wasdeveloped to recognize the graduating student(s) who have made significant contributions to thementoring program. The students who receive the LSU Leadership Legacy Award must benominated by current mentors in the program and voted on by the faculty/staff advisors. Morethan one student can be selected for the Legacy Award each semester. All of the mentors are encouraged to join the LSU Distinguished Communicatorprogram, a university wide program that is listed as a special designation on students’ transcripts.The Distinguished Communicator program recognizes students’ exceptional abilities in fourareas of communication: verbal, written, visual and technological. Currently, every officer inSPM has been accepted into the program and is
computing devices will provide us multipleprojects in the foreseeable future with a little more structure and research on how to transformthe data. This will reduce the stress of finding new projects each semester with minimal funds. Itwill also allow students to gain experience with a new engineering tool: apps. The results of thispilot semester indicate that simple projects with just a balance board and Smartphone can teachengineering students the process of designing and analyzing a statistical experiment.1. S. Deans, “Determining the validity of the Nintendo Wii balance board as an assessment tool for balance,” (MS thesis, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 2011). Accessed October 24, 2013, http://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/cgi
area(s). Learning Objectives: What will teachers take away from this lesson? While some learning objectives can be bottom line and traditional, the intention is that the most beneficial portion of the lesson is the teacher's inference on its application to the teachers' subject area. Main Idea: This is the message to the team of freshmen who pick this topic in order to communicate what the EPICS course is envisioning for this module. These are restatements of the learning objectives with subtle suggestions for the interactivity; Page 24.1392.7 however, this decision is ultimately made by the
. A., & Fowler, E. (2001). Improving First‐Year Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 33-41. [4] Brockman, J. B., Fuja, T., & Batill, S. M. (2002, June). “A Multidisciplinary Course Sequence for First- Year Engineering Students,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Educational Annual Conference and Exposition. [5] Montgomery, R., Follman, D., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2003, November). “Relative Effectiveness of Different First-Year Engineering Seminars,” Proceedings of Frontiers in Education. [6] Budny, D., LeBold, W., & Bjedov, G. (1998). “Assessment of the Impact of Freshman Engineering Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 405-411. [7] Brannan, K. P., &
Page 24.32.5students to take an introduction to engineering course but they may choose from introduction tothe various disciplines, an engineering projects course, and an engineering survey course.DisseminationAs indicated earlier, sharing the detailed taxonomy with ASEE will result in broad disseminationand impact. We have shared our work primarily through conferences to gain the help of theengineering education community in framing the taxonomy and our other results. We havepresented our work in four presentations at 3 conferences, and have another under review forpresentation at this ASEE conference. We have engaged the community with several workshopsand presentations as well. Orr, M., Ohland, M., Long, R., Brawner, C., Lord, S., and
, 21 Sep 2009. Lecture.[8] Young, Jeffrey R., "'Hybrid' Teaching Seeks to End the Divide Between Traditional and Online Instruction." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 22 Mar 2002. Web. 6 Jun 2013. .[9] Welsh, Ralph S., "Making the Transition from Traditional Classroom Instruction to Distributed Hybrid Instruction Utilizing Video Lecture Capture." Just Flip It: From the Front Lines of the Flipped Classroom. Clemson Public Health Sciences, 21 May 2013. Webcast. 30 May 2013.[10] Berrett, Dan, “How ‘Flipping’ the Classroom Can Improve the Traditional Lecture.” The Education Digest 78.1, 2012: 36-41. ProQuest Education Journals. Web. 13 Mar 2013.[11] Rutter, Michael, "‘Flipped Classroom’ Teaching Model Gains an Online
Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 12-29. ACM, May 2006.3. “SWEBOK: Guide to the software engineering Body of Knowledge” IEEE Computer Society, 2004.4. V. Subbian, C. Purdy, “UnLecture: Bridging the gap between computing education and software engineering practice,” in ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2014 (accepted).5. K. Beck, “Embracing change with extreme programming,” Computer, vol. 32, pp. 70-77, 1999.6. M. Fowler, UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004.7. K. M. Slaten, M. Droujkova, S. B. Berenson, L. Williams and L. Layman, “Undergraduate student perceptions of pair programming and agile software
,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(3): 05-525. 11. "Premier Award Winners." K-Gray Engineering Pathway Digital Library. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Feb. 2014. 12. Baker, D.F. (2008), "Peer assessment in small groups: a comparison of methods," Journal of Management Education, 32(2):183-209. 13. Wang, E., Velasquez-Bryant, N., Adams, J., Batchman, T., Cantrell, P., Jacobson, E., Johnson, W., Kleppe, J., LaCombe, J., LaTourrette, N., Norris, G., Sparkman, W., and Varol, Y. (2004), "First Year Engineering Experience Initiative," Proceedings of the ASEE Annual conference and exhibition, Salt Lake City. 14. Freeman, S. A., & Dyrenfurth, M. J. (2003), “Using peer assessments in team
Cyber Security education, training, and awareness in the undergraduate curriculum. References1. President's Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC), Cyber Security: A Crisis ofPrioritization (Feb. 2005).2. Can higher education fix the cybersecurity shortfall? – Retrieved fromhttp://www.schools.com/articles/cybersecurity-shortfa3. D. Rowe, B. Lunt, J. Ekstorm, “The Role of Cyber-Security in Information Technology Education” -SIGITE’11, October 20–22, 2011.4. L. Clinton, “Education's Critical Role in Cybersecurity” - EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 44, no. 5(September/October 2009): 60–61.5. R. Raj, S. Mishra, C. Romanowski, T. Howles, “CyberSecurity as General Education”, 15thColloquium for
reported immediately. One Week M Tu W Th F 8- SCHOOL SCHOOL WORK WORK WORK 10 hr s Program work (1-2 hours) Home Work & STUDY Figure 5 (a). Student weekly schedule Figure 5 (b). Student schedule for a two-year spanBesides academic curriculum, the students also have to conduct Manufacturing Core Exercises(MCE) weekly
students training programs at Texas A&M Qatar,and Maersk Oil Qatar is playing a major role in funding STEM development and their relatedactivitiesReferences:[1] Minerick, A.R., D.P. Visco, S.M. Montgomery, D. Briedis, J. Sticklen, C.A. McDonough, S.P. Walton,A.M. Portis, E.H. Chimowitz, W.E. Rochefort, K.L. Levien, Elbashir N. O., J. Condit, and S. Lindeman, (2011)“Special Session: What Works to Retain Students in Chemical Engineering Programs,” The ChemicalEngineering Division Publication- American Society of Engineering Education Proceedings, June 2011,Vancouver, Canada (pages 1-13).[2] Elbashir N. O.; Parsaei H.; Elmalik E. (2013) “A New Educational Approach towards Preparing SkilledChemical Engineers for Special Assignments in the Energy
/The_ASC_Doctoral_Task_Force.pdf2. Barlish, K., Sullivan, K., De Marco, A. (2012). Education and Simulation of Best Value in an International Academic Setting: A Case Study. Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information and Value, 4 (1), pp44-62.3. Davenport, J., and Davenport, J., A. (1985). A Chronology and Analysis of the Andragogy Debate. Adult Education Quarterly, 35 (3), pp. 152-159.4. Dowlatshahl, S. (1996). An Empirical Assessment of Continuing – Education Needs. Journal of Management in Engineering, 12 (5), pp37- 44.5. Epstein, H., I. (1987). Continuing Education – A Look to the Future. Journal of Professional Issue in Engineering, 113, pp2-9.6. Gagne, R. M., Driscoll, M. P. (1988). Essentials of Learning for Instruction
partners willing to help with curriculum, supplies, technology information, class visits and more. All enjoyed and the celebration of manufacturing in Florida. Partnerships Partners and regional leaders came from a number of expected and unexpected venues. FLATE posted a sign up page on its “Made in Florida” website (http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/WR8NBBT ) for interested parties to sign up including companies wanting to host tours, schools wanting to go on tours, and other organizations who
Applications, 2 nd edition. CRC Press,2008.24. Slotta, J. D. In defense of Chi’s ontological incompatibility hypothesis. The Journal of theLearning Sciences, 2011, 20, 151–162.25. Sonntag, Richard E.; Borgnakke, C.; Van Wylen, Gordon J. Fundamentals of Thermodynamics, 6 th edition. NewYork: J. Wiley, 200326. Streveler, R. A., Geist, M. R., Ammerman, R.F., Sulzbach, C. S., Miller, R. L., Olds, B. M., & Nelson, M. A.The development of a professional knowledge base: The persistence of substance based schemas in engineeringstudents. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2006, Chicago,IL.27. Tipler, Paul A.; Mosca, Gene. Physics for Scientists and Engineers: with Modern Physics, 6 th edition.New York
both “marketpenetration” and development of transferable programming skills: they recommended exposingstudents to it, but not restructuring the course around it.)We thus kept VB6 in Sensor Lab, knowing that we would eventually need to change. Thischange was ultimately demanded by our university’s conversion to 64-bit Windows 7 (Win7):our IT support person advised that there were issues surrounding VB6’s access of the COM portsin 64-bit Win7, and that it may be time to move on. (A survey of several online programmingforums showed this to be true. While there may be some workarounds that “fix” this issue, thesedid not seem worth it, given that the rest of the world is moving past VB6, especially for newapplications.)We considered Microsoft
. Page 24.399.7AcknowledgmentsThe contents of this paper were developed upon work supported by a grant from the NationalScience Foundation (Grant CNS-1132609). However, these contents do not necessarily representthe policies and views of the National Science Foundation. Endorsement by the federalgovernment should not be assumed. The authors would also like to thank the teachers whoparticipated in the professional development program and the school administrators whofacilitated the implementation of the developed engineering-inspired educational activities.References 1. Brophy, S., et al., Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 2008. 97(3): p. 369-387. 2. Tran, N.A. and M.J. Nathan, Pre
] Franco, J. http://www.ece.uc.edu/~franco/C321/html/RedBlack/redblack.html. January 2014.[5] Hagerty, G. and S. Smith. Using the web-based interactive software ALEKS to enhance college algebra. Mathematics and Computer Education, Volume 39, No. 3, pgs 183-194, 2005.[6] Horstmann, C. and T. Budd. Big C++ 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.[7] Inkling. https://www.inkling.com/. January 2014.[8] Jarc, D. J. http://nova.umuc.edu/~jarc/idsv/lesson1.html. January 2014.[9] Kloss, J. http://www.cs.jhu.edu/~goodrich/dsa/trees/btree.html. January 2014.[10] Mukundan, R. http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/mukundan/dsal/GraphAppl.html. January 2014.[11] OpenDSA: Open Source Interactive Data Structures and Algorithms. http://algoviz.org
conversion system laboratory setup. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education; 50 (2), 111-126. 8. Zhang, H. and Zhu, S. (2013) ‘Internet-based Electrical Engineering Lab Integrates Real and Virtual Experiments, 8th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (ICCSE) Location: Sri Lanka Inst Informat Technol, Colombo, Sri Lanka, Apr 26-28, 2013. 9. Harnack, J. et al. (2012) ‘Assessment of the efficacy of learning modules on FEM instruction,’ Proc. ASME Intl. Mech. Eng. Congress and Expo. 6, 451-459. Page 24.471.10
ofTechnology. They also acknowledge the use of the images from projects in the class (Appendix D).References[1] Grose T. K., 2012 “Wow the Audience”. ASEE Prism, http://www.prism-magazine.org/dec12/tt_01.cfm[2] Nicometo C., Anderson K.J.B., Courter S., McGlamery T., NathansKelly T., “Vital Skills in Engineering: Communication”. School of Education: University of Wisconsin-Madison, http://www.cirtl.net/files/Communication.pdf[3] Shook J., 2009 “Toyota’s Secret: The A3 Report”. MIT Sloan Management Review, http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/toyotas-secret-the-a3-report/[4] Leipold K., Landschoot T., 2009, “Utilizing an A3 report format for a technical review at the end of a cornerstone design course”. ASME International Design Engieneering
Higher Ed, September 22, 2011. 9. Kane, R.; Gonzalez-Lenahan, C. (2007) The Doctoral Pathway, an Institutional Journey of Development. Page 24.533.10 Presented at 2007 ASEE Annual Conference.10. Hirsch, L.; Carpinelli, J.; Kimmel, H.; Perna, A.; Narh, K. (2009) Measuring the Impact of Undergraduate Research Programs on Engineering Students’ Attitudes Toward Graduate Studies. Presented at 2009 ASEE Annual Conference.11. Rossetti, M. D.; Clausen, E. C.; Gattis, C. S.; Hale, M.; Needy, K. L. (2013) On the Development of a Student Integrated Intern Research Experience as a Pathway to Graduate Studies. Presented at 2013
] 4. De Pablos, Juan (2010). “Higher Education and the Knowledge Society. Information and Digital Competencies”, Information and Digital Competencies in Higher Education, Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC). Vol. 7, No 2. 5. EAEA General Assembly (2003), “Definition and Selection of Competencies: Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations (DeSeCo): Strategy Paper on Key Competencies – An overarching frame of reverence for an assessment and research program “, [online] Available at: Page 24.534.9 http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&
; Courter, S. (2008). Internationalization of engineering education. Proceedings ofthe ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. AC 2008-1144. Pittsburg, PA: ASEE.10 Flynn, G. (1995). Expatriate success is no longer just a question of job skills. Personnel Journal, 84(6), 29.11 Graf, A. (2004). Expatriate selection: An empirical study identifying significant skill profiles. ThunderbirdInternational Business Review, 46, 667-685.12 Kohrs, K. (n.d.) Program in global engineering [Brochure]. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan College ofEngineering
with embedded systems before? If, yes, please specify the course(s), projects developed, and devices used. 6. Have you worked with open-source embedded systems? i.e. Arduino, Raspberry Pi, etc. Please specify with which devices you have worked and enumerate the projects developed.For Questions 2-4, students selected their response from a simple choice list of options. Theoptions were: (a) A lot, (b) Some, (c) A little, and (d) None. Questions 5 and 6 included fields thatoffered students the opportunity to elaborate in their responses.3.3 Post-Tutorial Survey QuestionsThe questions of the post-tutorial survey allowed for collecting feedback from the students abouttheir experience conducting the exercises in the tutorial modules
‟ attributes on their position in theSCALE-UP network. Similar to QAP multiple regression, estimate standard errors andsignificance will be estimated using the random permutations method. Both statistical testingprocedures were performed in UCINET 6, a package for social network analysis. Table 1 givesan overview of our research questions and the statistical techniques that were used to examinethem.Results We first examined the major avenues of how information about SCALE-UP spread andclustered the items from the survey into meaningful categories: (1) Talks/Workshops, (2)Interacting with other user(s), (3) Website, (4) Reading, (5) Don‟t know, and (6) Other. Theresults indicate that vast majority of respondents learned and heard about SCALE-UP
: 1. Understand the basic logic gates and combinational logic functions, symbols, truth tables, timing diagrams, and logic circuits. 2. Simplify complex logic circuits by applying Boolean algebra laws and theorems 3. Understand the operation of basic counters, decoders, multiplexers and arithmetic circuits. 4. Convert between the decimal, binary, and hexadecimal number systems. 5. Understand binary, and BCD, and the need for alphanumeric codes, especially the ASCII code. 6. Perform binary addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division on binary (using the 2's-complement system) and hexadecimal numbers. 7. Understand the basic types of flip-flop. 8. Understand sequential logic systems including
Science Teaching, 42(5), 36-41.9. Hoyt, J. E., & Winn, B. A. (2004). Understanding retention and college student bodies: Differences between drop-outs, stop-outs, opt-outs, and transfer-outs. NASPA Journal (National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, Inc.), 41(3), 395-417.10. Divjak, B., Ostroski, M., & Hains, V. V. (2010). Sustainable student retention and gender issues in mathematics for ICT study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 41(3), 293-310. doi: 10.1080/0020739090339841611. Wasburn, M. H., & Miller, S. G. (2008). Keeping women students in technology: Preliminary evaluation of an intervention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research
hardwareexperiments.Bibliography1. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Atman, C. J., Shuman, L.J., " Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 2, 1997, 139-149.2. Grose, T. K., "The 10,000 challenge," ASEE Prism, 2012, 32-35. Page 24.608.93. Johnson, M. J., Sheppard, S. D., "Students entering and exiting the engineering pipeline-identifying key decision points and trends," Frontiers in Education, 2002.4. Olds, B. M., Miller, R. L., "The effect of a first-year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal
Summary S Y T Y Final Final Total Avail % Availab % PG Total Total B B B M able UG le PG Votes Avail % Tech Tech Tech Tech UG Votes Votes able Votes Votes Civil 6 28 3 13 50 248 15% 107 12% 355 14% Computer & IT 65 88 64 6 223 517 42% 18 33% 535 42% Electrical 19 7 5 29 60 255 12% 38 76% 293 20% E & TC 13 31 14 22 80
spending on protection.” Bernstein Global Wealth Management October. p1-188.6. Finkle, J. (2013) Retrieved from the internet on 12/29/2013 at http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/19/us-target-breach-idUSBRE9BH1GX201312197. Kaplan, D. (2013) Retrieved from the internet on 12/24/2013 http://www.scmagazine.com/data-breach-lawsuits-roll-on-as-lawyers-work-to-establish-legal-precedent/article/309439/8. Kerner, S. (2013). “Cyber-crime costs continue to rise: Study”. eWeek. 10/8/2013, p2-2.9. LeClair, J. (2013). Protecting our future: Educating a cybersecurity workforce. Albany, NY. Hudson Whitman/Excelsior College Press.10. Lynch, M. (2009). “TJX settles cyber-breach case.” Women's Wear Daily. 197(131