in your organization. Wiley, 2012.[21] K. A. Ericsson and H. A. Simon, Protocol analysis verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.[22] D. Kilgore, C. J. Atman, K. Yasuhara, T. J. Barker, and A. Morozov, “Considering Context : A Study of First-Year,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 321–334, 2007.[23] D. H. Jonassen and Y. H. Cho, “Fostering Argumentation While Solving Engineering Ethics Problems,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 680–702, Oct. 2011.[24] N. Genco, K. Holtta-Otto, and C. C. Seepersad, “An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of Undergraduate,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 60–81, 2012
in each year of study. This sequence of courses is expected toinculcate skills in engineering design and development, use of analysis tools, development ofprofessional and communication skills, understanding of professional behavior, business ethics,commercial constraints, project management, team work skills, etc. Teaching these skills is verychallenging in other engineering classes that are generally focused on delivering a lot of content.Having a chain of PBL courses allows the integration of the content learnt in other courses intoprojects and hands-on activities at different levels during the four years of engineeringcurriculum.The learning outcomes identified for the introductory course discussed in this paper are asfollows: 1
Perry, William G (1999) Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years: A scheme, Jossey-Bass Publishers.3 Lenhart, Amanda, Purcell, Kristen, Smith, Aaron and Zickuhr, Kathryn (2010) Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults, Pew Internet & American life Project.4 Yardi, Sarita (2008) ‘Whispers in the classroom’. Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected, pp. 143–164.5 Costa, Cristina, Beham, Guenter, Reinhardt, Wolfgang and Sillaots, Martin (2008) ‘Microblogging in technology enhanced learning: A use-case inspection of PPE summer school 2008’, in Proceedings of the 2nd SIRTEL’08 Workshop on Social Information Retrieval for Technology
AC 2012-5554: AN OVERVIEW OF EXISTING POWER ELECTRONICSCOURSESDr. Florian Misoc, Southern Polytechnic State University Florian Misoc, Ph.D., is Associate Professor, Southern Polytechnic State University, Department of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering Technology. His research interests include renewable energy (fuel cells, wind, and solar energy), distributed energy systems, power electronics, energy conversion, electric power generation and distribution, professional ethics, and control systems (theory and applications). He has a Ph.D. in electrical engineering, Dec. 2007, from Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kan.; a M.S. in engineering technology, July 1999, from Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, Kan
PowerPoint Slides on Risk Management, Configuration Management, andOther Considerations (Environ./political/social, Health/Safety, Economic, Manufacturability/Sustainability, Ethics)Area (weight) A Work B Work C Work UnsatisfactorySchedule: (70%) Detailed and logically Plan is complete Significant tasks Major PDR tasks linked set of tasks that with several missing missing thoroughly cover the minor issues with Some tasks vague or Schedule unusable activities required to task descriptions, not linked
travel expense to foster the development of others. Key Attributes of a Bottom 3 Leader 1 High Ethical Standards - Personal & Professional 2 Visionary / Entrepreneurial approach to life 3 Excellent Communication skills 4 Community Service Volunteer 5 Passion to serve others 6 Embraces and shares feedback (team and individual) 7 Willingness to try and fail until success is attained 8 Mentors 9 A life-long learner 10 Truly On Call 24/7 11 Brings potential solutions when presenting problems 12| Views leadership as
Page 23.26.11the cooking, and raised the children. When asked what the men do, the COR responded that they spent much of their time in groups talking, when not working. During the first design review,nearly every group mentioned how the women do all of the work and the men are lazy. The CORfound these statements shocking and culturally insensitive but recognized that the statementstemmed from the COR praising the women for their amazing work ethic. What was not saidabout the men was heard as loudly as what was said about the women.One method to combat injecting biases included having additional community organizationmembers speak to the students. In addition to providing validation for the information that wasshared, showing the students
and Ricardo from HSI2. Carlossaid: …I have my classes with [the engineering faculty] and they're really nice and they're very knowledgeable. They know what they're doing… I think it was Dr. S for engineering ethics…he would go through and explain everything, and then he would use his background…in transportation…for the Department of Transportation. He uses his background in that and… connect[s] everything else…He’s really good. The faculty is great here.Ricardo also reported: …[T]hey’re all really good…[T]hey have been really, really good [people]…[W]hen I Page 23.510.12 have… any doubts…I easily
oriented courses and his main research area deals with the mechanical behavior ofcomposite materials. He also writes and does research in the areas of engineering ethics and engineering education.He is a registered metallurgical engineer in the state of Louisiana.Dr. Ramona Travis is the University Affairs Officer at NASA Stennis Space Center. She received her Ph. D. fromLouisiana State University in Agronomy. She administers a number of university and colleges initiatives andeducational and scientific engineering research programs for various agencies that are administered through Stennisspace Center. In addition to the many undergraduate, graduate
engineering ethics using available economical resources and applying available regulations. 4. Expose the students to real-life situations and orient their mentality towards the needs of the industrial society. 5. Initiate applied research programs suitable for the undergraduate level to ignite the creativity and competition between the students.For seniors and staff: 6. Emphasize the need of applied research programs to solve industrial problems. 7. Focus on community services and solving community problems on the local and national levels. 8. Establish consulting services for private and government sectors where faculty members and graduate and undergraduate students work together as a professional team
suchconnection, and thus for greater learning to occur. Three typical comments from womenparticipants are: As long as everyone considers others’ ideas, there should be no tension in the group. A successful team needs everyone to contribute and contribute to the best of their potential. With communication and a good work ethic, the project should be successful and everyone should have fun. (JSh-F-04F-I:1) I also believe that by working in teams with different types of personalities that you can benefit your communication skills and how to work together through a common goal. Page 10.538.8 (RT-F-04J-I:2
performance. Each department, as well as each student, is assessed.Departments evaluate each other on a weekly basis. This encourages students to worktoward and surpass their departmental goals. Students are also assessed on authenticactivities that are provided throughout the course. Some activities include, but are notlimited to business card design, business plan creation, ethical cases, and SWOT analysisof their own business and other businesses. Page 10.726.12 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationJune 2005
). Page 10.225.8 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering EducationAs expected, personalities and different work ethics frequently affected mutual perceptions in thepeer evaluations. Common complaints included apathy, procrastination, closed-mindedness, andchronic unavailability. Such comments were far outnumbered by complimentary remarks, how-ever, emphasizing helpfulness, creativity, organization, experience, and pragmatism.Team InterviewsEach project team met with the course assessor within a few days of demonstrating its search-and-rescue final project, to discuss the course’s emphasis
1Run an experiment and analyze the results 70 1(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, (f) an understanding of professional and science, and engineering ethical responsibility(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, (g) an ability to communicate effectively as well as to analyze and interpret data (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of(c) an ability to design a system, component, engineering solutions in a global and societal context
semester helped students to learn a new method ofthinking. In the past many students assumed that operating with concern for the environmentmeant sacrificing profit and eating a lot of granola. The problems helped show students thatoperating with environmental issues in mind can be beneficial in many ways, not just for trees.”Nicole A.“I learned to not always think with my wallet but rather the health of myself, others, and theenvironment. Overall, I no longer see these assignments as a waste of time or busy work,because of the impact it had on my sense of ethics in the engineering world”Alex S.“The purpose of this particular problem was to show that there are situations where the bestapproach economically is not the best approach environmentally
1 to a more difficult design problem. Less guidance was providedand students were expected to be able to apply the skills acquired and use the design tools taughtduring project 1. In addition, students were exposed to additional design concepts such as thetheory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ), materials and material selection, green design, andengineering ethics. The end of semester student course evaluations scores for the section, however, turnedout to be significantly lower than the mean of all 13 sections, and significantly lower than thevalues the authors typically receive for this course. The very low scores and general studentdissatisfaction with the course provided motivation for this work. This aim of the study
: History: • Research and analyze the social context of a modern material artifact, Students must choose an emphasizing ethical, environmental, political, or cultural influences and ancient counterpart to their impacts object dating no later than 500 • Research a historical counterpart to a modern item and explore its context AD. as well • Connect historical and technical analysis and evidence
faculty member about 4-6 clock hours per week.Course Content and StructureWe use a structured design process. We have one lecture each week throughout the twosemesters in which we present the design process, including additional topics such as intellectualproperty, engineering ethics, engineering economics, conflict resolution, industrial design, teamprocesses and other related topics. We seek outstanding outside speakers to address the studentson these and related topics throughout the two semesters. In addition, we have 5 writtendeliverables that document the status of the project. These deliverables are due throughout thecourse of the two semesters. Each deliverable is evaluated by different coaches of other studentteam projects and the
knowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work and incorporating engineeringstandards and realistic constraints that include most of the following considerations: economic;environmental; sustainability; manufacturability; ethical; health and safety; social; andpolitical.” There are other elements to this criterion that specify math, engineering and basicsciences, as well as general education components, but there is a distinct focus on attempting toaccomplish all the elements listed above on a culminating experience. The criterion suggests anages old approach to professional education that starts with the basic sciences, then the applied
directing towork of other team members. In end-of-the-semester surveys, seniors have cited this as one ofthe most valuable outcomes of course (whether or not the specific interactions were good orbad). In past semesters, teams were asked to build a more or less traditional milestone chart toschedule the tasks to be accomplished. The primary vehicle to keep teams on schedule was thetask planning sheet.The BSC idea of multiple perspectives is clearly in line with Criterion 4 of EC2000 whichrequires: “… a major design experience … incorporating engineering standards and realisticconstraints that include most of the following considerations: economic; environmental;sustainability; manufacturability, ethical, health and safety, social, and political.”1
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationstudents need to have a good understanding of the process, methodologies, and tools commonlyused in industry to design and develop products, good written and oral communication skills, theability to work in an effective and efficient fashion in multidisciplinary teams, good planning andtime management skills, an understanding of ethical and societal issues, and the list goes on.Also, they must be exposed to meaningful practical experiences that closely resemble the “realworld” practice of the engineering profession. In this regard, two approaches that have beenwidely used to provide undergraduate
Feasibility Study • Preliminary Business Plan • Trade Show Booth • Project Website • Weekly Individual Activity Reports, once teams are formedThe feasibility study touches on technical, schedule, financial and “marketing” feasibility. Thebusiness plan is not complex; it has minimal financial content, focusing on top level specs, theproduct value proposition, competitive analysis and risk awareness.Fall semester Senior Design Topics – • Product to Market System Details • Project Planning, Management, Execution and Closure • Product Design • Design-for-X • Manufacturing Readiness • Risk Management and Mitigation • Engineering Ethics
solutions. 5. Ethics, with a focus on the immediate student issue of academic integrity (cheating). 6. Metacognition: Students being aware of and controlling which of the four problem solving activities they are currently involved in. 7. Drawing good diagrams that facilitate problem solving. A majority of the problems worked involved geometry in some way.In general, very little time was spent lecturing, and most class periods consisted of active andcooperative learning exercises. These exercises included: 1. Finding the weight of the bar of a see saw near the student recreation center using only distance measurements and the weights of the students. 2. Estimating the surface area of a soda can. 3. Finding
. The potential for this system to identify opportunities for quality improvement is alsoevident from some of the figures. In Figure 4, for example, several disparities between studentand faculty assessments deserve investigation. The results for course outcome 9b (which relatesto the course’s impact on students’ social, environmental and ethical awareness) indicates thatfaculty judged the course to have no influence on this outcome, nor did the course test students’performance in this area. Nonetheless, students had a very favorable view of their abilities withrespect to this outcome, and they felt the course had some influence on those abilities. Clearly,there is need to look into this situation. In a similar fashion, results for course
ethical is it to use a lecture only control group when over 100 years of research demonstrates that cooperative learning is more effective?Relationships o Inanimate objects do not o In human research, relationships experience relationships with must be established before data researchers. collection can begin. After data is
described themselves as loners, they were pleasantlysurprised by how well their group functioned. Their success was largely due to chance and acommitment to some shared goals. This team believed experience was the best way to learnabout teamwork, reporting little confidence in formal team training. Despite their surprise andenjoyment of this team experience, no one reacted positively to the notion of future team basedengineering classes.Seniors, on the other hand, attributed their success to the careful selection of team members, ashared mindset, work ethic, and motivation to complete the project to a high quality standard.Although luck may play a role, these students were seasoned members of engineering projectteams. They cited their prior team
ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs; (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams; (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; (g) an ability to communicate effectively; (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context; (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning; (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues
. Page 9.351.7 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationThe NSF Competitive Assessment LaboratoryFor engineering students who are interested in developing their own ideas into engineeredproducts, it is important that they have the skills and resources to evaluate currently existingproduct lines of their would be competitors. Indeed, it is imperative for any would beentrepreneur to keep abreast of the technological advances and design innovations incorporatedinto competing product lines. The term competitive assessment has been coined bymanufacturers to describe the process of ethically acquiring, inspecting
professional and ethical responsibility 2. To improve the level of achievement of the following POs. (g) communicate effectively At present, no POs have been identified for this perspective. (h) … the impact of engineering solutions in … context … (i) recognize the need for, and engage in life-long learning 3. Consider addition/deletion of the following POs. (j) be knowledgeable about contemporary issues (Note: letters indicate potential designation as Program Outcomes