generation college students and other underrepresented groups such as genderand ethnicity8, 23, 24. Results of Flores23 show that traditional versus non-traditional contextualvariables influenced the strength of the linkage between interests, career self-efficacies, and Page 23.429.5career choices for Mexican Americans. Research specific to supports and barriers includes workconcerning coping efficacy versus barriers relative to the process variables for obtaining outcomeexpectations25 and a comparison of Bandura’s model to SCCT for contextual support andbarriers in engineering majors26. Qualitative research using SCCT includes research onengineering
”, Commissioned by the NCSU Friday Institute, 2007, http://www.tdhah.com/site_files/Teacher_Resources/MUVE/MUVE%20Documents/Dede_21stC- skills_semi-final.pdf36. Gardenfors, P. and Johansson, Cognition, Education, and Communication Technology, Routledge, 2005.37. Marra, R. and Bogue, B., “Women Engineering Students Self Efficacy – A Longitudinal Multi- Institution Study”, http://www.x-cd.com/wepan06/pdfs/18.pdf38. Akl, R., Keathly, D., and Garlick, R., “Strategies for Retention and Recruitment of Women and Minorities in Computer Science and Engineering”, http://www.cse.unt.edu/~rakl/AKG07.pdf39. Tindall, T., and Hamil, B., “Gender Disparity on Science Education: The Causes, Consequences, and Solutions”, Education, Vol. 125, Issue 2
presentations in “regular” communication classes and those who have participated in Idol students’ attitudes and self-efficacy about public speaking factors that motivate students to participate.Literature reviewOnce we saw how well-received Idol was, we put together some quick survey questions,gathered some data from students, and then went back to see where our research fit in theexisting literature. We knew from the beginning that Idol could add important contributions toresearch into communication skills in engineering, and research on student motivation andpersistence. We also recognized that Idol is a good example of faculty and student collaboration,interdisciplinary initiatives, and that it shared many of the qualities of
competency was removed as the focus groupdata demonstrated that it was a difficult competency to assess due to interpretation and itsassessments were highly correlated with those of motivate others on the team to do their best,and encourage progress to meet goals and deadlines. Since the essence of this competency wasalready encompassed in other competencies it was deemed redundant and eliminatedWithin the relational aspect, two competencies were removed: accept feedback about strengthsand weaknesses and collaborate effectively. The accept feedback competency was removed asfeedback is a form of suggestion for improvement, and this competency was seen as the self-efficacy component that is a precursor to the competency adopt suggestions from other
Engineering Beer’s Law ModuleDesign Process Portfolio Scoring RubricEngineering Cartilage Regeneration! Summer Physics Camp for GirlsClues to becoming a STEM Major: How the Top 5 STEM Projects in IndependentSAT Questionnaire and AP exam taking Schoolspatterns & performance can predict STEMmajorsAppendix BConcurrent Session C Concurrent Session DResearch and Curriculum: Biofilms and Inspired Design: Engaging Girls in STEMDeutschland through Product DevelopmentEngineering, implementing and assessing a Engaging Girls in STEM: What therich STEM educational experience research showsImproving Girls' Self-Efficacy Micro-messages: The
statement to their peers of their academic failures.4 Students who are notconfident in their ability to perform well in a course are more likely to seek help than their moreconfident peers.7 A 2004 study done at Texas A&M University demonstrated that students whowere more engaged in supplemental instruction had significantly lower self-efficacy, butachieved higher final course grades.7The personality of the tutor is also an important factor students consider when seeking extrahelp.5 Students feel that traits associated with a good tutor are empathy, patience, sensitivity,diplomacy, friendliness, intuitiveness, supportiveness, responsiveness, and care.8 If students feelthat tutors are arrogant or not empathetic to their concerns, they are
, and 82 teachers completed a questionnaire concerning amount of homeworkassigned by teachers, portion of assignments completed by students, and attitudes abouthomework. Upon collection of student achievement measures, the authors found weak relationsbetween the amount of homework assigned and student achievement, and positive relationsbetween the amount of homework students completed and achievement, especially at uppergrades (6-12). Hoover-Dempsey et al.[16] reviewed research on parental involvement in studenthomework, and found that parents involve themselves in student homework because they believethat they should be involved, believe that their involvement will make a positive difference, andperceive that their children or children's
significant.There may also be differences between lateral and vertical transfer students in GPA and otherstudent outcomes. Specifically, in a study of one-time transfers who were non-science and non-professional majors, Kirk-Kuwaye and Kirk-Kuwaye15 found that vertical transfer students Page 23.39.5scored higher than lateral transfers on three out of four measures of engagement: active andcollaborative learning, a supportive campus environment, and enriching educational experiences.The lateral transfer students scored higher than vertical transfers on the student-facultyinteraction measure. The authors conclude that because of the inconsistency in culture
kit (http://www.pasco.com/). Calculate the bar forces of truss bridge under static loads. Measure the bar forces of truss bridge under static loads. Measure the bar forces of truss bridge under dynamic traffic loads. Compare the bar forces under static and dynamic loads. Prepare project report and presentation.Electrical Engineering Project: Mini TimerThe Electrical Engineering group project uses the BASIC Stamp Activity Kit from Parallax, Inc.(http://www.parallax.com/) to achieve the following objectives: Understand basic circuits principles. Understand circuit elements, symbols and diagrams. Design, build and test simple circuits. Understand the basics of microcontrollers. Learn concepts of
as microteaching) is a practice that is recommended by Prieto, Yamokoski, & Meyers(2007) for graduate student development because the practice helps increase TAs’ self-efficacy.21 Page 23.136.3During the 5-minute practice teaching, TAs plan & present a topic, reflect on their teaching withthe support of a trained facilitator (often a peer teaching mentor) and provide feedback to a smallgroup of their peers about their teaching. For students where English is their second language,we ask students to self-select into microteaching sessions where there is at least one facilitatorwho is trained to provide English language feedback and
mentors and mentees, not on any official recommendations or suggestions.While the mentors were generally positive and optimistic program participants, differences ininitial assumptions or assumed understanding of program expectations led to variedinterpretations of their self-efficacy as mentors. Early on, several mentors explained theirperspectives on the difficulties of being a mentor without a clearly established structure: “Since she [my mentee] can only work on my primary project, she’s just been reading papers that are way over her head and helping me order stuff. The phase my project has been in is not hands-on. This lack of flexibility has also made meeting with her a drain on my time…When structured well
. Page 23.1149.148. Grasso, D., and Martinelli, D. (2008). Holistic Engineering: The Dawn of a New Era for the Profession. In G. Madhavan, B. Oakley, & L. Kun (Eds.), Career development in bioengineering and biotechnology. (pp. 303- 307). New York, NY: Springer.9. Henderson, W. D., & Cudahy, R. D. (2005). From Insull to Enron: Corporate (re)regulation after the rise and fall of two energy icons. Energy Law Journal, 26, 35-110.10. Hoel, M., & Kverndokk, S. (1996). Depletion of fossil fuels and the impacts of global warming. Resource and Energy Economics, 18(2), 115-136. doi:10.1016/0928-7655(96)00005-X.11. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student