affective, Orientation- all elements Mechanical Engineering Course [27] behavioral Being- all elements cognitive, Skill- Perspective Taking, Affective Sharing, Self & Other Awareness, Mode Switching How Role-Playing Builds Empathy and Concern affective, Orientation-all for Social Justice [36] behavioral Being- all Inner engineering: Evaluating the utility of mindfulness training to cultivate intrapersonal Skill- Emotion Regulation unclear and
% replied “Yes” when asked, “Would you be willing to test prepared lecture modules on Page 23.161.4unsaturated soils in your introductory geotechnical engineering course?” With that in mind, we 3 4are attempting, through this National Science Foundation funded project, to address the issue oflack of unsaturated soil material in undergraduate classes by developing learning modules on thestress state variables that govern unsaturated soils with an emphasis in concepts related to matricsuction; along
. 1, pp. 55–67, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2021.1997175.[21] L. R. Murphy, S. R. Daly, T. Makhlouf, and C. M. Seifert, “Board 286: ‘Exploring Other People’s Mind, Exploring Your Own Mind’ —A Story of Divergent Thinking from Mechanical Engineering Practice,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Oct. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-286-exploring-other-people-s-mind-exploring-your-own-mind-a- story-of-divergent-thinking-from-mechanical-engineering-practice[22] V. C. McGowan and P. Bell, “Engineering Education as the Development of Critical Sociotechnical Literacy,” Sci. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 981–1005, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11191-020
Paper ID #7243Introducing Software Defined Radio into Undergraduate Wireless Engineer-ing Curriculum through a Hands-on ApproachProf. Shiwen Mao, Auburn University Dr. Shiwen Mao received a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Polytechnic Institute of New York University in 2004. Currently, he is the McWane Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Auburn University in Auburn, AL. Dr. Mao’s research interests include performance analysis, optimization, and algorithms for wireless networks. He was awarded the McWane Endowed Professorship in the Samuel Ginn College of
Paper ID #30742A Qualitative Analysis of How a Student, Faculty, and PracticingEngineer Approach an Ill-structured Engineering ProblemSecil Akinci-Ceylan, Iowa State University Secil Akinci-Ceylan is a PhD student in Educational Technology in the School of Education at Iowa State University.Dr. Kristen Sara Cetin, Michigan State University Dr. Kristen S Cetin is an Assistant Professor at Michigan State University in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.Dr. Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Dr. Benjamin Ahn is an Assistant Professor at Iowa State University in the Department of
many people to turn to for help besides counselors and faculty. The S-STEMProgram would be very helpful in this aspect through the guidance and mentoring they offer tostudents in an effort to help them succeed in the field of engineering.”Students also wrote about hopes to build a community of like-minded peers, as one male Whiteenvironmental engineering student states, “I also hope this program can help introduce me tolike-minded individuals going into engineering-related fields. I would love to help build upon theSTEM community at UCI and positively impact my campus.” Several students believe a diversecommunity can provide immense support as they transition into a new and overwhelmingenvironment as, one male White mechanical engineering
Paper ID #42991Board 225: Collaborative Research: Research Initiation: Assessing GlobalEngagement Interventions to Advance Global Engineering Competence forEngineering FormationProf. Scott Schneider, University of Dayton Scott J. Schneider is an Associate Professor and the ETHOS Professor for Leadership in Community at the University of Dayton. Schneider is currently focusing his research in the areas of engineering education and community engaged learning.Prof. Erick S. Vasquez-Guardado, University of Dayton Erick S. Vasquez-Guardado (Erick S. Vasquez) is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and
comprehensivewriting-across-the-curriculum program): (1) large lecture format required “core” courses and (2)traditional technical electives. Our initial focus is large sophomore- and junior-level lectureformat courses, while subsequent work will broaden and adapt our approach to technicalelectives. The types of courses that we have in mind cover topics such as statics, dynamics andmechanics, fluid mechanics, materials, surveying, linear circuit analysis, and thermodynamics.These courses are typically required for undergraduate engineers and taught in a traditional largelecture format. Unless mandated by the individual department or school, instructors are unlikelyto implement writing in these types of courses because of the large numbers and
to the workplace:How students become engineers among other forms of self. (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuestDissertations & Theses (Order No. 3669254), 2014.[23] A. Byars-Winston, Y. Estrada, C. Howard, D. Davis, & J. Zalapa. “Influence of socialcognitive and ethnic variables on academic goals of underrepresented students in science andengineering: a multiple groups analysis”. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 5: 205–218, 2010.[24] L. I. Rendón. “Academics of the heart: Reconnecting the scientific mind with the spirit'sartistry”. The Review of Higher Education, 24(1): 1-13, 2000.[25] Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages. Changing the Conversation:Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering
itself makes the students have to take risks. And then personally, I guess I don't mind making something hard for myself to make sure that I try to do it more… I am very confident that I understand the engineering that I want to understand. I'm not 100% Confident in statics … If I wanted to go farther in statics, I'd probably have to learn more. (Student #3) That changes my experience of learning, because then I'm number one, I'm not afraid to fail. Number two, I push myself to actually understand the concept because I'm not just trying to memorize the definition out of a book, because the book is right in front of me. And I could read that definition, I have to make sure I actually understand what it
Paper ID #6522What is Engineering Knowledge: A Longitudinal Study of Conceptual Changeand Epistemology of Engineering Students and PractitionersDr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Washington State University Dr. Shane Brown conducts research on cognition and conceptual change in engineering. He received his bachelor’s and Ph.D. degrees from Oregon State University, both in Civil Engineering. His Ph.D. degree includes a minor in Science and Mathematics Education. His master’s degree is in Environmental Engineering from the University of California, Davis. Dr. Brown is a licensed professional civil engineer and has six years of
: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Learning in doing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 138. (1991).8. H. Ginsburg, Entering the child's mind : the clinical interview in psychological research and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 277. (1997).9. Nrc, ed. How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. ed. M.S. Donovan, J. Bransford, and J.W. Pellegrino. National Academies Press: Washington DC. (1999).10. S. Brown, D. Montfort, and K. Hildreth, An Investigation of Student Understanding of Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams. International Network for Engineering Education Research. (2008).11. D. Montfort, S. Brown, and D. Pollock, An Investigation Of Students’ Conceptual
defined based on a students’ cognitivemeasures, including GPA and standardized test scores. Such metrics are used as predictors ofstudents’ future success, and student outcomes, in engineering. However, these metrics fall shortin explaining why admitted students, with high GPA and standardized test scores, can still fail tostay in an engineering program or struggle to graduate on time [1]. Literature suggests that non-cognitive and affective (NCA) factors can play an important role in a students’ success andencompasses measures such as stress, social support, engineering identity, meaning and purpose,mindfulness, belonging, and many others [2]–[11]. Incorporating NCA factors into how studentsuccess is defined and measured can lead to the
: Implications for intervention. Couns Psychol 2010;38(7):1001-1043.6. Kirn A, Godwin A, Cass C, Ross M, Huff J. Mindful Methodology: A transparent dialogue on adapting Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis for engineering education research. In: Mindful Methodology: A Transparent Dialogue on Adapting Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis for Engineering Education Research.; 2017.7. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne 2008;49(3):182- 185.8. Nelson KG, Shell DF, Husman J, Fishman EJ, Soh L-K. Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Profiles of Students Taking a Foundational Engineering Course. J. Eng
–194.7 Strobel, Johannes, Morris, Carrie Wachter, Klingler, Lisa, Pan, Rui Celia, et al. (2011) “Engineering as a Caring and Empathetic Discipline: Conceptualizations and Comparisons,” in Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Madrid, Spain.8 Immordino-Yang, Mary Helen and Damasio, Antonio (2007) “We feel, therefore we learn: the relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education.” Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), pp. 4–10.9 Schutz, Paul A and Pekrun, Reinhard (2007) Emotion in Education, New York, Elsevier.10 Immordino-Yang, Mary Helen (2008) “The Smoke Around Mirror Neurons: Goals as Sociocultural and Emotional Organizers of Perception and Action in Learning.” Mind, Brain, and
] R.H. Kluwe, “Cognitive knowledge and executive control: Metacognition”, Animal mind—human mind,pp. 201-224, 1982.[5] P.R. Pintrich, “The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing”, Theory intopractice, vol. 41, no.3, pp. 219-225, 2002.[6] D. H. Schunk and B.J. Zimmerman, “Social origins of self-regulatory competence”, Educationalpsychologist, vol. 32, no.4, pp. 195-208, 1997.[7] R. Longhurst, “Semi-structured interviews and focus groups”, Key methods in geography, pp. 117-132,2003.[8] R.A. Dixon, “Experts and novices: Differences in their use of mental representation and metacognitionin engineering design”, Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011.[9] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using
self-efficacy. As a result, elementary teachersmight then be better equipped to build students’ engineering identity and encourage them toconsider engineering as a potential career option.In addition to helping students develop engineering identities, exposure to engineering inelementary school is also beneficial for developing students’ engineering habits of mind(EHoM). EHoM are internalized dispositions and ways of thinking that engineers draw uponwhen confronted with problems [4] and include things such as optimism, persistence,collaboration, creativity, systems thinking, and attention to ethical considerations [5]. TheseEHoM can be beneficial to all students, regardless of career choice, but as with all habits,EHoM take time to develop. As
Paper ID #32427Is it Rocket Science or Brain Science? Developing an Approach to MeasureEngineering IntuitionDr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskio˘glu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa State University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University. Her early Ph.D. work focused on the development of bacterial biosensors capable of screening pesticides for specifically targeting the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. As a result, her diverse background also includes
Green Design Project Part 1: The Hybrid Powertrain ProjectAbstractSubjects that are separate in the curriculum, such as thermodynamics and mechanical design, areintegrated in practice, since thermal and mechanical systems must function cohesively in realmechanical systems (e.g. an air conditioner). With this in mind, we are beginning theimplementation of a novel, potentially transformative approach to integrating courseworkthrough five semesters of the core mechanical engineering curriculum.The centerpiece of this research is a long-term design/build/test project that will be developed bystudents over the course of five semesters. The project, a bench-scale hybrid powertrain, isimplemented in modules, so that parts of the
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Transforming Engineering Education for Neurodiversity: Epistemic Communities as Infrastructure for ChangeAbstractA growing body of literature suggests that neurodiverse learners, including students with autism,ADHD, and dyslexia, may possess strengths that are highly desirable within engineeringdisciplines, such as systems thinking, creativity, and 3D visualization skills. However, despitethe potential of neurodiverse individuals to leverage these assets to contribute to innovativesolutions to engineering problems, they remain highly underrepresented in engineering majors.With this in mind, a department-level initiative was established to radically transform theeducational
Paper ID #39182Board 411: Thinking Inversely in Engineering Design: Towards anOperational Definition of Generative Design ThinkingMr. John Zachary Clay, The University of Texas, Austin Research assistantXingang Li, The University of Texas, AustinOnan DemirelDr. Molly H Goldstein, University of Illinois, Urbana - Champaign Dr. Molly H. Goldstein is a Teaching Assistant Professor and Product Design Lab Director in Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering at the Grainger College at the University of Illinois. She is also courtesy faculty in Mechanical Science and Engineering, Curriculum & Instruction (College of Education
Paper ID #33565Supporting Teachers to Implement Engineering Design Challenges usingSensor Technologies in a Remote Classroom EnvironmentDr. Alexandra Gendreau Chakarov, University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Gendreau Chakarov received her Ph.D. in Computer Science and Cognitive Science from the Univer- sity of Colorado Boulder where she examined how to integrate computational thinking into middle school science curriculum using programmable sensor technologies as part of the SchoolWide Labs project. She continues this work on the SchoolWide Labs Project as a research associate where she serves as the com- puter science and
forprofessional shame to occur. [9-10]. With this in mind, we have organized this study around thefollowing research questions:RQ1: How do students psychologically experience shame in the context of engineeringeducation?RQ2: How are these experiences located and socially constructed within the institutional culturesof engineering programs?RQ3: In the context of engineering education, how do individual, psychological experiences ofshame interact with perceived cultural expectations?To answer these research questions, we organized the study in two phases. In this paper, we willfocus on Phase 2 of this study which examines the experience of shame as an individual student(RQ1) within the context of engineering education as a student minoritized in
Paper ID #6584Assessment and repair of critical misconceptions in engineering heat transferand thermodynamicsDr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell UniversityDr. Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University Dr. Margot Vigeant is an associate professor of chemical engineering and associate dean of engineering. She is interested in chemical engineering pedagogy, first-year programs, and international education.Dr. Katharyn E. K. Nottis, Bucknell University Dr. Nottis is an educational psychologist and professor of education at Bucknell University. Her research has focused on meaningful learning in science and engineering education
Paper ID #41608Board 278: Faculty and Staff Ideas and Expectations for a Culture of Wellnessin EngineeringMs. Eileen Johnson, University of Michigan Eileen Johnson received her BS and MS in Bioengineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She previously worked in tissue engineering and genetic engineering throughout her education. She is currently pursuing her PhD in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan. After teaching an online laboratory class, she became interested in engineering education research. Her current research interests are in engineering student mental health & wellness
genre-specific features among other genres, too.Focus group responses noted both similarities and differences among writing assignments inFYC and engineering laboratory courses. Students agreed that writing assignments in bothcourses included writing for an audience with a purpose in mind, employing rhetorical appeals(logos, pathos, and ethos), and using evidence as support. Many of the distinctions that studentsnoted emphasized differences in how these elements were employed. For example, studentsnoted the difference between using thesis statements in research papers and using hypotheses inlab reports to define the genre’s purpose. They also observed that there is little pathos in labreports, and that lab reports tend to emphasize logos and
belonging inengineering. The study found that classroom inclusion was the only significant predictor ofbelonging and could predict it positively to a moderate degree. Further, it was found that studentsin revised inclusive courses reported significantly stronger feelings of inclusion and belongingthan their peers in traditional courses. These findings suggest that systematic efforts toimplement neuroinclusive learning practices in engineering education may contribute to a senseof belonging for all students.IntroductionThe concept of neurodiversity, a term coined by sociologist Judy Singer [1], emerged asmembers of the autistic community challenged the predominant disability framing of autism andembraced the notion that diversity of minds is both
Alicia Beth Consulting2 , Island Pond, VT 05846 Burd’s Eye View Research & Evaluation3, Austin, TX 78704AbstractNorwich University, a private military college that serves both civilian and Corps of Cadetsstudents, secured an NSF S-STEM award to develop a program to attract and retain highlytalented, low-income students. Norwich recognizes that students who enter college with lessexperience in mathematics are less likely to graduate with a degree in a STEM discipline. Withthat in mind, the project aims to measure the benefits of a corequisite implementation ofprecalculus and calculus to help students complete the required calculus sequence by the end oftheir first year. In the first year of the study, 34 engineering students
. Student teams generate as many concepts aspossible through methods such as brainstorming, mind mapping [27], or C-Sketch [28]. In theexample EDT, students are given a handout that presents relevant background about heat,temperature, and heat transfer. In groups of four, they use brainstorming methods to generatesketches of at least three possible storage devices that fit the parameters of the design challenge. Once several concepts are generated, the best one is selected based on evaluation criteria.During stage three, teams use engineering techniques to select the best concept from the previousstage and construct an argument for their best design. The methods used during this stageencourage students to move from “tinkering” to authentic
ASSISTment System. In Ikeda, Ashley & Chan (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 635-644.29. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher order mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.30. Redish,E.F & Smith, K.A.(2008). Looking beyond content: Skill development for engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3).31. Gage, M., A. K. Pizer, V. Roth. 2003. WeBWorK: generating, delivering, and checking math homework via the internet. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics. New York:Wiley. http://www.math.uoc.gr/~ictm2/Proceedings/pap189.pdf.32. Roth, V., Ivanchenko, V., Record, N. 2008. Evaluating student responses to