso be learned, as the students must take into account viable engineering
/Why America Needs a Refresher Course on Energy. In National Environmental Education & Training Foundation: Washington, DC, 2002.7. NOWCAST, U.S. Public in the Dark on Climate Change Issues. American Meterological Society 2005, June 2005, 775.8. Riecken, G.; Yavas, U., Energy Conservation Awareness. Ball State Business Review 1979, 9, (2), 2.9. Ritchie, C. A.; Steinbrink, J. E., Knowledge, Attitude, and the Energy Ethic. Social Education 1984, 48, (2), 149-52.10. Barrow, L. H.; Morrisey, J. T., Energy Literacy of Ninth-Grade Students: A Comparison Between Maine and New Brunswick. Journal of Environmental Education 1989, 20, 22-25.11. Farhar, B. C., Energy and the Environment: the public view. Renewable Energy Report
information required to solve the problems is contained in aspecific chapter of their textbook. When teams are involved, all the students are in thesame class, and typically have the same academic background. The authors submit thatproject-based learning (PBL) is especially effective at helping the students develop skillsat solving open-ended problems, multidisciplinary teamwork and communication. Theseskills, as well as professionalism and ethics are emphasized throughout the clinics. Asstudents progress throughout the Rowan curriculum, the clinic projects become decidedlymore “real-world.” Many of the goals of the engineering clinic sequence have since beenspecifically identified in the ABET 2000 A-K Criteria5.The purpose of this paper is to
Resources, Communication, Risk and Procurement. Professional responsibility and ethics will receive particular emphasis. ENGR 651: Technical Project Planning and Scheduling This course explores the principles and applications of work breakdown structures (WBS); the Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT); earned value management, critical chain scheduling and buffer management; definition and allocation of resources; resource leveling; and schedule compression. Course content includes realistic projects, case studies, Primavera and MS Project computer applications, along with web-based management and technology tools. ENGR 652: Applications of Quality
University (CE498) focuses on providing anintegrated, realistic capstone design experience covering the multifaceted aspects of a real-worldengineering project (e.g., technical, legal, environmental, ethical, etc.) in a fashion whichaddresses (as much as possible) all major aspects of the civil engineering profession. The courseis taught every semester with enrollments ranging from 50 to 100 students. Teams of 5 or 6students each are formed and work together for the entire semester and all teams work on thesame project. The author has been the lead instructor for the course each spring semester since2001. The project is typically a building, bridge, or highway relocation that is in the process ofbeing designed and constructed by professional firms
affected by this as many states will certainly adopt the model law into their own professional licensure requirements. Up to this point, AE programs have provided little input or participation in this effort.• The civil engineers have published a body of knowledge (BOK)21 that lists the skills and attitudes that civil engineers are expected to attain. These include additional skills beyond those required by ABET, such as leadership, project management, business policy and ethics. The new ABET civil engineering program criteria22 have been approved by the Engineering Accreditation Commission and will probably go into effect after the one year review period. The AE program criteria will likely be affected by these
areas, selecting appropriate media sources, using effective research processes, and demonstrating ethical use of resources and materials.To the Edge of Space is an exciting modality to address these educational standards. Theenthusiasm and engagement of students were so great that the Ferguson School teacher askedand was invited to participate again the next year. A level of continuity was created as previousfifth grade students were invited to serve as “veterans” while in the sixth grade.Students moving into sixth grade that were involved in the program as fifth graders were calledon to present their PowerPoint presentation at the fall parent meeting of the current fifth gradestudents. They again presented their project to the
restaurants, movie theaters, ashopping center, and a recreational park within walking distance or a short bus ride, several othersocial activities were arranged for them.Educational and other informational presentations need to be arranged too. Workshops on libraryresearch techniques, ethics, poster design, presentation skills, writing research papers, gettinginto graduate school, obtaining financial support, patents and licensing, and strategies for successin professional careers, are several alternatives. Several of these presentations can be organizedas lunch seminars. In addition, it is very important to schedule presentations for the students tohighlight their accomplishments. Formal presentations at the middle and the end of the ten-weekperiod
Advisory Board Involvement”, ASEE Annual Conference, June 20-23, Salt Lake City, UT.9. Kramer, K. (2004), “Partnering with Industry to Promote Ethical Business Practices in a Capstone Design Course”, 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 20 – 23, 2004, Savannah, GA.10. The Pennsylvania State University (2008). Industrial and Professional Advisory Council (IPAC) http://www.engr.psu.edu/AlumniFriends/ipac.aspx. Accessed: January 2008.11. Civil Engineering Institute, Inc. (2008). http://www.gmu.edu/org/cei/ Accessed: January 2008.12. ABET (2007), List of Accredited Programs by curricular area, http://abet.org/accredited_programs.shtml. Accessed: December 2007.13. ASEE (2007), 2006 Profiles of
?Brainstorming As a result of the pre-conference workshop, it was proposed that from the Turabo Declaration acommittee be created to develop the accreditation theme and strategies in LACCEI. A taskforceof 21 professionals, including deans, authorities and representatives of careers of Engineeringdisciplines, organizations and agencies of accreditation agencies from Latin American andCaribbean countries.The taskforce decided that one of the first objectives should be to have conceptual clarity anddefine the principles over which the system or systems will be developed, and determine whatthe final outcomes should be.With this objective in the taskforce defined the following:VisionTo produce engineers for the Americas that are creative, ethical, flexible
project management, industrial design, Page 13.703.2engineering economics, and ethics. Several mechanical dissections are conducted during thesemester.Team Collaboration with Microsoft OneNote and GrooveStudents in each section of ME 2024 are divided into teams of three and collaborate in and out ofclass on specific activities related to a semester-long design project. Teams select from a list of10 to 15 product ideas and develop an economically feasible product of sufficient technicalcomplexity. Students learn to apply engineering and industrial design methodologies to a productbefore taking more advanced topics such as mechanics of materials and
Professional Responsibility & Legal Issues8.1 Company Specific Policies and Procedures8.2 Regulatory Requirements8.3 Business Contracts, Patents, Copyrights and trademark laws8.4 U.S and International Codes, Standards and Regulations8.5 Professional Code of Ethics; Professional Liability Page 13.581.12 Appendix B: Comparison Tables of ASEM EMBoK versus Standardized EM Handbooks Table 1: ASEM EMBoK versus “Engineering Management”; Mazda, Fraidoon ASEM EMBoK Versus "Engineering Management"; Mazda, Fraidoon Corresponding Topic in
in the biomedical and health sciences • Promoting environments that support innovation, economic growth and development in an ethical and fair context • Supporting communities where Merck employees work and live4Within the Merck Foundation, the Engineering Advisory Committee provides support toengineering schools and engineering-related organizations. Areas in engineering educationfunded by the Engineering Advisory Committee are: • Graduate and undergraduate engineering education in the areas of chemical engineering including biochemical, mechanical, and industrial systems engineering with primary focus on chemical engineering • Curriculum and faculty development focusing on needs of pharmaceutical industry
science education are important foundations for becoming a competent engineer, butanother area central to engineering practice is design. Teaching and learning good design skillsare important aspects of engineering education in colleges and universities [19, 20]. ABET hasrecognized this need by including “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meetdesired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability” in the Criteria for AccreditingEngineering Programs, as one of the eleven learning outcomes that students should attain beforegraduation [21
AC 2007-2901: PROMOTING HOLISTIC PROBLEM-SOLVING IN MECHANICSPEDAGOGYChris Papadopoulos, University of Wisconsin -Milwaukee Chris Papadopoulos is Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering and Mechanics at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. He is the PI of the UWM Computer Science, Engineering and Mathematics > Scholarship Program. His teaching and research interests are in engineeing mechanics, structural stability, engineering ethics, and engineering education. He is a recipient of the 2006 Ferdinand P. Beer and E. Russell Johnston, Jr. Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award through the Mechanics Division of ASEE.Josh Bostwick, Cornell University Josh Bostwick is a doctoral
AC 2007-2930: A SCHOLARSHIP RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION STRATEGYTHAT SUCCESSFULLY ATTRACTS DIVERSE AND ACADEMICALLYTALENTED FRESHMENChris Papadopoulos, University of Wisconsin -Milwaukee Chris Papadopoulos is Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering and Mechanics at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. He is the PI of the UWM Computer Science, Engineering and Mathematics > Scholarship Program. His teaching and research interests are in engineeing mechanics, structural stability, engineering ethics, and engineering education. He is a recipient of the 2006 Ferdinand P. Beer and E. Russell Johnston, Jr. Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award through the Mechanics Division of ASEE.Karen
of course content ‚ Goals, content, design and organization of the course. ‚ Appropriateness of course objectives. ‚ Appropriateness of instructional materials. ‚ Appropriateness of evaluative devices to foster and measure student learning (i.e., exams, written assignments). ‚ Appropriateness of methodology used to teach specific content areas (i.e., pedagogical strategies). ‚ Commitment to teaching and concern for student learning. ‚ Student achievement, based on performance on exams, projects, presentations and reports. ‚ Support of departmental instructional efforts. ‚ Professional and ethical behavior.Articles on peer evaluation of teaching
, because of theirleadership role or work ethic, carried more responsibility for the team.Results of Changes Introduced in 2007 Overall, the grading changes made produced positive results. Each change presentedadvantages as well as minor disadvantages that will be discussed in more detail. However,combination of the four changes made in 2007 produced a much different result in the finalcourse grades. Compared to the previous ten years, as depicted in Table 1, the final coursegrades in 2007 featured a course GPA much closer to the mean GPA of the students entering thecourse. While it was not the goal of the course directors to arbitrarily reduce the students’grades, the changes introduced appear to have tempered the impact that the natural bias
called EngE 1024, “Engineering Exploration” Over the past seven years, the first-year courses in the GE program have evolved from somewhat standard problem solving(including statics, electrical engineering, material balance concepts), graphics, and programmingcourses to a format that emphasizes early design and realization, collaborative learning, andhighly interactive classroom environments. In 2004, the syllabus of EngE1024 was updated toinclude general problem solving, engineering ethics, visualization of 3-D objects and alsovisualization of information, early design (including realization), graphing and simple analysis ofgraphs, and introduction to object-oriented programming (OOP) approaches for problem solving.Further, significant
3.32 1.59 engineering 4. Name some potential future applications of the methods 3.05 1.94 5. Explain the basics of bioprocess engineering 3.37 2.12 6. Describe the ethical issues and arguments associated with genetic engineering 2.42 2.29 7. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of biotechnology methods relative to 3.44 1.82 conventional methods 1=Very Knowledgeable; 2=Somewhat Knowledgeable; 3=Not Sure; 4=Somewhat Unknowledgeable; 5=Very Unknowledgeable Denotes statistical significance
suggested a more formal process of recording reviews andreminding them exactly what the review should accomplish. Taking these comments intoaccount a new policy was written (see Appendix A).The need to educate the students in the methodology was also noted. It was naïve for the authorto believe that the students would know what to do automatically without significant instructionand coaching. The students had not encountered this in previous engineering classes, and theauthor and the other course instructor took care to prepare the students. Combined with adiscussion of professional responsibility and ethics in the second lesson, the idea of peer reviewwas explained and the policy was introduced and its implementation discussed; this took abouttwo