Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

David Hartenstine, Western Washington University; Perry Fizzano, Western Washington University; Joseph Arthur Brobst, Old Dominion University; Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

education, K-12 STEM teacher professional development, and preservice teacher preparation in STEM.Dr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University Dr. Garner is Executive Director of The Center for Educational Partnerships at Old Dominion University, VA. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Near-Peer Mentoring and Early Exposure to Computer Science – Quantitative and Qualitative Results - SummaryIntroductionThe CS/M Scholars Program at Western Washington University (WWU) is funded by an NSFTrack 2 S-STEM grant (Award Number 1742110). The grant funds scholarships for low-incomehigh-achieving students majoring in computer science or math and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Carol Shubin, California State University Northridge

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

remotely on their year-long projects at the end of August. The mid-termpresentations were held on January, 2021 and it appeared that all students were making very goodprogress. Advisors meet with students weekly over ZOOM. While everyone is looking forward toreturning to our traditional format, we have all adjusted and I really believe that this year’s programis running as well as it would under traditional circumstances.References[1] ”Envisioning the Data Science Discipline: The Undergraduate Perspective: Interim Report” National Academies Press: OpenBook, https://www.nap.edu/read/24886/[2] Berman, F., Rutenbar, R., Hailpern, B., Christensen, H., Davidson, S., Estrin, D., aˆ Szalay, A. S. Realizing the potential of data science

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mohsen Moghaddam, Northeastern University; Jacqueline A. Isaacs, Northeastern University; Sagar Kamarthi, Northeastern University; Martin Storksdieck, Oregon State University; Xiaoning Jin, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Applications” innext phase of the project.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1935646. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] G. Giffi, P. Wellener, B. Dollar, H. Ashton Manolian, L. Monck, and C. Moutray, “Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute skills gap and future of work study,” 2018.[2] S. A. Ambrose, M. Lovett, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, and M. K. Norman, How learning works : seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco: US: Jossey- Bass, 2010.[3] S. A. Ambrose and L

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Susannah C. Davis, University of New Mexico; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Bala Vignesh Sundaram, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Jemal Bedane Halkiyo P.E., Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

wereendangered through their participation. Complementary to this line of analysis, we have beenconducting workshops that introduce this framework as a tool for participants seeking to makechange [6, 7].AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC 1914578, 1915484, 1913128, 1519339. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We would also like to acknowledge thecontributions of colleagues Kelly Cross, Donna Riley, and Alice Pawley, and graduate studentsJasmine Desiderio and Susan Sajadi.References1. Kezar, A., What is the best way to

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ekaterina Koromyslova, South Dakota State University; Anna Sadovnikova, Monmouth University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Andrea T. Kwaczala, Western New England University; Robert Gettens, Western New England University; Denine A Northrup, Western New England University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

), 1st-generation status (a student whose parent(s) did notcomplete a four-year college or university degree) and finally by responses based on scoring on theengineering self-efficacy scale (threshold value of 4.0 out of 5 set as high-ESE).Thirty-two females completed the survey and twenty-four males, one student identified as genderqueer ornon-binary. This data point was not considered when comparing differences in gender due to the smallsample size but was considered for analysis of 1st-generation and low- vs. high-engineering self-efficacy.Eighteen students reported being 1st-generation, thirty-nine were not. Twenty-one scored 4.0 or greater onmeasures of engineering self-efficacy, thirty-six scored below 4.0.To examine the reliability of the

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Pedagogy

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Justin Shaffer, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

limitscomparisons that can be made in the study, but in the future, more data will likely be added tohelp address this limitation. The study will also be expanded in the future to include more onlineand summer classes, in addition to the traditional face-to-face classes. This will help determinewhether students need the class to be structured differently from traditional face-to-face classes.References[1] S. Freeman, D. Haak, and M. P. Wenderoth, "Increased Course Structure Improves Performance in Introductory Biology," Cbe-Life Sci Educ, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 175-186, June 20, 2011 2011, doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-08-0105.[2] J. F. Shaffer, "Student performance in and perceptions of a high structure undergraduate human anatomy course

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Aamir Fidai, Texas A&M University; Samiha Momin; Asma Salim Maredia, Texas A&M University; Insha Ashirali Umatiya

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

) design and b) control dimensions of first-year engineering education References[1] R. M. Marra, B. Palmer and T. A. Litzinger, "The effects of a first‐year engineering design course on student intellectual development as measured by the Perry scheme," J Eng Educ, vol. 89, (1), pp. 39-45, 2000.[2] F. Ö Karataş, G. M. Bodner and S. Unal, "First-year engineering students' views of the nature of engineering: implications for engineering programmes," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 41, (1), pp. 1-22, 2016.[3] M. J. A. Brey, M. D. Mizzy and R. Goldberg, "A maker-in-residence program to build a community of makers," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[4] *E

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Dawn M. Maynen, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

[22]. During World War II (1939-45),women engaged in roles that were previously exclusive to males although women did not benefitequally [34]. The 1960’s and 1970’s led to the creation of law and programs to promote equityand challenge gender-related disparities including the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Title IX of theEducation Amendments Act of 1972, and the Women’s Educational Equity Act of 1974 to namea few. Nonetheless, these women scientists continued to bring “modest but essential change tohigher education in the years 1972-1985” [35, p. 39].In the Nineteenth and Twentieth century, women studying or working in engineering wereperceived as outcasts. The first women pursuing engineering were labeled as “others”; a smallthreatening group of

Conference Session

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nagash Antoine Clarke, University of Michigan; Joi-Lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

marginalized populations. A potentiallimitation of this study involves the first author having relationships with most of theparticipants. It will be interesting to replicate the study with participants who are unknown to thefirst author. Those participants might be less willing to be interrogated and challenged.References[1] S. Stokes, Into the Wildfire: Campus Racial Climate and the Trump Presidency (Doctoral dissertation, 2020, University of Southern California).[2] S. R. Harper, An anti‐deficit achievement framework for research on students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010, (148), 63-74.[3] Z. W. Taylor, A sage on two stages: What a Black academic taught a white scholar about cross-cultural mentoring. Texas

Conference Session

Assessing Hard-to-Measure Constructs in Engineering Education: Assessment Design and Validation Studies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University; Hillary E. Merzdorf, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Blake Williford, Sketch Recognition Lab; Lance Leon Allen White, Texas A&M University; Karan Watson P.E., Texas A&M University; Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, “Drawing on experience: Connecting art and language/bridging the theme,” Primary Voices K-6, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 2, 2001. [3] R. M. Yasin, L. Halim, and A. Ishar, “Effects of problem-solving strategies in the teaching and learning of engineering drawing subject,” Asian Social Science, vol. 8, no. 16, p. 65, 2012. [4] S. A. Sorby, “Educational research in developing 3-d spatial skills for engineering students,” International Jour- nal of Science Education, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 459–480, 2009. [5] J. M. Lakin and J. Wai, “Spatially gifted, academically inconvenienced: Spatially talented students experience less academic engagement and more behavioural issues than other talented students,” British Journal of Educa- tional Psychology

Conference Session

Making in Design Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kate Youmans, Colorado School of Mines; Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida; Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University; Louis Nadelson, University of Central Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

University Jana L. Bouwma-Gearhart is an associate professor of STEM education at Oregon State University. Her research widely concerns improving education at research universities. Her earlier research explored en- hancements to faculty motivation to improve undergraduate education. Her more recent research concerns organizational change towards postsecondary STEM education improvement at research universities, in- cluding the interactions of levers (people, organizations, policy, initiatives) of change and documenting the good, hard work required across disciplinary boundaries to achieve meaningful change in STEM ed- ucation.Dr. Louis S. Nadelson, University of Central Arkansas Louis S. Nadelson has a BS

Conference Session

Bring Your Own Experiment: Experimentation and Laboratory-oriented Studies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University; Robert D. Adams, Western Carolina University; Paul M. Yanik, Western Carolina University; Hugh Jack, Western Carolina University; Andrew Ritenour, Western Carolina University; Hayrettin B. Karayaka, Western Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies

kits withportability, and the students can use such lab kits in multiple courses throughout theirundergraduate study.Digilent offers a BNC adaptor for the AD2 to allow the usage of BNC cables for signal input andoscilloscope probes for monitoring signals while preserving the bandwidth. It is important tonote that this feature is in addition to the built-in 2-channel function generator and the virtual 2-channel oscilloscope of the AD2. AD2, M2K, and OSMZ all share identical flywire interfaces(the pinout maps are also almost the same except the pins that differ in functionality. Forexample, the AD2’s waveform-2 pin is a clock pin on the OSMZ board as the OSMZ board doesnot provide a second function generator channel). Therefore, the BNC adaptor

Conference Session

Assessing Hard-to-Measure Constructs in Engineering Education: Assessment Design and Validation Studies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jeremiah Pina, Smith College; Glenn W. Ellis, Smith College; Al Rudnitsky, Smith College; Rebecca Mazur, Collaborative for Educational Services; Beth McGinnis-Cavanaugh, Springfield Technical Community College; Isabel Huff, Springfield Technical Community College

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University; Baker A. Martin, Clemson University; Katherine M. Ehlert, Clemson University; Haleh Barmaki Brotherton, Clemson University; Jessica Allison Manning, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

decision treeand separate the sample into mutually exclusive nodes which share common attributes.Attributes of nodes with a high proportion of students overpersisting will be used to identifycurrently enrolled students at risk of overpersisting. The variables used to make thesedeterminations can be categorical or continuous. In addition to traditional demographic variables,the variables currently under consideration are listed in Table 1.Table 1. Predictor variables computed for CHAID analysis Variable(s) Description first.term.hours Number of credit hours attempted in student’s first term first.major & last.major Majors enrolled in during the student’s first and last terms grad.major

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Patrick Sours, Ohio State University; Michael J. Hagenberger, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

can be evaluated in terms of t effectiveness ascompared to the other capstone courses to inform changes can be made to the Global Capstone.Citations(1 )Chubin, D. E., May, G. S., & Babco, E. L. (2005). Diversifying the Engineering Workforce. Journal ofEngineering Education, 94(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2005.tb00830.x(2) De Graaff, E., & Ravesteijn, W. (2001). Training complete engineers: Global enterprise andengineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 419–427.https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790110068701(3) Jesiek, Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global Engineering Competency inContext: Situations and Behaviors. 16.(4) Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., &

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Darby Rose Riley, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

“disseminationparadigm” in contrast to the “propagation paradigm” [6]. The dissemination paradigm is the ideathat “if we build it, they will come,” meaning that developers acting in this paradigm believe thatdesigning evidence-supported pedagogical innovations and presenting the results at conferencesand in journal articles will result in adoption. However, the data suggest that this is not the case[7], [8]. On the other hand, the propagation paradigm involves developers working with potentialadopters throughout the development process to create innovations that meet the needs of a widerange of engineering educators, thus providing motivation and opportunity for sustainedadoption. Using Froyd et al.’s [6] paradigms as two ends of a spectrum, we can capture a

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ingrid Buckley, Florida Gulf Coast University; Peter J. Clarke, Florida International University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

testing and regression testingDeliverable 3 Update test design plan, and perform continuous integration testing and regression testingDeliverable 4 Complete the test design plan and perform system testingNote that developing and testing the same project sometimes involved changing requirements; onthe other hand, testing the same project did not involve changing requirements, thereby making thetesting process a lot easier.4.3 Sample ProjectsThis section summarizes some of the group projects used for testing in CEN4072 in 2016, 2017,2019, and 2020. The summary includes the semester (year) the project was done, the project name,a short description of the project, the language(s) used, and development and testing tools used. In2016 and 2020, the

Collection

2011 North Midwest Section

Authors

Christopher R. Carroll

-of-products or product-of-sums form leads to he m ec n mical im lemen a i n, he de igne in he final im lemen a i n i n n-existent. In the ultimate insult to a digital designer, it is even possible to simply input the truthtable of the desired function(s) and the software will determine the optimal implementation.Where is the design effort to be assessed?In current CPLD implementations, the flip-flop in each macrocell can be implemented as either aD- or a T-type flip-flop. The configuration software decides which flip-flop type yields the bestresult, not the circuit designer. If the designer specifies the less-optimal type, the software will Proceedings of the 2011 North Midwest Section

Conference Session

DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2020 Best PIC and Zone Papers

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Florida; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder; Nathan E. Canney; Chris Swan, Tufts University; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors

, S = Energy and Sustainability,No = not observed)Code Definition CourseMastery Competence, proficiency in understanding and applying No knowledgeBroader context Understanding of the subject’s societal implications F, E, SEngagement active Student involvement in learning F, E, S learningEthical Ability to identify ethical issues and decide on ethical actions F, E, S developmentRelatedness Feeling of belonging and support in the learning setting F, ESystems thinking Ability to see connections and see the whole instead

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: REU 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Hua Li, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Kai Jin, Texas A&M University, Kingsville

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

achieve thesame research objective(s). In the fourth year, all the REU participants worked in group projectsetting. In addition, each group of REU participants was required to complete a group projectreport discussing the social impacts of their research projects. In both individual project andgroup project settings, REU participants were provided ample opportunities to share theirresearch progress through formal and informal presentations in order to enhance REUparticipants’ understanding and broaden their perspective of energy systems challenges. Inaddition, each REU participant was required to submit an individual final research project report,in order to highlight their findings through an individual poster presentation and give anindividual

Conference Session

Research in Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Sarah E Cooksey, University of Colorado Colorado Springs ; Kathryn Elizabeth Starkey, University of Colorado Colorado Springs

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

to one another during the career decision-making process(Lent et al., 1994). SCCT served as the basis of the interview protocol administered in this study,the deductive data analysis process, and in considering the implications of the study.Figure 1Social Cognitive Career TheoryNote. From “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest,Choice, and Performance,” by R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, 1994, Journal ofVocational Behavior, 45, pp. 79-122.MethodologyResearch design. An embedded, multiple-case study design (Yin, 2018) was utilized to explorethe ways in which 22 engineering postdoctoral scholars describe the appeal of pursuing a careerin the professoriate. Interviews, grounded by SCCT (Lent et al

Conference Session

Key Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession - and ASCE - Part 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Norb Delatte P.E., Oklahoma State University; Stephen J. Ressler P.E., United States Military Academy; Audra N. Morse P.E., Michigan Technological University; Camilla M. Saviz P.E., University of the Pacific; Brock E. Barry P.E., U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

for EAC programs) and CETAA (CommitteeTelecommunication(s) for ETAC programs) committee meetings.INCOSE, Systems No Still working on initial criteria requirementsSNAME, Naval Architecture and Feedback from program heads and discussion No Yes Ad hocMarine Engineering among society reps. Any changes to Program Criteria have beenSPIE, Optical and

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Johanna Kristiina Naukkarinen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology; Kati Maarit Koikkalainen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

also by generating some turnover among the participants.In the long run the successful implementation of the cooperation will result in increasinginterest of local pupils to study engineering at LUT University. However, it will take a longtime before the full potential of the cooperation is in use, and therefore these other indicatorsof the effectiveness of the activities must be systematically developed and applied.References[1] H. Kirschenbaum & C. Reagan, “University and urban school partnerships. An analysis of57 collaborations between university and a city school district,” Urban Educ. vol. 36, no. 4,pp. 479–504, Sep. 2001, doi:10.1177/0042085901364003[2] S. Sjøberg & C. Schreiner, “The ROSE project. An overview and key findings

Conference Session

Faculty and Student Perspective on Instructional Strategies

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Philip P. Graybill, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

of Applied Social Research, Columbia University, 1964. [3] J. Harp and P. Taietz, “Academic Integrity and Social Structure: A Study of Cheating among College Students,” Oxford Univ. Press. Soc. Study Soc. Probl., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 365–373, 1966. [4] D. L. McCabe, “Classroom Cheating Among Natural Science and Engineering Majors,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 433–445, 1997. [5] D. D. Carpenter, T. S. Harding, C. J. Finelli, S. M. Montgomery, and H. J. Passow, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Towards Cheating,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 181–194, Jul. 2006. [6] H. J. Passow, M. J. Mayhew, C. J. Finelli, T. S. Harding, and D. D. Carpenter, “Factors

Conference Session

Work in Progress: Assessment, Evaluation and Hands-on Activities

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Julianne Vernon, Vanderbilt University; Matthew Rogers, Vanderbilt University; Benjamin Joseph Saba; Yin Huang

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

student assignments and be used the following year to assess how students connectchemical engineering outside of the classroom. In addition, we hope that the increase in samplesize will show more distinct differences amongst the groups.References 1. Zappe, S., & Leicht, R., & Messner, J., & Litzinger, T., & Lee, H. W. (2009, June), “Flipping” The Classroom To Explore Active Learning In A Large Undergraduate Course Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/4545 2. Bays-Muchmore, M. F., & Chronopoulou, A. (2018, June), First-Year Engineering Students Perceptions of Engineering Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Conference Session

Work in Progress: Hands-on Activities

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kitana Kaiphanliam, Washington State University; Olivia Reynolds, Washington State University; David B. Thiessen, Washington State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

-Colleges-Are- Best- and/245758?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en&elqTrackId=61c76ff393544f33916 cdf7efa62f902&elq=1228defe891449bf8337f489863032f4&elqaid=22356&elqat=1&elqC ampaignId=110123. Burgher, J.K., D. M. Finkel, B. J. Van Wie, and O. O. Adesope, "Implementing and Assessing Interactive Physical Models in the Fluid Mechanics Classroom," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 2501–2516, 2016.4. Hunsu, N.J., O. Adesope, and B.J. Van Wie, “Engendering situational interest through innovative instruction in an engineering classroom: what really mattered?” Instructional Science, vol. 45, pp. 789-804, 2017.5. Liu C., C. Chen, S. Chen, T. Tsai, C. Chu, C

Conference Session

Student Perceptions of Self-efficacy, Success, and Identity

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Isabel Hilliger P.E., Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Constanza Melian, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Javiera Meza, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Gonzalo Cortés, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Jorge A. Baier, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

pedagogical underpinnings of Active Learning in Engineering Education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 5– 16, 2017.[3] E. J. H. Spelt, P. A. Luning, M. A. J. S. van Boekel, and M. Mulder, “A multidimensional approach to examine student interdisciplinary learning in science and engineering in higher education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 761– 774, 2017.[4] D. Gerrard and C. Variawa, “Bridges and barriers: A multi-year study of workload- related learning experiences from diverse student and instructor perspectives in first- year engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.[5] T. Geyer and W. R. Loendorf, “Handling increased faculty and student workload

Collection

2020 ASEE North Central Section conference

Authors

Robert Allen Langenderfer, The University of Toledo; Hong Wang, The University of Toledo

could incorporate the algorithms coursework to develop a massively multiplayer networkbased game.References[1] “Occupational Outlook Handbook: Software Developers Job Outlook”, Bureau of LaborStatistics, Sept. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/software-developers.htm#tab-6 [Accessed Jan., 2020][2] Ashok R. Basawapatna, Kyu Han Koh, and Alexander Repenning. “Using scalable gamedesign to teach computer science from middle school to graduate school,” In Proceedings of thefifteenth annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education.(ITiCSE ’10) Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2010, pp. 224–228.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1822090.1822154[3] S

Conference Session

CoNECD Session : Day 1 Slot 5 Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 CoNECD

Authors

Jerry Austin Yang, University of Texas at Austin; Audrey Boklage, University of Texas at Austin; Maximilan Kolbe Sherard, University of Texas at Austin; Christine Julien, University of Texas at Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity