, J., & Magana, A.J. (2015). Exploring Design Characteristics of Worked Examples to Support Programming and Algorithm Design. Journal of Computational Science Education, 6(1).22 Shiflet, A. B., & Shiflet, G. W. (2014). Introduction to computational science: modeling and simulation for the sciences. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Appendix A Due to space limitations, a reduced rubric describing only the lowest and the highest score is presented here. Criterion Description Poor (0-2) … Excellent (9-10) Evaluates the student’s plan for - No strategy is
learningexperiences. We will then pilot these elements with educators who are designing learningexperiences and then reverse engineer our tool to help these designers assess whether they areeffectively designing a learning experience aligned with Perkins’ model.Discussion and Future Work In this paper, we presented the first stage of a larger project whose aim is to develop atool that will help educators develop courses and learning experiences as well as assess theeffectiveness of their design and their pedagogical objectives, offering both planning andfeedback functions. More specifically, this paper situates this study in the context of broaderengineering education priorities, provides an overview of the Making Learning Whole3framework and
Research Fellowship. His research interests range from sophomore-level engineering curricula to spatial ability and creativity to student entrepreneurship.Mr. Steven David Wood, Utah State University Steven Wood is a junior in the Civil Engineering program. After finishing his BS he plans on completing a MS in Civil Engineering. In addition to studies, he is a teacher’s assistant and he teaches a recitation class for the Statics course. His Interests in the field of engineering are public transportation, specifically in rapid and heavy rail systems. His research interests include spatial ability, learning styles, and gender differences in meta-cognition. c American Society for Engineering
and many have elective courses focused on I&E. • Only a few had I&E as part of the core curriculum. • There was almost universal interest in increasing the presence of extracurricular and elective course offerings and a majority view that I&E should be part of the core curriculum. • On most campuses, the number of faculty engaged in supporting I&E education was said to be limited. • Most saw their university leadership as supportive of I&E, and engaged in early or more advanced stages of strategic planning. • Common challenges included finding space in the engineering curriculum, overcoming faculty and, to a lesser degree, administrative resistance
Peer Evaluations 16 Week Due 2st Semester 9 Updated Drawing Package from First Semester 2 10 New Gantt Chart w/WBS and Milestones 2 11 Functional Prototype 8 12 Mid-Term Peer Evaluation 8 13 Prototype Test Plan 9 14 Prototype Test
appropriate, with Expanded participation including many of the attendees from the first workshop, and including Both pairwise and three-way interactions among themes to explore connections. An important outcome of the second workshop will be to identify small leadership teams for each theme. The workshop steering committee would begin that process in the planning stage.”The foregoing demonstrates that this objective was met. Substantial progress was made in each of thethree groups resulting in specific recommendations and action items. One overarching recommendationwas again that there should be a third such workshop to address some of these specifics, and todisseminate progress that has been made in
stand out that affected your choice to pursue engineering? This program? 18. Do you think being a woman will help your hinder your career as an engineer? Why? 19. Are male and female engineers equally rewarded for the same work?” 20. Do you think there are preconceived expectations of your performance because you are a woman? If yes, can you think of an example? 21. Do you feel you have to prove yourself as a woman? 22. Do you think female students are taken less seriously? 23. Do you feel like you’re going to be equally compensated? 24. As a female, do you feel that it hurts you’re chances of being an engineering/having an engineering future? 25. Do you plan on going to graduate school, working in
examples of how the content was applicable to the company. In addition, while the faculty member provided participants with feedback related to the course content, the executive was able to offer feedback and input on the quality of the presentation as it related to the company’s realities. A preparation meeting between the faculty member and company executive who would be co-leading the webinar was also a useful way for the two to align their plans, better understand their respective roles, and for the faculty member to be further educated about some of the specific challenges facing the company. Over time, the faculty members became much more attuned to the specific dynamics of challenges facing the
Paper ID #15882Using Focus Groups to Understand Military Veteran Students’ Pathways inEngineering EducationDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego Michelle Madsen Camacho is Chair and Professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of San Diego. She formerly held two postdoctoral
for the first time. Other eventssuch as bowling and bubble ball soccer were held in the middle of each semester, with theintention of creating and strengthening relationships outside of the academic environment. Thehope in providing these opportunities for social interaction is that the students will feel a strongerconnection to the department and university, build stronger relationships with each other, andthrive academically and socially because they are having positive experiences. The plan is tocontinue to offer social activities at least once or twice per semester going forward.4. AssessmentProgram SuccessThe peer mentor program is in the first year of implementation. Preliminary assessment ofprogram goals was achieved through voluntary
substantially defines our senior class one year in advance,allowing for planning of technical electives and recruitment of senior capstone design projects.The educational setting is 2/3 flipped classroom environment where students prepare by readingand working problems outside of class and then work on problems during class and 1/3 lecturefor introduction of new subjects and delving into more difficult topics. Class is held twice weekly(M-W 1 hour 15 minutes) with a homework assignment due on Friday.Sometime ago when class sizes began increasing, we began to assign students, alphabetically,numbers starting at 1 to the number of students in the class. This number is placed in the upperleft hand corner of all assignments. This facilitates ordering of
Paper ID #14773Using the Flipped Classroom Model to Improve Construction Engineeringand Management EducationDr. Namhun Lee, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Namhun Lee is an associate professor in the department of Manufacturing and Construction Manage- ment at Central Connecticut State University, where he has been teaching Construction Graphics/Quantity Take-Off, CAD & BIM Tools for Construction, Building Construction Systems, Building Construction Estimating, Heavy/Highway Construction Estimating, Construction Planning, and Construction Project Management. Dr. Lee’s main research areas include Construction
administrative check-offs. Inaddition, the instructor may be familiar and comfortable with engineering or safety content, butquite uncomfortable with discussions of ethics, values and honor codes. It’s also going to bedifficult to create performance-based objectives to meet any sort of ABET requirement as anextension of Criterion 3.f (understanding ethics). In our limited experience with an experimentalclass, graduate students are surprisingly interested, willing to read course materials extensivelyand have provided encouraging feedback.12 We have limited concrete data demonstrating successbeyond the classroom at this point, but there are plans to assess the impact of the algorithm.SummaryThe literature suggests that while academics endeavor to teach
technology, etc.); demonstrate academic ability or potential; and demonstrate financial need, defined for undergraduate students by the US Department of Education’s rules for need-based Federal financial aid, Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), or, for graduate students, defined as financial eligibility for Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need (GAANN).”3History of NSF-funded scholarships in STEM:The following press release statement announced this new H-1B visa-funded NSF program onMarch 29, 1999: “The National Science Board…approved plans by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) to provide some $21 million to fund 8,000 one-year scholarships of up to$2,500 each to low
worked on water rights and quality projects in the Lake Tahoe Basin. As a researcher and professional engineer he has been responsible for water quality monitoring and modeling investigations, water quality planning, pollution impact studies, and subsurface remediation efforts. Recently, Dr. Litton was a principal investigator of two studies focused on understanding the algae-induced depletion of dissolved oxygen in the San Joaquin River Delta. Current research includes evaluating wetland ponds for methylmercury removal in the Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Where is Everybody? Participation in Online Student
. Women discussedstereotypes at additional length in the open comments section of the survey.4. ConclusionsBased on the survey data we have concluded that the Industrial Distribution climate is overallpositive for both male and female participants. This is based on the fact that the majority ofrespondents reported satisfaction and did not report instances of gender stereotyping, internaldiscrimination, or internal harassment.Despite this positive climate however, the research has shown evidence that a glass ceiling ispresent for women in the industry. Additionally, men are less likely to acknowledge theexistence of this glass ceiling indicating that firms could benefit from succession planning,training, and consideration for women in the industry
al., SIIP was designed to focus on creating collaborativeteaching environments that enabled faculty to iteratively and sustainably innovate instruction.This environment was created by organizing faculty into Communities of Practice (CoPs) thatwould choose what innovations to pursue and evaluate their efforts to create those innovations. ACoP is an organizational structure that effectively spreads knowledge, decreases the learningcurve for novices, minimizes reenactments of failures, and promotes creativity11,12.The MatSE CoP is composed of one tenured and five tenure-track faculty who meet on a weeklybasis to discuss course administration, data collection, and future plans. The goal of thesemeetings is to develop a common set of resources
-based retrieval, supervised learning for regression-based time series prediction, andBayesian models for causal inference on the decision support end.Both informal assessment of the system and intensive user testing on a pre-release version haveyielded positive feedback. This feedback is instrumental in feature revision, both to improvesystem functionality and to plan the adaptation of the design of these two data explorationcomponents to other STEM disciplines, such as computer science and mathematics. Lessonslearned from visualization design and user experience feedback are reported in the context ofusability criteria such as desired functionality of the pattern inference system.The paper concludes with a discussion of the system as an
,internships, and job placement provide the students structural guidance for graduating withinfour years with good jobs. In summary, cross-cultural opportunities for professors as well asstudents can benefit not only developing countries, but also developed countries so thatinstitutions do not become too path-dependent. For future research, we plan to empiricallyextend this study to include teaching and learning in Korea and compare and contrast this toJapan and the U.S.References1. Nations, U., Word Investment Report. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2015: p. 258.2. Brynjolfsson, E.a.A.S., Wired for Innovation: How Information Technology Is Reshaping the Economy. 2010, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.3. Yin, R.K
includes student activities aimed at creating of a new not previouslyexisting and unknown product (including analytical research). Various categories ofemployees such as academics and research staff from the HSE departments and institutionseven external to the HSE can provide a project and course work. This work develops not onlythe professional but also universal and social student outcomes.Curriculum provides also such important educational element as internships and practices.The practice of students is part of the basic educational program and is carried out inaccordance with the educational plan and schedule of training process. Its main goal is toacquire the professional skills, to deep and consolidate the knowledge and outcomes obtainedby
honest dialog, where all responses are valued. Plan to let the data speak for itself and inspire action to achieve equity. 3. Identify systemic constructs that prevent or obscure inclusion. Multi-modal approaches, e.g., oral conversation, anonymous electronic polls, anonymous comments on uniform notecards, give all participants an opportunity to contribute. 4. Carefully reflect and choose colleagues who will adopt “champion” roles to support inclusion. Be sure that the audience includes people in positions of power in order to effect change in policies as appropriate. 5. Encourage the champions to be comfortable with their role. Champions can encourage of collegial behavior modification among those who are
cohorts, typically at least 10 students.Faculty-led programsFaculty-led programming is an essential component to campus internationalization plans aimedat making study abroad part of the academic culture and not the exception. Programs mayinclude faculty taking students abroad and delivering course(s) in the host country in which thestudents are studying. The abroad experience can be a continuation of a course taught on campusand/or a team taught course where U.S.-based and the host foreign country’s students aregrouped to work on a project during the semester and then come together at the end. Whateverthe iteration, faculty-led opportunities ease many traditional fears and significantly impact theinternationalization process. First, faculty who
, 2013, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/01/24/remarks-president- state-union-address17. Executive Office of the President President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2011). Report to the President on Ensuring American Leadership in Advanced Manufacturing, p.9. Retrieved September 25, 2013, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-advanced- manufacturing-june2011.pdf18. The Boston Consulting Group (2013). Majority of Large Manufacturers Are Now Planning or Considering ‘Reshoring’ from China to the U.S. Retrieved September 25, 2013, from http://www.bcg.com/media/PressReleaseDetails.aspx?id=tcm:12-14494419. Sirkin, H. L., Zinser, M., and
Engineering Ambassadors, who need advanced training beyond what weprovide at the workshop. We have started to address this by testing advanced training sessionsfor seasoned ambassadors at the workshop. We plan to continue refining this and creating onlinemodules to carry students beyond the workshop. Continuing collaboration and conversations among members after the workshop can alsobe challenging. The advisors and the Engineering Ambassadors are extremely busy and focusedon their program operations. Finding more ways for cross-university collaboration is animportant goal for the coming year. There is also a balance between letting member programsgrow and develop their own character, while also maintaining the trademarks of the
oravoid and react positively or negatively to a subject. In this case, the subject is geotechnicalengineering and the research question is whether PBL has a positive or negative effect onattitude. Because the concept of attitude is broad, its assessment requires a carefully researchedand planned survey which is why the ASCI survey was used. This survey has been vetted forreliability and validity, 11, 12.The two subscales measured by the modified ASCI are intellectual accessibility and emotionalsatisfaction. These broad subscales are necessary to capture many of the mental constructsrelated to attitude. As described by Bauer 12, 13, many behavioral aspects need to be addressed tounderstand the effect of ‘attitude.’ The survey is based on a seven
. Full descriptionsof the modules including procedures and presentations slides are available at AuburnUniversity’s MSP Website under teacher resources;10 lesson plans have also been submitted forpublication in the Alabama Learning Exchange (ALEX). Both activities have been disseminatedin multiple formats including the SECME Summer Institute for teachers, K-12 classrooms,university open houses, and student organizations’ outreach activities. The use of everyday andnatural materials as well as the incorporation of art in the modules has made them accessible to adiverse audience.Why are Abalone Seashells so Strong and Shiny: This module was largely developed by achemical engineering undergraduate researcher with no prior background in
basement. List 3"nuggets" (useful pieces of information) that you learned from the sitevisit. These could range from technical observations ("I learned thatrising damp can cause paint on bricks to blister") or skills/techniques x x("I learned to always open louvers") or site logistics ("I learned that itis better to review the floor plans thoroughly before a site visit"), etc.In other words, what did you learn on the site visit that wouldn't havebeen learned in a traditional lecture format?In the YouTube link previously distributed, describe the problem thatRobert Silman & Associates was hired to address. What are
during winter semester, with the actual travel being done in the two weeks directly after finals, I think interest would increase. Then it wouldn’t conflict with internships. I would love to go and am planning on it next year if it is still around. I just need to make a little more money before I can go. It seems like a great opportunity, but I chose not to participate mainly for financial reasons and timing issues. At this point in my education I need to be finishing up my classes and working in the field. I think it would be a great program to continue. I wish I had known about it at an earlier stage in my career.For this program to thrive, there are a number of clear obstacles that have to be
face class devoid of some of these activities. Itencompasses methodologies that are not only sustainable and scalable, but can be easily adoptedin any university in teaching engineering online classes.References[1] Schmieder, E. J. (2008). “The Tool to Interact with and Control Your Online Classroom Environment”. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning Vol. 5. No. 3 pp 39-50.[2] Sarder, M. B. (2014). “Improving Student Engagement in Online Courses”. Proceeding 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis IN, June 15-18, 2014.[3] U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning
tasks, and identified several commonincorrect lines of reasoning or approaches associated with the most prevalent incorrect answersin the populations studied. We plan to collect additional student data on modified versions ofthis task and to develop additional tasks and related interview protocols in order to gain greaterinsight into student understanding of ac biasing networks. These efforts will also be used toguide the ongoing development of research-based instructional materials on this topic for useacross multiple disciplines.AcknowledgementsThe authors very much appreciate the collaboration of colleagues Nuri Emanetoglu and DuaneHanselman, who allowed us to collect data in their classrooms and who provided valuablefeedback. This material