have responded to the needs of themarket by offering degrees ranging from associates to masters, as well as certifications inspecific topics such as planning, scheduling, and safety management.There are many benefits to the online classroom environment; it is not limited by geography, aslong as reliable internet access is available. The flexible nature of online instruction allowsstudents of any age or level of experience to enroll in courses of their choosing at times that aremost convenient to them. Depending on the flexibility of the respective institution students maywork full-time and pursue an advanced education in the comfort of their own homes. In addition,students are able to work at their own pace, gradually transition to their new
Pontificia Universidad Católica (UC), themost prestigious and oldest engineering schools in the country. A key difference between thesetwo institutions’ proposals is that UCH developed its own strategic plan, while UC created aconsortium with Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María (UTFSM), another prestigiousinstitution within the region. By comparing both strategies, this investigation seeks to understandcurricular and organizational change in selective institutions after the first years of the designingand implementation of the program. As a conceptual framework, we ground our work in the richliterature of change in engineering education, in particular the branch that studies national effortsand coalitions for change. Our data set consists of
the two tables below, we present demographicdata on the students in each engineering major and rates of graduation. All data presented in thefollowing tables can be found on the GT Institutional Research and Planning website,www.irp.gatech.edu. Page 26.860.3 Native American Hawaiian Indian or Black or or Other Two or Alaskan African Hispanic Pacific MoreMajor Gender Native Asian American or Latino
that the engineering and scientific workforce is still made up of 51%white males2despite continued efforts on the part of academic institutions, professionalorganizations and other stakeholders to address this issue.As part of the ASEE’s “Year of Action on Diversity”, the Chemical Engineering divisionassembled a committee to perform a review of the state of diversity within its division and toidentify opportunities where improvements could be made and a plan for accomplishing thesegoals. The diversity committee performed preliminary analysis of the Chemical Engineeringdivision’s membership information and compared it against diversity data for engineering facultyand the overall engineering workforce. Chemical engineering divisions’ membership
WTP.There were other doctoral students produced by the Department of Transportation and UrbanInfrastructure Studies. Their research projects were related to driving simulation, transit orienteddevelopment and highway safety. After graduation, many of them are working at transportation-consulting firms and state government transportation-related agencies. 6. Outcome Assessment on MSU Graduate Students Participating in NSF S-STEM GrantsAs a premier minority-serving institution, Morgan is transitioning to a doctoral researchuniversity, which is a primary goal promoted in our ten-year strategic plan. To contribute toinstitutional goals, a scholarship program funded through the National Science Foundation wasdeveloped, which aims to significantly
educational objective of the E-Lead degree is to developengineers into leaders with engineering domain knowledge, broad leadership knowledge, and theability to inspire and lead others. But E-Lead goes well beyond being a program, an initiative, ora cluster of classes added to a degree plan. The E-Lead program also develops a culture wherestudents actively contribute to their own education and where individual contributions are valuedand important. E-Lead students strive for excellence because they have a sense of ownership andpower over their own education. Building this new discipline has inherent challenges, especiallywithin a large public university.To help minimize having to “reinvent the wheel” in starting an ambitious student-centereddegree
, diplomas and certificates in 201410. Currently, more than 25 public and private schools have Guaranteed Admissions Agreements with the VCCS where approximately 56% of graduating students are in transfer programs planning to pursue a bachelor’s degree10. Figure 2 shows that more than 40% of Virginia Community College System students enrolled in the 2010-‐11 Academic Year transferred to a 4-‐year institution by 2014. Figure 2. Percent o f students enrolled in 2010-‐11 Academic Year
invited speaker for many technical and non-technical forums. He has mentored over 30 Masters, PhDs and Post Docs. Anshuman works with industry and global organizations and has extensive experience negotiating contracts and executing projects globally such as Pacific Islands, Africa, Asia and the Caribbean. Ambika P. Adhikari is Program Manager (Research) at the Office of Knowledge Enterprise and Develop- ment at Arizona State University (ASU). At ASU, he is also a Research Professor (affiliate faculty) at the School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, and Sr. Sustainability Scientist at the Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability. Ambika was Sr. Planner and Impact Fees Administrator at SRPMIC
University. His scholarly interests span computing education research, information technology for teaching and learning, and software engineering. Prior to coming to Drexel, Dr. Hislop spent eighteen years working in government and industry where his efforts included software development and support, technology planning and evaluation, and development and delivery of technical education.Dr. Sarah Monisha Pulimood, The College of New Jersey S. Monisha Pulimood is on the faculty of the Department of Computer Science at The College of New Jersey. She has been successfully incorporating immersive learning experiences and multidisciplinary collaborative projects into her courses for several years; has published on undergraduate
, professional development, and networking skills. The workshops also included three teambased engineering projects that gave participants an opportunity to work on crosscultural engineering teams. Additionally, a few of the workshops were targeted toward developing and sustaining their local SWE student organization (Liberia Society of Women Engineers, LSWE). Underlying all of these workshops was the desire to provide all students involved with crosscultural leadership experiences. Finally, to assist with the planning of the camp and to encourage crosscultural team building, committees were formed between the LSWE leadership team and the University of Michigan members to plan and carry out different aspects of the camp, namely, logistics, health
. Utilizing a three-year Magnet School grant,DLJ established a Center for Mathematics and Engineering to developed and thenimplement its integrated, whole school curriculum with engineering as the core and theconnector. The results of this careful planning and meticulous attention to detailsproduced an elementary school environment that fosters student creative thinking withthe expectation of quantitative metrics to gauge that creativity. The merit of this totalemersion of engineering into an elementary curriculum is reflected in student scores onstandardized test as well as a plethora of awards and acknowledgements for the schoolincluding being named the top elementary STEM program in the nation by the 2015Future of Education Technology Conference
importance of STEM education for the future of learning and motivation.Mr. Terrance Denard Youngblood, Texas Tech University Terrance D. Youngblood is a doctoral student in Educational Psychology at Texas Tech University, spe- cializing in the effective evaluation and assessment of educational outreach programs and workforce de- velopment.Ibrahim Halil Yeter, Texas Tech University IIbrahim H. Yeter is currently a PhD candidate in the Curriculum and Instruction program at the College of Education, and at the same time, he is pursuing his Master’s degree in Petroleum Engineering at Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to
-service teachers have with teachingengineering. Verbal persuasion includes encouragement from others as well as coaching. Verbalpersuasion is most effective at increasing self-efficacy when the one doing the persuading is seenas an expert [13]. Exposure to verbal persuasion is also likely to be low for pre-serviceelementary teachers, as engineering design is not a focus of the pre-service curriculum. A majorexception to this, as with mastery experience, would be those in the section of the sciencemethods course at Purdue University that utilizes engineering design. These students activelydesign engineering concepts into science lesson plans with students. This provides masteryexperience while the rest of the course ideally provides verbal
well as the barriers theyperceive to doing so. Results indicated that most elementary teachers support the inclusion ofengineering within the science standards for elementary grades. Teachers describe lack ofpreservice and in-service training, lack of background knowledge, lack of materials, lack of timefor planning and implementing lessons, and lack of administrative support as barriers toimplementing engineering activities within their classrooms.*The views and opinions of the speaker expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect thoseof the U.S. Government or any agency thereof.Introduction The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) incorporated engineering practices intoK-12 science standards [1], and because NGSS calls for
planning to start engineering at Loyola University Chicago (LUC), the new Director decidedto integrate social justice with engineering in the curriculum. This decision seemed a naturalextension of Jesuit universities’ emphasis on social justice. LUC’s BS Engineering Scienceprogram began the following year in August, 2015.BackgroundIn his 1968 survey for ASEE, Liberal Learning for the Engineer, Sterling Olmsted counted 93engineering schools that had initiated programs in liberal studies in the last three years. By 1973,as a result of this report, almost 200 technical colleges experimented with curricula to address thesocial implications of technology. Two curricular approaches included “humanizing”engineering through interdisciplinary education and
theirrespective disciplines. In addition, FESP provides interactions with engineering societies andjunior/senior level teaching assistance to enhance early experiences and to encourage students tobe self-directed in their educational planning process and overall academic success.The ENGR194 course was designed as a complementary 1-credit course to FESP and was offeredin the Fall of 2018 for the first time. Enrollment in this class was allowed for all students in theCollege of Engineering. The students who took this course had the opportunity to interact withprofessionals of different disciplines and cultural backgrounds and attend seminars and symposiaon subjects including engineering identity, undergraduate research, time and stress management,and
connection to industry. This paper reviews theactions taken to develop this culture based on the four essential areas of change. It also providesinsights on lessons learned thus far and plans to reach long term goals in the coming years.IntroductionIn 2017, the Mechanical Engineering Department at Seattle University was awarded a NationalScience Foundation grant to revolutionize the department. The project leverages thedepartment’s small size and close ties with industry to create a culture of “Engineering withEngineers.”This paper summaries the current status of the five-year project and is an updated version of theNSF Grantees Poster papers presented at the 2018 and 2019 ASEE Annual Conferences [1], [2].The project background and objective are
Communities Foundation of Texas (CFT) 2003 Member of dissertation committee for Margarita Greer (CSP Fellow) Member of dissertation committee for Roland Heranadez (CSP Fellow) The University of Texas at Austin, Education Administration De- partment Martha Ovando and Nolan Estes (collaboration for development of curriculum for new co-hort of CSP Fellows) 1993 Cooperative Superintendent’s Program (CSP) Fellow Community Activities 2011-Present Travis County Juvenile Justice Department, Education Consultant 2009-Present E3 Alliance P-16 Council and various committees 2009 Advised/supported development of district strategic plan for Title I Compliance San Benito Consolidated Independent School District 2002 Austin
who were eligiblereported that they would be attending their first-choice college. Students were asked about theirfuture plans and nearly all of the students who responded to the final survey reported that theywere planning to attend their first-choice college. Most of the participating students weregraduating seniors, but 6 were juniors and reported that they would be attending high school nextyear. Of the graduating seniors (who completed the year-end survey), all reported that theywould be attending higher education the following year. Moreover, all students were acceptedinto one of their top choice colleges/universities. All but one reported that they planned onattending a top choice college or university. The one student who reported he
feedback from researchers regarding their changing needs and practices.Samuel and others analyzed twenty-nine data management plans (DMP), specifically related toNational Science Foundation grant proposals, to understand better, how faculty approach datamanagement. The results help librarians build a foundation for future DMP services [2]. Coatesand others examined five case studies that highlight common challenges for librarians to evaluateexisting research data services in academic libraries, and suggested that evidence-based approachprovides valuable information for assessing the still-emerging services [3]. Goben and Griffin’sstudy confirmed, “Researchers are most worried about storage, sharing, and issues that revolvearound longer term access
Computing in Engineering is a course required for all 200 engineering students ata research university in Massachusetts. In the last few years, the course underwent a transitionfrom a large, lecture-based course taught by one professor to several smaller sections taught bydifferent professors, each using their own instructional technique. In the spring of 2019, fourprofessors taught the Introduction to Computing Course using three different instructionalmethods. All courses had the same syllabus goals, outlined in Table 1 below. Table 1. Course Goals (as defined in the 2019 syllabi) Overall Goal Key ComponentsFluency in a Master basic Know common Use good code Plan
theeducational outcomes and STEM readiness of students of color will have direct implications on America’seconomic growth, national security, and global prosperity [2]. Thirdly, the nuclear energy workforce gapanalysis in the USA is expected to include the full range of existing and potential variations in U.S.nuclear reactor technologies (current and future) plus the nuclear fuel cycle [3]. Fourthly, in nuclearworkforce development, our team has embarked on studying those unique challenges and diverse livedexperiences of our minority students that they bring to our learning environments away from home andhas formed part of our Institution Transformation 2030 Strategic Plan. These lived experiences includeneeds for technology [4], shelter, income
assumptions, Stage 4. Recognition that one’s discontent and the process of transformation are shared and that others have negotiated a similar change, Stage 5. Exploration of options for new roles, relationships, and actions, Stage 6. Planning a course of action, Stage 7. Acquisition of knowledge and skills for implementing one’s plans, Stage 8. Provisional trying of new roles, Stage 9. Building of competence and self-confidence in new roles and relationships; and Stage 10. A reintegration into one’s life based on conditions dictated by one’s new perspective.King [12] summarized the ten stages of Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Heconceptualized “journey of
as me. So, yeah, I love this program… don't ever leave, ever.”Professional developmentSurvey results indicated GradTrack assisted students in understanding what they wanted to do intheir future career (Fig 2; mean = 3.73 ± 0.28) and managing time and priorities well (Fig 2;mean = 3.56 ± 0.33). The specific skill of making an individual development plan, while stillabove neutral (3.0), was the lowest rated question in the professional development block (Fig 2;mean = 3.31 ± 0.33). This could be a practical tool to introduce within future GradTrackprograms.Participants also reflected on the professional development they received from GradTrack andhow that has helped them in their graduate program. One student said:“[…] just learning how to
asexpected given the nature of the essay prompts. In relation to their overall career plans, somestudents planned to pursue further higher education after receiving their bachelor degree (e.g.,male Hispanic mechanical engineering student: I also plan on attending graduate school andwould like to obtain guidance in applying and succeeding in a master’s program.). Otherstudents described their career plans for a future job in industry with varying degrees ofspecificity. For instance, one male Asian mechanical engineering student already developed avery specific job goal stating that “I see my future as a mechanical engineer working for Toyota,designing and building an engine with more than 50% efficiency.”, whereas another maleHispanic chemical
. Ringleb received a B.S. in biomedical engineering from Case Western Reserve UniverMr. Francisco Cima Francisco Cima is a PhD student of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Old Dominion University. He obtained his Masters in Business Planning and Regional Development from the Technological Institute of Merida. His areas of interest are innovDr. Orlando M Ayala, Old Dominion University Dr. Ayala received his BS in Mechanical Engineering with honors (Cum Laude) from Universidad de Oriente (Venezuela) in 1995, MS in Mechanical Engineering in 2001 and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 2005, both from University of Delaware (USA). Dr. Ayala is currently serving as Associate Professor of Mechanical
drawconclusions. We end the paper with our future plan.Theoretical Framework and Background LiteratureAs communities of practice, college learning communities facilitate the development ofcollaborative and academic support relationships through ongoing peer interaction [5]. Sense ofcommunity is the feeling that one is part of a larger, dependable, stable structure [16]. It iscomprised of the following sub-factors: membership, influence, needs fulfillment, and emotionalconnection [11], [12], [14].The authors of [17] presented a linked-course learning community in computer science majorsfor men of color and women (of any ethnicity) with “a variety of activities planned to facilitatethe forming of an academic support group.” They reported that “learning
(CSTEP). Claudine served as an Administrative Representative for the Office of the Provost on the Administrative Management Council (AMC), a member of the Academic Progress Committee, a member of the CAS ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #36422 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, and International Students team, and she is a current member of the annual STEP Student Statewide Conference Planning Committee and Co-chair of the Entertainment committee. Claudine consults as an adoption social worker on private adoptions, and is an Educational Consultant with the New York City
has grown to serve over 720 participants each summer with multiple one-weekfully residential and virtual sessions. Funding support from industries such as NorthropGrumman, Raytheon, and Boeing has increased allowing EPIC to serve more low-incomeparticipants.Due to the recent COVID-19 pandemic, in 2020, when most universities simply shut down theirengineering summer pre-college programs, EPIC swiftly changed its programming to a fullyvirtual program and served over 400 participants. EPIC created a new curriculum, activities,training, and planned on how to solve issues such as participants' ability to use school-issued orpersonal chromebooks. Intensive home-laboratory activities with mechanical, electrical, andsoftware elements were created
attending class and coming prepared,complete assignments in a timely fashion, participate in class, communication, avoid makingexcuses, respectful of others’ ideas and opinions, and develop a comprehensive plan to achieveeducational goals [11]. Students must make a choice to become a part of the learningcommunity and to take time to think about their future. When discussing universities one mainlythinks of academics, however, there are other opportunities in which students can participate.What is the right mix of curricular and co-curricular activities? Kovalchuk et al. see this as the 3right question to ask and that a lack of a proper mix can adversely influence readiness whenbecoming part of the