and sociocultural norms as well as in classic studies of socialization in scientific andtechnical careers, which don’t mention novices’ existing knowledge, skills, or identities (e.g.,[17], [18], [19]). Despite ongoing critiques of this mindset as inaccurate and a barrier to learningand identity formation (e.g., [20], [21], [22]), some academic communities, such as theengineering research laboratory groups that co-author Wylie studies, continue to talk aboutnovices according to this model. This approach does great injustice to newcomers to expertcommunities as well as robs experts of opportunities to learn from “a wisdom of peripherality”([23] p. 216), i.e., the invaluable perspective of outsiders. In ongoing observations and interviewsof
; Benson, Kirn, &Faber, 2013; Felder & Brent, 2016; Vogt, 2008) all contain central features of interaction-dominantcomplex systems. These features include complex, dynamic qualities that produce emergent outcomes(Kaplan, et al., 2012; Mitchell, 2009; Richardsen, et al., 2014). Research conducted within learningenvironments (i.e. classrooms, laboratories, etc.) necessarily involves the interaction of settings, tasks,teachers, and students (Schwab, 1971) and the study of motivation and engagement involves competingintraorganismic and extraorganismic factors (Deci & Ryan, 2002). Because cooperation, competition, andinterference are ever present features of these areas of study, changes in any system variables results inchanges to another
Paper ID #19321Computer-Mediated Peer Review: A Comparison of Calibrated Peer Reviewand Moodle’s WorkshopDr. Patricia Carlson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Patricia ”Pat” A. Carlson is a transplanted middle westerner, having spent her childhood in Norfolk, Va. She came to Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology early in her teaching career and has taught a variety of courses over the past three decades. Dr. Carlson has held a number of American Society for Engineering Education summer fellowships that have taken her to NASA-Goddard, NASA-Langley, the Army Research Laboratory in Aberdeen, Maryland, and NASA’s
well as faculty advisor for several student societies. She is the instructor of several courses in the CBE curriculum including the Material and Energy Balances, junior laboratories and Capstone De- sign courses. She is associated with several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and retention.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and assistant professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program
-year undergraduate student at Northeastern University, majoring in chemical engi- neering and pursuing minors in mathematics and material science and engineering. Outside of class, Kaeli works as a chemistry tutor and class grader, and she participates in undergraduate research in a materials science laboratory on campus. She also has held co-op positions with Rogers Corporation’s Innovation Center, the National Renewable Energy Lab, and Lockheed Martin Energy Storage.Mr. Bradley Joseph Priem, Northeastern University Bradley Priem is a third year undergraduate student at Northeastern University, majoring in chemical en- gineering and minoring in biochemical engineering. He has been involved in the Connections Chemistry
Senior Research Associate (Auditory Protection and Prevention - US Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Fort Rucker Alabama), Joint Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Applied Engineering Technology and Built Environment at North Caro- line Agricultural and Technical State University, as a visiting professor at University of Ibadan, Nigeria, Industrial and Production Engineering Department, as a research assistant with Dr. Denise Tucker at University of North Carolina Greensboro in the Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, School of Health and Human Science, as a Facilities Engineer at Maryland Motor Vehicle Administra- tion Glenn Burnie. Dr. Fasanya holds a B.S. in mechanical engineering
donorcompany.Special emphasis should be given to the importance of the maker space in the development of theEngineering and Computer Science program at Skyline College. The program now has eightEngineering and eight Computer Science courses, most of which are taught in or have projectsconnected to the maker space. The adjunct faculty that started the program is now tenure tracklead of the program. The program faculty consists of one full-time residential faculty member,one adjunct instructor in Engineering, two adjunct instructors in Computer Science, and a full-time laboratory technician who manages the maker space and supports physical scienceinstruction including Engineering, Physics, and Computer Science.South Mountain Community CollegeSouth Mountain
minimum, core essentials in order to allow time for depth of exploration and engagement in labs and projects. As a result of trying to cover too many topics, in- class demonstrations and labs were only offered periodically due to time constraints, even though they were found to be extremely worthwhile. ● There is disparity among personnel regarding preparedness to teach an integrated lab course as well as the depth of content required. Faculty buy-in of laboratory-style teaching is a must. The recommendations for future iterations of this and subsequent courses in this series involve setting the stage for a laboratory-style course both through the design of
was originally designed to have 9-10 predetermined labs.The laboratory experiments cover a wide set of topics including fluid properties, piston speedanalysis, to motor and pump performance analysis. However, students follow predeterminedprocedures and, thus, they lack critical thinking, real and complex problem solving as they areguided through the steps of the experiment and through its analysis by the guided questions. To help improve the students’ experiences and knowledge, two hands-on exercises were designedand added to the course content. The objectives of each exercise were designed to meet theCLOs of the course. Students would have to design, conduct tests and submit a report with alimited duration of time in and out of class.The
addition to using the concepts and skills of a traditional engineering field [24].Situated Learning in TERM. Learning environments in BME labs have been extensively studiedto identify features (i.e. skills gained, concepts learned, and how) of positive learningexperiences for students and create strategies to improve those lab experiences [24]–[28].Various learning theories have been used to study these lab environments (e.g. distributedcognition [26], cognitive apprenticeships [25], situated learning [24], and agentive learning [28]).One of the studies specifically focused on a TERM research laboratory identified two skillswhich are relevant to the situated student learning environment [28]: the observed need formembers to persevere in the face
Paper ID #25371Facilitating Collaborative Engineering Analysis Problem Solving in Immer-sive Virtual RealityAlexander James Tuttle, University of Georgia Alexander Tuttle is an undergraduate student at the University of Georgia majoring in Computer Systems Engineering. He works in Dr. Kyle Johnsen’s Virtual Experiences Laboratory where he develops and researches various Virtual Reality applications.Dr. Siddharth Savadatti, University of Georgia Dr. Siddharth Savadatti received his PhD in Computational Mechanics from North Carolina State Univer- sity in 2011 and has since been on the faculty of the College of Engineering at
, Canada, 2002.[2] B. Yalvac, H. D. Smith, J. B. Troy and P. Hirsch, "Promoting Advanced Writing Skills in anUpper-Level Engineering Class," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 117-128,2007.[3] J. Parkinson, "The Student Laboratory Report Genre: A Genre Analysis," English for SpecificPurposes, vol. 45, pp. 1-13, 2017.[4] A. Shapiro, "WAC and Engineering, or Why Engineers Can't Write," in The 42nd AnnualMeeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Boston, MA, 1991.[5] D. Kim and P. Sekhar, "A Preliminary Study on Supporting Writing Transfer in anIntroductory Engineering Laboratory Course," in Proceedings of the 2016 American Society ofEngineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA
Wilcox, Oak Ridge Historian, in which he discusses GeneralGroves who led the Manhattan Project in WWII. Students are shown original telegrams describingthe Hiroshima and Nagasaki missions in August 1945.In collaboration with the institutional library’s Unique Resources Staff, relevant archival recordsand manuscripts materials are displayed throughout the semester. Sections of these manuscriptsthat mention physics concepts and equations studied by previous students during the past twocenturies are highlighted for the current students to read.The course assesses student technical knowledge with two mid-term exams. There is onecomprehensive final exam. There is a 10-session laboratory program. Required problems are thesame for all students. Each
preparatory workin math, physics, chemistry, mechanics, and liberal arts, the program has a full schedule ofmaterials science and engineering focussed courses in the final two years. The foundationaltopics of thermodynamics and kinetics, including diffusion, are lecture courses in the junior yearas is a course on numerical methods in materials science and engineering. Each of the fiveclasses of engineering materials (metals, ceramics, polymers, electronic materials andcomposites) is covered in its own lecture class with a focus on structure and properties. Three ofthese classes are in the junior year (metals, electronic materials, polymers) and two are in thesenior year (ceramics, composites). There is a laboratory-based class each semester. In
about GradStudent STEM Share, 60% of teacher responses included some mention of the researcherssharing about their educational backgrounds and the importance of school. For example, oneteacher wrote, “[They shared] how education revolutionizes our abilities and future.” Twoteachers also specifically mentioned that the classroom visits expanded students’ understandingof science by noting, “Knowing there is science everywhere! Even outside the laboratory,” and,“They showed my students how scientific concepts are applied in the world outside theclassroom.” The teachers replied with similar responses to the question, “How did Grad StudentSTEM Share impact your students?” One teacher noted, “Not only did they inform the studentsabout their research
Paper ID #17010A New Robotics Educational System for Teaching Advanced EngineeringConcepts to K-12 studentsDr. Fernando Garcia Gonzalez, Florida Gulf Coast University Dr. Fernando Gonzalez joined FGCU as an Assistant Professor in the Software Engineering Program in the fall of 2013. Previously he has worked at Texas A&M International University in Laredo, Texas, the U.S. Department of Energy at Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los Alamos, New Mexico and at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, Florida. Dr. Gonzalez graduated from the University of Illinois in 1997 with a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering. He
State University Jacob Leachman is an Assistant Professor in the School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Washington State University (WSU). He initiated the HYdrogen Properties for Energy Research (HY- PER) laboratory at WSU in 2010 with the mission to advance the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of hydrogen systems. He received a B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Idaho in 2005 and a M.S. degree in 2007. His master’s thesis has been adopted as the foundation for hydrogen fuel- ing standards and custody exchange, in addition to winning the Western Association of Graduate Schools Distinguished Thesis Award for 2008. He completed his Ph.D. in the Cryogenic Engineering Laboratory
systems for internet ser- vices providers and mobile service companies. He has trained engineers and technicians through formal courses, on-the-job training, and supervising on field. His research interest includes self-regulated learn- ing, abstraction in problem solving, and troubleshooting problem solving in laboratory environments. His long-term goals include improving laboratory hands-on activities based on how students improve their metacognitive skills. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Abstraction Thresholds in Undergraduate Electrical Engineering CurriculaAbstractA great deal of work has been done to study the types of problems posed to students in variousdisciplines and
5 of 5 Literacy in Materials Science Undergraduate Students” #11347 11. Manufacturing Materials M735 Teaching the Latest 1 • “Improving Student Lab Report Writing Performances in Materials and & Processes Manufacturing 4 of 4 Manufacturing Laboratory Courses by Implementing a Rhetorical Processes & Materials Approach to Writing” #14083 Concepts 12. Multidisciplinary W241 Multidisciplinary 1 • “Strategies to Integrate Writing in Problem-Solving Courses: Promoting Engineering
Research Advisor to the Stanford University Epicenter.Dr. Michael R. Ladisch, Purdue University, West Lafayette Michael R. Ladisch is Director of the Laboratory of Renewable Resources Engineering (LORRE), and Distinguished Professor of Agricultural and Biological Engineering with a joint appointment in the Wel- don School of Biomedical Engineering. He was CTO at Mascoma Corporation from 2007 to 2013 and serves on Agrivida’s SAB. His BS (1973) from Drexel University and MS (1974) and PhD (1977) from Purdue University are in Chemical Engineering. Ladisch’s research addresses transformation of renew- able resources into biofuels and bioproducts, protein bioseparations, and food pathogen detection. He is an author of two
Paper ID #15982Assessing the Efficacy of K-12 Engineering Outreach ”Pick Up and Go” KitsDr. Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton Dr. Margaret Pinnell is the Associate Dean for Faculty and Staff Development in the school of engineering and associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton. She teaches undergraduate and graduate materials related courses including Introduction to Ma- terials, Materials Laboratory, Engineering Innovation, Biomaterials and Engineering Design and Appro- priate Technology (ETHOS). She was director of the (Engineers in Technical
Paper ID #15724Assessment of STEM e-Learning in an Immersive Virtual Reality (VR) Envi-ronmentDr. Hazim A El-Mounayri, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Dr. El-Mounayri received his PhD in 1997 from McMaster University (in Canada) in Mechanical En- gineering, He is currently an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering, the co-director of the Ad- vanced Engineering and Manufacturing Laboratory (AEML) at IUPUI, and a senior scientist for manu- facturing applications at Advanced Science and Automation Corp. Also, he is a leading member of INDI (Integrated Nanosystems Development Institute). He co-developed
-dimensional(3-D) structural members/systems. The issue with the former arises since students viewprescriptive, code-based design as an exercise of plugging values into equations disregarding thatthese analysis/design approaches are based on actual physical phenomena – flexure is foundedon strain compatibility and shear on the results of countless experimental tests. On the otherhand, visualizing structures is typically a problem for students who have not been exposed to thedesign and construction of reinforced concrete members via laboratory, work-site, or design-office experience. They have no 3-D reference to help them make sense of the many two-dimensional (2-D) figures shown in textbooks, course notes, and the concrete building code.The question
pertaining to engineeringstructures; (6) to see (in person) modern engineering marvels.The principles of structural engineering and calculations of efficiency and safety were presentedthrough the use of structural case studies. Homework assignments, laboratories, and hands-ondesign projects were designed to emphasize structural analysis for columns, towers, buildings,trusses, and arch structures. This course included field trips to relevant local landmarks,documentaries, structural analysis using computer modeling software, and hands-on learning bybuilding and testing domes and a model bridge. In addition to technical calculations, this courseemphasized the importance of effective communication in the field of engineering throughstudent
-Declaration 84.3 82.2 85.2 87.7 89.9 Retention (%)improved retention. During the 2013-14 academic year WTSN 111 and WTSN 112 lengthenedthe laboratory from 1-1/2 hours per week to 2 hours and went to a single 1-hour lecture per weekfrom the previous two 1-hour lectures per week. However, improved retention had already beenseen in the 2012-13 academic year, the year previous to the introduction of the new projects Also, in the 2012-13 academic year the class sizes in WTSN 103 and WTSN 104 werereduced from 32 students per section to 24 students per section. And as previously noted, thesame 24 students in an WTSN 103 section were together in the WTSN 111 laboratory
sabbatical period in the laboratory of Dr. Kurt Fischer at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, she has spent the past several years developing a common language in order to bridge and translate the findings of developmental science to first year college engineering and science education.Dr. Robert M. Henry P.E., University of New Hampshire Associate Professor of Civil Engineering University of Pennsylvania - BSCE 1973, PhD 1981 Areas of interest: structural analysis, engineering educational software, engineering education, using Minecraft to teach engineering ideas to middle school childrenProf. Ernst Linder, University of New Hampshire (UNH) 2001 - present: Professor of Statistics, Dept. of Mathematics &
across the nation. Engineering curricula during this period was based on specializedtechnical training to allow graduates to become immediately useful in industrial design careersand to efficiently meet the needs of the quickly developing economy. This trend of educationcontinued and “by 1900, it was generally recognized that American laboratories and methods forthe teaching of engineering were not surpassed and often not equaled in any other part of theworld. This could not be claimed, however, for much of the theoretical instruction in design” 1.Despite the weakness of design theory instruction, the focus on applied learning and hands-onexperience in engineering schools sufficiently met the needs of the booming manufacturing,automobile
engineering technology curricula, 2) the faculty inter-disciplinary expertisenecessary to teach new sustainability, green design or renewable energy topics, 3) the resistanceto revising existing senior design project courses, and 4) new laboratory infrastructure6-12. Thegreen manufacturing, renewable energy technology and sustainability skills and knowledge arerequired to meet the following objectives, including energy efficiency and management,sustainable planning and design, sustainable and green manufacturing, and renewable energysources such as biomass, biofuels, solar power, and wind energy. These components are selectedbecause they represent green technologies highest potential impact in our areas. Development ofa workforce skilled in these
addition of a card ortwo. Consequently, engineering faculties are constantly faced with the dilemma of establishing abalance between virtual and real labs to address cost problems while graduating sophisticatedengineers with enough practice. One advantage of virtual experimentation and computersimulation is that engineers are better equipped to understand and use mathematical expressionsas well as graphics effectively. The advantages of using engineering simulation-based training also include reducing thegap between the learning environment and the "real" environment, and making available training“real world” situations that are difficult to simulate in a hands-on lab. Traditionally for teachingtechnology-based courses, laboratory
laboratory. Several weeks before school begins in the fall, Page 26.606.4each department receives a list of the mentees receiving the award, and a synopsis of the areas ofresearch that she is interested in. The departments can then match students with faculty mentors, aligning as best as possible the student’s interests with faculty expertise and availability. Theengineering departments are responsible for contacting the students, informing them of theirmentoring professor, getting them hired as research assistants, and making sure they are trainedin department policies and safety procedures.The