Briggs Personality Type Inventory. While these two tools provide students with useful insights about their personalities, behaviours and habits of mind, our findings suggest that engineering educators who use these tools with their students would be well advised to discuss them as temporally-contextualized orientations rather than immutable categories. If they can critically examine these two typologies and expose students to multiple ways of influencing, supporting and relating to their colleagues, the next generation of engineers will learn the value and practice of flexibility while opening themselves to qualitatively diverse forms of professional development. 2) If it proves to be the case that female
Scholarship Program continues to support the scholars financially andprovide critical support for their success. With this in mind, three scholars who were in theirthird year had their scholarships extended until graduation, and this was based on their academicperformance and funds available as a result only six of the ten new scholarships were awarded in2012-2013.The engineering majors represented by this cohort were chemical, civil, electrical, mechanicaland petroleum, and they entered LSU as transfer students in the fall 2010 or spring 2011semester. The scholars’ academic performance at selection (i.e. at the end of the spring 2011semester) was on average well above the scholarship criteria, and demographics indicate that theprogram attracted
Paper ID #12534Building a STEM Pathway with Engineering by Design andMs. Laura E. LeMire, The Community College of Baltimore County Upon graduation from the University of Maryland at College Park with her masters in geotechnical en- gineering, Laura went to work for Baltimore Gas and Electric where during her career there she was responsible for substation and transmission line construction projects, relocation and installation of BGE facilities for Oriole Park at Camden Yards and for the Light Rail, and for improving service reliability. After obtaining her MBA, Laura became the Director of Corporate Purchasing and was a
Paper ID #13554Integrating Affective Engagement into Systems Engineering EducationDr. Timothy L.J. Ferris, School of Engineering, University of South Australia Timothy Ferris holds the degrees B.E.Hons, B.Th., B.Litt.Hons. Grad.Cert.Ed., and PhD from University of Adelaide, Flinders University, Deakin University, Queensland University of Technology and University of South Australia, all in Australia, respectively. He is a member of the School of Engineering at the University of South Australia. He teaches courses in systems engineering and research methods and supervises several PhD students in systems engineering. He was a
Paper ID #11895Leading Large-Scale Change in an Engineering ProgramDr. Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington Dr. Allendoerfer is a Research Scientist in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington.Prof. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Integrated Engineering program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, home of the Iron Range and Twin
or herown mind by constantly making and changing connections between with is new and what isalready known. Further, as it is just not possible for teachers to transfer knowledge into learners’brains, the students need to do the work required to learn. Thus, course innovations can bedesigned not only to help students develop metacognitive skills (e.g., previewing, summarizing,paraphrasing, note-taking), empowering them as active partners in their learning, but also toprovide students with the opportunity to do the work required to learn.12In response, recent innovations to the course not only increase the emphasis on active studentlearning but also provide students with opportunities that encourage them to think of themselvesas engineers by
intentions with the technology they are building. If someone takes their technology and uses it, you know, in a bad way that’s more on the person who used it. That’s my personal opinion (shrugs shoulders) anyways.Asked if in his future job he personally will have to grapple with the social impact of his designs,he says that he would like to be involved in that discussion. But says that engineers might belimited by their mindset: Engineers can be closed minded. We are very technically oriented. We don’t really think a lot about our impacts...I think it’s just how our brain works...Because I don’t come from an engineering [familial] background, I think about it. I would like to have some say in how [my
science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 564-582.10 National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education:Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.11 Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.12 Tonso, K. L. (2014). Engineering identity. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Handbook of engineering educationresearch (pp. 267-282). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.13 Godfrey, E., & Parker, L. (2010). Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education, Journal ofEngineering Education, 99, 5-22.14 Pawley, A. L. (2009). Universalized narratives
, with the capacity to function effectively in a globally connected, innovation driven economy. Within the Center it is appreciated that the field of neural engineering will be most innovative and transformative when people from a wide range of backgrounds contribute. With this in mind the Center places a special emphasis on recruiting females, students from historically underrepresented groups, and people with disabilities into our education Page 26.894.3 programs.2As one of many Center education interventions developed to support the K-to-career pathways,the design of the YSP is aligned to concepts of
students in their academic programs. International students experience a variety of adjustment issues that affect the teaching andlearning processes that take place in the classrooms. The primary issues are associated withcultural differences, communication, psychological states of mind and academic challenges 6–8.For example, students from Asia who come from very structured and hierarchical societies areused to a passive-learning, instructor-led approach to education. Those students must adapt to themore active, student-driven education style, found in U.S. institutions 9. Developing teamwork skills is essential for any engineering professional since engineering isby nature a collaborative discipline 10. The importance of this skill is
senior-level counterparts, without sacrificing feasibility from a manufacturing and design perspective.” This occurred even though the seniors were more advanced in technical and drafting knowledge and skills. As might be expected, the authors recommended more studies. For example, they suggested determining the types of classes and pedagogical techniques that enhance creativity/innovation and considering changing curricula to more effectively promote students’ creative/innovative abilities throughout their undergraduate education. Engineering professor Richard McCuen19 addresses our creative-innovative mind set, or lack thereof, by offering this thought: “The attitude that creative thinking
teamwork are defined as importantfactors in developing and assessing entrepreneurial skills in engineers10,11 and in general.12,13Additionally, communication, teamwork and problem solving are essential components ofABET’s a-k outcomes.14 The development of programs for 15, 16 and assessments of17. 18 theseskills continues to be a focus on engineering education publications.MethodsMultiple methods were used to assess the Leadership Academy. An overview of all of thesemethods is shown on Table 1. Two surveys were given to students who participated in theacademy before and after the completion of academy activities. The first was a survey with itemstailored to each of the most recent KEEN outcomes called the Entrepreneurial Minded Learning(EML
sustainabilitystrategies and participating in a network of like-minded sustainability peers. A sustainable futuredemands a leader not just immersed in the sustainability issues but also be able to articulate a Page 26.826.3new paradigm that addresses sustainability not in silos but as systems based and have interrelatedfocus.Putting it all together using Learning LabsOne learning structure to help integrate sustainability, leadership and engineering in onecohesive student experience is the use of Learning Labs. Learning Labs are a two part hands oncollaborative learning experience designed for students to apply theories, models and processesinto practice and
and evaluated every year.The choice of courses for course-embedded assessment is guidedby two principles: (1) each Student Outcome is assessed withstudent work in a benchmark course, and (2) only required courses,not elective courses, in the curriculum are selected as benchmarkcourses.Assessment of a benchmark course is conducted with the followingin mind: (1) assessment of student work measures the extent towhich SOs are being attained, (2) it is not necessary to use all ofthe student work to assess an outcome, and (3) outcomesassessment is based upon student work and is guided by thegrading of that work.The implementation of our course-embedded assessment methodto a benchmark course, namely Engineering Economics, ispresented in this paper
Paper ID #11927Development of a Programmable Integrated Switch Matrix (PrISM) throughUniversity-Industry CollaborationDr. Baha Jassemnejad, Federal Aviation Administration-CNI Airway Syatems Engineering Organization Baha Jassemnejad was a Professor of Engineering and Physics and is a senior IEEE member as well as an ABET PEV. He is working as an Electronics Engineer VI for the FAA-Chickasaw Nation Industries, a contractor for National Airway Systems Engineering Organization.Mr. Igor IlikjJonathan Ryan Adams Full time electrical engineering student, currently working on masters degree.Mr. Neil Peery, CNI Aviation Technical
Paper ID #12107History and Heritage as a Vehicle for Contemporary IssuesDr. Douglas G Schmucker, University of Utah Dr. Schmucker has 15 years experience focused on high quality teaching following the T4E, ExCEEd, and NETI teaching models. A full-time teaching professional, he focuses on practice, project, and problem- based teaching methodologies.Dr. Steven J. Burian, University of Utah Page 26.847.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 History and Heritage as a Vehicle
patterns looking for specific evidence ofthese behaviors and saw that there were nuances to each of these levels. The students wehighlight below represent this range and some of the nuances we saw in the data. In thefollowing section, we suggest the implications that our observations can have for supportingteachers as they teach engineering, identify how to promote expert behaviors, and fosterengineering habits of mind. We also believe that our data emphasizes the need for a deeperevaluation of student’s approaches to solving authentic and realistic engineering problems. Page 26.593.4Beginning designer patterns in understanding the challenge and
Page 26.478.5considered in this engineering solution and she listed these ideas on the board. Responsesgathered included: How will vacationers be affected by the smell created by the treatment? 4(People). Where will the effluent go when the pipe is flushed? Will it affect the wildlife?(Planet). Who will do the wok? Unions? (Politics), How much will it cost? (Prosperity)With this framework in mind, the student were then again given the original assignment as agroup and asked to frame the challenges (#1 - #3) with the 4 Ps in mind. This assignment wasalso turned in.3. Do they retain the 4 Ps weeks later after learning the technical
listen toothers with an open mind) and Q21 (work on collaborative projects as a team).In addition to the survey questions, participants were asked to respond to five prompts(Q31) about various outcomes of the project. In response to the prompts, one studentsaid: “collaborating with different people from different technical backgrounds is thebiggest advantage of the program in giving students the ability to learn from peoplewith different perspectives and gain a wider view of engineering”. Another studentwrote: “gaining valuable teamwork and management skills in a setting where themain objective was shared by many”.Effective Communication: To evaluate development with respect to effectivecommunication, participants were asked to rate their growth
did not know what to expect in terms of thisparticular project relating to education—however, I was open minded and prepared to engagemyself in whatever the project encompassed. The major reasons why I applied for this researchproject were because of my strong interest in interdisciplinary work, my desire to learn aboutnew things, and because I wanted to gain experience in more ‘hands-on’ research, in contrast tothe more theoretical and abstract type of work that I had done in the past.”Q2. Confidence in Success.A2. “When I first began this project, I was a bit nervous about mylack of knowledge in engineering preventing me from bringing anything valuable to the table.Not only was I ignorant in many engineering principles (such as Dynamics
Paper ID #11298Learning from Experiences: Examining Self-Reflection in Engineering De-sign CoursesJennifer Wegner, University of Michigan College of Engineering Jennifer Wegner is an Assistant Director in Engineering Student Affairs at the University of Michigan, with responsibilities including student organization development, leading unit strategic objectives, and supporting university and college co-curricular initiatives. Her teaching and facilitation experiences in- clude a mentorship/leadership course, LeaderShape R , first year seminars, and a university course on social psychology in residence settings. She is a
Paper ID #11972Improving Student Technical Communication via Self ReflectionMr. Kenneth P Mineart, North Carolina State University Kenneth Mineart received his Bachelor’s degree in Chemical & Biochemical Engineering from the Uni- versity of Iowa. Currently, he is a doctoral student in Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University where he works in the field of block copolymer science with Professor Richard Spontak. Kenneth has regularly served as a graduate teaching assistant for a variety of courses including: Unit Operations Laboratory, Material and Energy Balances, Introduction to
(eds.), 1999, How People Learn: Brain Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.18. Brown, A.L., and Campione, J.C., 1994, “Guided Discovery in a Community of Learners,” in Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice, pp. 229-270, K. McGilly, (ed.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.19. Kim, J., Kim, D.M., Consiglio, S., Severengiz, S., Seliger, G., Patil, L., and Dutta, D. 2006. “A Global Collaboration to Teach Global Product Development: Faculty Perspectives.” Advancing Scholarship in Engineering Education, American Society for Engineering Education.20. Tate, D., Ertas, A., Tanik, M.M., and Maxwell, T. 2006. “A Transdisciplinary Framework for Engineering Systems Research based on
Paper ID #11205Improving Undergrad Presentation SkillsDr. Gene Dixon, East Carolina University Gene Dixon is a tenured Associate Professor at East Carolina where he teaches aspiring engineers at the undergraduate level. Previously he has held positions with Union Carbide, Chicago Bridge & Iron, E.I. DuPont & deNemours, Westinghouse Electric, CBS, Viacom and Washington Group. His work expe- rience includes project engineer, program assessor, senior shift manager, TQM coach, and production reactor outage planner, remediation engineer. He gives presentations as a corporate trainer, a teacher, and a motivational
when students do not realize a computedanswer is incorrect by multiple orders of magnitude. Indeed, poor conceptual understanding hasalso been observed in young engineers during their work in industry6,7. With this in mind,instruments which can effectively teach and evaluate engineering students’ conceptualunderstanding are key tools for modern engineering educators.In addition to the struggles of engineering students to achieve conceptual understanding, recentengineering graduates’ grasp of written communication and associated skills is often below thatexpected by their anticipated positions in the modern workplace8. Pedagogical research hasfound that writing assignments effectively facilitate learning by forcing students to
Paper ID #12121Exploring the Relationship between Dynamics and StabilityWilliam G Rosenblatt, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo William Rosenblatt is a Graduate Assistant for the Architectural Engineering Department at California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo. He currently conducts research in the field of building damage detection through forced-vibration testing. He will be graduating in December 2015 with the intent of entering the field of forensic engineering.Dr. Peter Laursen P.E., California Polytechnic State University Dr. Peter Laursen, P.E., is an Associate Professor of
Paper ID #12619Incorporating Training In Research & Research Methods into the Under-graduate Curriculum in Engineering and Engineering Technology-(E&ET).Dr. Cyril B OKHIO, Kennesaw State University Cyril B. Okhio is a Faculty at the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering & Engineering Tech- nology, Kennesaw State University and an Adjunct Professor at Clark Atlanta University’s Dual Degree Engineering Program. He earned his B.S. (Engineering) and Ph.D. (Mechanical Engineering) degrees from, and was an (Science and Engineering Research Council) SERC Post-Doctoral Research Fellow at the University of London
October 2014 a similar survey was sent to Engineering News Record's Top 500 Design Firms.The purpose of both surveys was to assess the prevalence of degreed librarians and the types ofresources available in engineering design firms. In the decade since 2004, when the articledescribing the survey results was published1, the U.S. experienced an economic crisis. With thisin mind, the author of the original survey wanted to repeat the study to learn what, if anythinghad changed at the engineering firms in the preceding decade. In October 2014 a survey wasmailed to 500 engineering design firms using the most recent version of the Engineering NewsRecord’s Top 500 Design Firm list.BackgroundAs in 2004, there is still no other detailed study of
Paper ID #12044What does it take to deliver an active hands-on course?Dr. Steve C. Hsiung, Old Dominion University Steve Hsiung is a professor of electrical engineering technology at Old Dominion University. Prior to his current position, Dr. Hsiung had worked for Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Seagate Technology, Inc., and Lam Research Corp., all in Silicon Valley, CA. Dr. Hsiung also taught at Utah State University and California University of Pennsylvania. He earned his BS degree from National Kauhsiung Normal University in 1980, MS degrees from University of North Dakota in 1986 and Kansas State University in
Exercise. (2010). at 11. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. (National Academy Press, 1999). at 12. Michael, D. R. & Chen, S. L. Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. (Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade, 2005). at 13. White, B. Y. & Frederiksen, J. R. Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students. Cogn. Instr. 16, 3–118 (1998).14. Smith, P. L. & Ragan, T. J. Instructional design. (Wiley New York, NY, 1999)15. Wankat, P. C. Improving engineering and technology education by applying what is known about how people learn. J. SMET Educ. Innov. Res. 3, 3–8 (2002).16. Kubiszyn, T. &