Biomedical Engineering, Biomechanical Engineering, Biomolecular Engineering, Senior Design, and Entrepreneurial Bioengineering. He is active in Engineering Education Research, where he studies different mentoring strategies to ensure the academic and professional success of historically marginalized groups. Further, he studies strategies for instilling the entrepreneurial mindset in engineering students as well as innovative approaches to teaching, such as using virtual reality. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Advancing Equity in Biomedical Engineering Education: Insights from Clinical Observations and Needs-Finding CoursesAbstract:Identifying clinical
, no. 2, pp. 284–301, Apr. 2016.[21] “Entrepreneurial mindset,” engineeringunleashed.com. Accessed: Jan. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset.[22] T. Parks, S. Shehab, T. Bretl, E. Wroblewski, and M. Lembeck, “WIP: Using a human- centered engineering design framework to develop learning progressions in an aerospace engineering program,” in the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon, USA, June 23–26, 2024. ASEE, 2024.
broaden students’ perspectives and enhance student learning, and the use of digital portfolios for students to showcase and reflect on their experiences. Amy has contributed to the development of an interdisciplinary grand challenges focused course and introduction to engineering course in both in-person and online (MOOC) formats at ASU. She is also actively involved in the ASU Kern project and Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), focused on students’ development of entrepreneurial mindset. Amy received the national 2019 KEEN Rising Star award from KEEN for her efforts in encouraging students in developing an entrepreneurial mindset. She is also a member of the current interim Executive Committee for the
, Introduction to Engineering and Perspectives on Grand Challenges for Engineering for the Global Freshman Academy/ASU Earned Admission/Universal Learner Courses Program. Her Ph.D. research focused on multi-scale multiphase modeling and numerical analysis of coupled large viscoelastic deformation and fluid transport in swelling porous materials, but she is currently interested in various topics in the field of engineering education, such as innovative teaching pedagogies for increased retention and student motivation; innovations in non-traditional delivery methods, incorporation of the Entrepreneurial Mindset in the engineering curriculum and its impact. She has published over 30 papers and presented at various conferences
program educational objectives as well as ABET student learning outcomes [6]. These progressions also connect to the Kern Family Foundation (KEEN)’s entrepreneurial mindset [13], which proposes a set of attitudes, dispositions, habits, and behaviors that shape a unique, desirable engineering problem-solving approach. Learning Progressions Framework Development In previous work, we piloted the development of program-level learning progressions that connect directly to program educational objectives and ABET student learning outcomes [14]. This included developing a framework that identifies a set of pertinent competencies and breaks them into naive, intermediate, and informed stages through which students
major, augmentretention and improve engineering efficacy in the undergraduate program. The initiative aims toenhance the sense of belonging of the students to the profession, school, and major, as well as tograduate more holistic engineers with an entrepreneurial mindset. Subsequently garneringexternal funding, the initiative applies interactive learning and entrepreneurially minded learning(EML) pedagogies - such as problem-based learning (PBL), team development, story-drivenlearning (SDL), and, value sensitive design (VSD) as well as computational skills development -to engage students early and keep them engaged throughout their undergraduate journey. Thispaper discusses effective practices, challenges and lessons learned along the way with
evaluators.References[1] E. Jensen, “First Year Civil and Architectural Engineering Student Project, 2024 ASEE North CentralSection Conference, Kalamazoo, MI, USA” [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/45620 [Accessed April 27,2025][2] E. Evrekli, D. Inel, and A.G. Balim. “Development of a scoring system to assess mind maps,” in Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 2330-2334, ISSN 1877-0428,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.331.[3] D. Hay, H. Wells and I. Kinchin, Quantitative and qualitative measures of student learning at Universitylevel. Higher Education. Volume 56, 2008, Pages 221-239. 10.1007/s10734-007-9099-8.[4] C. Bodnar and E. Barrella.. ""Master" Entrepreneurial Mindset Concept
provide a similar,enriching first-year experience that equips students with the tools and mindset necessary forlong-term success. The pilot implementation of this model in the 2024-2025 academic year,along with subsequent assessments, will inform further refinement and ensure its effectiveness inmeeting the needs of engineering students.Background The FYS program for engineering students in Penn State has long been a fundamentalcomponent of the college’s curriculum, aimed at facilitating the transition from high school touniversity life. Historically, the program has encompassed 19 distinct FYS courses: one genericcourse for the entire college, 16 departmental courses tailored to specific engineering disciplines,and two special topics
the educationalexperience for first-year students in the introductory mining engineering course.References[1] N. Nelavai and S. Ramesh, "An Insight into the challenges faced by First Year Engineering Students: Poor Foundational Knowledge," Procedia Computer Science, pp. 823-830, 2020.[2] D. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of Learning and Development Second Edition, Pearson Education, 2015.[3] D. Rae and D. E. Melton, "Developing an entrepreneurial mindset in US engineering education: an international view of the KEEN project," The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 7, no. 3, 2017.[4] M. Peel, "Nobody Cares: The challenge of isolation in school to university transition," Journal of
track) award in September 2020.The primary focus of the RED project is to address program deficiencies through developingcourses to engage students earlier in the curriculum, integrating professional and advancedcomputational (i.e., applied artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics) skills,and revamping the sequence and structure of the curriculum with an overarching goal to enhancethe sense of belonging to the School, the major, and the profession. In addition, the School, inpartnership with three other programs at Georgia Tech, received a Kern EntrepreneurialEngineering Network (KEEN) grant from the Kern Family Foundation in March 2021 with theobjective to develop more holistic engineers with entrepreneurial mindset, which
education.Dr. Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Michelle Marincel Payne is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She earned her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, her M.S. in Environmental Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is co-leading a project to infuse an entrepreneurial-mindset in undergraduate students’ learning, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula
created, RSECS was becoming a National Academy of EngineeringGrand Challenge Scholars Program (NAE GCSP) school and incorporated that theme into newcourse offerings. Simultaneously, the school was also becoming part of the Kern EntrepreneurialEngineering Network (KEEN), and we incorporated many elements of KEEN into the sequenceof courses which stress the Entrepreneurial Mindset and the three C’s, Curiosity, Connections,and Creating Value. Through a series of student surveys during the inaugural years of thiscourse, it was clear that the methods and pedagogies used in this thematic course created anenvironment for non-major students to thrive and become curious about aerospace engineeringand space topics. This paper describes several of the
. [Accessed: Jun. 24, 2024].3. K. J. Donovan, J. J. Kellar, M. West, S. D. Kellogg, W. Cross, and C. M. Birrenkott, "Board 326: Investigating Creativity, Confidence, and an Entrepreneurial Mindset through Curricular Modification and Community Engagement," presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023.4. K. Donovan, J. Kellar, M. West, C. Birrenkott, S. Kellogg, D. Mitchell, and M. Whitehead, "Investigating the Impact of Arts on Student Learning by Introducing Glass Science in the Materials Engineering Curriculum," presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.5. K. J. Donovan, J. Kellar, M. K. West, C. M. Birrenkott, M. Whitehead, S. Kellogg, and D. Mitchell, "South Dakota Mines Art + Engineering
academic and professional pursuits. Project mentors attend weekly teammeetings to guide collaborative innovation projects. They mentor student teams as they navigatethe complexities of open-ended, real-world problems. By offering feedback on the feasibilityand impact ofproposed solutions and ensuring alignment with innovation objectives, project mentors helpteams develop creative and practical solutions.Learning coaches undergo a rigorous selection and training process overseen by faculty.Graduate students are identified and selected based on their demonstration of a growth mindset,entrepreneurial mindset, professionalism, strong communication skills, engagement, andpunctuality. To be considered, candidates must have successfully completed a prior
Paper ID #48223Assessing the Impact of Makerspace Workshops on Breaking Academic SilosThrough Cross-Disciplinary CollaborationMitra Varun Anand, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Mitra Anand serves as the Director of Makerspaces and Innovation Studio, in addition to being an Adjunct Faculty of Mechanical Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Anand’s research interests lie in combining hands-on Maker skills with an entrepreneurial mindset and value creation, aiming to develop practical solutions for real-world problems. He is enthusiastic about innovation in engineering education, design thinking, prototyping
) from Wichita State University (WSU) in Kansas. Dr. Lynch has 30 years of global industry experience, particularly aerospace. Dr. Lynch now serves as an Associate Teaching Professor in the Applied Engineering department and as an Adjunct in ISME at WSU. His research interests include Engineering Education, Leadership, Mentoring and Lean Six Sigma. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Building an Engineering Entrepreneurial Mindset through reverse engineering using a Lean Six Sigma approach Mostafa Mohammad Adam Carlton Lynch, PhD Applied Engineering Department
her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, her M.S. in Environmental Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is co-leading a project to infuse an entrepreneurial-mindset in undergraduate students’ learning, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula. Michelle also mentors undergraduate researchers to investigate the removal of stormwater pollutants in engineered wetlands. Michelle was a 2018 ExCEEd Fellow, and was recognized as the 2019 ASCE Daniel V. Terrell
stakeholders and their needs.Since 1998, faculty associated with the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) havedescribed curiosity, connections, and creating value as the Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM), a mindsetwe want our graduates to have. (Note: we’re not talking about small businesses but rather educatingengineers who understand the stakeholders in what they do and who can make the world a betterplace.)Faculty can build on all the work that KEEN has put together at EngineeringUnleashed.com whereactive learning, problem-based learning, curiosity modules, and stakeholder analysis becomes thefocus for any of hundreds of classes. The site includes classroom activities as short as 2-5 minutesto engage students with questions like, “But why
mindset around the design of biomedicaldevices, students will also learn about the various stages and considerations for a startup, in thecontext of the LEAN methodology.Weeks 3-7 Weeks 3-7 of the course overlap with the concurrent Clinical Immersion Experience(CLINEX) where students rotate through clinical departments each week observing proceduresin a clinical setting. During this time participants work with their clinical mentor to observe andidentify “pain points” and potential opportunities for entrepreneurial project development. Eachteam brings their observations back to the SIDE course for discussion with the entire cohort. Thisreporting takes place in the form of a “Student Grand Rounds” type reporting, where studentspresent on cases or
2) an evaluation phase where participants assessed ChatGPT’s performance incompleting these tasks. These activities were designed to improve GAI literacy while alsobuilding the 3 Cs of the entrepreneurial mindset (connection-building, curiosity, and creatingvalue) [11].The survey portion of the activity included ten different tasks for participants to evaluate. Foreach task, participants were asked to rate their confidence that ChatGPT would be able tocomplete the task on a scale from 1-5 with 1 being “not confident at all” and 5 being “veryconfident”. Participants were instructed to not complete any testing during this phase. Further,these tasks were designed to be relevant to the participant group, so each of the three groups hadslightly
oncuriosity, connections, and creating value. These 3Cs are the tenets of the entrepreneurialmindset (EM), a mindset, or mental habits, necessary for engineers to excel at problemidentification, innovation, and value creation [1]. While motivation and autonomy might not bedirect facets of EML, they are linked with the 3Cs, and provide students the opportunity to takeownership of their learning. Furthermore, an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) instills in studentssuch attributes as uncertainty tolerance, opportunity recognition, and healthy competition [2].Research has shown that a student’s motivation in a given educational assessment directlyinfluences their creativity, as well as critical thinking skills [3]. Related to motivation, inclusiveclassroom
break free from theconstraints of traditional, costly commercial textbooks. The financial impact of commercialtextbooks often causes students undue stress [1]. Beyond cost-saving, OER allow instructors totailor content to their courses, rather than the course adapting to the textbook. This creates a moredynamic and relevant learning environment, with no negative impact on learning outcomes[2].The Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) recognizes the need for engineeringstudents to develop skills desirable by employers beyond the analytical capabilities taught in astandard engineering curriculum, such as communication and interdisciplinary thinking. TheEntrepreneurial Mindset (EM) emphasizes the importance of these skills through the
Paper ID #46280WIP: Introducing thriving in a first-year engineering courseMs. Alexandra Mary Jackson, Rowan University Alexandra Jackson is a fourth year PhD student at Rowan University seeking a specialization in Engineering Education. She began her research in Rowan’s Experiential Engineering Education Department in the Fall of 2019, and has developed interests in entrepreneurial mindset and student development. In particular, she is interested in assessment of entrepreneurial mindset through both quantitative and qualitative methods, including self-report, concept mapping assessment, and narrative inquiry. She was
, Programming Languages, Dynamic Control, Robotics, and Numerical Methods & Simulations. She has developed several undergraduate courses in the MTDE program for the first time and made significant curriculum changes to other courses in the department. Her research focuses on Computational Fluid Dynamics, numerical analysis, and applied mathematics. Dr. Shaw serves on the editorial board for two journals, successfully won an NSF I-Corp Grant in 2016 as the entrepreneurial lead for commercializing a high-efficiency, cost-effective research product, and actively reviews for several top-tier journals. She holds various leadership positions within the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and has authored 25 peer-reviewed
resource, are accessible, reusable, andadaptable learning tools that can be utilized to advance learning and professional development[13]. Additional work has shown that learning effectiveness is related to the integration of RLOsinto learning activities [15]. Prior RLO efforts have made use of games [16] and student-produced artifacts [17]. RLOs tend to be reusable for the instructors who oversee updates [16] orstatic, non-living products produced by the student, such as portfolios [18]. ThisCustomer/Career Discovery Bootcamp aims to provide RLOs in the form of a mindset andtoolkit approach for students to adopt that can guide and inform current and ongoing careerchoices.Defining short-term and longer-term career goals relies upon self-reflection
.[4] Roszelle, Breigh. “Implementing Mastery Based CAD Activities into an Introduction to Engineering Design Course to Develop Entrepreneurial Mindset.” 131st Annual ASEE Conference, Portland OR, June 23rd-26th 2024.
/44260.[3] A. R. Carberry, H.-S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, “Measuring engineering design self-efficacy,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01043.x[4] L. A. DiBerardino III, L. Funke, and D. R. Mikesell, “Incorporating the entrepreneurial mindset into a system dynamics course,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/1-2–30648. Salt Lake City, Utah: ASEE Conferences, June 2018, https://peer.asee.org/30648.
equilibrium had statisticallyno significant impact on students learning. Students from the “active” group remainedenthusiastic about the instructor and the taught material the whole semester. On the other hand,several students from the “passive” group did not enjoy the course. Future work will incorporateflipped class principles [10] to allow time for more activities in the classroom.AcknowledgmentThe KEEN national workshop on “Embedding Entrepreneurial Mindset in Civil Engineering:Structures and Mechanics (EMCE)” motivated the creation of this work.References[1] B. Dogani, “Active learning and effective teaching strategies,” Int. Jn. of Advanced NaturalSciences and Engineering Researches, vol. 7(4), pp. 136-142, 2023.[2] E. L. Dolan and J.P. Collins
, embedded systems, and industrial communication networks, he brings a unique blend of academic and practical expertise to his research and teaching. Dr. Ma is a Certified ScrumMaster® and has pioneered the use of Scrum practices in engineering education, creating innovative curriculum models such as the ”Tiered Educational Scrum Model” and ”Mini Scrum” for student-centered project-based learning. His work aims to cultivate an entrepreneurial mindset among engineering students through active learning approaches. Dr. Ma has also authored multiple publications on integrating agile practices into engineering education, presented at major conferences such as IEEE Frontiers in Education and ASEE Annual Exposition.Dr
guidance and insufficientcollaboration, difficulty in understanding concepts, and time management issues were noted,indicating areas where additional support could enhance the lab experience. Furthermore, whilemany students felt confident in applying what they learned to real-world problems, a substantialportion expressed moderate confidence, reflecting the need for continued efforts to ensure thatstudents feel fully prepared for professional applications. More diverse activities, structuredguidance, and better equipment could help address these concerns and lead to a more satisfyinglab experience.Open-ended labs are a powerful tool for fostering and entrepreneurial mindset in engineeringstudents because they go beyond traditional structured