Conference Session

Reimagining STEM Transitions: Bridging Gaps and Building Resilience in Post-Pandemic Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexis Daniels, The Johns Hopkins University; Michael L Falk, The Johns Hopkins University; Rachel E Durham, Notre Dame of Maryland University; Alisha Nicole Sparks, The Johns Hopkins University; Allison Reigel, The Johns Hopkins University; Margo K Williams, The Johns Hopkins University; Karen Watkins-Lewis, Morgan State University; Emily J Yanisko, American University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

’ effects, a convergent parallel mixed methods research design 3was employed based upon Lent and colleagues’ Social Cognitive Career Theory [24]. Theguiding research questions were: • RQ1: What effect does program participation have on math proficiency, as indicated by mastery of the algebra I benchmark skills targeted? • RQ2: What effect does BOAST have on students’ math self-efficacy? • RQ3: What effect does BOAST have on students’ STEM choice goals? • RQ4: What are the effects of math self-efficacy on change in STEM career goals?3 Randomization of students and schools was infeasible, due to school leaders’ ethical concerns about encouragingstudents to apply to the program without knowing ahead of time what

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 5.A

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Friday Emmanuel James, Kansas State University; Joshua Levi Weese, Kansas State University; Nathan H Bean, Kansas State University; Russell Feldhausen, Kansas State University; Michelle Friend, University of Nebraska - Omaha; Robert Stewart, Kansas State University; Carrie Grace Aponte; David S. Allen, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

“strongly agree,” which eventually helped in measuring teachers’ attitudes in the role of being computer science teachers.Lastly, the survey incorporated items from Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Computational Thinking(TSECT), which is meant to capture a sense of students’ self-efficacy in utilizing programmingand Computational Thinking [4]. All of these instruments were put together to providea comprehensive evaluation of the impact of the teacher training program in expandingComputer Science Education.3.4 Ethical ConsiderationsParticipants in the study were informed prior to the commencement of the program aboutthe purpose of the study, what it entails and their right to opt out at any time.Identifiable information was collected for the purpose of

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 6

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gabriel Eduardo Prieto, Florida International University; Neila Bennamane, Florida International University; Agoritsa Polyzou, Florida International University; Peter J Clarke, Florida International University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

of McCourt School of Public Policy at Georgetown University, Washington, DC. She is involved in projects in the intersection of education, data mining, machine learning, ethics, and fairness. Her research interests include data mining, recommender systems, predictive models within educational contexts, and the fairness concerns that arise from their use. Her goal is to help students succeed using data and machine learning models.Dr. Peter J Clarke, Florida International University Peter J. Clarke received his B.Sc. degree in Computer Science and Mathematics from the University of the West Indies (Cave Hill) in 1987, M.S. degree from SUNY Binghamton University in 1996 and Ph.D. in Computer Science from Clemson

Conference Session

Building Engineering Identity and Practice in Rural and Pre-College Contexts

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natasha Wilkerson, Vivify, LLC; Joanne K Olson, Texas A&M University; Justin Wilkerson, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

: Engineering Design: Problem Framing, Project Management, Ideation, Engineering Prototyping, Decision Making, Design Methods, Engineering Graphics, Design Practices Communication Material Processing: Manufacturing, Management & Precision, Fabrication, Classification, Casting, Molding & Forming, Separating & Machining, Joining, Conditioning & Finishing, Safety Quantitative Analysis: Computational Thinking, Data Collection, Analysis & Communication, System Analytics, Modeling & Simulation Professionalism: Ethics, Workplace Behavior & Operations, Intellectual Property, Technological Impacts, Role

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 2: Designing Creativity - Innovation Through First-Year Maker Projects

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Udeme Idem, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Senay Purzer, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE); Jason Morphew, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

Paper ID #46517How Microelectronics and Microcontrollers are Integrated into First-yearand Sophomores Engineering Programs.Udeme Idem, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Udeme Idem is a PhD student and graduate research assistant at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette. She received her B. Eng from Federal University Oye-Ekiti in Electrical and Electronics Engineering. She has 13 years of industry experience as a Reliability Engineer (Electrical) in the manufacturing Industry. Her research interests involve advancing ethics, empathy, and policies in engineering education

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 10: Institutions and Structures

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saskia van Beers, University of Toronto; Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

Paper ID #47634Illustrating Meritocracy: (How) Do Canadian Engineers See Social Structure?Ms. Saskia van Beers, University of Toronto Saskia van Beers (she/her) is a current MASc. student studying engineering education under the supervision of Dr. Cindy Rottmann. Her research interests include engineering culture, cultural reproduction and transformation, and structural inequity within engineering.Dr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Leadership Education at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, ethics, and equity in the

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Teaching Engineering Decision and Process

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fiona C. Zoutendyk, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Kimberly LeChasseur, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

required an assumption, design choice or information gathering.Successive assignments contained increasing levels of ambiguity related to the sub-system, andthe final project was open-ended, affording teams latitude in design choices of sub-systems andthe system as a whole.Students were expected to consider broader implications of their project, including socio-economic, ethical, geographic and environmental issues. All teams needed to include a sectionon the broader context of their work as part of their final project report.Using valid assumptions and determining if the scale and scope of the proposed solution wasreasonable was also an ongoing topic of discussion amongst teams and during open office hours.Students were able to compare their

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 3

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Micheal Oketunde Okegbola, Morgan State University; Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University; Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University; Olushola V. Emiola-Owolabi, Morgan State University; Julius Ogaga Etuke, Morgan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

Conference Session

Preparing Future Chemical Engineers

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sourojeet Chakraborty Ph.D., EIT, Johns Hopkins University; Daniela Galatro, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

towardsthe Society 5.0 global vision. Coupled with the use of conscious, ethical Artificial Intelligence tools (ChatGPT, JasperAI, Copilot, Gemini, etc.) and learning modalities (active/experiential/inquiry-driven, flipped-classroom, etc.) willempower students to individualize learning experiences/outcomes. However, e-learning must be supplemented byopen discussions [13], and project-based/textbook-based learning, especially for foundational subjects. Withinchemical engineering, core subjects and topics like calculus, transport phenomena, chemical thermodynamics,separation processes, and plant/process design (undergraduate capstone) must be taught through a mix of pedagogicalstrategies. Our results reveal an increase (especially since 2017

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Equity & Accessibility in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlyn Anne Thomas, University of Nevada, Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Kelly J Cross, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

., 2017.[8] K. A. Thomas, A. Kirn, and K. J. Cross, “A Systematic Literature Review of Women’s Epistemologies in Engineering Education,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2022.[9] M. Fricker, Epistemic Injustice: Power & the Ethics of Knowing. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.[10] D. Montfort, S. Brown, and D. Shinew, “The personal epistemologies of civil engineering faculty,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 388–416, 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20050.[11] L. Benson et al., “Assessing Students’ Researcher Identity and Epistemic Cognition,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2017.[12] L. Benson et al., “Interactions Between Engineering Student Researcher Identity and Epistemic Thinking,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Best of CoED Paper Session (Track 1.B)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jean Louis, University of Florida; Nadia Simone Jean Morrow, University of Florida; Juan E Gilbert, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

feasible, stu-dents should participate in both internship and undergraduate research as their computer sciencetraining. Certain skills, such as locating and synthesizing new work, are important for develop-ers and researchers. We recommend that students be taught skills related to creating a literaturereview. We believe these recommendations will help foster a great IoT learning environment forstudents. 1. Leverage low-cost feature-rich IoT kits like the ESP32 kit 2. Scaffold assignments at each level of IoT stack 3. Incorporate “Show of worthy” assignments 4. Leverage guest lectures from industry professionals 5. Incorporate other components such as AI ethics and Research 6. Be flexible with scheduling and build in-class working

Conference Session

Track 3: Technical Session 1: Bridging Educational Equity Gaps: A Systematic Review of AI-Driven Tools for Students Living with Disabilities in Engineering and STEM Education

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Kevin Zhongyang Shao, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Eric Kyeong-Min Cho, University of Washington; Sophia Tang, University of Washington; Hanlin Ma, University of Washington; Sep Makhsous, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

by improving social interactions and personalized learning. Italso discusses the limitations of existing AI tools, emphasizing the need for future developmentsto focus on personalization to cater to individual learning needs more effectively while takingprivacy and ethical considerations into account.Rather than focusing purely on NDDs, Bhatti et al. [17] analyzed diverse applications of AItechnologies aimed at assisting students with not only dyslexia and dyscalculia but also a widerspectrum of learning disabilities. Similar to the review by Barua et al., this study also examinedliterature involving facial expressions and eye-tracking analysis to monitor students’engagement. The authors highlight the potential of AI to provide personalized

Conference Session

Track 7: Technical Session 4: Diversity in STEM: Strategies of Professional Engineering Organizations in Recruiting and Retaining Women from Minority-Serving Institutions

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Rebeca Petean, Society of Women Engineers; Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

additional questions thatprompt questions aimed to explore individual experiences and capture nuanced recruitmentexperiences.The study's protocol was submitted for Institutional Review Board (IRB) review and was exemptfrom full review. To ensure the confidentiality of all participants in this study, the researchersexplained the interview's purpose and format, obtaining consent for recording, and consent toparticipate in the study. Moreover, a direct line of contact information was provided forfollow-up inquiries, and participants were given the verbal option to omit or add any informationwithin two months from the start of the interview. Adhering to ethical standards and privacylaws, all participants were fully informed about the terms of their

Conference Session

ME Division 3: Modern Tools and Methods in Structural Analysis and CAD

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Szwalek, The University of Illinois at Chicago; Christopher Carducci, The University of Illinois at Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

work together. It is unclear if these students, the majority of whom areGeneration Z, tend to think of themselves as self-reliant or if the COVID-19 pandemiclockdowns have made lasting effects of isolationism in their work ethics. Another possibleexplanation comes from students lacking confidence in the advice or feedback from peers, as onecomment stated (Q18).3.3 Perceived Design and CAD Skills and Students’ Benefits After Design ReviewMore than half of the students agreed with the statement that they had strong CAD and designskills coming into the course, much higher than anticipated when examining the Part II surveyresponses. The question then becomes about who benefits from design review and how. Basedon the students’ perceived design

Conference Session

ABET, PE, and CEBOK

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shenghua Wu, University of South Alabama; Min-Wook Kang, University of South Alabama; John Cleary, University of South Alabama

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

[6]. During the Middle Ages, professionalguilds established regulations akin to codes of ethics, ensuring the quality of construction andpenalizing breaches with financial loss or expulsion from the guild [7]. The term “civil engineer”emerged in the 18th century, distinguishing engineers working on civilian infrastructure frommilitary projects. With the formal establishment of engineering societies such as the AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in 1852, efforts to standardize practices gained momentum,culminating in the formation of key organizations like ASTM International (1898), AASHTO(1914), and NIST (1901) [8].Standards, specifications, and codes are typically developed in response to identified needsarising from industry

Conference Session

ME Division 7: Making it Matter: Projects and Communication

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Fleming, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Prabhakar Venkateswaran, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

provide students with a chance toreflect on the design of the system, rather than just providing an analysis of the dataset, and toencourage students to recall and incorporate other thermodynamic concepts.DiscussionThe project described in the paper was administered during the Fall 2023 semester. The lastdeliverable, in which the students had to provide recommendations to improve the system asdescribed above, was also used as the performance indicator to collect assessment data for ABETStudent Outcome 4: “An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities inengineering situation and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact ofengineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and social contexts” [3

Conference Session

STEM Education and Intercultural Competence

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton; Leanne Petry, Central State University; Elizabeth Generas, Wright State University; Amy Anderson; Marjorie Langston Langston; Douglas Picard, Greene County Career Center; Camryn Lanise Justice, University of Dayton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division (COMMENG)

Conference Session

Innovative Pathways in K–12 STEM: Bridging Emerging Technologies and Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Alejandro Gonzalez, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Brandon Costelloe-Kuehn, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Science and Technology Studies; Emily Liu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; James Olson, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

regarding the nature of the decisions requested [52]. Examples of this areexperiments [53], medical procedures [54], and the use of data from digital technologies [55]. Whendeveloping processes of consent, participants must be informed of the different consequences upondeciding [56]. This notion arose from the development of ethical principles while performing researchexperiments that involved human subjects and has been translated into frameworks such as theBelmont Principles [57]. A crucial aspect in the process of informing is the development of methodsthat provide individuals and communities with sufficient and useful information to understand therisk and benefits of their decisions [58]. However, many of these interactions are based on the

Conference Session

Innovations and Inclusion in Pre-Service and Pre-College STEM Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marcelo Caplan, Independent Researcher; Aaron Cortes

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

empower them toevaluate both the positive and negative impacts of their projects. This not only enhances their technicalabilities but also nurtures a sense of social responsibility. Tools like the computational action toolkit helpstudents analyze the ethical implications of their designs, fostering a deeper connection between theirwork and societal outcomes. The Computational Action Toolkit provides structured tools to guidestudents through problem-solving, design, and project management. It includes: • Ideation Tools: A mind map for brainstorming meaningful problems. • User Research Tools: Templates for user research, user personas, and a collaborative analysis framework. • Design and Impact Tools: An impact matrix, a

Conference Session

ECE-Career Development and Program Structures

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory Theodore Ling, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Jackson Hafele, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Henry Duwe, Iowa State University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

. Paul, Minnesota. He completed his B.S. and M.S. in electrical and computer engineering at Iowa State University, with a focus on Computing and Networking Systems in his graduate program.Dr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Nicholas D. Fila is an assistant teaching professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His research interests include empathy, ethics, design thinking, and course design.Dr. Henry Duwe, Iowa State University of Science and

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division (CONST) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Blanca Esthela Moscoso; David Francisco Coronado; MiguelAndres Andres Guerra P.E., Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ; Valeria Dayana Izurieta

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

provide a more accurate and supportive measure of student achievement [24],[25], [26].Background/FrameworkAcademic integrity refers to the expectation that all members of the academic community actaccording to universal standards of responsibility, honesty, and sincerity, avoiding unethicalpractices such as plagiarism and cheating [27], [28], [29]. Plagiarism is defined as submittingsomeone else's work without proper citation and is a serious violation of academic ethics [30].Cheating on tests can be caused by multiple factors, including inadequate preparation, workloadoverload, or fear of failure [31]. In many cases, students are not taught values such as honestyand responsibility from the beginning of their education, making them more

Conference Session

International Division (INTL) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xinfeng Quan, Westlake University; Jing Wang

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International Division (INTL)

Conference Session

Programmatic Design and Resiliency Among Women Engineers

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jing Zhang, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Hou Xie; Rosie Ruoci Shen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Valeri Werpetinski, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign; Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Yuting W. Chen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

were very “humane”. She elaborated that they had more “commonsense” in areas such as professionalism, nondiscrimination, mutual respect regardless of gender,and maintaining a gender-neutral perspective. While acknowledging individual differences inmaturity and behavior, A003 emphasized that this group of engineers stood out for their maturityand humanity. Additionally, her fellow interns supported her by addressing a situation in which amale colleague was not contributing—they spoke to him and “forced” him to collaborate withher. A003 attributed this support to her personality rather than her gender as she consistentlydemonstrated a strong work ethic. Similarly, A016 reported that her colleagues in her coreengineering team were very supportive

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 4: Fostering Belonging - Identity, Self-Efficacy, and Retention

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Patrick O'Connell, Northeastern University; Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University; Richard Whalen, Northeastern University; Constantine Mukasa, Northeastern University; Susan F Freeman, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

students experiencehow engineering knowledge coalesces to create practical solutions.The curriculum focuses on learning the principles of engineering and design, which is accomplishedthrough active learning in areas such as problem definition, conceptual design, preliminary and detaileddesign, design communication and implementation, and engineering ethics. The courses emphasizetechnical communication through report writing and presentations related to the projects. There is astrong emphasis on applying technical knowledge, developing problem-solving and decision-makingskills, and using computer-aided design (CAD) to communicate graphically.Algorithmic thinking and programming with C++ and Mathworks’ MATLAB are introduced along withthe basic use

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division (MVD) 1 - Access and Integration

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alyson Grace Eggleston, Pennsylvania State University; Ronald W. Welch P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans Division (MVD)

. Although each branch has its own list of characteristics such as, theArmy leader characteristics [19], Professional Ethics [20], and individual values called the 4 C’s.These service branch characteristics allow their military members to serve others whileaccomplishing the mission of the nation. Even though stated differently with slightly differentfocus by each branch of service, all have the same general focus to guide military members toserve honorably the ideals of the nation.Lifestyle insightsThe military asks service members to sacrifice much while they serve. Generally, they: • Live on military locations throughout the world that are many times in need of upgrading to meet expected (desired) living conditions • Live

Conference Session

DSAI Technical Session 4: Workshops, Professional Development, and Training

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

yilin zhang, University of Florida; Bruce F. Carroll, University of Florida; Jinnie Shin, University of Florida; Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (DSAI) Constituent Committee

-Move Frameworkcollection is ongoing to further expand the study’s scope and enhance the framework’svalidation. All conversations were recorded with informed consent, anonymized duringtranscription, and securely stored in compliance with ethical guidelines.3.2 Data Collection ProcessThe mentoring sessions encompass three primary types of interactions that map ontoour five-category Talk-Move Framework in different ways: • Academic Planning: Students sought guidance on course selection, workload management, and long-term career goals. These interactions typically map to the Goal Setting and Planning category when focusing on objective-setting, and to the Feedback and Support category when providing guidance on

Conference Session

ME Division 14: From M&Ms to Air Quality: Engaging Students in Energy and the Environment

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John T Solomon, Tuskegee University; Hang Song, Auburn University; Karen McNeal, Auburn University; Lauren E. Beckingham, Auburn University; Kelly Lazar, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

, personalinvolvement, interdisciplinary work, anticipatory thinking, justice, responsibility & ethics, andstrategic action [10], critical thinking & analysis, communication & use of media, assessment& evaluation, tolerance for ambiguity & uncertainty [11]; and interpersonal relations &collaboration [12]. A summary of survey development and its validation are discussed in thenext section. 3 III. METHODSA. Survey development A comprehensive and systematic approach has been used to develop the surveys thataccurately reflect the research goals of this project. Although a detailed description andapproaches used for survey development and its validity

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 3

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Micheal Oketunde Okegbola, Morgan State University; Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University; Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University; Abiola Olayinka Ajala, Morgan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 5

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meghan Allen, University of British Columbia

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

in size in the last decade. Many faculty members at UBC havetransitioned their courses to use Automated Assessment Tools so it is becoming less common forstudents to have their course work manually assessed by faculty or teaching assistants.5 Research DesignThis study answers the research question: How do course assessment practices affect students’perspectives of learning technical writing?5.1 Research EthicsThe research study was approved by the UBC Behavioural Research Ethics Board before theresearch commenced.I am a computer science faculty member at UBC. In this study, I was conscious of the power thatI have in relation to the participants who are UBC computer science students. In any study, thereis a risk that participants

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators (NEE) Technical Session 3 - Professional and Faculty Development

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gracie Kerr, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Hayden J Wulf, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

transparency between instructors and students in higher education has notable positiveimpacts on student success, particularly among underrepresented populations [25]. Transparencycreates opportunities for students to feel more involved in their education and prepared for thestructure of a course while requiring minimal additional effort on the part of the instructor.Expectations. Establishing expectations within a syllabus, particularly regarding the level andtypes of effort required of students to perform well in a course, allows instructors to betransparent about a class’s workload immediately. Emphasizing effort in a classroom also createsan environment where students are able to benefit from increased work ethic, regardless of innateability [26