Asee peer logo

Improving understanding of reaction forces in free body diagrams using a paired vector object in Prairie Learn

Download Paper |

Conference

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Minneapolis, MN

Publication Date

August 23, 2022

Start Date

June 26, 2022

End Date

June 29, 2022

Conference Session

Statics Fanatics 2

Page Count

13

DOI

10.18260/1-2--41583

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/41583

Download Count

362

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Hadas Ritz Cornell University

visit author page

Hadas Ritz is a senior lecturer in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, and a Faculty Teaching Fellow at the James McCormick Family Teaching Excellence Institute (MTEI) at Cornell University, where she received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 2008. She received the 2021 ASEE National Outstanding Teaching Award.

visit author page

biography

Sanjit Basker

visit author page

Sanjit is an engineering student at Cornell. His interests lie in aerospace propulsion and machine learning.

visit author page

biography

JINGJIE YEO Cornell University

visit author page

Prof. Jingjie Yeo is the Principal Investigator at the J² Lab for Engineering Living Materials. The Lab performs Computations in Materials and the Sciences to engineer dynamically-responsive, living materials through interdisciplinary studies of material and biological phenomena with multiscale computational methods for engineering and medical applications. He is a co-instructor in Station1, a social nonprofit organization dedicated to building the foundations of the university of the future through educational opportunity and socially-directed frontier STEM education, research, and internships. Before joining Cornell University in 2020, Prof. Yeo was a research scientist in the Institute of High Performance Computing, Singapore. He worked on developing cutting-edge, silk-based cosmeceuticals and also collaborated closely with Procter & Gamble for molecular dynamics (MD) modeling of keratins and pigment cells. Prior, he was a postdoc at both Tufts University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he developed and performed numerous multiscale simulations with density functional theory (DFT) and fully-atomistic to coarse-grained MD modeling on a broad variety of biomaterials such as squid skin, silk and silk-elastin-like proteins, and graphene. He received his Ph.D. and his B.Eng. degrees from Nanyang Technological University Singapore.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

A foundational skill in mechanics is the ability to draw complete and correct free body diagrams (FBDs). Students benefit from extensive practice and feedback as they build their FBD skills, but in large enrollment courses the ability for course staff to give detailed individual feedback is limited. That mismatch between need for feedback and capacity to provide it drives adoption of teaching software with automated grading, such as PrairieLearn (PL). In the sophomore level Statics and Mechanics of Solids course at Cornell University we have recently introduced limited use of PL to give students additional practice with FBDs.

One particularly challenging application of FBDs for new learners in a statics course is for "frames" or "mechanisms." These consist of multiple members, both two-force and multiforce members, pinned together and loaded with forces and/or moments at any location. A major point of confusion for students in the course is how to treat reactions on members separated from each other at pins, including identifying two-force members and correctly showing equal and opposite reactions on the separated members. When we began using PL for our course, there was no mechanism in that platform to grade "exploded" FBDs for frames, which significantly limited the utility of the platform for our students. We hypothesized that students would perform better when drawing FBDs by hand outside of the PL platform if they could practice placement of two vectors in PL as the equal and opposite reactions where members are separated from each other. To test this hypothesis, we devised and implemented a new object in PL, a "paired vector" object, that allows students to practice drawing exploded FBDs and simultaneously reinforces the concept of equal and opposite reactions. We then randomly divided the 240 person course into two groups. Each group had two PL assignments during the statics unit of the course. The first assignment was identical for all students, but for the second one, the intervention group had frames problems including the paired vector object and exploded FBDs, while the control group had modified versions of the same problems that did not involve drawing equal and opposite reactions. On one midterm exam and the final exam we included problems requiring exploded FBDs. We compare performance on drawing FBDs, including frequency of specific mistakes, between the intervention and control groups. Our results suggest that practicing with the paired vector object led to better outcomes on drawing exploded FBDs and decreased the incidence of incorrect reactions at joints where members are separated from each other.

Ritz, H., & Basker, S., & YEO, J. (2022, August), Improving understanding of reaction forces in free body diagrams using a paired vector object in Prairie Learn Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--41583

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015