and Inclusion in Undergraduate Engineering Programs,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[3] L. A. Meadows, D. Sekaquaptewa, A. Pawley, S. S. Jordan, D. Chachra, and A. Minerick, “Interactive Panel: Improving the Experiences of Marginalized Students on Engineering Design Teams,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[4] C. S. Brown and H. Chu, “Discrimination, Ethnic Identity, and Academic Outcomes of Mexican Immigrant Children: The Importance of School Context,” Child Development, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 1477–1485, Sep. 2012.[5] H. Chun and G. Dickson, “A Psychoecological Model of Academic Performance Among
during that semester that failure rate was 29% andthe combined failure/drop rate was about 1/3 of the class (33%). Contrastingly, by Fall 2021, thegrades on exams were similar to the pre-pandemic semester of Fall 2019. Still, in Fall 2021 thefraction failing and dropping were elevated relative to pre-pandemic. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 6Fig. 8 Assessment of Fluid Mechanics. Note the course delivery style as F2F (face-to-face), hybrid, or hyflex.A look into particular
2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 36095Work-in-Progress: A Collaborative Model of Teaching and Learning for Undergraduate Innovation Education Jackson Otto* Purdue University ottoj@purdue.edu Greg J. Strimel Purdue University Sherylyn Briller Purdue University Todd Kelley Purdue University © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID
Paper ID #37560An Analysis of Engineering and Computing Students’Attitudes to AI and EthicsKerrie Hooper Kerrie Hooper is currently an Engineering and Computing Education Ph.D. student at Florida International University. She obtained her Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from the University of Guyana in 2019 and then worked for two years in the industry as a Data Analyst & Systems Administrator, before pursuing her doctoral degree. Her research interests are in AI ethics, responsible technology in education, women’s careers in computing, and arts-based approach to STEM education.Trina Fletcher Dr
, “Impact of Faculty Development Workshops on Instructional Faculty at Hispanic-serving Institutions,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 32931. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32931.[8] H. Bradbury, The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2015. doi: 10.4135/9781473921290.[9] T. Vilkinas and G. Cartan, “The integrated competing values framework: Its spatial configuration,” Journal of Management Development, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 505–521, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1108/02621710610670092.[10] R. Dempsey, “Teachers as Leaders: Towards a conceptual framework,” Teaching education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 113–122, 1992.[11] S. P
resulted in revenues exceeding $5 Billion. He then moved to direct new business initiatives for Intel in the dense server space resulting in businesses with a net present value of $600 Million. Stavros holds 11 patents in the field of CPU computer architecture. In 2016 he joined the faculty at the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) department at Texas A&M University as a Professor of Practice where he was appointed Director of the Capstone program. He was the ECE ABET representative for 2 years and was appointed co-Associate Department Head in 2019. He has been a Texas A&M Maroon and White Leadership coach since 2017 and won the coach of the year award in 2021. Since joining Texas A&M University, he
on peer evaluation ratings in project teams. In International Journal of Business Communication, 43(1), 4-20.[12] C. Martin & K. Locke. (2022). What do peer evaluations represent?: a study of rater consensus and target personality. In Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-7.[13] The Regents Of The University Of Michigan, “Tandem,” tandem.ai.umich.edu. https://tandem.ai.umich.edu/welcome (accessed: June 23, 2022).[14] ASEE. (2019). Current status of the U.S. engineering and computing workforce, 2019.[15] J. Roy. (2019). Engineering by the Numbers. American Society for Engineering & Education, 13-52.
because they could be done alone and virtually.The Data Analysis topics added in Spring 2020 were kept in the curriculum. Drills focused oncareer development and were delivered remotely with corresponding quizzes.Fall 2021, University of Arkansas returned to normal class capacities and interactions with amask mandate. GNEG 1111/1111H returned to essentially the same content as Fall 2019 exceptfor Lego Mindstorm EV3 robots replaced Arduinos for the hands-on projects. We also returnedto in-person drills. In Spring 2022, GNEG 1121/1121H returned to themed based hands-onprojects. The mask mandate was lifted mid-semester.Grade Distribution in GNEG coursesFigures 1 and 2 show the grade distributions in GNEG 1111/GNEG 1111H and GNEG1121/GNEG 1121H
change," Assoc of Mex Am Educators J, vol. 11, no. 3, pp.154-177, 2017.[15] A.-M. Núñez, G. Crisp, and D. Elizondo, “Mapping Hispanic-serving institutions: Atypology of institutional diversity,” J of Higher Educ, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 55-83, 2016.[16] E. Q. Villa, A. C. Gates, S. Kim, and D. Knight, “The CAHSI INCLUDES Alliance:Realizing collective impact,” in Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, July26-29, 2019.[17] G. A. García and A. Guzman-Alvarez, “Descriptive analysis of graduate enrollment trendsat Hispanic-serving institutions: 2005-2015,” J. Hisp. Higher Educ., 2019, doi:1538192719835681.[18] National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, Minority Serving Institutions:America’s Underutilized Resource for
gathered from pre- and post-program surveys from both the 2019 and 2021 sessions arepresented here. These results are shown in Figure 3. Based on a rating scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high),participants reported the largest pre- to post-experience jumps in “Research Self Efficacy” (from © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Annual Conferencenearly 3.4/5 to almost 4.5/5), “Research Skills and Knowledge” (from about 3.4/5 to 4.3/5), and“Scientific Identity” (from 3.2/5 to 3.9/5). To Objective 2, participants significantly improvedtechnical skills including with finite element analysis, improving from 50% to 90% on pre- andpost-experience quizzes related to each participant’s
standards in the third andfourth years of study can help students align educational concepts with real-world applications.6However, this requirement is not universally applied in most colleges and universities.2 Phillips, M. and S. Huber (2017). Standards Resources for Engineering and Technology. Issues inScience and Technology Librarianship, Purdue University.3 Harding, B. and P. McPherson (2010). What do employers want in terms of employee knowledge oftechnical standards and the process of standardization? 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition.4 Solomon, D., Y.-T. T. Liao, and J. T. Chapin (2019). Maximizing the Effectiveness of One-timeStandards Instruction Sessions with Formative Assessment. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition.5 ABET
. Accessed: Nov. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/students-in-engineering-design-process-and-applied-research[3] S. Patel, M.-I. Carnasciali, M. Whitson, and D. Schrage, “Board 119: Innovative Mars Exploration Education and Technology Program: Development of an Informal Learning Curriculum (Work in Progress),” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah, Jun. 2018, p. 29894. doi: 10.18260/1-2--29894.[4] R. Tang Dan and S. He, “Board 112: A STEM Training Program to Improve Middle and High School VEX Competition Outcomes,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 32191. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32191.[5] Z. K. Stuart, M. Bugallo, K
.20023Bosman, L., & Fernhaber, S. (2018). Teaching the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers. Springer International Publishing.Brubaker, E. R., Maturi, V. R., Karanian, B. A., Sheppard, S., & Beach, D. (2019, June 15). Integrating Mind, Hand, and Heart: How Students Are Transformed by Hands-On Designing and Making. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32988Desai, N., & Stefanek, G. (n.d.). A Literature Review of the Different Approaches That Have Been Implemented to Increase Retention in Engineering Programs Across the United States. ASEE Zone II Conference.Drewery, D., Nevison, C., & Pretti, T. J. (2016). The influence of cooperative education and reflection upon previous work
/s13412-019-00557-w.[18] C. Lopez del Puerto, H. Cavallin, J. Perdomo, J. Munoz Barreto, O. Suarez, and F. Andrade, “Developing a Collaborative Undergraduate STEM Program in Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructure,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 32629. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32629.[19] I. Pagán-Trinidad, R. Lopez, and E. Diaz, “Education and Building Capacity for Improving Resilience of Coastal Infrastructure,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 32686. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32686.[20] N. Salzman, B. Chittoori, S. Miller, and T. Robbins, “Senior Civil Engineering Students’ Views on Sustainability and Resiliency
Technological Literacy Programs at College Level”. In 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, Canada. ASEE. PERMALINK: https://peer.asee.org/178056. Krupczak, J., Mina, M., Gustafson, R. J., & Young, J. (2010, June). “Development Of Engineering Related Minors For Non Engineering Students”. In 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY. ASEE. PERMALINK: https://peer.asee.org/162947. Heywood J, Lyons MP. Technological Literacy, Engineering Literacy, Engineers, Public Officials and the Public. In2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2018 Jun 23.8. Heywood, John. "Why Technological Literacy and for Whom?." 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2019. Krupczak, John, John Heywood, and
modernglobalized market economy makes the supply chain a way more complex network, in which not allthe members are located in the same country. Under this scenario, standardized rules and regulations Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 2must be used to make the supply chain work in a more effective, efficient, and safe manner. Applyingnational and international standards in the design and operation of supply chain and logistics isbecoming one of the key solutions to improve its safety and
significance of working as an undergraduate teaching assistant. Dissertation, University of North Dakota. 2018.[5] B. Ben Rohde and E.P. Douglas, “WIP: Motivations and Outcomes of an Undergraduate Teaching Assistantship Program,” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Virtual Annual Conference, 2020, 9 pp. DOI 10.18260/1-2—35671, https://peer.asee.org/35671.[6] A. Baumann, S.M. Gillespie, and N. Sanchez, “Adding the extra 5 percent: Undergraduate TA’s creating value in the classroom,” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019, 17 pp, DOI 10.18260/1-2—32037, https://peer.asee.org/32037.[7] J.E. Lewis, G. Willing, and T.D. Rockaway, “Peer-led team learning in an
organizations in the Midwest and East Coast. In addition to one U.S. patent, Schilling has numerous publications in refereed international conferences and other journals. He received the Ohio Space Grant Consortium Doctoral Fellowship, the ASEE New Engineering Educators Distinguished Service Award, the Merl K. Miller Award from the ASEE Computers in Education Journal, and numerous other awards. He is a member of IEEE, IEEE Computer Society and ASEE, and serves as an ABET Program Evaluator. At MSOE, he routinely teaches courses in software verification, software engineering practices, real time systems, secure software development, network security, and operating systems, and other cybersecurity related topics, as well as
==("ARTICLE" OR "REVIEW")) NOT (DT==("EARLY ACCESS"))) Andrews © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Midwest Section Conference2.2. MS Excel and VBA ProgrammingThe windows system used during the analysis was Office 2019. The software version used wasExcel 2019. All eight exported WoS results were consolidated into one sheet to analyze theentire engineering college. In the worksheet designed around the VBA program, the consolidatedWoS exports remain unedited from their original state. Any worksheet manipulations are done toa copied worksheet that updates each time the program is run based on user input (see Fig. 3
/37070Yeter, I. H., Rynearson, A. M., Ehsan, H., Rehmat, A. P., Dasgupta, A., Fagundes, B., Menekse, M., & Cardella, M. E. (2019, June). Design and implementation of data collection in a large-scale, multi-year pre-college engineering study: A retrospective. In Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32596Yeter, I. H., & Burley, H., & Youngblood, T. D., & Williams, C. M. (2016, June), Developing a questionnaire and evaluation methods for a high school rocket program. In Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p
students must take tograduate.References[1] ABET, Inc. (2021). ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs 2021-2022, Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting-engineering-programs-2021-2022/ . [Accessed January 5, 2022].[2] J.W. Blake, (2019, June), Using Stories of Technology to Teach Technological and Engineering Literacy in Courses for Majors. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33518[3] A. Cheville & J. Heywood (2019, June), Don’t Let the Computer Take Your Job – a Framework for Rethinking Curriculum Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa
(χ2) statistic is usedto compare two or more independent groups [18]-[23].The Chi-square statistic is used to determine if the sample data matches the observed populationwhich is called the “Goodness of Fit Test”. The Chi-Square test is also useful in comparison oftwo variables which is called the “Test for Independence”.In this study, the Chi-square test is used to statistically compare the pre-, during, and post-pandemic (Spring 2019, 2020+2021, and 2022) sections and student grades (which correlates tothe student performance) in the two ECE courses. Since this is the work in progress paper, theauthor expects to get a more comprehensive analysis and results from the 2022 grades. If theresulting p-value of comparison is greater than 0.05
theproduct, whereas human-centered design considers the stakeholders more broadly than thestereotypical user” [26, p.31]. Scholars have also mentioned the closely-relatedconceptualizations of sustainable design [27] and, more explicitly, empathic design [28].In this review, we sought to explore what empirical evidence exists for cultivating empathy, andwhich learning activities or pedagogical approaches can be used for its development in STEMstudents. While we do examine how some of these other concepts related to empathy wereintegrated into educational contexts, empathy remained at the forefront of our inquiry.3 Theoretical FrameworkIn 2019, Stanford psychologist Jamil Zaki published The War For Kindness: Building Empathy InA Fractured World [29
platform is encouraged as it broadens the types ofproblems that instructors can successfully implement in the platform.AcknowledgmentsThis work was completed under Cornell University IRB protocol #2108010487. We thank Dr.Mariana Silva and Nicolas Nytko for their helpful conversations about how best to implementexploded FBD support in PL and technical assistance incorporating the new object into theplatform. We thank also Dr. Erika Mudrak from Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit for invaluableassistance with the statistical analysis.References [1] P. Cornwell and A. H. Danesh-Yazdi, “Good strategies to avoid bad fbds,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32877 [2] K. N. Leipold and S. R
, “NSF S-STEM ScholarshipProgram Initiative via Recruitment, Innovation, and Transformation: SPIRIT Program Year-OneResults,” In Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, June 2016.[4] Eun-Young Kang, Jane Dong, Mathew Jackson, and Emily Allen, “Developing a CulturallyAdaptive Pathway to Success,” ASEE Annual Conference, June 2019.[5] Shultz, E., Colton, G., Colton, C., “The Adventor Program: Advisement and Mentoring forStudents of Color in Higher Education,” Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education andDevelopment, v40 n2 p208-18, 2001.[6] Rodgers, K. et al., “A Real PLUSS: An Intrusive Advising Program for UnderpreparedSTEM Students,” NACADA Journal Volume 34(1), 2014.[7] Allen, E., Castillo F., Schiorring, E. “Starting a New Conversation: An
. (2019, June), Location, Location, Location: The Value of Disciplinary Adjacency in Enhancing Environmental Engineering Programs Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--33069 [8] Miller, C. T., Gray, W. G., & Bruning, K. (2020). Evolution of environmental engineering: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 146(7), 02520001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943- 7870.0001734 [9] ABET, 2022. Accredited Programs Search Tool. https://amspub.abet.org/aps/name- search?searchType=institution [10] National Center for Educational Statistics at the Institute of Education Sciences (US Department of Education). https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?cx=1
] M. Tomko et al., "Observations on guiding principles, or best practices, in university makerspaces," presented at the International Symposium on Academic Makerspaces, Cleveland, OH, 2017.[6] M. Braga and G. Guttmann, "The Knowledge Networks in a Makerspace: the Topologies of Collaboration," International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 13-30, 2019/06/01 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10763-019-09954-7. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Conference[7] Make/Intel, "Maker market study and media report: An in-depth profile of makers at the forefront of hardware innovation," 2012. Accessed: 5/2019
Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceAfter the fall semester 2019, Polesski State University implemented an online education process.Classrooms were equipped with video cameras. During the first month a technical specialist waspresent in each classroom to help lecturers solving potential technical issues during the onlinelecture. Specialists from IT Department chose to use two platforms: Moodle and MS Teams. Thefirst platform, Moodle, had been in use at the university for five years, but had not been widelyused by instructors for several reasons. First, because the majority of them clearly understoodthat face-to-face communication with several low-stakes assessments during a semester is abetter
implementation. Moreover, we leverage the USB accelerator to improve the detection speed.1 https://www.canakit.com/raspberry-pi-3-model-b-plus-starter-kit.html Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright ã 2022, American Society for Engineering EducationFinally, we extend this implementation to weapon detection through fine-tuning pretrained deeplearning models on data samples collected and annotated manually. ProjectThis project implemented object detection on Raspberry Pi. As a core task in the field of
currently serves as the Engineering Communications Coordinator for the first-year engineering program, as well as a faculty member for the Scientista Foundation and ASEE student chapters at Binghamton University.Meghan Crist (Academic Advisor)Koenraad E Gieskes (Assistant Director) Koen Gieskes first joined the Engineering Design Division at Binghamton University as a graduate student in 2004, then, in 2009, he was hired on as a full-time lecturer, and in 2017 he became the Assistant Director. In 2022, Koen began serving as the Interim Director. Mr. Gieskes received both his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Binghamton University. In 2019, Mr. Gieskes received the Chancellor's Award in Teaching