Traditional 4 5 15 38 389. Knowledge of professional and ethical MEA 9 26 46 14 6responsibility. Traditional 54 24 13 4 5 MEA 6 14 57 17 610. Ability to write reports effectively. Traditional 90 5 3 0 2 MEA 74 17 6 0 311. Ability to make effective oral presentations. Traditional 92 2 2 0 312. Knowledge of the potential risks and impacts MEA 6
by improving social interactions and personalized learning. Italso discusses the limitations of existing AI tools, emphasizing the need for future developmentsto focus on personalization to cater to individual learning needs more effectively while takingprivacy and ethical considerations into account.Rather than focusing purely on NDDs, Bhatti et al. [17] analyzed diverse applications of AItechnologies aimed at assisting students with not only dyslexia and dyscalculia but also a widerspectrum of learning disabilities. Similar to the review by Barua et al., this study also examinedliterature involving facial expressions and eye-tracking analysis to monitor students’engagement. The authors highlight the potential of AI to provide personalized
additional questions thatprompt questions aimed to explore individual experiences and capture nuanced recruitmentexperiences.The study's protocol was submitted for Institutional Review Board (IRB) review and was exemptfrom full review. To ensure the confidentiality of all participants in this study, the researchersexplained the interview's purpose and format, obtaining consent for recording, and consent toparticipate in the study. Moreover, a direct line of contact information was provided forfollow-up inquiries, and participants were given the verbal option to omit or add any informationwithin two months from the start of the interview. Adhering to ethical standards and privacylaws, all participants were fully informed about the terms of their
JAMES HELBLING, M.S.A.E.Currently an Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering where he teaches structural analysis,computer aided conceptual design, and aircraft detail design courses. He has 21 years ofindustry experience with McDonnell Douglas (now Boeing) and Northrop GrummanCorporation where he specialized in structural fatigue loading and served as manager of F-5/T-38 Engineering.M. ANGELA BECK, PH.D.Currently serving as Chair of the Department of Humanities/Communications at Embry-RiddleAeronautical University, Prescott campus. As an Associate Professor she primarily teachestechnical communications with occasional forays into linguistics, the philosophy of language,and ethics. A graduate of San Diego State University and Northern
expected to do the work to improve inclusion. The students recommended the creation of aCenter for Engineering Diversity, structured project and lab teams to prevent isolation, strongeralumni/ae relationships, more formal mandatory training for faculty and TAs, teaching empathyand ethics in the first year, and altering syllabi to underline the value of DEI thinking. Thestudents, without faculty intervention, came up with many of the same solutions as have beenseen in the literature [17].MethodsThe complete survey administered to each class at the beginning of the term can be found inAppendix A. This will be referred to as the Before survey for the remainder of the paper.Surveys were distributed via campus email at the beginning of the Fall 2021
forthe same job and the competition can bring out the worst in some people.I decided to apply to an internship for a civil engineering company. I was worried about gettingthe position because my novice resume and that I was a sophomore in college barely starting mycivil engineering classes. I expressed my concern to one of my Hispanic classmates and was toldnot to worry about it. “You’re a Black woman, you already got it.” I did not get the position, butI was angered that this person limits my abilities to just my gender and race. It didn’t occur tothis person that someone may hire me because of my intellectual capabilities or work ethic, butbecause I possess something I have no control over. It is unfair for someone’s abilities to bediscredited
experiential, methodological, spatial-temporal, technological, institutional, social, and political/ethical as well as consider that transdisciplinary teams evolving through different stages may require changes in their communication processes [115]. Wang et al. (2019) [116] developed a communication framework for transdisciplinary teams that offers topics for communication and indicators of successful communication (subdivided into relationship development and solution development) at each stage of team formation and performance. One feature of the workflow should be regular and ongoing (emphasis added) communication [98]. Transdisciplinary teams are often separated spatially and these
array of different technologies available for use.Student attempts to modify plagiarized work in an effort to evade detection by similarity engines,which will be known as “mutations” for the remainder of this paper, are of substantial concern toengineering educators as they threaten the ability of the assessment process to accurately identifywhich students behaved ethically and which students engaged in academic misconduct.Therefore, it is essential that similarity engines are as well-equipped as possible for mitigating theimpact of these attempts. The ability of a similarity engine to retain accurate and precise detectionof plagiarized source code files in spite of the application of mutations is an important factor toconsider in an evaluation
also be used to assess ABET outcomes for communication and teamwork,indicating their use for assessing students’ abilities to apply technical knowledge to solveproblems collaboratively while also communicating those solutions effectively.Based on a 2013 review of engineering education scholarship, when faculty assigned teamprojects, they primarily targeted outcomes based in teamwork, design, and communication, withsome focus on innovation, lifelong learning, ethics, and motivation [8]. In a breakdown of theteamwork outcome, researchers found a focus on global/cultural competence (for both teammembers and clients), project management, and interdisciplinary teamwork, as well as somefocus on societal concerns, distributed teamwork, leadership
experiences as graduate students and be open to adopt in ways in which the experiences of minority graduate students today may differ [56]13. Seek for intentional faculty development: effective mentoring of all students includes providing instrumental support and advocacy [52], and requires intentional faculty development [57]; training on the stages of mentoring relationships, developing mentoring contracts, the ethical responsibilities involved in mentoring, and the benefits and costs of mentoring for both mentee and mentors themselves could serve this purpose well [57]14. Increase multicultural competence via training: specifically related to conflict
services to meet students’ learning needs,but they also need to make opportunities for faculty to explore their teaching and researchinterests and priorities. In addition, HEIs need to prepare students for society so they can notonly meet employer needs, but also social, economic, and environmental needs of society.Students need to progress as individuals in an intellectual and ethical way, and some professionalcompetency frameworks may not address these dimensions. Many HEIs are responsible for andhave a mission to grow and produce citizens, not just competent employees. HEIs also need toconsider administrative structures, services, and resources available to pursue competency-basedlearning, which may differ from human resource structures in
research and design (i.e. apprenticeship style) projects have naturally been theprimary avenues for student research, as they remain the major modes of quantitative explorationin STEM professional and academic fields [12]. However, there are other presumed merits to theresearch interview approach utilized here in the STEM environment: ● It forces students to confront the impact of science and engineering on a broad population. ● It can “humanize” STEM work, connecting data to people. ● It strengthens soft skills like communication, socialization, and ethics. ● It provides additional training beyond lab or workshop attributes. ● It familiarizes students with government policies that intersect with their
numerical methods into one course while keeping students engaged,and (2) infusion of liberal arts into math-heavy curriculum by facilitating conversations about thehistorical, ethical and societal aspects of computing. The PSS approach was leveraged tointroduce undergraduate engineering students to the contributions of scientists, mathematiciansand engineers from traditionally underrepresented groups. In class, students are tasked withexploring an open-ended problem with the goal of learning a fundamental numerical methodsconcept. The problem is contextualized with a real-world application and used to highlight theachievement of an underrepresented STEM figure that links to the concept. Students then workin groups of two while problem complexity
research and instructional Interests include programming languages, computer ethics and student success and development. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Uneven Playing Field: Examining Preparation for Technical Interviews in Computing and the Role of Cultural ExperiencesAbstractWhile starting a career may be challenging in any field, in computing the process tends to beaggravated by requirements of digital portfolios and technical interviews that necessitate codingextemporaneously. During the programming components, candidates are expected to offer asolution, while also giving consideration to the choice of algorithm and its time complexity.Although
must be prepared for engineering practice through the curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work and incorporating engineering standards and realistic constraints that include most of the following considerations: economic; environmental; sustainability; manufacturability; ethical; health and safety; social; and political. The professional component must include (a) one year of a combination of college level mathematics and basic sciences (some with experimental experience) appropriate to the discipline (b) one and one-half years of engineering topics, consisting of engineering sciences and engineering design
engineering programs [4].Significance and impactChanges in the ABET accreditation criteria for engineering education also indicate a significantneed for educational reform. The new criteria include a need to demonstrate training andexperience in areas specific to design methodology. These skill requirements, such as teamwork,technical communication, economics and ergonomics of system or product design, civicengagement and ethics, reveal that the mere acquisition of technical knowledge is insufficient fora robust, modern engineering education [2].Goals and objectivesThere are several core goals involved in this paper, all centered on improving student experience,learning, and satisfaction in undergraduate education. Content creation for this paper
indicated three of the four top areas were either learned on the job or had beenforgotten since formal education: 1) software and design patterns, 2) object-oriented conceptsand technology, and 3) requirements gathering and analysis. Other top areas learned on the jobincluded analysis and design methods; testing, verification, and quality assurance; projectmanagement; confirmation and release management; human-computer interaction/userinterfaces; and databases.Business and art topics of high importance in the respondents’ careers, but which were learnedon the job, included 1) ethics and professionalism, 2) technical writing, 3) giving presentations toan audience, and 4) leadership. Today, this need for a well-rounded, project-based
interdisciplinary approach with an overall objective of improving ecosystem understanding, health and management, and provide a mechanism by which to bring research expertise into the classroom. Dr. Meadows has taught upper level environmental ocean dynamics courses as well as the college’s Introduction to Engineering course, which combines a team project with technical communication material, environmental consciousness and ethics. Her most recent contribution to this course has been the development and implementation of a service-learning curriculum and the inception of an engineering education research program to explore the service-learning pedagogy in engineering
between a number of opposing forces. Theyrecognized that a minimum of fundamental knowledge in science and mathematics wasrequired to prepare students for more specific engineering coursework, but exposure to thenature of engineering and its opportunities was also needed to enable students to identify andconfirm an appropriate career path. Also competing with these forces were the calls toeducate students in areas of communication, ethics and professionalism, design, working inteams, leadership, entrepreneurship, and global understanding (to name a few), all vying forcurriculum time.Froyd and Ohland9 provide comprehensive evidence from research which suggests thatintegrated curricular programs encourage students to affiliate and develop
the beginning of the second term) were well on their way to reaching the performing stage of team development. Page 14.637.11≠ Resolving problems: The teams were enabled to deal with conflict (which often arose from differences in thinking preference18). Scheduling conflicts were another common problem, but most teams found a creative way to deal with those. Lack of motivation, commitment, and a poor work ethic proved to be most difficult. If a student chose not to change and contribute an average of 6-7 hours/week on the project, the consequences were a penalty in points distributed according to the contributions each member