academic year. It should be noted that one part of the ceremony has aninstructor holding a student‟s hand to help teach them how to draw. This is a very importantmoment in the ceremony as the students must use this knowledge with great care for thisknowledge can damage any community and is an important point to consider in theirprofessional ethics. The professors also tie a string to the students‟ wrists and sometimes neckwhile wishing them well in their studies. The string becomes a physical memory of the ceremonyand should be kept on for several days.Even though the respect from student to instructor seems less than before (especially in a largecity such as Bangkok) this tradition is still very strict in other regions of Thailand. It shows
in Industry & Technology Design of Experiments Problems in Business & Industry Semester 3 (Summer '10): Interpersonal Skills for Leaders Seminar in Technology Directed M.S. Project Semester 4 (Fall '10): Quality and Productivity in Industry & Technology Project Management in Industry and Technology Directed M.S. Project Semester 5 (Spring '11): Leadership and Ethics Strategic Planning and Marketing in Technology Directed M.S. Project
teams in the Design4Practice program at NAU for nearly ten years.Bridget N. Bero, Northern Arizona University Bridget N. Bero is an Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Civil Engineering, Construction Management and Environmental Engineering at Northern Arizona University, where she has been since 1995. Her primary interests are engineering pedagogy, including ethics and design in engineering curric- ula, tribal environmental training programs, forest waste utilization, environmental management systems and international engineering. Page 22.1037.1 c American Society
school students with the knowledge, skills, and dispositionsthat will motivate more of them to consider STEM careers and will prepare them for success inpursuing those careers. More specific program objectives follow.Objective 1. All HSE participants develop and strengthen the eleven essential applied skills identified by U.S. employers in The Conference Board’s 2006 report, Are They Really Ready to Work? 3 These are the eleven skills cited in that report: critical thinking/ problem solving; oral communications; written communications; teamwork/collaboration; diversity; IT (information technology) application; leadership; creativity/ innovation; lifelong learning/self direction; professionalism/ work ethic; and ethics.Objective 2. HSE
as “it aids in teaching the skills that [students] willneed in the workplace.” 52 Providing a narrative in the form of a case study gives the teams someguidance on how to “communicate and work in teams, and especially to act ethically andcreatively.” 52 While this statement was focused on engineering activities, the case study providesscenarios of “what would you do if you were in that situation?,” and gives opportunities toexplore more realistic, complicated, real-life situations.Extending the application of the procedure The teaching strategy presented above has illustrated three major activities: (1) Reading thenarrative, (2) Analyzing the reading, and (3) Discussing the analysis within a design team. Theteaching strategy can be
needs of the stakeholders at aforefront, taking into account diverse social, cultural and ethical considerations. In today’sglobally competitive economy, it is more important than ever to develop effective design skillswithin the undergraduate years. However, before effective design learning experiences todevelop the skills necessary for human-centered design can be created, an understanding of theways in which students experience human-centered design is needed. This paper provides anoverview of a phenomenographic study that explores students’ understanding of human-centereddesign, presents the resulting outcomes space, and discusses the educational implications of thefindings.MotivationDesign has long been a core function of engineers
,and international projects in the engineering workplace. Research methods in studyingengineering practice included mixed quantitative and qualitative online surveys,interviews with practicing engineers, and case studies of engineering firms. We foundthat effective engineers value communication, problem-solving, teamwork, ethics, life-long learning, and business skills. Many of them note that their undergraduate educationdid not always prepare them well in these areas. Because of these two misalignments, wehypothesize that potential engineering talent goes underdeveloped at important stages ofeducational pathways as students move from high school to college. We believe thatincorporating these findings into an interactive special session would
member. The PAL coordinator isinvolved in the training of all PAL Leaders according to established guidelines and standards setforth by the SI Supervisor Manual published by University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC).This training encompasses administrative details, ethical responsibilities, and instructionalstrategies for the PAL Leaders to employ. Additionally, the PAL Coordinator monitors theleaders’ activities and PAL sessions by helping plan the sessions and supervising theirperformance on a weekly basis.During the first week of each semester, the PAL coordinator holds weekly PAL leader meetings,as previously stated, to debrief PAL sessions, discuss interactions between PAL leaders andfaculty, and to review in class announcements and
discipline on the lives of others in the wider world, examine the ethics and philosophy characteristics of the discipline and their implications, and project themselves into the discipline while developing a sense of pride and humility related to both the self and the discipline. 24 Although it not always explicitly addressed, most engineering programs aim to have engineering have a strong identity as an engineer. Capstone and senior design projects are ways that traditional engineering programs develop identity, but providing opportunities earlier in the academic career may help to develop this earlier. Service learning and mentoring programs are strategies used recently, especially with
Creating and integrating effective graphics Providing clear technical descriptions Providing logical transitions between ideas Unifying paragraphs Providing constructive criticism for peers Writing or presenting effectively as a team Listening and participating productively in a team meeting Thinking critically about political, social, and economic constraints Thinking critically about ethical ramifications Writing effective email Employing audience-appropriate tone and style Using proper grammar, punctuation, and spellingWe then asked our
program, theory vs. application (hands-on), 2) faculty issues such astenure and reward systems and staying current with field and pedagogy, 3) specific curriculumcontent issues of communications, teamwork, technology use, ethics and 4) concern regardingstudent preparation and retention of information. Objective 3 Students will be able to recognize the options for types of instructionalapproaches.. Results from a pair of questions related to types of instructional approaches theypreferred as a student and then how they are or have been teaching demonstrate that a gap doesexist between the two (Figure 2). The largest gap occurs in the areas of active learning exercisesand laboratory
productive manner. The teamagreed on one approach and all left the room feeling it was a win-win.Earlier in her career, Ellie was a project manager who had constant personality problems with thequality manager. Nothing she did seemed to be right. She learned to understand the social styleof this manager and through persistence and active listening broke down the communicationsbarriers in three months. They are now enjoying a great working relationship as the result ofEllie‟s perseverance.Doing the right thing is a trait that pervades those interviewed. Marsha Salter was an engineer ata company that produces fluid handling equipment. She believes that to be a good leader one hasto be ethical, do what is good for business and be able to sleep at night
term (see Table 1) and takes the student through the stages of conceptual design and meta-design (planning), through detailed design, to construction, demonstration, and even a littlemarketing. Table 1. ME3110 Class Periods Because teaching such a course Period Weeks Description ID presents serious logistical, Bid 1.5 Bid: Newly formed student teams must submit a report detailing their team’s work ethic and their statement of the problem, resembling a contractor bid. cognitive, and motivational DR1 1.0
-Austin, USAFA, and MIT. Course Institution and Methods and Theories Activities and Outcomes LevelME 202 UT-Austin; Survival skills, professions in ME, world-wide Skill exer., web search, teamIntroduction Freshman web, email, modeling, ethics, first team dynamics, MBTI, air-waterto Mech. experience, intro. to engr. design, simplified rocket analysis, reverse engr. ofEngineering reverse engineering mech. products (toys, etc.)EM 290 USAFA; Design processes, customer needs, functional Incremental design notebookIntroduction Sophomore
manuscripts:research investigations and research reviews. Research investigations should state the questionsaddressed and their context relative to the body of knowledge on the subject. The relevanttheories should be presented, research design described, limitations acknowledged, and researchmethods and instruments discussed so as to permit evaluation of the validity and reliability of theevidence offered. Ethical considerations in data collection, analysis, and reporting involvinghuman subjects should be addressed. A description of any statistical analyses, discussion of theuncertainties, and the significance of the results to advancing engineering education research orpractice should be provided. Research reviews should state the propositions addressed in
of materials on the Internet, there isalso the ever-present danger of plagiarism. Consequently, the instructor should clearlyexplain the ethical and judicial repercussions of plagiarism. This will hopefully guide thestudents to police their own practices.10 Because OEPs require the students to doindependent study on the subject and to define a unique idea using limited knowledge,another good resource is the US patent database. Because each patent must have at leastone cookbook-type recipe concerning how to implement the idea, this makes patents avaluable source for students working on OEPs. However, in the case of patents theinstructor needs to very carefully guide the students in their selection of good qualitypatents. Even though most high
contribute to understanding. It isappropriate to set aeronautical education in the context of aerospace product development forseveral reasons. First, it is what our graduates will do when they graduate. It culturally preparesthem for the activities of engineering, and excites them by satisfying their desire to perform theroles of an engineer. Secondly, it aids in teaching the skills that they will need in the workplace.If we are to teach students to communicate and work in teams, and especially to act ethically andcreatively, it is far easier to impart this understanding while working on authentic engineeringactivities. Finally, and most subtly, learning in context better supports the learning of the criticalaeronautics core competencies
AC 2011-1860: A STUDY ABROAD IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC:MENTORING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS AS THEY PREPARE AND TEACH6-12 GRADE STUDENTS TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING CONCEPTSSteven L Shumway, Brigham Young UniversitySClaudina Vargas, Complex Systems Optimization LabGeoff Wright, Brigham Young UniversityRon Terry, Brigham Young University Ron is a Professor of Technology and Engineering Education at Brigham Young University. His scholar- ship centers on pedagogy, student learning, and engineering ethics and has presented/published numerous articles in engineering education. Page 22.108.1 c American
of the graduate engineeringprocess and intended to address professional skills such as practicing effective time management,gaining familiarity with ethical issues and practices, and learning strategies for attending andleading meetings. We addressed these skills through articulating and modeling behaviors thatmay not, at first, seem to belong in a communication framework. For example, it might soundobvious, but we told students to bring their calendars and a notebook and pen to every meeting.We also created a form that incorporated both writing milestones and task-related milestones totrack progress and completion of task components and the entire task. Beginning in the secondsemester of the program, both the writing coach and the faculty
AC 2010-1860: ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING A COMPUTERGAME TO BRIDGE A RESEARCH AGENDA WITH A TEACHING AGENDAKristen Sanford Bernhardt, Lafayette College KRISTEN L. SANFORD BERNHARDT is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College, where she teaches courses related to transportation, civil infrastructure, and engineering ethics and researches issues related to infrastructure systems modeling. Dr. Sanford Bernhardt received her Ph.D. and M.S. from Carnegie Mellon University and her B.S.E. from Duke University, all in Civil Engineering.Sharon Jones, Lafayette College SHARON A. JONES is a Professor at Lafayette College in both the Department of Civil
ofparticipation leads to a lack of community “ownership”, wasted resources and a discouragedcommunityIf the necessity of interdisciplinary work has been well established, the process by which it isaccomplished remains poorly understood. For example, in a textbook intended to guideengineering students in the design of community-based service-learning projects instructsstudents that “.. people should be involved in the engineering process. You should always knowyour community partner, your stakeholders …. and their needs and desires. Frame yourengineering project within these parameters, and work with these groups throughout the project.”The text goes on to talk about understanding the project from historical, cultural, ethical, societal,educational
• Cognitive Domain: Instrumentation, Models, Experiment, Data Analysis, and Design • Affective Domain: Learn from Failure, Creativity, Safety, and Ethics in the Laboratory • Psychomotor Domain: Psychomotor and Sensor AwarenessHigher-level learning3 will be planned into each module (see Section III.C.). The ‘Learn fromFailure’ area will be addressed via built-in failure experiences, where students will be providedjust-in-time help to address a problem. Audio/visual elements will be added to target theSensory Awareness area and therefore positively increase the impact of these experiences o theaffective and cognitive domains.49 Biomedical applications will be emphasized to increasestudent interest, optimize module re-use in ECE 772, and maximize
information from the Yes = 10 No = 0 REU homepage? 5. Do you want to see any additional Yes = 4 No = 6 information on the REU homepage? 6. Was it easier for you to select faculty Yes = 10 No = 0 mentors based on the information available on their websites? 7. Do you have any prior research experience? Yes = 4 No = 6 8. Have you taken any courses on how to write Yes = 6 No = 4 technical papers and make technical Page 15.1038.12 presentations? 9. Have you taken any courses on ethics? Yes = 6 No = 4 Table III: Results of Pre-Program
. Personallearning outcomes (Section 2) focus on individual students' cognitive and affective development, forexample, engineering reasoning and problem solving, experimentation and knowledge discovery, systemthinking, creative thinking, critical thinking, and professional ethics. Interpersonal learning outcomes(Section 3) focus on individual and group interactions, such as, teamwork, leadership, and communication.Product and system building skills (Section 4) focus on conceiving, designing, implementing, and operatingsystems in enterprise, business, and societal contexts.Rationale: Setting specific learning outcomes helps to ensure that students acquire the appropriatefoundation for their future. Professional engineering organizations and industry
Engineering Education”different way of designing/developing courses and programs. It called for involving allstakeholders (students, industry, faculty, administrators) in the design phases, having toreach a consensus in defining the graduating engineer skills, his/her competencies andvalues, as well as the desired learning outcomes. To enhance the learning experience,courses had to include hands on activities, industry projects and other non-traditionalexperiences, which emphasized skills development, like teamwork, ethics and effectivecommunication. Students had to learn to not only solve a problem in teams, but alsodefine and characterize the problem, to build a prototype, write a business proposal andmake effective presentations. Finally yet
, Newton’s solving concurrent spring Structure report, and Laws, statics simultaneous engineering constants discussion on systems of related issues cost modeling equations in satisfying indetermin- in engineering and control Matlab conflicting ate strutures ethics constraints finite elements economicsAs the table illustrates, a number of
sustainability factors. 2. Apply simplified model equations for specific applications using appropriate approximations. 3. Solve heat transfer problems using engineering calculations, simulations, and numerical methods. 4. Collaborate effectively as a member of an engineering team while considering ethical, engineering, and professional responsibilities. 5. Advance proficiency in professional communication. 9 Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering EducationStudent Design Solution ExamplesThe project design