Asee peer logo
Displaying results 91 - 120 of 1849 in total
Conference Session
Decision-Making in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tim Ransom, Clemson University; Alysa Rose Lozano, University of Kentucky; Betul Bilgin, The University of Illinois Chicago; Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern University; Sindia M. Rivera-Jiménez, University of Florida; Katie Cadwell, Syracuse University; Gisella R Lamas Samanamud, University of Kentucky
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
' written reflections on ethical dilemmaswill be grouped according to three types of possible outcomes: client-based, company-based, andinnovation-based according to their answers to corporate social dilemmas. Students will have asurvey to determine what type of moral reasoning they adopt when they face an ethical dilemma.Students will be presented with an ethical decision-making scenario and answer it based on theirown individuality. The pre and post activity reflections will be compared to verify any changesin perspective in addressing the dilemma. The EM component to this decision-making activity isnot only mimicking decision-making situations as entrepreneurs, but it also includes thediscussion of the entrepreneurial mindset framework to either
Conference Session
Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED) Technical Session 2
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Karina Ivette Vielma, University of Texas at San Antonio; Robin Lynn Nelson, University of Texas at San Antonio; JoAnn Browning P.E., The University of Texas at San Antonio
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED)
the diverse individuals.Throughout the summer, students complete weekly guided reflections, and before and after theprogram, complete a pre- and post-assessment.MethodologyThis research study used mixed methods to collect data throughout the NHERI REU SummerProgram for a five (5) year period, which included five different cohorts of student researchers.The data collection is designed to follow a case study that is bound by time as studentsparticipate in the program together, attend the same events virtually, and provide the sameweekly deliverables. Although students have different experiences and perceptions based onindividual interactions at each of their sites, they are immersed as part of the community ofundergraduate researchers for the
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 4
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica A Kuczenski, Santa Clara University; Christelle Sabatier, Santa Clara University
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)
end of this course, students will be able to 1. Reflect on interests and potential career paths 2. Leverage existing digital technologies ethically and efficiently to solve the problem of how to create professional relationships from scratch 3. Perform outreach and schedule career conversations, via video chat, with professionals via warm networking and cold networking strategies 4. Effectively conduct career conversations (making small talk, active listening, asking smart questions, expressing gratitude, etc.) 5. Develop a professional brand, including an effective LinkedIn profile 6. Utilize newfound relationships to access
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Urszula Zalewski, Stony Brook University; Marianna Savoca, Stony Brook University; Monica Bugallo, Stony Brook University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
studentteam leader and held to co-develop the process, deliverables, timeline and implementation plans.Students complete bi-weekly personal journal reflections to unpack their experience throughoutthe term. Projects are presented at the end of the term with agency representatives attending. Peerevaluations are conducted, as well as periodic surveys and focus groups to understand theefficacy of the experiences for both students and community partners. Students report highsatisfaction with the experience, pointing to several gains: deeper understanding of the plight ofcommunities in need (e.g., homeless, seniors, underprivileged kids), skills they honed during theproject (e.g., essential skills such as organizational, communication, presentation
Conference Session
Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE) Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gon Namkoong, Old Dominion University; TIAN LUO, Old Dominion University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)
response to these trends, more engineering courses are being designed to incorporate moreinnovative, creative problem-solving skills2,3,4,5. Some examples include field trips or minicompetitions as a creative model to encourage creativity6. In addition, problem-based learningand critical thinking skills in the context of real-world problems have been integrated intoengineering education to facilitate students’ divergent thinking during the idea generation phase7.Among them, the most common instructional approach in engineering education is open-endeddesign projects, where the target product is not defined in order to allow creative opportunities3,5.One argument in favor of open-ended design projects is that students reflect on their owncreative
Collection
2024 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Annual Conference
Authors
Bhavana Kotla; Lisa Bosman
entrepreneurial mindsetin students, particularly engineering students (who work at the forefront of design, technology,and new product development). One such pedagogical intervention is photovoice, which hasbeen widely used in educational, social science, health, and non-traditional literature [3] as aresearch approach to problem-solving through the use of photo (e.g., image) and voice (e.g.,narrative reflection). Photovoice is based on three primary goals: 1) enable individuals to reflecton existing issues and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses, 2) promote critical dialoguethrough group discussions, and 3) initiate a call to action to drive social change. In recent years,photovoice has been extensively used in engineering education research to
Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 1: Student Experiences and Support
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katelyn Churakos, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Jayden Mitchell, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
examines the student perception and experience of solving open-endedmodeling problems (OEMPs) through an autoethnographic account of the student-authors’personal reflections about an OEMP completed during an introductory level statics course.Currently, the student perspective is not represented in literature about engineering problemsolving. This is significant as the student perspective is integral to understanding how studentslearn and develop an engineering mindset. By incorporating the student voice throughautoethnographic techniques, this study can begin to fill this gap and provide meaningful insightsabout the student experience and perceived benefits surrounding an OEMP.Autoethnography is an approach to research and writing that
Collection
15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE)
Authors
Lisa Lampe, University of Virginia; Esther Tian, University of Virginia
reflection and planning to take ideas back to their campus. Thepresentation will include advising standards, resources, and recommendations.Learning goals: Attendees will be able to name 2 best practices within Academic Advising thatare feasible to implement in their program.Content: We will review National Academic Advising (NACADA) definitions of academicadvising, advising values, and resources. We will also cover some terminology and most citedliterature on Advising Structures, and how academic advising should be seen as teaching [1]. Wewill also review the Academic Advising Handbook to help participants understand StudentLearning Outcomes (SLOs) and recommended assessment practices [2].Activities: The welcome will include a poll to hear more
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 17
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University ; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
developing feedback literacy. The framework also draws from Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick's [20] principles of good feedback practice, emphasizing the role of peer and self-assessment in feedback processes. In the context of Scrum, this dimension reflects the framework's collaborative nature, where feedback sources are not limited to the traditional instructor-student dynamic but include peers and self-reflection [22]. 2. Feedback Timing: Timeliness in feedback is highlighted by Hattie and Timperley's [19] model of effective feedback, which emphasizes the importance of immediate feedback in learning processes. This aspect is mirrored in the Scrum methodology, where regular sprint reviews and retrospectives [23] provide
Conference Session
Inclusive Horizons: Shaping Diverse Pathways in Engineering and Design Education
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Allison Murray, Marquette University; Lisa Chase, Marquette University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
human-centered design approach, (2) the intersection of socialjustice and design thinking, and (3) the implications of design choices on historicallymarginalized groups. Course artifacts, student reflections, and instructional team reflections areused to understand the growth in mindset of the students and instructor through this course.Additionally, these resources are used to present key learnings for future implementation.This project focused on examining systems. Groups historically excluded from engineering,including people of color, disabled, LGBTQ+, and women, were recentered through the humancentered design process. Students evaluated engineering systems for exclusion and ideated on thesource of these design flaws. In doing so, they
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 20
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dorothy Decontee Gocol, Florida International University; Helen Urpi Wagner-Coello, Florida International University; Monica E. Cardella, Florida International University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
narratives, storytellingevokes strong emotions and imparts significant insights while translating private experiencesinto publicly negotiated forms [11]. As such, storytelling has been recognized as a tool forenabling learning as well as a tool for sharing experiences within a community of practice [1]. Inour work we extend this by partnering with undergraduates to share their stories more broadly.Storytelling enables the storyteller to adjust the narrative according to the situation, putting themin charge of what they want to say and how they want to say it.Beyond the professional community and body of knowledge in engineering education, students'experiences, and their reflections on their experiences can potentially transform
Collection
2024 ASEE-GSW
Authors
John Carrell, Texas Tech University; Tirhas Hailu, Texas Tech University
University Tirhas A. Hailu Edward E. Whitacre Jr. College of Engineering Texas Tech University AbstractEngineers are increasingly looking for inspiration in the design of structures and processes to solveproblems in engineering practice. Bioinspired design uses nature as the influence and inspiration forcreating and improving designs. Through its application, bioinspired design has a long and expandinginfluence on human technology. As a reflection of this impact, more and more engineering collegesare incorporating bioinspired design into their curricula. Starting in the fall of 2020 the Texas
Collection
2024 South East Section Meeting
Authors
Elizabeth Zanin Flanagan, Clemson University; Kassidy Y. Maron, Clemson University; Angelina Cotto, Clemson University; Isha Vishal Raj, Clemson University; Ben S. Fields, Clemson University; Elijah Austin Wilbanks, Clemson University; Karen A High, Clemson University
people in this group, this CI is their first real experience with taking partin research, specifically qualitative research. Over the fall 2023 semester, the team has beencoding written student reflections using a priori coding [4] and we meet in a hybrid format. Theteam has processed over 100 pages of student reflection data on a curriculum intervention inengineering and improved their intercoder reliability continually over the past semester. Thegroup began to think about how they have grown as qualitative researchers and reflected on thefollowing questions to answer what has helped them grow as qualitative researchers. 1. What was it like to work on your first educational research project? Reflect on your classroom and out-of-class
Conference Session
Decision-Making in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tori N. Wagner, University of Connecticut; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Richard Tyler Cimino, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
score (n = 178, p = 0.65), butshowed a decrease of -3.38 in P score (n = 178, p = 0.017). This suggests that over four years,there is a reduction in students prioritizing decisions that were altruistic and based on universalgood. It is challenging to predict why this occurs, but we tentatively suggest that it may reflect amore accurate representation of students' thoughts on these ethical dilemmas. Additionally, itmight indicate a deeper consideration of the complex factors typically involved in real ethicaldecisions, rather than merely an abstract evaluation of what a reasonable engineer should do.Given these results and to gain a fuller understanding of students’ changes in ethical reasoningthroughout their undergraduate programs, we contend
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gemma Henderson, University of Miami; Ines Basalo, University of Miami; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
take action(and which action) toward educational goals that matter to them. In particular, the agencyframework posits that professional capital (such as that can be developed in a group coachingsetting) can broaden an individual's awareness of possible actions to reach their goals [13].Consequently, a group coaching model was implemented to equip EIFs with the necessary toolsto lead educational change at their HSI. Coaching, often misinterpreted as other forms ofprofessional development such as mentoring or consultation, is a unique practice that avoidsadvice-giving strategies and encourages a client to seek solutions within themselves [14], [15].This coaching model was designed to encourage reflective practice, broaden their community(thereby
Collection
15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE)
Authors
Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology
Alternatives: Apply brainstorming techniques to creatively solve the problem. ▪ Rapid Prototyping: Use available materials for quick prototyping. ▪ Mindful of Process: Describe and reflect on the design process. ▪ Visual Thinking: Document ideas and solutions visually in a design notebook.Over the span of just one week, students are introduced to the sequential steps of the designprocess and are afforded ample time to refine their designs. The challenge promotes iterativedesign through a tinkering pedagogical approach [4], which strikes a balance between rigorousengineering analysis and fostering creativity. Throughout the process, students meticulouslydocument their design journeys and engage in reflective exercises to evaluate their
Collection
15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE)
Authors
Haritha Malladi, University of Delaware
topodcasts, reading the transcripts, and/or creating podcasts or podcast scripts is in line withUniversal Design for Learning (UDL) guidelines of creating multiple means of engagement,representation, action and expression [2].The first and easiest method involves assigning students to listen to a podcast episodeaccompanied by a written reflection response. Podcast listening assignments are a goodalternative to assigning a reading. Before assigning students in course to listen to a podcastepisode, the author suggests polling students about their familiarity with podcasts and the use ofpodcast player apps. Many podcasts provide access to full transcripts for each episode, which canalso be provided to the students. An effective way to help students
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Tools for Planning and Evaluation of Design Projects
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Saeedeh Ziaeefard, The Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
communication.However, a noticeable gap emerged during PDR, CDR, and FDR presentation, where studentsoften fell short in providing adequate information to elucidate their design or present acomprehensive picture of the project's progress and completed work. When prompted for self-reflection, students expressed confusion, having adhered to the rubric, yet finding their workquality not meeting the expectations of sponsors and instructors. The critical missing elementwas identified as the quality of the presented work and the overall narrative. Students, engrossedin checking rubric boxes and conforming to rigid categories, inadvertently neglected the crucialinformation transformation process and the art of effective storytelling.The investigation unfolded in a
Conference Session
Transgression, Conflict, and Altruism
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephanie Hladik, University of Manitoba
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
liberatory pedagogy in bell hooks’ Teaching to Transgress. Ibegin by summarizing some key ideas from the book and subsequent calls for more liberatorypedagogies in engineering education. Next, I provide some context for my specific course as wellas my positionality. I discuss the course redesign along four themes: creating a community oflearning, transgressing against objectivity and apoliticism in engineering, promoting legitimacyand intellectual authority, and centering critical reflection. Finally, I conclude by reflecting onmy successes and challenges, and providing some lessons learned about “teaching to transgress”in an engineering technology and society course that I hope will be useful to instructors ofsimilar courses.BackgroundTeaching to
Collection
2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference
Authors
Carson Emeigh; Austin Griswold; Rumayel H. Pallock; Jaideep Sahni; Morgan Schake; Udochukwu Anuta; Jessica Deters; Sangjin Ryu
their prototype was functional but still needed improvement. After thesemester, students were each asked to reflect about the course. Altogether, students’ reflectionsshow that they perceived that they learned more, were more engaged, and were less stressed in thiscourse than in a traditional lecture-style course. Their learning spanned new knowledge, hands-onskills, research skills, professional skills, and problem-solving skills. While the students were notall able to directly use the knowledge gained through the course in their research, they all reportedgaining new skills or knowledge that will be transferrable to their future careers.KeywordsProject-based learning, plug-and-play motherboard, 3D printing, soft lithography
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 12
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alexis Gillmore, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Courtney June Faber, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
reflect further on themethodology and its potential for use in other engineering education research. Throughout thecase study section of the paper, we will use the terms we and the researchers to refer to the twoauthors of this paper and the participants to refer to the two people enrolled in our study. Outsideof our positionality statements, I will refer to the first author of this paper, Alexis Gillmore.Case study: Representing Researcher Identity with I-poemsResearch ContextIn the work presented here, we aimed to learn how members of an interdisciplinary researchteam represent their identities as researchers within the team. We expected that the participant-generated I-poem method we employed would lead to unique results compared to
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 23
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leslie Bostwick, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Alex George, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Trinity Lee, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Zachary Del Rosario, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
) framework to actively promote research quality.Our reflection data illustrate how numerical reporting conventions, formative life experiences,and professional aspirations can all affect a young engineer's perception of the relevance ofvariability. We conclude with a discussion of implications for instructional practice.IntroductionVariability—the phenomenon of non-identical values—is core to modern science. The movebeyond calculating averages to the study of real variation is one of the most important scientificdevelopments of the 19th century [1]. Ernst Mayr [2] positions variability as fundamental tounderstanding evolution through “population thinking.” Statistics as a discipline exists in largepart to develop techniques to study variability
Conference Session
ELOS Technical Session 3 - Diversity
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hannah Rosene Conover Kimmel, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Maya Sri Miriyala, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Hanwen Liang, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Megha Agrawal, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Kaitlyn Tuvilleja, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)
common thread from UDL, EM, and HCD is collaboratively identifying solutions to meet theneeds of many users. As such, methods from all three frameworks were applied throughout thisproject to identify potential improvements to the bioinstrumentation lab.Background on Participatory Action ResearchOne common application of participatory action research (PAR) is developing knowledge andidentifying opportunities for quality improvement. The PAR approach combines participants andexperts in the research of social practices [12]. Generally, PAR includes cycles of reflection,planning, action, and observation. In education, PAR can be employed by instructors who wishto improve their teaching or courses by gathering evidence of teaching effectiveness
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kenya Z. Mejia, California State University, Los Angeles; Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Lizabeth L Thompson P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Yilin Feng, California State University, Los Angeles; Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
” than tenured faculty [10].Another common difference is the higher rate of women and faculty of color that are in NTTfaculty positions compared to those in Tenure-Track positions [13]. This reality points tosystemic inequities, given that Tenure-Track Faculty are, on average, paid significantly morethan NTT faculty. Given the project’s overarching goal of creating more inclusive environmentsand helping those in the ecosystem “thrive” and “meet them where they are,” it was an organicstep to create this space specifically for NTT faculty, given the tremendous contribution theymake to the ecosystem, and their unique needs.Data and ParticipantsThe data for this paper includes both participant and facilitator reflections in the form of“minute-papers
Conference Session
Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD) Technical Session: Innovative Approaches to Teaching & Developing Engineering Leadership
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert Benjamin Simon, Georgia Institute of Technology; James Field; Lauren Stewart, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)
around student teamingis the distinction between academic settings and the environments students will experience inprofessional settings. This omission is problematic when juxtaposed to the motivation behindmuch of educators' work: to better prepare engineering students for the profession ofengineering. If classroom settings continue to be just that, students will continue to be ill-equipped for their transitions into the workforce. This paper tests a unique approach to studentteam formation, reflective journaling, and final grading by mimicking certain aspects of theprofessional setting in the classroom – especially as it relates to team formation, projectmanagement, and feedback. This work builds on a previous work-in-progress paper that
Conference Session
Architectural Engineering Division (ARCHE) Technical Session 2
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alexander Campbell, Oklahoma State University
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering Division (ARCHE)
, and we’re looking into fixing it” [7].Due to the issues encountered with the first exercise, students did not complete the assignment andwere instead asked to focus their attention on writing a reflection on why AI Chatbots may not beready to produce graphs within Excel at this time. Students also reflected on the issues theyencountered when trying to complete the assignment and if they felt they could have accomplishedthe task in Excel faster and more accurately without the assistance of the AI Chatbot. The feedbackreceived overwhelmingly suggested that AI Chatbots are not ready to produce VBA code thegenerates graphs within Excel for the time being and creating these graphs manually may be a betteroption since it would be faster and result
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 4
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Osama Desouky, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Yasser M. Al Hamidi, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Marwan K. Khraisheh, Texas A&M University at Qatar
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)
printed partsfor biomedical prosthetic molds, and reducing cooling loads using highly reflective paints.The specific learning outcomes are highlighted below with reference to selected student’s projects. 1- Structured problem solvingResearch indicates that problem-based learning, such as the one employed in this methodology,increases student engagement and enhances critical thinking skills [7]. As students assume roleswithin their hypothetical company, they not only learn to articulate the need for their chosen projectbut also develop a deeper understanding of its societal impact. This aligns with the findings ofstudies emphasizing the importance of real-world context in enhancing problem-solving abilities[8]. The technical knowledge phase is
Conference Session
Continuing Professional Development Division (CPD) Technical Session 1
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary Grace Golden, Purdue University ; Emeline Anne Ojeda-Hecht, Purdue University ; Savannah Meier, Purdue University ; Eric Holloway, Purdue University; Jennifer S. Linvill, Purdue University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Continuing, Professional, and Online Education Division (CPOED)
explicate thedevelopment of a professional skills certification framework for undergraduate students in amicroelectronics engineering workforce development program and creation of the mechanism(s)to assess professional skill development. The framework facilitates students’ acquisition ofprofessional skills through experiential learning as viewed through the overarching theoreticallens of both social cognitive career theory and self-determination theory. The certificationframework, rubric, and assessment development are described, and the implications arediscussed.Tags: professional skills definitions, implementation, portfolio, professional skills,microelectronics, reflections, rubricIntroductionEmployers and educators alike have recognized a lack
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division GIFTS: Great Ideas For Teaching Students
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dori Harcharik, Western Washington University; Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
creating inclusive and equitable learning environments through the development and implementation of strategies geared towards increasing student sense of belonging. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 GIFTS: Sharing Stories and Building Belonging in a First Year Engineering CourseAbstractThis Great Ideas for Teaching, and Talking with, Students (GIFTS) paper presents a method forfostering a sense of belonging in students through a story sharing assignment in a first-yearengineering course. The authors present how story sharing is integrated into an introductoryengineering course and provides a reflection of the experience on the successes, challenges, andimpact on student
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Heidi M Sherick, University of Michigan; Valerie N Johnson, University of Michigan; Heather Wagenschutz, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
Leadership: An intentional approach to faculty leadership developmentPositive Leadership: An intentional approach to faculty leadership developmentAbstractAs Michigan Engineering (the University of Michigan College of Engineering) moved forwardafter the tumultuous pandemic years, College leaders recognized the need for concertedprofessional development in positive leadership. This evidenced-based practice paper discussesa year-long positive leadership development program for engineering faculty and staff members,which was grounded in research from the University of Michigan Center for PositiveOrganizations and a “learn-experiment-reflect” framework. The program was delivered throughsix in-person cohort sessions, self-paced learning via