Page 7.511.1experiments; understand professional and ethical responsibility; understand the impact of Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationengineering solutions in a global and societal context; and recognize the need for, and have anability to, engage in life-long learning. In addition, few involve interaction with engineeringdesign and construction professionals.Many engineering programs count on the capstone design class to address these importantcriteria. However, implementing a suitable project in a design class improves student learning andallows students to develop abilities and
needed.There was already a system in place that had been used to staff the courses in the first-yearcurriculum, and it provided a mechanism to address this issue with the new curriculum. Known asthe barter system, it involved a complex calculation, made in the associate dean’s office, of howmany faculty each department would provide to teach the sophomore courses, as well as otherservice courses, like engineering ethics. Once the determination was made, the department headsproposed specific faculty and the associate dean makes the final selection (the so-called right offirst refusal). The downside, however, is that there is less control over who exactly teaches thesecourses.In the pilot phase, at least early on, an apprenticeship model was used to
public school teachers’ to teach mathematics, science and technology.Our vision is to graduate engineering, mathematics and science students who are motivated, havegood work ethics and serve as role models in their own communities, and to achieve this in anextended community environment that fosters academic excellence.IV. Program ComponentsIn order to address the concerns and achieve the goals cited in Sections II and III, the MEMSprogram at UNM has developed a comprehensive program: •= To foster community in an environment of academic excellence, •= To cultivate academic success strategies in its students, and •= To provide opportunities for professional development, such as; internships, co-ops and undergraduate
course taken by students after their sophomore year and an off-campus internshipcompleted during the summer after their junior year. The on-campus portion of the ILTM,which is the primary source of material for this paper, engages the students in an extremelyintensive six-week program that focuses on issues such as globalization, ethics, communicationskills, critical thinking, teamwork, and leadership. The students hear lectures and attendworkshops by faculty and corporate leaders, travel to selected industrial and business sites, andwork with companies on significant and real-world management and technological projects.For the project portion of the program, the 20 students are div ided into 4 project teams of 5students each. Each team is
and ethical side of technology decisions. Specific objectives incorporate thestudents developing business plans to evaluate the potential marketability of applications orproducts created during structured classroom activities. In this way we will meet our objective ofthe theoretical knowledge gained through traditional academic being clarified and integrated intothe students’ personal skill set through their efforts to productize their own creative efforts.b) Integrating traditional physics education with creativity trainingNext-generation Physics students have a need to concentrate on the ever-deepening body ofknowledge in a technical specialty. This may be viewed as being in conflict with the need for ascientist or engineer to be able to
their parents and teachers, while achieving its educational objectivesfor the first year engineering students as well as the education students.IntroductionENGR 100: Exploring EngineeringENGR 100: Exploring Engineering is a first-semester course taken by all engineeringstudents as well as interested students from the college of Arts and Sciences, with atypical enrollment of 200 students. The course follows a modular structure, wherein allstudents attend overview lectures on engineering, teamwork, ethics, and the disciplines,but break into much smaller sections for an in-depth exploration of a given discipline(called a “seminar”) [1, 2]. Each student takes three of nine possible seminars, sostudents arrive at the end of the semester through very
theequivalent of a video game. Course/lab teams must be viewed as real world teams with anobjective. In fact, the objective of the course team is to get a good grade in the course. To dothat, the team must deliver on its goals, this is the real world. The extent to which the teammembers are concerned about their grade is, however, the factor that motivates them individuallyand the instructor has little control over that. Students, after all, are not subject to being fired andsome would like quite well to ride along on the coat tails of others. This creates opportunity forthe introduction of content on ethics, which has been used by Biernacki as well, however, is notgenerally introduced in the two interdisciplinary courses of interest here.The
, why do K-12 educators’ participate in professional developmenton engineering curricula and adopt engineering curricula? The reasons are less well-documentedin the literature, but they include a desire to increase their students’ technological literacy;expose them to engineering technology as educational and career pathways from an early age;make science and mathematics relevant by providing real-world applications; and providecollege credit for entry into engineering and engineering technology programs. 12, 13 Otherreasons include fostering interpersonal “process skills” such as teamwork, communication,documentation, ethics, and aesthetics,14 and providing a vehicle to increase student motivationand reduce anxiety in STEM subjects.15Robotics
grouped according to three primary “units of Page 22.970.8competences” – analytical, technical management, and professional. The analytical unit covers13 competencies related to the technical base for cost and aspects of the system life cycle. Thetechnical management unit addresses 12 competencies focused on the technical side of projectmanagement. The professional unit covers the broader competencies of communication, problemsolving, systems thinking and ethics.22The SERC Technical Lead Competency Model, shown in part below, includes 12 primarycategories of competencies and 71 unique competencies; the 12 primary categories are:23 1. professional
alsorepresented a third of the tools used to describe engineering, and included blueprints, modelingand diagrams. Design tools include items like rulers and compasses, and seemed to be toolsrelated to creating the planning tools of blueprints and diagrams; design tools formed about afifth of the mentions of tools across all participants. “Constructive” tools include objects likepipe wrenches and glue guns, and, surprisingly to us, made up just over a tenth of all the kinds oftools discussed in the pre-interviews.Six of our 19 participants mentioned something having to do with values in their interview. Webroke engineering values into six different values: precision and accuracy, creativity, logic andpracticality, progress, efficiency and ethics and
, they are not necessarily included in the participants’formal engineering classes. Kevin stated: It helps develop professional skills that an engineer needs that they won't necessarily learn in a normal classroom, like etiquette and how to present yourself, ethical design, you don't often get that in other classes.Ian believed that his experiences with PFP were very helpful in obtaining a summer internship: I got, the internship that I have this summer, the reason that I even got asked to interview for the company was because FIRST was in my resume … that was something that the recruiter told me when I went to meet him…because it's like an applied leadership experience which is something that in the
competenciesof communication, problem solving, systems thinking and ethics. Table 1: SPRDE-SE/PSE Competency Model 1. Technical Basis for Cost Analytical 2. Modeling and Simulation Page 22.1277.3 (13) 3. Safety Assurance 4. Stakeholder Requirements Definition (Requirements Development) 5. Requirements Analysis (Logical Analysis) 6. Architectural Design (Design Solution) 7. Implementation
and celebration. The team designed their own logo, advertised their presentation,bought pizza for themselves and the TA (though the TA abstained for ethical reasons), andpresented their new knowledge for over two hours.6 Discussion The students in our control IE sections and our control IM sections began the semester assimilar populations of students. The students had similar prerequisites and displayed comparablelevels of domain knowledge prior to entering the course as demonstrated by the DLCI. Thestudents’ motivations were similar as well. Some students were motivated by grades or by theirenjoyment of learning, but most were motivated by their desire to pursue a career in electricaland computer engineering or general interest in
: Measured ABET Outcomes Outcome 1: An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering. Outcome 2: An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. Outcome 3: An ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs. Outcome 4: An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams. Outcome 5: An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. Outcome 6: An understanding of professional and ethical responsibilities. Outcome 7: An ability to communicate effectively. Outcome 8: The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. Outcome 9: Recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long
interest, personality, and work ethic ofstudents from the past semester’s first offering of the Renewable Energy course. TheExperimental Mechanics course allows for student self-selected teams of three; therefore the Page 25.153.4remaining two team members were left to the students to decide upon after a basic projectabstract was provided. Once the team formed, a meeting with the team and faculty advisor wasarranged to discuss project background, available equipment, and desired outcome. Referencesincluding a fuel cell technical background website8 as well as a current news link discussing fuelcells for future home electrical power generation9
goes unnoticed. Every ‘thing’,including machine parts, consumer products, architecture, any artifact that involves solid or fluid mechanics,has undergone some sort of design process. Good design encompass many aspects, from simple functionality(will it do the job) to structural integrity, manufacturability, cost, material selection, history, environmentalimpact, sustainability, aesthetics, ergonomics, ethics and safety. Design is central to engineering, and awarenessof the multiple, competing criteria that govern the final results of a design process is essential to engineeringcompetence. Based on results from an informal exit survey from FV, PD was initially designed to increaseawareness of, and appreciation for, all aspects of design. The
, 77, 81-112.2. Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119- 144.3. Carless, D., Slater, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2010). Developing sustainable feedback practices, Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395-407.4. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineering of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century, Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.5. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE Policies, Section 7 – Professional Activities (Part A – IEEE Policies), 7.8 Code of Ethics. Retrieved from http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html.6. McCarthy, A. M., & Garavan, T. N. (2001). 360* feedback
the low-mid range of the scale (levels 1-Knowledge, 2- Comprehension, and 3- Application) designated as an appropriate level for thebachelor’s degree for most outcomes. However, students graduating with a bachelor’s degreeare expected to achieve level 4 (Analysis) for mechanics, experiments, design, breadth in civilengineering areas, communication, and professional and ethical responsibility and level 5(Synthesis) for design.1The University of Memphis (UM) is a learner-centered metropolitan research universitycommitted to providing high quality educational experiences while pursuing new knowledgethrough research, artistic expression, and interdisciplinary and engaged scholarship. The UMDepartment of Civil Engineering currently has 10 full
confronted with the need for probabilistic reasoning in upper division lab courses where they need to make conclusions from measured data which are always probabilistic. Propositional reasoning. This is the classic application of Aristotelian logical statements and Venn diagrams. This type of reasoning rarely shows up in homework type problems, but often can be found in general conversations about personal choices and ethical issues. The lack of propositional reasoning shows up in students being unable to construct logical discussions or essays to reach a supportable conclusion. However, a lack of propositional reasoning skills can be easily found whenever students have to explain why they chose
efforts areconcentrated on providing support, career preparation and augmenting the professional skills,competencies and capacities of graduate women in STEM. This last area of emphasis reflects theABET engineering accreditation criteria which includes not just technical skills but sixprofessional skills essential to educating future engineers.xvi These skills includedcommunication, teamwork, ethics and professionalism, engineering in a societal/global context,life-long learning and knowledge of contemporary issues (awareness skills). Higher educationstudies have shown that the way that graduate students are socialized into their graduate programand supported does make a difference. This process of socialization is influenced by departmentclimate
______ MECH 3751 Stress 1 3 ______ MECH 3725 Heat Transfer 3 ______ MECH 3751L Stress Lab (WI) 1 ______ MECH 3762 Machine Design 3 ______ ECEN 2632 Circuit 1 3 ______ MECH 3762L Mach Des Lab (OI) 1 ______ PHIL 2625 Prof Ethics (GER, PS) 3 ______ ISEN 3710 Engr Statistics * 3 ______ 16 GER Elective ( AL)2, 3 3 ______ 174th Year
sustainability draws from others mentioned in the literature4-6 and illustrates the application of engineering techniques in solving real-world problems by Page 25.1161.2holistically approaching the situation from five vectors of success: energy, environment,education, economics and ethics. Each of these concepts individually addresses specific aspectsof sustainability, shaped by the confluence of the ideals of people, planet, and prosperity.Moreover, it is through the multi-leveled application of the vectors of success that the studentshave developed the means to
. Dunkin. 1992. “Students evaluations of university teaching: Amultidimensional perspective.” In J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory andResearch 8 (pp. 143-233). New York: Agathon Press.McKnight, Philip. 1990. “The evaluation of postsecondary classroom teaching: A wickedproblem?” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 43 (Fall): 57-62.Ory, John C. 1990. “Student ratings of instruction: Ethics and practice.” New Directions forTeaching and Learning 43 (Fall): 63-74.Rice, John A. 1995. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis, 2nd Edition. Belmont, CA: Page 6.903.12Duxbury Press.Seldin, P. 1993. “How colleges evaluation professors