. These incidences may sometimes cause thestudents to reconsider their intents for graduate study. Third, moving equipment to some remotelocation(s) is time consuming and carries some degree of risk of loss and/or damage, anddeprives the school of its potential use to teach, learn, or conduct research.Ideally, hands-on, online graduate programs should allow the students to learn the requiredmaterial at their convenience; permit adequate interaction with instructor and among thestudents; conduct hands-on exercises anytime and anywhere; individualize instruction tocapitalize the varied backgrounds and experiences of working professionals; provide adequateand up-to-date equipment for relevant and uninhibited exploration and experimentation; andmuch
Mechanics ModulesFor each of the design tasks discussed in Section 4, we identified the fluid mechanics principlesneeded to complete the task, as shown in Table 1 below. These basic principles guideddevelopment of the fluid mechanics IT modules. To the extent possible, the modules areindependent of one another; where some previous knowledge is needed, the student is linked tothe appropriate section(s).Table 1. Fluid mechanics principles needed for projects in water resources engineering. Task Description Fluids Principles 1 Water demand • basic units (Q, V, gallons, liters, etc.) • hydrographs
successful distance learning. Paper presented at EdMedia 2000: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Montreal, Canada.9. Sabry, K. & Baldwin, L. (2003). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 443-454.10. Cennamo, K. S., Ross, J. D., & Rogers, C. S., (2002). Evolution of a web-based course: Incorporating strategies for self-regulation, Educause Quarterly, 25(1), 28-33..11. Hase, S. & Ellis, A. (2001). Problems with Online Learning are Systemic, Not Technical.” In Stephenson, J. (Ed). Teaching And Learning Online: Pedagogies for New Technologies. Kogan Page: Sterling, VA, pp. 27- 34.12. Massa, N. M
; (b) itreminds the reader what had been accomplished during the previous period; and (c) itdescribes the work that is to be accomplished during the next reporting period. The WARalso gives a brief synopsis of any and all meetings held with the project advisor andsponsor(s). The specific format used for the construction of the WAR is left up to eachadvisor and/or sponsor; the main requirement being that each maintains the highestprofessional standards. At the end of the first two weeks, each design team provides the course directorwith a statement of work with timelines/milestone schedule. (An example of anacceptable statement of work with timelines/milestone schedule was provided in class.)At the end of the fall semester, each team
pedagogy reported by Solomon, et.al.8,(case studies, business plan writing, and lectures) by providing critical information and trainingin novel and innovative ways, and by utilizing inter-disciplinary, team-based methods. Thisallows different viewpoints and areas of expertise to be utilized for maximum team performanceand outcome benefit; in addition to providing the best education and training for students andfaculty, with maintenance of quality control and accountability through the mentor(s)/instructors.The goals and objectives of this course have been to: • teach and demonstrate the principles and techniques of inter-disciplinary teamwork, • teach students and investigators the principles and techniques of intellectual property
Session Number: STEM Teams and The Great Orange Squeeze: A Unique Approach to Preparing Middle School Educators for the Massachusetts Engineering Framework Requirements Katherine S. Ziemer1, Tracy Carter1, Paula Leventman2 1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115/ 2College of Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115Massachusetts was the first state in the nation to introduce engineering as part of the K-12education frameworks. In the middle schools, the engineering framework is tested as part of thecompulsory Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) exam. The engineeringframework requirement
. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education2. Hill, S. T. (National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Studies, Arlington, VA, 2001).3. Tobias, S. (1990) They're not dumb, they're different: Stalking the second tier. Research Corporation: Tucson, AZ.4. Rosser, S. V. (ed.) Female-friendly science (Pergamon Press, New York, 1990).5. Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. M. (1997) Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press: Boulder, CO.6. Adelman, C. (U.S. Department of Education (USDE), Office of Educational Research and
history, or the history ofindividuals”28 to philosophy and literary criticism, what is often called “science and technologystudies” is growing in reach and depth, and considers the topic of gender in science from manymore angles than simply women's underrepresentation.Feminist science scholars question who benefits from how science is practiced, how scientistsproduce theory about the natural/cultural/political/social world(s), how scientists determine whatis worthy of study and what is not, and who does not benefit from these investigations.Simultaneously, they are concerned with what remains “unsaid” in science: along with manyother scholars, Harding28, 29 has written extensively about the androcentric bias in biology andthe social sciences, as
engineering majors may anticipate aftergraduation. Types of jobs represented ranged from expected chemical engineering tasks to sales,management, and consulting. The speakers represented employers such as NASA, Magotteau,Gobbell Hays Partners, and DuPont. Only two speakers worked in Nashville, where Vanderbilt islocated. Of the remaining three, one was from Delaware, one from Alabama, and one fromTexas. Three different decades were represented, with one speaker having graduated in the '70's,two in the '80's, and two in the '90's. In addition to all speakers being alumni, four of the fivewere my former students. (A sixth speaker, a 2002 graduate from Marathon Oil in Illinois,accepted but had to cancel travel plans because of extreme weather conditions
-Piana, C. K., 1999, "CircLES: A Retention Program for Entering Students in Engineering, Mathematics and Science," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 3, 13d8-2.4. Richardson, J., Dantzler, J, 2002, "Effect of a Freshman Engineering Program on Retention and Academic Performance," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 3, S2C/16-S2C/22.5. Kellar, J.J., Hovey, W., Langerman, M., Howard, S., Simonson, L., Kjerengtroen, L., Stetler, L., Heilhecker, H., Arneson-Meyer, L., Kellogg, S. D., 2000, "Problem Based Learning Approach for Freshman Engineering," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 2, F2G-7-F2G-10.6. Howard, B., 1999, "Enough of This Science and Mathematics, Let's Do Some
. building and working in a multidisciplinary business team 5. business planning and plans 6. marketing in an entrepreneurial environment 7. financing models (fundraising) 8. financials (income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement).ITV teamsIn the pilot offering, three virtual companies were formed. At least two ITV teams will beformed in each subsequent program year. Each ITV team consists of the following:• a technology development team composed of four to six undergraduate engineering and business students coached by an engineering faculty “coach”• a two- to five-person market research and business plan development team composed of MBA students coached by a CEI faculty member, the engineering faculty inventor(s
/Fuel_Cells_for_Houses.pdf (Accessed January 2004.)4. Larminie, J. and Dicks, A., Fuel Cell Systems Explained, Wiley, 2000.5. Fuel Cell Handbook, 6th Edition, U.S Department of Energy, November 2002.6. Mehta, V and Cooper, J. S., Review and Analysis of PEM Fuel Cell Design and Manufacturing, Journal of Power Sources 114, pp 32-53, 2003. (Recommended)7. Fuel Cells: Green Power, S. Thomas, M. Zalbowitz, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, August 2003 http://education.lanl.gov/resources/fuelcells/fuelcells.pdf. (Accessed January 2004.)8. Barbir, F. - Technical Challenges in PEM Fuel Cell Development, Energy Partners, Inc., http://www.powerpulse.net/powerpulse/archive/aa_071299b1.stm.9. Bar-On, I., Kichain, R., Roth, R. – Technical cost
. This paper presents thedetails of this experiential learning activity as well as a formative assessment of its effectiveness.I. IntroductionPrior to the 1950's, it was common for engineering programs to offer in their curricula suchcourses as sheet-metal fabrication, casting, and machine shop. With the advent of computers andmore emphasis on the theoretical side of engineering education, the courses on mechanical artswere gradually phased out with most of hands-on activities reduced and squeezed into thelaboratory courses. This shift in engineering education is mostly responsible for manyengineering graduates to have a very narrow understanding of the product development processthrough which a design concept is transformed into a physical
prototyping tool would be valuable for an integrated teaching/research activity inPE area.References[1] G. Kurpis and C. Booth, The New IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms. NewYork, 1993.[2] O. Mo, Ned Mohan, R. Nilssen, W.P. Robbins, T.M. Undeland, “Simulation of Power Electronic andMotion Control Systems- An overview”. Proceedings of the IEEE, Volume:82 Issue:8, Aug. 1994 pp 1287 –1302[3] D. Maksimovic, A.M. Stankovic, V.J. Thottuvelil ,G.C. Verghese, “ Modeling and Simulation of PowerElectronic Converters”. Proceedings of the IEEE , Volume: 89 Issue: 6 , June 2001 ,Page(s): 898 –912.[4] R. Satish , T. V. Sivakumar, V. V. Sastry, V. Ajjarapu, S. S. Venkata, “ A PC-based Object-Centric VirtualPower
Figure 3. Fall '97 Overall "C" grade Freshman-Engineering Student Performance.A display of all Fall '97 students grades in EF1015 versus their respective mathematicspre-test scores is displayed in Figure 4 and provided from Figure 1. The figure is derivedby taking vertical slices of Figure 1 when the “EF1015 Grade”s are “0.0” (“F”), “1.0”(“D”), “1.7” (“C-“), “2.0” (“C”), “3.0” (“B”), and “4.0” (“A”). EF1015 Grade / Fall 97 / All 5 4 F Student
thereform path than other disciplines due to the existence of an assessment instrument thattests basic concepts. The well-known Force Concept Inventory (FCI) assessment instrumentof Hestenes, et al.14 has been in use for over 15 years and is now credited with stimulatingreform of physics education. Such assessment inventories can play an important part inrelating teaching techniques to student learning. The design of these instruments relies onthe designer(s) knowing the misconceptions commonly held by students in a discipline.The instruments use these misconceptions as distractors to see if a student can pick out acorrect concept from among the common misconceptions
Another By! Paper presented at UMR Instructional Software Development Center Seminar Series, Rolla, MO.Dillon, A. and Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research 68: 322 - 349.Hall, R. H. (2001). Web-based training site design principles: A literature review and synthesis. in Web-based training. B. Khan (Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Educational Technology Publications: 165 - 172.Hall, R. H., Watkins, S. E. and Eller, V. E. (in press). A model of web based design for learning. in The Handbook of Distance Education. M. Moore and B. Anderson (Eds.). Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum.Landauer
Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Session 2480AcknowledgementsThe above study was funded by The U.S. Department of Education under Title II, Part B –Dwight D. Eisenhower Professional Development Program to the District of Columbia. Theopinions expressed herein are those of the authors' and not necessarily those of the U.S.Department of Education or the District of Columbia.References1. Dede, C. (1999). The multiple-media difference. Technos, 8, 16 - 18.2. Bruner, J. (1963). The process of education. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.3. Papert, S. & Turkle, S
learned in class to novel situations. Through the use of an on-lineforum, the potential exists for students to achieve greater understanding and more meaningfulreflection. A study involving the role of individual learning styles in terms of students' use ofand students' benefit from the use of on-line discussion forums is needed. Further research onthe impact of on-line discussion forums to long-term understandings and perceptions as well as acomparison to more “traditional” methods of instruction is also warranted.References1. Edwards, V. B. (1997). Editor’s introduction in Education Week. Washington, DC: Editorial Projects in Education.2. Hein, T. L., and S. E. Irvine (1998). Assessment of student understanding using on-line
0 −0.5 −1 −1.5 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045 time (s) Figure 5: An AM signal to be demodulated via DSP. 62nd Order Hilbert Transformer FIR Filter Coefficients 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 amplitude 0 −0.2 −0.4 −0.6 −0.8 0
to do some library research to determine the nature of thepower generating technology and its potential effects on the environment and society. Table 1shows a decision matrix from one of these projects. Table 1: Electric Power Decision Matrix Alternatives Hydroelectric Wind Solar Natural Gas etc. … Criteria Weights Score Weighted S WS S WS S WS Score Cost 10 10
School, Northwestern University, 2002 url: http://www.kellogg.nwu.edu/academic/majors/8) Private communication from David Ku, Georgia Institute of Technology.9) NCSU College of Engineering, 2002 ECE 292/492 Engineering Enterprise course sequence10) T K Miller III, NCSU, private communication, (October 2001).11) Pennsylvania State University, 200212) See for example, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Educators, Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, June 200113) A I Kingon, R Thomas, S K Markham, L Aiman-Smith and R Debo, An Integrated Approach to Teaching High Technology Entrepreneurship at the Graduate Level, Proc. of the ASEE Albuquerque, NM (2001).14) S Shane and S Venkataraman, The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of
upon by most LdV scholars. For “Invention Day” students prepared a“quasi-patent” write-up on an invention of their choosing, as described above.Arithmetic, Italian high finance, silverpoint pencils, and soldi came into play as students soughtto answer the question of whether a reference to a certain Caterina in Leonardo’s Notebooks doesindeed refer to his mother: Expenses of the Interment of Caterina [1494] For the 3 lbs of tapers 27 S For the bier 8S A pall over the bier 12 S For bearing and placing the cross 4S For bearing the body 8S For 4 priests and 4 clerks
course attendants. We refer to the former as “the instructor” and the later as “thesupervisor” in this paper. Page 7.1108.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationWe think that the difficulties of VC++ result from the following two factors:1. The difficulty of the C++ language, particularly the object oriented aspects of the language, such as the notion of classes, inheritance, polymorphism, and class variables. The same claim is also found in [2].2. VC++'s black-box nature of both the
Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationlevel of that conclusion determined from statistical methods. If Am and Bm are the means oftheir respective data sets based on N points, then the difference in the means and its uncertaintycan be determined from: D = Am – Bm Del D = [(S A2 + S B2) / N] 1/2where S represents the sample standard deviation of each sample. The ratio of D to Del D can beused, along with a standard normal distribution probability table (or the NORMDIST function) todetermine the probability that D is larger than zero (i.e. Am is larger than Bm). A
s s s na l nt nt
Session 2248 Paper 902 Word Problems and Problems with Words: A Possible Solution Natalie D. Segal, Sallie S. Townsend S.I. Ward College of Technology at the University of HartfordAbstract: We began with a question: Why do our students have so much difficultysolving word problems in Math I? Another question followed: Why do our studentshave so much difficulty writing short (three-to-five paragraph), logical essays in EnglishI? One possible answer: Our students approach math and English problems as if theyrequired entirely different skills. However
students.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantsNo. 0624738, 0953698, and 0939128. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We would like to express our gratitude tothe students who have participated in the Gender and Engineering Co-Curricular Activity. Wewould also like to thank our colleagues for intense conversations on the subject and support inthe formation of this manuscript.References:1. National Academy of Engineering (2002). Diversity in Engineering: Managing the Workforce of the Future, Washington, DC: National Academy Press2. National
: |Vright | − |Vleft | < 3 𝑉𝑉 Page 22.813.6 (1) fright − fleft < 0.1 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻 (2) Fuses N N Ra Xa R R Three Phase S
students.Bibliography1. National Assessment of Educational Progress, 2005. Available at http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/2. Rose, D. H., Meyer, A., & Hitchcock, C. (2005). The universally designed classroom: Accessiblecurriculum and digital technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.3. Graham, S., Harris, K., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (1991) . Writing and Writing Instruction forStudents with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly. 14(2), 89-114. Page 22.859.124. National Science Education Standards, 1996. Available at http://www.nap.edu/html/nses/5. Wallace, R., Soloway, E., Krajcik, J. S., Bos, N., Hoffman, J