Collection

2025 ASEE -GSW Annual Conference

Authors

Hoo Kim, LeTourneau University; joshua ryan millikan, LeTourneau University; Joonwan Kim, LeTourneau University; Alan Clipperton, LeTourneau University

through leadership training, ethical grounding, and exposure toarts and culture, ensuring our graduates are well-rounded innovators and leaders. As a work inprogress, the authors will continue efforts to conduct an effective assessment of studentoutcomes, incorporating more quantitative data, such as the number of students participating infield trips, coursework, and senior design projects. Additionally, interviews with former studentsregarding their internships and involvement will be included. A change model applicable toLeTourneau University’s business model will also be introduced and implemented. Invitation for Future CollaborationThe authors propose three key aspects for companies and educational institutions

Collection

2025 Northeast Section Conference

Authors

Mina Gaber Wahba Ibrahim; Xingguo Xiong; Navarun Gupta; Ahmed El-Sayed El-Sayed

sending the data to the server and encrypted it needed.as Flask based web server gives a simple with high speedoutperformance with simple integration between the ArduinoWi-Fi and the raspberry pi 5.D. Experimental Setup For ethical consideration all experiments were conducted ina controlled environment to ensure safety and minimize theenvironmental risk by wearing the proper PPE and preparing thefire stop equipment in case needed. And all the experiments weresupervised to prevent accidents. Fig. 8. Shows the hemlock needles tree branch was unsuccessfully ignited. The outdoor experiments were conducted on a rainy

Conference Session

Professional Papers

Collection

2025 ASEE Southeast Conference

Authors

Chaohui Ren, Auburn University; Cheryl Seals, Auburn University; Nilanjana Raychawdhary, Auburn University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Professional Papers

, Analysis, and Impact Assessment2.4.1 Data CollectionThe data for this study were retrospectively collected from Canvas, the learning management sys-tem utilized for the courses. Four datasets were analyzed: two for Exam 1 (2022 Fall and 2023Spring) and two for Exam 2 (2022 Fall and 2023 Spring). These datasets contain aggregated itemanalysis reports that summarize question-level metrics such as Correct Ratio, Difficulty Index, andPoint Biserial correlations. No individual student information was included, ensuring the analysiswas entirely anonymized and ethically sound.The 2022 Fall data represent baseline student performance prior to the implementation of anyenhanced teaching strategies. In contrast, the 2023 Spring data reflect the impact of

Conference Session

CANCELLED: Track 5: Technical Session 6: Think-Aloud Insights: Exploring QuantCrit Challenges and Diverse Survey Responses Among Undergraduate Engineering Students

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Sheila Kathryn Castro, University of Florida; Bruce Frederick Carroll, University of Florida; Janice Mejía, Northwestern University; Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

them navigatesocial situations. Kyle noted that while student friendships have helped to support himacademically, they also encouraged him to maintain a consistent diet.Resistant CapitalWhen asked whether they believed completing their degree would contribute to combatingstereotypes about those who share their social identities, participants acknowledged theunderrepresentation of their identities in STEM but expressed not viewing it as a significant issue.Similarly, participants believed their peers shared values and attitudes like their own. Althoughpolitics was mentioned, it was not seen as important for undergraduate degree completion.Rather, they focused on shared academic values, work ethic, and morals. Contrary to findings inthe

Collection

2025 Northeast Section Conference

Authors

Noha Alharbi; Peter Cavanaugh

, “Can women entrepreneurs thrive in Saudi Arabia?,” Entreprendre & Innover, no. 2, pp. 100–109, 2021.including descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, and [7] A. Salamzadeh, L. P. Dana, J. Ghaffari Feyzabadi, M. Hadizadeh, andcorrelation analysis to test hypotheses and validate findings H. Eslahi Fatmesari, “Digital technology as a disentangling force for[90]. Ethical considerations, including data privacy, women entrepreneurs,” World, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 346–364, 2024.participant consent, and adherence to IRB

Collection

2025 Northeast Section Conference

Authors

Srilekha Bandla; Mukesh Reddy Jonnala; Peiqiao Wu; Sarosh Patel; Xingguo Xiong

pharmaceutical treatment, achieving automated epilepsymanagement, potentially leading to more rapid and effective acteristic. The treatment options available to patients withseizure suppression. epilepsy do not work for one-third of people with drug- The implementation utilizes the MPU6050 accelerometer for resistant epilepsy (DRE), thus requiring different therapeuticactivity recognition and AD8232 for ECG activity recognition, approaches [1]. Ethical standards endorse Vagus Nerve Stim-combining these data with ECG readings to minimize false ulation (VNS) as an effective treatment solution for

Collection

2025 Northeast Section Conference

Authors

Marvin Gayle; Danny Mangra

with minimal instructor interaction. All of thisemerging technologies that will engage students more fully are could raise several ethical issues around instructor vs AIhighlighted below [11]. assessments of students. The other challenge arises if the AI is driving the troubleshooting process and thinking through the Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR) Labs. The sets needed to troubleshoot, leaving to a significant reductionhope is that VR and AR tools will become cost

Collection

2025 ASEE North Central Section (NCS) Annual Conference

Authors

Trevor Joseph Bihl, Wright State University; Terry Lynn Oroszi, Wright State University; Subhashini Ganapathy, Wright State University; Jeffrey B. Travers, Wright State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Conference Session

Track 3: Technical Session 1: Bridging Educational Equity Gaps: A Systematic Review of AI-Driven Tools for Students Living with Disabilities in Engineering and STEM Education

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Kevin Zhongyang Shao, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Eric Kyeong-Min Cho, University of Washington; Sophia Tang, University of Washington; Hanlin Ma, University of Washington; Sep Makhsous, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

by improving social interactions and personalized learning. Italso discusses the limitations of existing AI tools, emphasizing the need for future developmentsto focus on personalization to cater to individual learning needs more effectively while takingprivacy and ethical considerations into account.Rather than focusing purely on NDDs, Bhatti et al. [17] analyzed diverse applications of AItechnologies aimed at assisting students with not only dyslexia and dyscalculia but also a widerspectrum of learning disabilities. Similar to the review by Barua et al., this study also examinedliterature involving facial expressions and eye-tracking analysis to monitor students’engagement. The authors highlight the potential of AI to provide personalized

Conference Session

Track 7: Technical Session 4: Diversity in STEM: Strategies of Professional Engineering Organizations in Recruiting and Retaining Women from Minority-Serving Institutions

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Rebeca Petean, Society of Women Engineers; Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

additional questions thatprompt questions aimed to explore individual experiences and capture nuanced recruitmentexperiences.The study's protocol was submitted for Institutional Review Board (IRB) review and was exemptfrom full review. To ensure the confidentiality of all participants in this study, the researchersexplained the interview's purpose and format, obtaining consent for recording, and consent toparticipate in the study. Moreover, a direct line of contact information was provided forfollow-up inquiries, and participants were given the verbal option to omit or add any informationwithin two months from the start of the interview. Adhering to ethical standards and privacylaws, all participants were fully informed about the terms of their

Conference Session

CANCELLED: Track 6: Technical Session 1: A Student-Centered, Theory-Informed, Integrated Model to Academic and Career Advising to Educate the Whole Engineer: Transforming Engineering Education and Broadening Participation in Engineering is Possible!

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University; Melissa C Kenny, Wake Forest University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity