. colleagues and clients) and their awareness of their obligations to, for example, provideassistance and be honest [6], [27], [28]. Individuals tend to orient themselves to the people in theirenvironment; that is, they tend to be able to imagine themselves in the positions of people withwhom they come into contact [6]. The alignment of engineering students is significantly associatedwith the majors and careers they choose to pursue [6]. Therefore, when facing ambiguous ethical 8dilemmas, orientation to others in their environment is likely to predict microethical understanding[6].Bairaktarova and Woodcock (2015) also found that differences in individual
Paper ID #28954Creating a Community of Practice for Operations Research by Co-creatinga High Impact Executive Education Program in IndiaDr. Venugopalan Kovaichelvan, TVS Institute for Quality and Leadership, TVS Motor Company Ltd Dr. V. KOVAICHELVAN is the Director of TVS Institute for Quality and Leadership, the Corporate University of TVS Motor Company Limited, India. The Institute focus on holistic development of talent through career lifecycle of the employees with focus on functional & professional skills, cultural capabil- ities, collective capabilities, support business strategy and Corporate Social
Company it was a significant learning opportunity to manage people related toa field in which they themselves did not have expertise in: Since I'm relatively new in my career, I've learned how to lead a group of people without necessarily knowing all the answers, if that makes sense. … So, being able to lead the students and direct them in the right way, even though I don't know where they're going to go and I don't know what the answers are going to be, that's something that's been my biggest learning.3.2 Project outcomesThe value of gaining new ideas, products, services and concepts was explicitly and frequentlymentioned in all of the five cases in the first round of interviews. As the projects developedand the later
Paper ID #31009Design Course in a Mechanical Engineering CurriculumDr. Jamie Szwalek, University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Jamie Szwalek is currently a Clinical Assistant Professor at University of Illinois at Chicago in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering.Dr. Yeow Siow, The University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Yeow Siow has over fifteen years of combined experience as an engineering educator and practi- tioner. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. from Michigan Technological University where he began his teaching career. He then joined Navistar’s thermal-fluids system group as a senior engineer, and later brought
studentengagement and creativity. The ideas students came up with were often trivial andunimaginative; they were frequently oriented toward individual use and addressed problems ofno greater significance than that of minor inconvenience. For example, each semester wouldyield various designs for collapsible backpack umbrellas, automated erasers for dry-erase boards,and novel charging methods for personal electronic devices. Equally problematic was thatstudents struggled to see the value of the patent application assignment to engineering practice.On course evaluations they frequently voiced that it was difficult to appreciate the project’srelevance to a career in engineering especially as they were unlikely to become inventors orpatent attorneys. Further
category are alternative businessmodels, economies of disadvantaged groups or areas and providing certain services orproducts for less. For example, one of the student reports mentioned business opportunitiesand the need of international standards to pursue them: “The IoT plays a key role in sustainable cities and communities. Successful and safe IoT technology will create more career and business opportunities. Our research shows that the most effective, and maybe also only global, solution for data security issues are laws, standards and contracts.” (group E, first report)All student groups were concerned about the economy in some manner in the initial reports.Some took it from a global point of view, where the
Basingstoke: Macmillan Publ, 1993.[6] M. R. Lea and B. V. Street, “Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 157–172, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1080/03075079812331380364.[7] N. Artemeva, “‘An engrained part of my career’: The formation of a knowledge worker in the dual space of engineering knowledge and rhetorical process,” in Writing in knowledge societies, D. Starke-Meyerring, A. Pare, N. Artemeva, M. Horne, and L. Yousoubova, Eds. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse, 2011, pp. 321–350.[8] D. A. Winsor, Writing like an engineer : a rhetorical education /. Mahwah, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.[9] C. Miller and J. Selzer, “Special topics of argument in
Foundation Energy Storage Project (ESP) at Madison Area Technical College in Wisconsin. She has spent the last nine years as the Project Manager for the National Science Foundation CREATE Center at College of the Canyons in California, and has more than fifteen years’ experience working on NSF grants. During her time as Project Manager for CREATE, Mrs. Temple coordinated three successful international projects funded through NSF to explore the renewable energy achievements in Australia, New Zealand, Denmark, Virgin Islands and Germany. Mrs. Temple started her career in the private sector in accounting and finance before coming to College of the Canyons. Mrs. Temple earned her B.A. in Communications with an emphasis in
Kellerton reported 4% AfricanAmerican, 87% white, 6% two or more races, 3% Hispanic, and other categories too low toreport.We used two of four kindergarten classrooms at Adamsville, the single kindergarten classroom atBlakely, and two of three kindergarten classrooms at Kellerton. (Principals at Adamsville andKellerton preferred that our research not be conducted in the other kindergarten classrooms inwhich there were early-career teachers.) The study occurred during the second half of the schoolyear, when participants ranged in age from 5.5 to 7 years. A total of 53 kindergartnersparticipated in the study with the following rates of participation: (1) Adamsville (36%participation; 13 participants); (2) Blakely (100%; 9); and (3) Kellerton (70%; 31
Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Learner Analytics in Engineering Education: A Detailed Account of Practices Used in Cleaning and Manipulating Learning Management System Data from Online Undergraduate Engineering CoursesAbstractThis is a research paper that provides a
prominent in the learningactivities of engineering programs; (Anderson et al., 2018; ASEE Workshop report, 2014;Danielson, 2014; Norval, 2015b).Social responsibility aspects of professional practice have been developing in parallel(Belanger & Pupulin, 2004). The design of learning activities to support the skills ofprofessional practice must include contextual and situational elements for students to gainpractice in the application of the specialized knowledge of the engineering profession tothe complex problems they will face during their careers and empathy for the social,cultural, and life cycle impacts of the solutions they propose (ASEE Workshop report,2014; Matthews et al., 2017). The legal expectation of providing adequate
suggested that the rural females are more likely thanurban females to restrict their career choices to female dominated fields and in turn, rural femaleswho enter engineering show larger degrees of motivation and self-confidence [5]. Having alarger number of female participants would allow to probe this theory further and confirm thequantitative trends with qualitative experiences of female engineers.Conclusions and future workThis study explored the lived experiences of seven first-year students from rural communities touncover barriers and challenges they face in the pursuit of an engineering degree. Using narrativeinquire, we identified five themes that pose barriers for students transition into an engineeringcourse of study: exposure to
field. However, the higher-level career position, such as theCISO, is fairly new and requires extensive knowledge and skills to ensure success. ManyMaster’s level programs include courses that address these skills in an attempt to provide a well-rounded program of study, but undergraduates who are in the practitioner’s world have otheralternatives to gain these skills. These individuals can gain various certifications, such as theCertified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) or the Certified InformationSecurity Manager (CISM). Due to a perceived gap between academics and field knowledge, itappears that academic programs may not fully consider the very specific competencies of C-Suite members (e.g. Chief Information Security
% Intro to Engineering 75% Intro to Discipline 60%Courses 45% 30% 15% 0%Figure 15. Assessments used in introduction coursesWe asked an open-ended question to find out more about projects in the introduction toengineering courses. Design projects such as catapults and wind turbines were very popular (13courses). Faculty-led projects were the next most popular (4 courses). Computer programmingprojects and projects to teach K-12 students about engineering or grand challenges (3 courseseach) were the next most common. Other projects included reporting on meetings of studentprofessional chapters, xkcd “what if” problem [5], career
process for product development to improve quality and better student preparationfor future careers [5-7]. Some studies focused on the importance of improving group selection,effective teamwork and motivation for overall project quality [8-11]. Another way to ensurequality projects is to establish partnerships with local industry to identify projects topics andcollaborate in monitoring and evaluation [12]. Aligning projects with community service andcauses such sustainability [13-18] proved to increase students’ motivation, creativity andimprove project success.In addition to adopting effective team selection, better management, motivation and partnershipsas discussed in above studies, the issue of bridging the gap between classroom
due to this being, inlarge part, the first semester of their college careers), they were unencumbered by the idea offailure or resistance to improvisation in the act of creation. Some in this group reported aninterest in the arts, some with advanced experience with art in high school. While these aregeneralizations, it is interesting to consider how area of concentration and age/academicexperience affect the outcomes.A further aspect to consider is how teaching a course in two distinct classrooms alters thedynamic. In the studio art instructional space there are four tables, each with four chairs. Asstudents worked, they frequently discussed their projects with their neighbors. This culminated inone table actually designing all of their
coding of a subsample of transcripts[27,28]. After building the codebook, the remaining transcripts were coded with a subsample ofdata independently coded by both coders with an intercoder reliability score of 0.71. Thematicanalysis was performed in two rounds, starting with a review of the content in each codefollowed by a second reorganization into emergent themes, as presented below.We conclude this section by acknowledging our positionality as authors and active members,former students, and a former CA of the PRL. As authors, we come from different backgroundsand career paths and have pursued this study in an attempt to better understand and therebyimprove participation and access to the learning resources in makerspaces (e.g. the PRL
engineering programs in the nation, we are building an innovative program aligned with the university mission of Pro Humanitate (For Humanity). We are committed to educating the whole person and the whole engineer with fearlessness and virtuous character. With inclusion being a core value, our engineering team represents 60% female engineering faculty and 40% female students, plus 20% of students from ethnic minority groups. Prior to joining Wake Forest University, Olga served as a Program Director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education and founding faculty of the Department of Engineering at James Madison University. As a 2009 NSF CAREER Awardee, her expertise and interests focus on