Conference Session

Professional Papers

Collection

2025 ASEE Southeast Conference

Authors

John M Mativo, University of Georgia; Ramana Pidaparti, University of Georgia; Jarron Gravesande, Providence Chrisitian Academy

Tagged Topics

Professional Papers

careers.Acknowledgment: The authors thank the U. S. National Science Foundation for sponsoring theresearch through a grant NSF-ITEST-1949493.References[1] S. Lucci, S. M. Musa, and D. Kopec, “Artificial Intelligence in the 21st Century,” pp. 1– 850, 2022, Accessed: Nov. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5671176[2] I. Lee, S. Ali, H. Zhang, D. DiPaola, and C. Breazeal, “Developing Middle School Students’ AI Literacy,” in Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Virtual Event USA: ACM, Mar. 2021, pp. 191–197. doi: 10.1145/3408877.3432513.[3] T. Kurz, S. Jayasuriya, K. Swisher, J. Mativo, R. Pidaparti, and D. T. Robinson, “Investigating Changes

Conference Session

Professional Papers

Collection

2025 ASEE Southeast Conference

Authors

Vivek Singhal, University of Wisconsin - Stout; Kenan Baltaci, University of Wisconsin - Stout

Tagged Topics

Professional Papers

their usein other courses.In conclusion, integrating assessment-based strategies like peer evaluations and bonuspoint rubrics can significantly enhance student engagement and academic performancein challenging subjects. These approaches offer a more comprehensive evaluation ofstudents' efforts and contributions, promoting a more inclusive and effective educationalexperience.AcknowledgementsSpecial thanks to: UW Stout Provost’s Office, OPID, Valerie Barske, Heather Pelzel,Sylvia Tiala, all my OPID peers.References[1] Tinto, Vincent. "Enhancing student success: Taking the classroom success seriously." Student Success 3.1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v3i1.119[2] Hu, S., Kuh, G.D. Being (Dis)Engaged in Educationally Purposeful

Conference Session

Professional Papers

Collection

2025 ASEE Southeast Conference

Authors

Michael V Potter, Francis Marion University; Lorna Cintron-Gonzalez, Francis Marion University

Tagged Topics

Professional Papers

S. M. Sait, “Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0,” J Ind Inf Integr, vol. 25, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100311.[4] J. Sonnenberg-Klein, E. J. Coyle, and K. Saigal, “How ‘Multidisciplinary’ is it? Measuring the Multidisciplinarity of Student Teams,” in 2023 Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD: ASEE, Jun. 2023. doi: 10.18260/1-2--43350.[5] J. Mellor and S. McGoldrick, “A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach to Addressing Climate Change in Fall River,” in ASEE North East Section, Fairfield, CT, Apr. 2024. doi: 10.18260/1-2--45751.[6] M. H. Ahmadian, “Effective Practices in Multidisciplinary Teamwork,” in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC

Conference Session

Professional Papers

Collection

2025 ASEE Southeast Conference

Authors

JuEun Lee, Humboldt State University; Joshua Paul Steimel, Humboldt State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Professional Papers

the advising model for broaderimplementation, while also exploring additional strategies to deepen student engagement in bothacademic and extracurricular activities. It would also be very informative to compare the trendsin engineering to other programs. By fostering an inclusive, supportive educational environment,mechanical engineering programs can more effectively nurture, retain, and empower diversetalent—critical for driving innovation, promoting equity, and advancing progress in the field.References[1] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, “Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 259–278, 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2168

Collection

2008 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Rashmi Jain; Keith Sheppard; Elisabeth McGrath; Bernard Gallois

design, encourage a mindset in which students seek technicalsolutions often rooted in a specific engineering discipline with little regard for the context in which theirproduct, system, or service may be deployed, the societal or business need(s) it may fulfill or even itsrelations to all the other engineering, business or ‘environmental’ domains that can contribute to success.In order to better prepare engineers with a systems perspective and the competencies to be effective insystem design, there is a need to promote the development of systems thinking in engineeringundergraduates. Coupled to these efforts we also see the merits of seeding this approach even earlier inK-12 communities as part of a movement to incorporate pre-engineering into

Collection

2008 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

David J. Palazzo; Chad C. Schools

acceleration, 3.8 g, is in accordance with many of today's roller coasters, where coasterengineers typically design for a maximum acceleration of 4 g. 9 o’clock 2 o’clock Figure 2a: Plot of Speed (m/s) vs. time (s) for the front cart. Figure 2b: Plot of Total Acceleration (m/s2) vs. Time (s) for the front cart. This analysis could easily be scaled to varying levels of difficulty and may also be suitable forengineering disciplines as well. Other physical phenomena which could be investigated from this casestudy include conservation of energy, non-conservative forces acting on the cart during its motion throughthe

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Abubaker E.M. Elbalsohi; Junling Hu; Ruoxu Jia

1family models, Renormalization Group, RNG k-ε model and Dynamic viscosity µ kg/m·s 0.000147Realizable k-ε model. These two models were proposed by TABLE II, INLET BOUNDARY CONDITIONSYakhot et al. (1992) and Shih at al. (1995) respectively as Variable Symbol Unit Valuealternative turbulence models of standard k-ε model to x-velocity U m/s 1.25improve numerical prediction where standard k-ε model failed

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Shiangyu Lin; Junyi Zou; Xingguo Xiong; Prabir Patra

International Conference on Advanced Manufacture (ICAM), Tainan, (2005) 222–229. Taiwan, 2007 [15] Zengerle, R., et al., "A Hi-Directional Silicon Micropump," Proceedings[5] Jianhua Tong, Craig A Simmons and Yu Sun, “Precision patterning of of MEMS, 1995 PDMS membranes and applications", Journal of Micromechanics and [16] Zhan, T. Lo, L.P. Liu, A silicon membrane micropump with integrated Micro engineering Volume 18 Number 3, 2008 bimetallic actuator, Chinese J. Electron. 5 (1996) 29–35.[6] Lynn Khine and Julius M. Tsai, “Design Consideration of Membrane [17] Boehm, S

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Fei Mi; Zixun Tong; Xingguo Xiong

Coefficient: 2 Vc = σ 0 xv I s = σ 0 σ i2 Figure 2 The fabrication procedure of the and σ 0 are the standard deviation of themicro-mixer [23] mass fraction of species at the inlet and outlet of micromixer, xv is the mass fraction of species at V Analysis And Performance of Design

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Breno Fabricio Lira Melo Sousa; Raimundo Pereira da Cunha Neto

generated, these are stored, so that For a better understanding of how this powerful technique administrator(s) of the network can analyze them in future andhas developed over the years, we have to keep in mind some may or may not modify its settings for added protection timefacts that contributed to its development. because if there is an actual failure, the honeypot can serve bridge so that the attacker can infiltrate the actual system. In 1997, the scholar Fred Cohen, launched the firsthoneypot, which had the characteristics: open source and Honeypots found in two classification levels: low-free.Já of the following

Conference Session

Equity, Identity, and Pedagogy in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rasha Malaeb, American University of Beirut; Elsa Maalouf, American University of Beirut; Aya Mouallem, Stanford University; Jana Sabra, American University of Beirut

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

Conference Session

Mechanics Division (MECHS) Technical Session 5

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna K. T. Howard, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Nicholas Garcia, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Gregory K Watkins P.E., North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics Division (MECHS)

difference.Comparing the grades on the weekly quizzes was more difficult. We can make some clearconclusions: week 8’s quiz is easier than week 7’s quiz as is shown in Figure 7.Figure 7. Comparison of Sections for Week 7 and Week 8 Weekly QuizzesFigure 8 shows that the Week 3 and Week 6 Quizzes foreshadowed final exam grades, but again didnot show a difference in the results from teaching modalities.Figure 8. Comparison of Sections for Week 3 and Week 6 Weekly QuizzesAnd last, we compared the overall class grades in the section. Note that these grades take intoaccount the differences discussed in Table 1. We first looked at the number of students who droppedeach section. Note that Statics is a C-wall course: students must score a C- or better to continue

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED): Identity, Motivation & Belonging in Experiential Learning

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sophia Vicente, Elizabethtown College; Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College; Kurt M Degoede, Elizabethtown College; Rebecca Holcombe

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED)

, the findings fromthis work will inform a second pilot semester. In terms of research, future work will compareacross students who participated in the intervention and students who remained at the maincampus.References[1] S. Lavado-Anguera, P.J. Velasco-Quintana, and M.J. Terrón-López, “Project-Based Learning (PBL) as an Experiential Pedagogical Methodology in Engineering Education: A Review of the Literature,” Education Sciences, 14(6), 617, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14060617[2] S. Atwood, M. Siniawski, and A. Carberry, “Using Standards-based Grading to Effectively Assess Project-based Design Courses,” 2014, doi: 10.18260/1-2--23278.[3] Atwood, S. A., & Scalaro, K., & Holcombe, R., “Work-in-Progress: Seizing failure as

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 5

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Caroline Crockett, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

and curriculum developers select the correct learning goals and activities for theirspecific student population.References [1] S. Isaac Flores-Alonso, N. V. M. Diaz, J. Kapphahn, et al., “Introduction to AI in under- graduate engineering education,” in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), College Station, TX, USA: IEEE, Oct. 18, 2023, pp. 1–4, ISBN: 9798350336429. DOI: 10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343187. [2] S. Khorbotly, “Machine learning: An undergraduate engineering course,” in 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings, Anderson, Indiana: ASEE Conferences, Apr. 2022, p. 42 132. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--42132. [3] R. DeMara, A. Gonzalez, A. Wu, et al., “A crcd experience: Integrating machine learning

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 5: BYOE (Bring Your Own Experiment): Innovative Tools and Techniques for Experiential Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George Prpich, University of Virginia; Amara L Pettit, University of Virginia; Clare Cocker, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

specific minimum ignition energy (MIE) required to trigger anexplosion4.Understanding these factors is essential for preventing and mitigating dust explosions. TheHartmann tube, a cylindrical apparatus, is commonly used to simulate dust ignition conditions toevaluate hazards posed by different types of dust under different environmental conditions. Theminimum ignition energy (MIE), minimum explosible concentration (MEC), and the dustdeflagration index (Kst), are common metrics used to evaluate the explosive severity of the dust.The Dust Deflagration Index (Kst)5 expressed as [bar*m/s] is defined as: 𝑑𝑃 1 𝑏𝑎𝑟 𝐾𝑠𝑡 = ( ) ∗ 𝑉3

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 4.B

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marlee Jacobs, Utah State University; Daniel Kane, Utah State University; Rosemary Yahne, Utah State University; Wade H Goodridge, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

. Guerra, and S. Duran Ballen, “ChatGPT to Support Critical Thinking inConstruction-Management Students,” in 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings, Portland, Oregon: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2024, p. 48459. doi: 10.18260/1-2--48459.[6] S. Vidalis, R. Subramanian, and F. Najafi, “Revolutionizing Engineering Education: TheImpact of AI Tools on Student Learning,” in 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings, Portland, Oregon: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2024, p. 47950. doi: 10.18260/1-2--47950[7] B. Qureshi, “Exploring the Use of ChatGPT as a Tool for Learning and Assessment inUndergraduate Computer Science Curriculum: Opportunities and Challenges”. 2023,https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11214[8] M. O. Agbese, M. Rintamaki, R

Conference Session

Faculty Development Works in Progress Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Hug, Colorado Evaluation and Research Consulting; Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Zoe Wood, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Anagha Kulkarni, San Francisco State University; Fang Tang, Cal Poly Pomona; Kanika Sood, California State University, Fullerton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

.2010.06.021.[5] Australian Catholic University, J. Yoo, D. Carter, and University of Technology Sydney, “Teacher Emotion and Learning as Praxis: Professional Development that Matters,” AJTE, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 38–52, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.3.[6] E. Smela, “Faculty Workshop on Teaching Sustainability”.[7] J. S. Bruner, The process of education. in The process of education. Oxford, England: Harvard Univer. Press, 1960, pp. xvi, 97.[8] L. Blum and C. Frieze, “The Evolving Culture of Computing: Similarity Is the Difference,” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 110–125, 2005, doi: 10.1353/fro.2005.0002.[9] D. Galvan, J. Dong, L. Schlemer, and E. Allen, “Lessons Learned: Teaching and Learning

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 8: Communication and Liberal Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine Woodworth Wong, University of New Hampshire; Cynthia Helen Carlson PE, PhD, Merrimack College

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

– 277, 2012.[23] M. Micari and S. Calkins, “Is it OK to ask? The impact of instructor openness to questions on student help-seeking and academic outcomes,” Act. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 143–157, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1469787419846620.[24] A. Yevelson-Shorsher and J. Bronstein, “Three Perspectives on Information Literacy in Academia: Talking to Librarians, Faculty, and Students,” Coll. Res. Libr., vol. 79, no. 4, Art. no. 4, May 2018, doi: 10.5860/crl.79.4.535.[25] J. Fagan, “Students’ Perceptions of Academic Librarians,” Ref. Libr., vol. 37, no. 78, pp. 131–148, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1300/J120v37n78_09.[26] “Literacy Statistics 2024- 2025 (Where we are now).” Accessed: Jan. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Connections and Community

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yonghee Lee, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jay Mann, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Chris Migotsky, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

into bothfaculty development and course design.In addition, future research should explore how institutional and peer support structures withinCoPs can reduce barriers to teaching innovation. It could also examine how CoPs help facultymanage demands between research and teaching expectations, and what recognition or rewardsystems are most effective in helping faculty continue to engage in teaching-focused efforts in aresearch-intensive university.References[1] M. Borrego and C. Henderson, "Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEMhigher education: A comparison of eight change strategies," Journal of Engineering Education,vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 220–252, 2014.[2] J. Tomkin, S. Beilstein, J. Morphew, and others, "Evidence that

Conference Session

Aerospace Division (AERO) Technical Session 3 - Student Papers 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taylor St. Fleur, Prairie View A&M University; Jianren Zhou, Prairie View A&M University; Minghui Xu, Clemson University; Yuhao Xu, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

rocket. This initial task ensuredshe was well-prepared for the more specialized responsibilities to follow. Afterward, she delvedinto the previous work conducted with ULA on Centaur V, enabling her to catch up to thecurrent state of their test readiness process.The Vulcan Centaur, a specific rocket design developed by ULA, includes an upper stage knownas the Centaur V. This stage is fueled by liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen, equipped with twoengines, and features cryogenic tanks insulated with foam. ET30’s primary focus was on CentaurV’s upper stage section. The Centaur V test article overview involved several critical objectives:structurally qualifying the internal and external hardware against critical failure modes, designlimits, and

Conference Session

WiP: Gen AI, Mixed Reality, and Simulations

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaoye Michael Wang; Jackie Anjie Liu, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; TImothy Welsh, University of Toronto; Ariel Chan, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

training: Comparing traditional and learning by teaching approaches,” Comput. Ind., vol. 144, p. 103785, 2023.[12] J. T. Bell and H. S. Fogler, “Vicher: a virtual reality based educational module for chemical reaction engineering,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 285–296, 1996.[13] M. Koretsky, S. Kimura, C. Barnes, D. Amatore, and D. Meyers-Graham, “Experiential learning of design of experiments using a virtual CVD reactor,” in 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006, pp. 11–621.[14] C. Norton et al., “Development and deployment of an immersive learning environment for enhancing process systems engineering concepts,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. e75–e83, 2008.[15] C. Pirola, C. Peretti, and F. Galli

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ria Madan, Texas A&M University; Hadear Ibrahim Hassan, Texas A&M University; M Cynthia Hipwell, Texas A&M University; Astrid Layton, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

focused on developing innovative solutions from root cause understanding, improved pace of learning, and discipline in experimentation and configuration management. She was inducted into the National Academy of Engineering in 2016 for her leadership in the development of technologies to enable areal density and reliability increases in hard disk drives and was elected a National Academy of Inventors Fellow in 2018. Dr. Hipwell is currently the Oscar S. Wyatt, Jr. ’45 Chair II at Texas A&M University, where she has developed new classes on innovation and technology development as part of her leadership of the INVENT (INnoVation tools and Entrepreneurial New Technology) Lab. She is Co-PI on a National Science

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

EMINE FOUST, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

of the author and do not purport to stateor reflect the position of the United States Government or any agency thereof, including the UnitedStates Military Academy, the Department of the Army, or the Department of Defense.References 1. L. T. Eby, T. D. Allen, S. C. Evans, T. Ng, and D. Dubois, “Does Mentoring Matter? A Multidisciplinary Meta-Analysis Comparing Mentored and Non-Mentored Individuals”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(2), 254-267, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005 2. W. B. Johnson, L. L. Behling, P. Miller, and M. Vandermaas-Peeler, “Undergraduate Research Mentoring: Obstacles and Opportunities”, Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 441

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaofeng Wu, Georgia Institute of Technology; David Frost

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

tightly connected groups. The differences are shown using a “close-up” sideto side contrast in Fig. 3. Referring back to Fig. 2, Group 2’s map revealed a more linearstructure, characterized by extended branches that reflected its higher average degree andnetwork diameter. In comparison, the maps of Group 1 and 3 exhibited more net-like structures,consistent with their higher graph density andmodularity. Similar comparison in these majormind map patterns have been discussed by othersthat referred to the pattern as “spoke”, “chain”and “net” structure [16]. Though, the linestructure referenced in the Group 2 map indicateda more linear arrangement compared to the other “Line” “Net”groups, rather than being

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Linda Vigdor, Advanced Science Research Center, City University of NY; Rosemarie Wesson, City University of New York, City College; JOSHUA Craig BRUMBERG

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

criticalproblem(s) they posed and the scientific and the societal significance of their research questions.Discussions included how to effectively communicate their ideas to a broader audience as well asbecome more comfortable with incorporating perspectives from non-disciplinary experts. Alongthe way, this mentoring also included career development advice. This ability to interact withdiverse scientific fields is a core aspect of team science or convergence research. Key is thatscientists from different disciplines learn and work together to dissect a problem and challengeeach other’s thinking to re-conceptualize a research program. Such diverse standpoints andapproaches open a space for new ideas to address globally significant scientific problems. One

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Reeping, University of Cincinnati; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE); Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis; Hossein EbrahimNejad, Drexel University; NAHAL RASHEDI, University of Cincinnati; Yunmeng Han, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

onset of Year 3, we began work on thefollowing research question: How do different populations and pathways (e.g., FTIC, changingmajors, transfer) navigate the curriculum? To address this question, we planned to useassociation analysis to discover frequent groupings of courses and association rules among themto build course-taking trajectories. The concept of association analysis [9] is classically appliedto analyzing transaction data to observe what items are bought together and develop associationrules of the form, "the people who bought item(s), A, also tended to buy item(s), B." Thosebundles of items we are trying to relate, A and B, are called itemsets, and the association rulewould be written as 𝐴 → 𝐵 (A is the antecedent and B is the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Sriram Mohan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Rae Jing Han, University of Washington; Selen Güler, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

perspectives on diversity efforts (Woods et al., 2024).AcknowledgementThe authors would like to thank the RED teams for their participation in the RED community ofpractice. This work is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No.’s 2317318 and 2317319. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in the material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.ReferencesBehfar, K. J., Peterson, R. S., Mannix, E. A., and Trochim, W. M. K. (2008). The critical role ofconflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict managementstrategies, and team outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.93, No. 1, pp. 170

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jingfeng Wu, University of Michigan; Erika A Mosyjowski, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Joi-Lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan; Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Vempala, Hayley Nielsen, Judy Kim, Dianna Torres,Berenice Cabrera for their contributions to data collection and analysis.References[1] C. C. Ngo and S. J. Oh, “Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate Education in the United States,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual Online: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2020, p. 34964. doi: 10.18260/1-2--34964.[2] C. W. E. Whiteman, “Mechanical Engineering Curricula: A Baseline Study for the Future Effects of ABET EC2000,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 327–338, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.7227/IJMEE.31.4.4.[3] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, D. W. Knight, N. Canney, and C. Swan, “Educating Engineers to Work

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Faculty Influences on Student Support

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Campbell James McColley, Cornell University; Alexandra Werth, Cornell University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

/2023/05/2024-2025_ANSAC_Criteria.pdf[7] J. A. Mynderse, A. L. Gerhart, and L. Liu, “Assessing ABET Student Outcome 5 (Teamwork) in BSME Capstone Design Projects,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Mar. 12, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/assessing-abet-student-outcome-5-teamwork-in-bsme-capstone-design- projects[8] D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson, “An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning,” Educ. Res., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 365–379, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.3102/0013189X09339057.[9] E. Panadero and S. Järvelä, “Socially Shared Regulation of Learning: A Review,” Eur. Psychol., vol. 20, pp. 190–203, Jan

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 12: Bridging the Gap - Strategies to Support Diverse Learners in Early Engineering Courses

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University; Sohan Panda, Plaksha University; Shubham Goel, Plaksha University; Tanmay Ravi Chowdhary, Plaksha University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

Gap betweenTheory and Practice: Connecting Courses with Field Experiences,” in Teacher EducationQuarterly, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 19–35, 2006.[4] S. Waks, E. Trotskovsky, N. Sabag, and O. Hazzam, “Engineering Thinking: The Expert'sPerspective,” in International Journal of Engineering Education, 838-851, February 2011.[5] E. Putilova, and A. Shutaleva, “Engineering thinking and its role in modern industry” inproceedings of the 16th International Conference on Industrial Manufacturing and Metallurgy(ICIMM 2021) 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0074665[6] L. Marin and S. Steinert, “Twisted thinking: Technology, Values and Critical Thinking” inPrometheus, vol. 38, pp. 124–140, 2022. [Online]. Available:https://www.jstor.org