letters for a comprehensive program proposal that was submitted by the authors to theU. S Department of Education. Currently, the authors are working to develop a long-termcollaborative relationship with a fourth Brazilian university (PUC-Rio). For this purpose, bothauthors will lead a workshop on “Methods and Strategies for Engineering Education, CurriculumDesign, and Program Assessment” which will be held at PUC-Rio during April 18-20, 2012.Forty participants from this and other universities are expected to attend this workshop. Theobjectives of the workshop are to: (i) Introduce methods and strategies related to first-yearengineering education, technology in the classroom, curriculum design, and academic programassessment, (ii) Present
Teaching and Learning, v11 n2 p76-90 Apr 201117. Khalid, A., Nuhfer-Halten, B., Vandenbussche, J., Colebeck, D., Atiqullah, M., Toson, S., Chin, C., ‘Effective multidisciplinary active learning techniques for freshmen polytechnic students,’ Intellectbase International Consortium Academic Conference, Atlanta, GA., October 13-15, 2011 Page 25.1229.13
. Assessment criteria can include: (a) Whether the problem was accurately defined (the Problem as State & Problem as Understood)? (b) Did the solution(s) solve the problem? (c) Did the student engage in critical thinking? (d) How is the solution going to be implemented? (identify concerns). (e) During student presentations: evaluate the use visuals, and presentation preparation & skills. (f) During group/team presentations: evaluate the quality of collaboration and initiatives undertaken by individual team members.(3) Student input should be part of the assessment process: Use class discussions to evaluate/critique PBL assignments/activities. Select
Page 25.1253.12and analyzed, therefore enabling the students to have a broader understanding of the differentkinds of network attacks’ behavior.Bibliography1. J. P. Anderson, Computer Security Threat Monitoring and Surveillance, Technical Report, James P. Anderson Co., Fort Washington, PA, April 1980.2. E. Denning, “An Intrusion-Detection Model,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Volume 13, Number 2, pp. 222-232, 1987.3. S. E. Smaha, “Haystack: An Intrusion Detection System,” Fourth Aerospace Computer Security Applications Conference, pp. 37-44, Austin, Texas, 1988.4. J. D. Howard, An Analysis of Security Incidents on the Internet 1989 – 1995, Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
, Proceedings of the 2007 American Society of Engineering Educators Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI 6. The Disappearing Associates Degree Program in Electronics Technology, by Louis E. Frenzal Jr. , Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Educators Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN 7. http://www.cesweb.org/ 8. Department of Transportation website: www.its.dot.gov/resources.htm 9. Special Issue on Cyber-Physical Systems, by Radha Poovendran, Krishna Sampigethaya, Sandeep Kumar S. Gupta, Insup Lee, K.Venkatesh Prasad, David Corman, and Jamers L. Paunicka, Proceedings of the IEEE, January 2012, Vol. 100, No. 1, pp 7-14 10. http://www.gartner.com
. and named to describe the larger construct they refer to from In addition, these engineers are an international group. the student’s point of view. We compare and contrast theThey have traveled and/or studied abroad, and they are structures and characteristics of the engineering educationconnected to an international student group. As we use a system from the student perspective(s).qualitative approach in our work, we will not attempt togeneralize findings here but instead to generate hypotheses to The themes consolidated from the five cases in our sampletest in future follow-up work (see Future Work). are noted in the two results sections that follow. The first
Research, 61(2), 179-211, 1991.12. S.M. Smith and P.C. Woody, Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles. Teaching of Psychology, 27(3), 220-223, 2000.13. L.P. Rieber, Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 318-328, 1991.14. T.N. Höffler and D. Leutner, Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722-738, 2007.15. H. Lin and F.M. Dwyer, The effect of static and animated visualization: A perspective of instructional effectiveness and efficiency. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 155-174, 2010.16. R.E. Mayer, M. Hegarty, S. Mayer, and J. Campbell, When static
., McComb, S.A., Mulkay, E.L., Oakes, W.C. (1998) ASEE Student Chapters: Perspectives on and Preparation for Higher Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(3), 231 - 234.Proceedings of the 2012 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 125. Chan, E., Holleran, S., & McGaughey, A. (2004) ASEE Student Chapters: Avenues for Promoting Future Engineering Educators. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.6. Maynard, J., Garza, D., & Finley, C. (2000) Addressing Future Engineering
staying compatible with current ABET accreditation criteria. This effort resulted ina total of thirteen program outcomes, which cover the breadth of the principles included in theBOK2.In 2011 two external forces have resulted in changes to the BSCE program. The University ofArkansas is strictly enforcing the statewide ‘core curriculum’ for Arkansas institutions of highereducation. Formerly, the engineering programs at the University of Arkansas enjoyed anexception to the state core requirements by specifying humanities and social science (H&S)courses based on an interpretation of ABET EC2000 criteria. This allowed advanced-level H&Scourses in the curriculum. With the enforcement of the statewide core, all H&S courses arelimited to
feedback on issues like aesthetics,ergonomics, and theme, as well as for marketing research and cost analysis. Prototyping is usedby engineers to provide manufacturing and assembly data, to investigate system integrationissues and to develop analysis and testing strategies. In some cases, prototyping is also used inthe concept generation phase of the design process to assist designers to either expand or contractthe set of possible concepts. Clearly prototyping is an important part of most design processes.We define the prototyping strategy as the set of decisions that dictate what actions will be takento accomplish the development of the prototype(s). Prototyping strategies include a variety ofdifferent options. In the broadest sense, prototypes
. Bereiter, Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2002.11. S. Ellis, Talk to Me. 2010. available on-line at http://www.talk2mebook.com.12. Talk to Me Website (2010), available on-line at http://www.talk2mebook.com.13. L.R. McAuliffe, G.W. Ellis, S.K. Ellis, I. Huff, B. McGinnis-Cavanaugh, Mysteries and Heroes: Using Imaginative Education to Engage Middle School Learners in Engineering, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, June 26-29, 2011.14. D.C. Dennett, Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981.15. A. Turing, Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind, 59
. Oneconsequence of this is that in terms of chronology, formal education in engineering at theundergraduate level came into being before the profession was well-organized in the UnitedStates. As the just quoted phrase “mechanic arts” suggests, the term “mechanical engineer” was Page 25.537.3still somewhat uncommon in the 1860’s. Terms such as electrical engineer or chemical engineeror industrial engineer were coined during the just described fifty year period in which academicdisciplines were being created and defined. The long term effect on engineering education ofthis is that while most professions such as medicine and law are taught in separate
. (1999). Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior, Proceedings of the 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan de Puerto Rico.20. Adams, R.S., and Atman, C.J. (2000). Characterizing Engineering Student Design Processes: An Illustration of Iteration, Proceedings from American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition, St. Louis, MO.21. De Bono, Edward. (1972). Children Solve Problems. Penguin Books. Page 25.549.1422. Thornton, S. (1995) Children Solving Problems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.23. Engel, Susan. (2005). The narrative worlds of what is and what if
, Mohammad-Zamry J. and Nor-Farida H. (2011a). “Cooperative Problem-Based Learning (CPBL): A Practical PBL Model for a Typical Course”, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, Vol. 6, Issue 3, Sept 2011, pp 12-20. Page 25.557.162. Ariffin A. H., Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Mohd. Kamaruddin A. H., Mimi Haryani H., Azila A. A., and S Syed Helmi Syed Hassan (2004). A review and survey of Problem-Based Learning Application in Engineering Education, accepted for Conference on Engineering Education, Kuala Lumpur, 14-15 Dis. 2004.3. Syed Helmi Syed Hassan, Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Mohd Salleh Abu, Shahrin Mohammad (2011
2011.11. http://cindyking.biz/cross-cultural-skills/12. Language Corps, Jed Willard. Global Competency. Accessed online www.LanguageCorps.com Dec 11 2010.13. Hovland, K. Global Learning: aligning Student Learning Outcomes with Study Abroad. Association of American Colleges and Universities, NAFSA May 2010. Accessed online http://dev.nafsa.org/uploadedFiles/NAFSA_Home/Resource_Library_Assets/Networks/CCB/AligningLearni ngOutcomes.pdf Dec. 10 2011.14. Cutler, S. Borrego, M.. Developing Global Competence in Graduate Engineering and Science Students through an IGERT International Internship Program. Proceedings of the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington DC, October 27-30 2010
programming assignments showed that the majority of first-yearstudents in programming courses do not meet the expectations of instructors at the end of theirfirst course in computing [2]. Engineering students are no different in this regard. One potentialreason for this discrepancy between the learning outcomes desired by instructors and studentperformance is that the instructional methods used as well as the course content do not matchwell with the learning styles of most engineering students.The idea of learning styles has been around since the early 1980’s [4] and there are manylearning style models and assessments. The most commonly used within engineering is theFelder-Silverman learning styles model [5], with its associated assessment, the Index
semester were:ECS Core Competencies in Teaching, Academic Integrity Update, and Innovation andCreativity in the Classroom.Seminar 1 – ECS Core Competencies in TeachingThe overall seminar series had four primary objectives: to intentionally refocus on one ofthe ECS’s Core Competencies, excellence in undergraduate teaching; to foster cross-disciplinary discussions within the School of ECS; and to promote the development of “bestpractices” in teaching. This first seminar was aimed at getting the faculty to identify whatcore competencies in teaching should be important for the School of ECS. Teachingexcellence is consistent with Baylor University 's Christian commitment, to do “…whateveryou do, you must do all for the glory of God.” (I Cor 10:31) or
States were down 2.8%, thebiggest annual drop since the 1980s [1]. The Smart Grid enables grid operators to see further into thesystem and allows them the flexibility to better manage the intermittency of RES. This in turn surmountsa significant barrier, enabling wind and solar to be deployed rapidly – and in larger percentages to havea green Smart Grid.Going Green through the use of RES and make the planet sustainable and by so doing improve the airquality and environment. US government has required that by the year 2030 that 20% of the electricalenergy generated in the U S will be from RES. There are many different types of RES such ashydroelectric, biomass, wind, solar, wave, tidal and geothermal. The key to the usage of renewableresources is
; Giles, C.L. CiteSeerx: an architecture and web service design for an academic document search engine. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web 883–884 (2006).17. Uren, V., Buckingham Shum, S., Bachler, M. & Li, G. Sensemaking tools for understanding research literatures: Design, implementation and user evaluation. International journal of human-computer studies 64, 420–445 (2006).18. Chau, D.H., Kittur, A., Hong, J.I. & Faloutsos, C. Apolo: making sense of large network data by combining rich user interaction and machine learning. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems 167–176 (2011).19. Cairns, P. & Cox, A.L. Research Methods for Human-Computer
experiment. The learning mode of Beta studentstends to stay “passive” in traditional learning. During the direct observation, additional comments on group kinetics including Alpha vs.Beta Student interactions were recorded to further understand student response to the virtualmodules by capturing followings; i) Ratio of Alpha- vs. Beta-students in the group, i.e., 2 Alpha and 4 Beta, etc. ii) Level of interaction/discussion between Alpha- vs. Alpha-, Alpha- vs. Beta-, and Beta- vs. Beta-students, i.e., do Beta-students point out/correct procedural mistake(s) made by Alpha-student? iii) Gradual change, if there is any, in Alpha- vs. Beta-students ratio in the group at the later
is sponsored by NSF, Grant #0737130.Reference[1] H. Guo and J. Dong, “Enhance Computer Network Curriculum using Collaborative Project-based Learning”, inProceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference, 2011[2] Hamid A. Hadim and Sven K. Esche, “Enhancing Engineering Curriculum Through Project-based Learning”, inProceedings of 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov. 2002[3] A. Martinez-Mones, E. Gomes-Sanchez at el, “Multiple Case Studies to Enhance Project-based Learning in aComputer Architecture Course”, IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 48, No. 3, August, 2005[4] K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson, “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,”Journal of Engineering
. 1988. 22(3): p. 120- 25.13. Kazerounian, K. & Foley, S., Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study of Instructors and Page 25.812.13 Students Perceptions. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2007. 129: p. 761-768.14. Heywood, J., Engineering Education: Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction. 2005, John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ.15. Torrance, E.P., Can we teach children to think creatively? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1972. 6(2): p. 114-143.16. Rose, L.H. & Lin, H.T., A meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs. Journal of Creative
. Thistiming offers a great opportunity to assemble an evaluating panel comprised of IndustrialAdvisory Board members along with other available industry, government, or faculty experts. Page 25.819.5AE and ME Preliminary Design Project ChallengesThe project selected for the first combined AE and ME preliminary design course was the designof a lightweight air-superiority area-defense aircraft. The requirements document given to boththe AE and ME students is shown in Figure 1. Light-Weight Tactical Fighter 1.0 Statement of Need (SON) The U. S. Air Force and Navy have determined a need for a truly light-weight
-0935103. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors would alsolike to thank the study participants for their participation.References1. T. Martin, K. Kim, J. Forsyth, L.D. McNair, E. Coupey, and E. Dorsa, “Discipline-based instruction to promote interdisciplinary design of wearable and pervasive computing products,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2011. (DOI) 10.1007/s00779-011-0492-z.2. R. Frodeman, J.T. Klein, and C. Mitcham, editors, The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, Oxford UP, 2010.3. C.L. Dym, A.M. Agogino, O. Eris, D.D. Frey, and L.J. Leifer, “Engineering
s/ ŝƐƉůĂLJ ŽŶƚƌŽůůĞƌFigure 1: FPGA architecture framework provided to students. Students were responsible for implementingcode in the graphics pipe sub-unit.and the FPGA-based GPU implementation, a protocol was provided along with source codeimplementation and a corresponding HDL code for the on-chip packet forwarding. The protocolsends messages of 32 bits and must be formated to meet the protocol outlined in Figure 2. Thisprotocol allows for data to be sent from the workstation OpenGL driver to multiple sub-unitsmemory mapped as registers. The Length field specifies the number of 32-bit packets thatfollow the starting packet and allows for custom data formates to be sent to the sub-units. TheOpCode allows the sub-unit to support multiple
." ASEE Annual Conference. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 16 - June 19, 2002. Session 2325.10. Newell, James A., et al. "Multidisciplinary Design and Communication: a Pedagogical Vision." International Journal of Engineering Education (1999): 376-382.11. Roemer, Robert, et al. "A SPIRAL Learning Curriculum in Mechanical Engineering." The 117th Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. Louisville, KY, 2010. AC 2010-1903.12. Besterfield-Sacre, Mary, Larry Shuman, Cynthia Altman. “Pittsburgh Freshman Attitudes Survey”. http://civeng1.civ.pitt.edu/~outcomes/13. Kolb, David A., “Learning Style Inventory Manual”, McBer, Boston, 1976.14. Prenzel, M. “The selective persistence of interest” In K.A. Renninger, S
”.Engineers and non-engineers alike widely characterize engineering as a discipline whose purposeis to “solve problems”, and this is often framed as “design”1. Despite movements since at leastthe 1990’s to reform engineering education to integrate design throughout the curriculum,including during the freshman year, engineering curricula remain dominated by “linear” and “topdown” models that postpone the introduction of design. In this standard model, basic math andscience (“analysis”) courses are given during the first two years, followed by application of thisknowledge to conduct basic engineering analysis during the second and third years, andculminating in engineering design (e.g., capstone design projects) during the last year2, 3. Theinherent
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2008.[11] D. Wilcox, S. Wilson, and G. Wostenkuhler, “Embedded design in a sophomore course,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2008.[12] A. Clements, “ARMs for the poor: Selecting a processor for teaching computer architecture,” in ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2010.[13] M. Fischer. (2011, Nov. 20) YAGARTO - yet another GNU ARM toolchain. [Online]. Available: Page 25.947.14 http://www.yagarto.de/[14] J. Ye. (2011, Dec. 22) GNU tools for ARM embedded processors. [Online]. Available: https://launchpad.net
Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). McCulley is a board member of the CAPA and SPARKS National Science Foundation project with five years of service. She has more than 17 years’ experience working in industry as a project engineer specializing in automation and controls engineering.Prof. Dustin Scott Birch, Weber State University Dustin S. Birch possesses a master’s of science in mechanical engineering from the University of Utah, a bachelor’s of science in mechanical engineering from the University of Utah, and an associate’s of sci- ence in design and drafting engineering technology from Ricks College. Birch is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology Department at Weber State University. He
farm project? (i.e. did you apply and use project 3.78 4.25 0.3878 management principles?) 3 - Team communication improved between the mousetrap 3.78 4.25 0.3627 car project and the wind farm project. 4 - The Excel tools presented in the course were useful in 4.33 4.5 0.5927 completing the wind farm project. 5 - The delivery of the course content was effective. 4.33 3.67 0.0758 6 - The textbook was useful. 4 2.67 0.0089 7 - The instructor(s) communicated effectively. 4.56