Conference Session

NSF Grantees: S-STEM 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kim Bullington, Old Dominion University; Cynthia Tomovic, Old Dominion University; Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Anthony W. Dean, Old Dominion University; Rafael Landaeta, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

manners”. ASEE Prism. American Society for Engineering Education. 2005. vol. 15. no. 4. pp. 45.[10] B. Horn. “A reflection on leadership: A comparative analysis of military and civilian approaches,” 2014, Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, vol 15. No. 3.[11] Y. Xue, R. Larson. “STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes”. 2015. Website. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800410/ (Accessed November 7, 2019)[12] A. Barr, A. “From the battlefield to the schoolyard: The short-term impact of the Post-9/11 G.I. Bill”. The Journal of Human Resources, 2015. vol. 50. no. 3. pp. 580-613.[13] A. W. Radford, A. Bentz, R. Dekker, J. Paslov, J. “After the Post-9/11 G.I. Bill: A profile of military service

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Learning Tools (Hands On)

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College; Lee W. Singleton, Whatcom Community College; Todd Haskell, Western Washington University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

subgroups.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grantnumbers DUE #1834425 and DUE #1834417. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe NSF.References[1] O. Ha and N. Fang, "Spatial Ability in Learning Engineering Mechanics: Critical Review," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 142, no. 2, p. 04015014, 2015.[2] J. G. Cromley, J. L. Booth, T. W. Wills, B. L. Chang, N. Tran, M. Madeja, T. F. Shipley and W. Zahner, "Relation of Spatial Skills to Calculus Proficiency: A Brief Report," Mathematical Thinking and Learning, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 55-68, 2017.[3] S. A. Sorby

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Diversity 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Richard A. Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Russell Andrew Long; Hossein EbrahimNejad, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Hassan Ali Al Yagoub, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

January 6, 2020.[13] S. M. Lord, “Retention and Persistence in Engineering: Data, Issues, and Ideas,” Benton Lecture for Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, April 18, 2019.[14] S. M. Lord, “Persistence in Engineering: Research and Reflections,” UCI Education Research Initiative Invited Seminar, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA, May 23, 2019.[15] M. W. Ohland, “We value what we measure: Exploring data quality and the challenges of working with pre-existing data structures,” Florida International University, School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education, Miami, FL, November 13, 2019.[16] M. W. Ohland, “Lessons

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Faculty Development 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lea K. Marlor, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Madison E. Andrews, University of Texas at Austin; Bobbie Bermudez, University of Oregon; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas at Austin; Laura J. Carroll, University of Michigan; Nicholette Marie DeRosia, University of Oregon ; Matthew Charles Graham; Jenefer Husman, University of Oregon; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

resistance. The study also hopes to provide answers of if students are actuallyresisting active learning, as well as the instructors’ perception of this resistance.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant NoDUE-1821488. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] Dancy, M., Henderson, C., &; Turpen, C. (2016). How faculty learn about and implementresearch-based instructional strategies: The case of Peer Instruction. Physical Review PhysicsEducation Research, 12(1), 010110.[2] Gradinscak, M. (2011). Redesigning engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: REU 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Subodh Bhandari, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Fang Tang, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Zekeriya Aliyazicioglu, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Amar Raheja, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Erika DeJonghe, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

, while I had not made up my mind on going to graduate school before,I now am certain that I want to get a masters.” Increased interest in Graduate schools is also seenin Figure 6, which shows the participant responses to survey questionnaire before and afterparticipation. Figure 6. Student responses to pre- and post-participation survey questions (average of 2017, 2018, and 2019 ratings).3. Lifelong Learning Skills and Acquisition of Interdisciplinary KnowledgeFigures 5 and 6 also show that the program has been able to instill lifelong learning skills in theparticipants and increase their knowledge of other disciplines. Mentor and participant qualitativefeedback reflected the value of participant exposure to the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Faculty Development 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University; Anastasia P. Samaras, George Mason University; Lori C. Bland, College of William and Mary

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

.[9] R.M. Felder and R. Brent, Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass, 2016.[10] S.B. Merriam, Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Jossey-Bass, 2001.[11] J. Saldana, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 2013.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1347675 (DUE). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: S-STEM 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tuncay Aktosun, University of Texas at Arlington; Yolanda Parker, Tarrant County College; Jianzhong Su, University of Texas at Arlington

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

our third funding cycle. The crucial information for our SURGE program is providedin Table 1 below, where the figures reflect the status quo [2] as of February 2020. We supported123 students; 2 of whom quit without getting a bachelor’s degree, 101 have obtained theirbachelor’s degrees, and 20 making timely progress toward their bachelor’s degrees. About 32%of the supported students have been URMs. 123 scholars supported 101 degree recipients 20 continuing 45% women 43% women 55% women 55% men 57% men 45% men 32% URMs 30% URMs 45% URMs Table 1. The supported student

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Student Learning 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Matthew A. Verleger Ph.D. (He/His/Him), Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Farshid Marbouti, San Jose State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

) demonstrated – 1 point; or not – 0 points 3 options (levels) fully – 2 points; partially – 1 point; or not demonstrated – 0 points 4 options (levels) fully – 3 points; some – 2 points; less – 1 point; or not demonstrated – 0 pointsIn the development of this rubric, reflection on the previous implementation of a similar problemwere considered – findings discussed by Rodgers et al. [28]. The two biggest changes were: (1)rubric items related to the shareability dimension were incorporated in and (2) some rubric itemshad more levels rather than having as many dichotomous rubric items. The first change was toadd another dimension of analysis in the study. The second change was primarily based on thedifferent context of the problem aligned better with

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: First Year Programming (2)

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Catherine L. Cohan, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Pradip K. Bandyopadhyay, Pennsylvania State University, Berks; Ryan Scott Hassler, Penn State University, Berks; Mark William Johnson, Pennsylvania State University, Altoona; Michael Kagan, Pennsylvania State University, Abington; Ann Marie Schmiedekamp; Peter J. Shull, Pennsylvania State University, Altoona; Peter J. Butler, Pennsylvania State University; Tonya L. Peeples, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Junior Year Participant Comparison Discussion and Conclusions We are grateful to the National Science Foundation for supporting the SustainableBridges project. Please note that any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation. The data presented here on the first three cohorts of theEngineering Ahead first-year bridge program for pre-major Engineering students is part of thelarger Sustainable Bridges project (#1525367). The preliminary results are promising for the first three cohorts of the first-year

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: S-STEM 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Scott Steinbrink, Gannon University; Adam Finn Nogaj; Karinna M. Vernaza, Gannon University; Lin Zhao, Gannon University; Saeed Tiari, Gannon University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

was supported with funding from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Arendale, D. (1997). SI (SI): Review of research concerning the effectiveness of SI from theUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City and other institutions from across the United States.[2] Dawson, P., van der Meer, J., Skalicky, J., & Cowley, K. (2014). “On the effectiveness of SI: Asystematic review of SI and peer-assisted study sessions literature between 2001 and 2010” Review ofEducational Research, 84 (4), 609–639.[3] Scott Steinbrink, Karinna M. Vernaza, Barry J. Brinkman

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Workforce Development (ATE)

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

was above 4.0/5.0 across all topics in both manufacturingexcellence session and manufacturing quality excellence session [25]. That being said, averagescore for the non-destructive evaluation (NDE) module in Manufacturing Quality Excellencesession was slightly lower (approximately 3.75/5.0) than those for other modules. The lowerscore for NDE could be explained due to the larger amount and more technical nature of thelearning materials as reflected in the participant’s open-ended comments. In overall, the higherthan target (3.5/5.0) course evaluation scores demonstrated that the professional developmentsessions were able to meet course objectives in terms of renewing/enhancing participants’ HVMskills set.5. ConclusionsThe National Science

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Workforce Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Marcia A. Mardis, Florida State University; Faye R. Jones, Florida State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

pertaining to female and minority hiring and participation. The unit of analysis is the transcript of each interview or focus group. Researchers will also calculate the extent of match between AM educators’ perceptions and AM standards/certifications as well as use established instruments to measure the extent to which the new professionals report entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial intentions [27-29].Sampling NoteRural NW Florida is highly diverse, with over 30% of residents reporting that they are black,Hispanic, or of multiple races; the enrollments of the participating state colleges reflect theircommunities. Because an intent of this project is to increase participation in AM education andcareers, the research team will reach out to

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: RED 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Rick Olson, University of San Diego; Chell A. Roberts, University of San Diego; Caroline Baillie, University of San Diego; Odesma Onika Dalrymple, University of San Diego; Leonard A. Perry, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

-Fitzpatrick and G. D. Hoople, “Cultivating an Entrepreneurial Mindset: An Interdisciplinary Approach Using Drones,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 3, 2019. www.advances.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/vol07/issue03/Papers/AEE-25- Hoople.pdf15 G. D. Hoople, A. Choi-Fitzpatrick, and E. Reddy, “Drones for Good: Interdisciplinary Project Based Learning Between Engineering and Peace Studies,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1378-1391, 2019. https://www.ijee.ie/latestissues/Vol35-5/12_ijee3801.pdf16 E. Reddy, G. D. Hoople, and A. Choi-Fitzpatrick, “Interdisciplinarity in Practice: Reflections on Drones as a Classroom Boundary Object,” Journal of Engineering Studies, vol. 11

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Learning Tools (Hands On)

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Blake Herren, University of Oklahoma; Nyree Mason; Firas Akasheh, Tuskegee University; Gül E. Okudan Kremer, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma; Yingtao Liu, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

lower than expected correction rates,indicating the necessity to enhance undergraduate solid mechanics education. Considering overallperformance by category provides additional evidence with regards to the limited understandingamong students on the multi-scale nature of materials and linkages to observed mechanicalbehavior and properties, Figure 5 (f). The collected student data indicates that although most ofthe students were able to identify the meaning of each keyword and categorize them properly inthe “materials processing” category (77% of students correctly categorized the keywordsbelonging to “materials processing” category), the macro-scale mechanics parameter resultsindicate significant misconceptions as reflected by the observation

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Student Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eduardo Santillan-Jimenez, University of Kentucky; Qing Duan, University of Cincinnati; Jacinda K. Dariotis, University of Cincinnati; Mark Crocker, University Kentucky

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

pre-and post-test surveys as well as program activity attendance, course enrollment, and mentoringteam constellation will be used.EQ3, “To what extent are student and faculty competencies and interdisciplinary andtransdisciplinary skills changing over the course of the training program? Additionally, to whatextent are these changes reflected in longer-term outcomes?,” is an outcome evaluation questionfocusing on competency, technical, and professional skills change over the programimplementation. Data from or about NRT trainees, students attending open activities, andstudents receiving no program exposure (retrospective cohort) data will be compared usinginstitutional research sources, faculty-administered student competency assessments, and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Entrepreneurship

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Magdalini Z. Lagoudas, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, University of Cincinnati; Rodney Boehm, Texas A&M University; Samantha Asbell, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

1, 33 < 0.001 0.319D. Learning Environments and Course EvaluationAs shown in Figure 8, students were all positive in describing the learning environment createdduring the course, such as collegial, motivating, productive, innovative, and positivelychallenging. While the course was neither harsh nor exhausting, it might be somewhat stressful,considering the rate of 4.28 over the neutral point.Figure 8. The Site learning environmentStudents all positively reflected the delivery of the Site program as shown in Figure 9.Figure 9. Overall delivery of the Site programThe effects of the Site program were all positive in their future plans, as presented in Figure 10.Figure 10. Impact of the Site program on future plansIV. DiscussionAfter

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: REU 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Pavan Kumar Moturu, Texas A&M University; Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University; Prabhakar Reddy Pagilla, Texas A&M University; Satish Bukkapatnam, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

career following the REU experience.Acknowledgement: This research was supported by a REU Site grant from the National ScienceFoundation (# EEC 1757882). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendationspresented are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References 1. Aggies Invent : Solving Problems in 48 Hours, Engineering Entrepreneurship program, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, https://engineering.tamu.edu/student- life/aggies-invent/index.html (accessed, May1, 2020). 2. Nepal, B., Pagilla, P. R., Srinivasa, A., Bukkapatnam, S., Moturu, P., 2019, “Preparing Next Generation of Manufacturing Leaders: A case of REU site in Cybermanufacturing

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Diversity 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Doris J. Espiritu, Wilbur Wright College; Ruzica Todorovic, Wilbur Wright College

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Center 5. Continue the engineering specific tutoring and provide the engineering cohort leadership opportunities and a community in which they feel they can belong. 6. Create a programmatic pre-engineering track. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE-1832553. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Approved by the City Colleges of Chicago IRB (IRB2018007). 11[1] T. D. Holmlund, K. Lesseig, and D. Slavit

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Student Learning 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brian J. Skromme, Arizona State University; Caleb Redshaw, Arizona State University; Abhishek Gupta; Shatrughn Gupta, Arizona State University; Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; Hector Erives, University of Texas at El Paso; Deanna Bailey, Morgan State University; Willie L. Thompson II, Morgan State University; Srividya Kona Bansal, Arizona State University; Wendy M. Barnard, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

of the students at ASU, though some students there were also challenged by them.It may be desirable to introduce more features to customize the level of the exercises to differentstudent populations and to give instructors more flexibility on which levels they can choose toassign. Such adaptations will be explored in future work.The biggest differences between institutions appeared to be on the preference between CircuitTutor and other options, which may reflect the use of different electronic homework systems atdifferent institutions. For example, WileyPLUS is used at ASU and Pearson’s Fig. 5. Results of an end-of-semester survey at three different institutions in Fall 2019 covering the entire Circuit Tutor system (not just the topics

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: S-STEM 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sura Alqudah, Western Washington University ; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Joseph Arthur Brobst, Old Dominion University; Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University; Andrew G. Klein, Western Washington University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

projects course on student retention,” in Proceedings ASEE Conference and Exhibition, 2003.[19] C. B. Zoltowski and W. C. Oakes, “Learning by doing: Reflections of the epics program.” International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, vol. 9, 2014.[20] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academies Press, 2005.[21] J. A. Mejia, D. Drake, and A. Wilson-Lopez, “Changes in latino/a adolescents engineering self- efficacy and perceptions of engineering after addressing authentic engineering design challenges,” in Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2015, pp. 1–14.[22] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and