four engineering-intensive organizations, asking them to identify 3-4 senior engineers with a range of career pathswho had graduated prior to 1992. We also asked them to be mindful of demographic diversitywhere possible. The four organizations represented the following industries: Chemicalprocessing, manufacturing, consulting/mining, and software. To ensure the inclusion ofengineers who had followed less traditional paths, we also reached out to senior engineersemployed in public service, finance, university leadership and social impact enterprises. In theend, 28 senior engineers consented to participate. Despite our intention to diversify our sample
University (United States), Universidad Nacional deIngenieria (Peru), 100,000 Strong in the Americas, Partners of the Americas, and Foundation,Department of State (United States), and Association of International Educators (NAFSA).References[1] https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ [Online][2] J. Adams, "The Fourth Age of Research," Nature, Vol. 497, May, 30, 2013.[3] A. L. Freeman, J. V. Urbina, and S. Zappe, “Engineering Pathways fellows: Four years of successful retention initiatives and international collaboration”, Conference proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, June, 2017.[4] C. Drew, “Why science majors change their minds (It’s just so
Paper ID #26543Library Partnerships to Support Data Analytics Engineering ProgramsMs. Wendy Mann, George Mason University Wendy Mann is the Director of the Digital Scholarship Center (DiSC) at George Mason University Li- braries.Ms. Theresa M. Calcagno, George Mason University Theresa Calcagno is the Librarian to the Volgenau School of Engineering at George Mason University in Fairfax, VA. Prior to that, Calcagno was a Research Librarian for an engineering project consulting firm.Deborah Ann Kermer, George Mason University Deborah Ann Kermer is the Data Services Research Consultant at the Digitial Scholarship Center in the
. Thisstudent discussion was primarily concerned with sharing a question with another student. Theteacher stopped the discussion after 30 seconds. Allen’s reading practices seem to match hisview of the purpose of reading: to gain information. Students were engaged in makingmeaning from the texts and they practiced strategies to improve comprehension andunderstanding. In these two units, students did not use the information they read and were notasked to read with an engineering purpose in mind such as identifying the problem.Allen’s texts seemed informational in nature. In one unit, students were asked to design andtest a model airplane. Students learned many new vocabulary words such as aerospaceengineer, tapered leading edge, and straight trailing
Engineering Science, Industrial Systems Participant 8 Unknown Upper Lvl Mngmnt Mechanical and Environmental Engineering Each of the researchers conducted 2-3 interviews and completed the correspondingtranscriptions. In order to analyze data consistently among team members, a codebook wasdeveloped. This was based on the initial analysis of several interviews and the identification ofcommon key words and phrases, or “codes.” Each interview transcription was read with thesecodes in mind, and quotes aligning with each code were identified and tabulated
longitudinal approach for additional analysis. While some of the data is the same,our study branches further into examining why students stay in or leave engineering. There hasbeen some previous research investigating relationships between demographic variables andengineering fields, but leaves out the student perspectives and expectations in choosing a major[11]. With this in mind, we focus on engineering specifically with our data from students in firstyear engineering coursework analyzing their expectations by reading the response data fromsurveys.A large portion of previously conducted major selection research comes from the perspective oftrying to introduce more people into STEM fields. For example, another study approaches theparticipation of
.: Consulting Psychologist Press, pp.181-20621. Lent, R. W., Schmidt, L., Schmidt, J., and Pertmer, G.,(2002), “Exploration of Collective Efficacy Beliefs in Student Project Teams: Implications for Student and Team Outcomes,” Proc.,, ASEE Conf.& Exhibition.22. de Graaf, E., and Kolmos, A.,(2003), “ Characteristics of Problem- Based Learning,” International Journal of Eng. Education, Vol.19, No.5, pp.657-662.23. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R.,(1999), “How People Learn: Brain, Mind , Experience and School,” Wash. .D.C.: National Academy Press.24. Wessel, D., “Building a Better Engineer,” Wall Street Journal, December 20, 2003, p.B1.25. Saddler, P.M., Coyle, H., and Schwartz, M.,(2000), “Engineering Competitions in the
Paper ID #26768Assessing Problem-Solving Strategy Use by Engineering UndergraduatesDr. Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University Roman Taraban is Professor in the Department of Psychological Sciences at Texas Tech University. He received his Ph.D. in cognitive psychology from Carnegie Mellon University. His interests are in how undergraduate students learn, and especially, in critical thinking and how students draw meaningful con- nections in traditional college content materials.Dr. Edward E. Anderson, Texas Tech University Professor Edward E. Anderson is a faculty member of the Texas Tech University Department of Mechan
Paper ID #26743Transitioning to Engineering Without Losing Experiential LearningDr. Jeffrey L. Newcomer, Western Washington University Dr. Jeffrey L. Newcomer is a Professor of Manufacturing Engineering and Chair of the Engineering and Design Department at Western Washington University. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Ms. Nikki Larson, Western Washington University After receiving my bachelor degree in Mechanical Engineering from Bradley University, I started working for Boeing. While at Boeing I worked to receive my master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering with an
Paper ID #26725Board 31: Engineering with Engineers: Revolutionizing a Mechanical Engi-neering Department through Industry Immersion and a Focus on IdentityDr. Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University Yen-Lin Han is an Assistant Professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Seattle University. Her research interests include micro-scale molecular gas dynamics, micro fluidics, and heat transfer ap- plications in MEMS and medical devices as well as autonomous vehicles and robotics. She is passionate about Engineering Education and experienced in developing inverted classroom lectures and facilitat- ing students’ learning
Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech is currently infusing entrepreneurial minded learning and critical reflection throughout the undergraduate curriculum. One unique aspect of this effort is the creation of studentfaculty partnerships that are focused on developing more entrepreneurially minded and reflective pedagogy within specific core courses. In this pilot effort, eight biomedical engineering students were recruited based on previous course experience, academic performance, and expressed interest in entrepreneurially minded learning and course development. These student partners formed a core team of course implementation assistants (CIA) that were overseen and supported by one faculty member serving as team leader. Six
ethical becoming of architecture students within courses utilizing community-engaged pedagogies.Dr. Brandon H Sorge, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Brandon Sorge is an Assistant Professor of STEM Education Research in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communication at the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. His research interests focus on creating a diverse and civically minded STEM citizenry. He is especially interested the impacts of all levels of policy, leadership, and corporate social responsibility on creating these outcomes. Before coming to IUPUI, Brandon ran the day-to-day operations of the Indiana STEM Resource Network where he co-founded the Indiana Science
University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. David Whittinghill is an Associate Professor of Computer Graphics Technology and Computer and Information Technology. Dr. Whittinghill’s research focuses on gaming, simulation and computer pro- gramming education and how these technologies can more effectively address outstanding issues in health, education, and society. Dr. Whittinghill leads projects in pediatric physical therapy, sustainable energy simulation, Chinese language learning, virtual reality, and games as a tool for improving educational out- comes. Dr. Whittinghill is the director of the Games Innovation Laboratory (www.gamesinnovation.org). c American Society for
. Engineering students at the Westinstitution were interviewed about their beliefs and attitudes on various diversity-related topics;interviews ranged from general conceptualizations of and experiences with diversity (e.g.,experiences with discrimination) to the specifics of their first-year engineering teamingexperiences, mirroring the interviews at the Midwestern institution. Through these personal andoften uncomfortable conversations about diversity, participants revealed that having anopportunity to talk candidly about diversity may be a catalyst to shifting attitudes about diversity[15]. Students indicated that the opportunity to discuss the topic of diversity was “mind-boggling(George)” and made them “think about how [they behave] with other
Paper ID #24744Safe Zone Level 2 Ally Training (90-minute Workshop)Dr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is Professor and Founding Chair of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University (USA). Prior to 2016 she was a faculty member in Chemical Engineering at Rowan for eigh- teen years. Dr. Farrell has contributed to engineering education through her work in inductive pedagogy, spatial skills, and inclusion and diversity. She has been honored by the American Society of Engineer- ing Education with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005
many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to assess impact of good supply chain practices such as
/Instructors.pdf. [Accessed: 10-Mar-2019].[21] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs (2016–2017),” 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2016-2017/. [Accessed: 29-Jan-2019].[22] “25 Years of Washington Accord,” 2014.[23] E. Schwitzgebel and J. Rust, “The moral behavior of ethics professors: Relationships among self-reported behavior, expressed normative attitude, and directly observed behavior,” Philos. Psychol., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 293–327, 2014.[24] J. Haidt, The righteous mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[25] J. D. Greene, Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. New York
-world scenarios. Indeed,in terms of cross-cultural ideological patterns [19], east-west differences in foundation [20], andgender differences [21], the moral foundations questionnaire (and the moral foundations theoryon which it was built), was shown to have practical application.The described purpose of the original publicly-available moral foundations questionnaire was to“understand the way our ‘moral minds’ work” answering questions like “why do people disagreeso passionately about what is right?” and “why, in particular, is there such hostility andincomprehension between members of different political parties?” [22]. Its application in thecontext of engineering disciplines can play, we think, a role in answering very similar questions.While
differentbackgrounds and engineering pursuits, their instructor/advisor, and the AI consultant mentionedearlier. Being a former Principia student herself, the AI consultant was able to mind-meld withthe students throughout the project, giving them insights on both a professional and student level.A strong bond of respect and understanding was forged among the entire team which contributedsignificantly to the research and the educational processes. Described below are some of theinsights gained from both the teaching and learning aspects of this project. ● The instructor was impressed by the ease and speed with which the students learned the technological aspects and capabilities of the drones used for photographing the Maybeck Chapel. This was also
important to the everyday health-conscious consumer and to people working in thebrewing industry. However, the value propositions of clean water differed greatly between thesetwo promising customer segments which caused the project to pivot to focus on the brewingindustry. The resulting device prototype was created with the market needs in mind as anaffordable reusable device with real-time chemical analysis capabilities. This paper focuses onthe educational progress and best practices students learned on engineering practical solutions tomeet people's needs. It then introduces the resulting water monitoring system and its variantwireless portable analysis platform that is in development, the latter which was created as aresponse to the needs
Paper ID #26997Resolving Moral Dilemmas Using the Creative Middle Way ApproachDr. Ashraf Ghaly P.E., Union College Ashraf Ghaly is Director of Engineering and Carl B. Jansen Professor of Engineering at Union College, Schenectady, NY. Published over 250 papers, technical notes, and reports. Supervised over 50 research studies. Registered PE in NYS. ASCE Fellow and Member of the Chi-Epsilon Civil Engineering Honor Society. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Resolving Moral Dilemmas Using the Creative Middle Way Approach Ashraf Ghaly, Ph.D., P.E., Professor
jobs. One participantresponded with the following: I came to this job with kind of an open mind. I didn't really know what exactly I wanted to do after college, so I pretty much took the mentality of I was up for anything, job-wise. And this was kind of the first and best option that came around to me so I took it. I didn't really know what to expect, but from what my professors told me, just [the] engineering professional world in general is that you have to, like communicating with people that aren't engineers is a big thing and, you know, it certainly is in my job. – Jeff, Data Set 2In this quote, Jeff talks about having not really known what to expect upon started his first jobpost-graduation and
Paper ID #26999Pollution Prevention and Energy Efficiency: A Case Study for EngineeringExtension Services in the Desert SouthwestJalal Rastegary, New Mexico State UniversityDr. Patricia A. Sullivan, New Mexico State University Patricia A. Sullivan serves as Associate Dean for Outreach and Recruitment in the College of Engineering at New Mexico State University. She received her PhD in industrial engineering and has over 34 years’ experience directing statewide engineering outreach services that include technical engineering business assistance, professional development, and educational outreach programs. She is co-PI for a
mind. Most of us have biases of which we are unaware. 5. Create equal opportunities for all students to participate in class discussions and answer questions. Beware of low ability signals such as asking women less challenging questions (Schnellmann & Gibbons, 1984). 6. Use diverse examples. In STEM this might include a variety of applications that would be meaningful to different gender identities, sexual orientations, or cultural backgrounds, or that address different societal needs. An instructor might seek opportunities to highlight contributions of LGBTQ engineers or scientists or others from minority or underrepresented groups, giving appropriate acknowledgement to the individual’s
guidance anddirection for students to generate innovative ideas for their projects.Given CoE’s limited experience in entrepreneurial-minded learning (EML), CoE believes thisteaching approach proved useful tool to engage students in coming up with relevant ideas forprojects and classroom activities that create market value. CoE also believes that thecombination of embedded EML ( [1], [2], [3], [4]) activities and the system engineering processprovide a rewarding learning experience for students. CoE also believes that the system thinkingfound in the entrepreneurial concept aligns well with the system engineering approach for thelast several years in making project ideas become reality ( [5], [6] [7], [8], [9]).Accreditation Board for Engineering
codes orpractices that allows one to make ethical decisions.[22] Haws (2006) called for a holistic andcontextualized ethics education that would help students develop “enactive mastery, as theyencounter moral dilemma and work through ethical deliberations” while being provided“vicarious experience, encountering the moral dilemma of others with whom they identify;and expert testimony, following those whose expertise they accept”.[23] More recently,scholars’ research on the goals of engineering ethics can be covered in two dimensions:internalization in mind, including knowledge and consciousness, and externalization inaction.[24] First, at the “knowledge” level, MIT D-Lab has designed a series of courses, such asIntroduction to Energy in Global
Paper ID #24812Designing a Reference Training Course and Cultivating a Community of Prac-tice: Utilizing the LMS for Staff Training and DevelopmentSarah Jane Dooley, Dalhousie University Sarah Jane Dooley is Reference Coordinator and Liaison Librarian for Engineering at Dalhousie Univer- sity’s Sexton Design & Technology Library in Halifax, Nova Scotia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Designing a Reference Training Course and Cultivating a Community of Practice: Utilizing the LMS for Staff Training and DevelopmentAbstractThis paper will review research pertaining to the value of
Paper ID #27792An Interdisciplinary Research-based Education Program for Engaging Plant/AgricultureSciences, Chemical Sciences, and Engineering Students (iREP-4-PACE) atMinority InstitutionsDr. Sharanabasaweshwara Asundi, Old Dominion University Sharan Asundi, a native of INDIA, is a Ph.D. from University of Florida working as an Assistant Profes- sor of Space Systems Engineering in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Old Dominion University (ODU). Currently, he is engaged in several teaching and research activities, largely focused on furthering the Space Systems Engineering Program at ODU. He has
Paper ID #26410The Teaching Assistant’s Perspective on Flipping an Undergraduate Biome-chanics CourseDr. Christa M. Wille, University of Wisconsin, Madison Christa Wille is a Biomedical Engineering doctoral student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She received an undergraduate degree in Biomedical Engineering and went on to get her clinical doctorate in Physical Therapy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She advanced her clinical skills through a Sports Physical Therapy Residency at UW Health. Although continuing to practice Physical Therapy, Christa has returned to academia to continue to pursue research
, many ‘traditional’ engineering students will enter careers where their work intersectswith military interests. Lucena describes how engineering education has consistently beeninfluenced by the defense needs of the United States since World War II [29]. Students mayactively seek military-related jobs, or more likely, will find themselves in them. A recentNational Academy of Engineering (NAE) report analyzed STEM workforce concerns of the U.S.Department of Defense (DOD), in terms of the ‘defense industrial base’ and DOD civilian andmilitary employees [30]. Many new technologies are developed with military funding orpotential military applications in mind, as acknowledged in a recent NAE report [31].Military issues in relation to engineering have