Student-led Multi-Disciplinary Approach for the Design of Experiments in Engineering: A Methodology

Osama Desouky; Yasser M. Al Hamidi; Marwan K. Khraisheh

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Portland, Oregon
Publication Date: June 23, 2024
Start Date: June 23, 2024
End Date: July 12, 2024
Conference Session: Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 4
Tagged Division: Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/48023

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Osama Desouky Texas A&M University at Qatar

visit author page

Osama Desouky is a Technical Laboratory coordinator at Texas A&M University in Qatar. Osama is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in interdisciplinary engineering from Texas A&M University at College Station. He is responsible for assisting with experimental method courses, 3D printing, mechanics of materials, material science, senior design projects, and advanced materials classes. Osama’s professional interests include manufacturing technology, materials science, 3D printing, experiments, and product design, and systems engineering for development of additive manufacturing systems.

visit author page

biography

Yasser M. Al Hamidi Texas A&M University at Qatar

visit author page

Yasser Al-Hamidi is currently working as a Laboratory Manager in the Mechanical Engineering Program at Texas A&M University at Qatar. He is specialized in instrumentation, controls and automation. He worked as a Lab Engineer in the College of Engineering,

visit author page

biography

Marwan K. Khraisheh Texas A&M University at Qatar

visit author page

Professor and Chair, Mechanical Engineering

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Design of Experiment (DOE) provides a structured approach for testing and optimizing processes, products, and systems. It allows us to efficiently identify and address problems or challenges in various domains, from manufacturing to scientific research. DOE can be a challenging concept to master, often applied within a multifaceted, interdisciplinary context. It demands not only a strong grasp of its principles but also the exercise of critical thinking and decision-making skills. The significance of DOE extends beyond its theoretical framework. It underscores the importance of equipping individuals with the capacity to navigate the intricate terrain of experimentation and to make choices that drive progress and innovation. In this paper, we present a progressive methodology for teaching the DoE in the Mechanical Engineering curriculum. Our methodology centers around three essential principles: (1) Embracing a Multidisciplinary Approach, (2) Empowering Students as Leaders, and (3) Focusing on Real-Life Engineering Challenges. We structure the course into two phases: Project 1 and Project 2. In Project 1, students form teams, each comprising four to five students, and are tasked with selecting a real-life problem or proposing a new product development. This approach encourages students to take personal ownership and responsibility for their learning. Project 1 unfolds in three key phases: first establishing the need for studying such a project, where students assume a scenario, assume a company name, build interest, highlight significance, and find statistics that back up the need. Secondly, students explore potential factors, levels, and outcomes while justifying their choices. The third phase entitles drafting the experimental plan, data collection strategy, data analysis, repeatability, randomization, and experimental work. Students formally meet weekly with the instructor to present their progress and discuss any challenges they face. Project 1 serves as the foundational learning experience and focuses on a manageable two-factor, two-level scope. Project 2 takes the successes of Project 1 and elevates them. It expands the scope to a three-factor, three-level experiment, challenging students to apply advanced analysis tools such as factorial design, Taguchi design of experiments, ANOVA, main effect analysis, Pareto diagrams, interaction plots, regression, and model prediction to extract valuable insights from their results. Students have demonstrated remarkable engagement and critical thinking in engineering, producing tangible results that extend beyond the classroom. These projects have included creating filaments using recycled PET bottles, optimizing sound deadening material in a machine shop, improving air quality through easily accessible material, enhancing concrete performance using recycled polymer materials, creating luggage handles using 3D printing, removing dyes from wastewater using membrane technologies, optimizing electric vehicle battery charging routines in harsh climates, uses of chemical itching of 3D printed parts for biomedical prosthetic molds, and reducing cooling loads using highly reflective paints. The course's evaluation is structured around four key components: presentation performance, laboratory proficiency, report writing, and personal reflective essays. Assessments show positive engagement, increased awareness of modern world problems, and enhanced critical thinking in engineering, which reflect the enhanced ABET outcome scores compared to traditional teaching styles. In practice, this methodology has empowered students to take control of their projects, develop a profound understanding of engineering principles, and apply their knowledge to tackle real-world issues. It encourages excellence in engineering education, endorsing student-led projects and project-based learning.

Citation
Format

Desouky, O., & Al Hamidi, Y. M., & Khraisheh, M. K. (2024, June), Student-led Multi-Disciplinary Approach for the Design of Experiments in Engineering: A Methodology Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/48023

TY - CPAPER
AB - Design of Experiment (DOE) provides a structured approach for testing and optimizing processes, products, and systems. It allows us to efficiently identify and address problems or challenges in various domains, from manufacturing to scientific research. DOE can be a challenging concept to master, often applied within a multifaceted, interdisciplinary context. It demands not only a strong grasp of its principles but also the exercise of critical thinking and decision-making skills. The significance of DOE extends beyond its theoretical framework. It underscores the importance of equipping individuals with the capacity to navigate the intricate terrain of experimentation and to make choices that drive progress and innovation.
In this paper, we present a progressive methodology for teaching the DoE in the Mechanical Engineering curriculum. Our methodology centers around three essential principles: (1) Embracing a Multidisciplinary Approach, (2) Empowering Students as Leaders, and (3) Focusing on Real-Life Engineering Challenges. We structure the course into two phases: Project 1 and Project 2. In Project 1, students form teams, each comprising four to five students, and are tasked with selecting a real-life problem or proposing a new product development. This approach encourages students to take personal ownership and responsibility for their learning. Project 1 unfolds in three key phases: first establishing the need for studying such a project, where students assume a scenario, assume a company name, build interest, highlight significance, and find statistics that back up the need. Secondly, students explore potential factors, levels, and outcomes while justifying their choices. The third phase entitles drafting the experimental plan, data collection strategy, data analysis, repeatability, randomization, and experimental work. Students formally meet weekly with the instructor to present their progress and discuss any challenges they face. Project 1 serves as the foundational learning experience and focuses on a manageable two-factor, two-level scope. Project 2 takes the successes of Project 1 and elevates them. It expands the scope to a three-factor, three-level experiment, challenging students to apply advanced analysis tools such as factorial design, Taguchi design of experiments, ANOVA, main effect analysis, Pareto diagrams, interaction plots, regression, and model prediction to extract valuable insights from their results.
Students have demonstrated remarkable engagement and critical thinking in engineering, producing tangible results that extend beyond the classroom. These projects have included creating filaments using recycled PET bottles, optimizing sound deadening material in a machine shop, improving air quality through easily accessible material, enhancing concrete performance using recycled polymer materials, creating luggage handles using 3D printing, removing dyes from wastewater using membrane technologies, optimizing electric vehicle battery charging routines in harsh climates, uses of chemical itching of 3D printed parts for biomedical prosthetic molds, and reducing cooling loads using highly reflective paints.
The course&#39;s evaluation is structured around four key components: presentation performance, laboratory proficiency, report writing, and personal reflective essays. Assessments show positive engagement, increased awareness of modern world problems, and enhanced critical thinking in engineering, which reflect the enhanced ABET outcome scores compared to traditional teaching styles. In practice, this methodology has empowered students to take control of their projects, develop a profound understanding of engineering principles, and apply their knowledge to tackle real-world issues. It encourages excellence in engineering education, endorsing student-led projects and project-based learning.

AU - Osama Desouky
AU - Yasser M. Al Hamidi
AU - Marwan K. Khraisheh
CY - Portland, Oregon
DA - 2024/06/23
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Student-led Multi-Disciplinary Approach for the Design of Experiments in Engineering: A Methodology
UR - https://peer.asee.org/48023
ER -