and Technical State University Dr. Andrea N. Ofori-Boadu is an Assistant Professor of Construction and Construction Management with the Department of Built Environment within the College of Science and Technology at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (NCA & T). Her research interests are in bio-derived cement replacement materials, delivery of sustainable built environments, and professional identity development in STEM students, particularly architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) women. In February 2019, Andrea received the prestigious National Science Foundation NSF - CAREER award to research professional identity development processes in undergraduate AEC women. In 2020, she
way compared to teaching in-person.Participants noted the need to practice empathy with their students and themselves, the effect thatexternal factors (such as administrative support) had on their acceptance of technologies, and thelessons learned on how their instruction has changed as a result of online instruction.IntroductionThe experience of adapting to new technologies is universal. However, we often are willing tomake these changes in order to adapt to our professional careers, or more specifically, theteaching landscape. The experiences faced when confronted with a global pandemic andcontinuing education are shared phenomena teachers, students, and even parental figures arecontinuing to navigate. The shift to exclusively online
perspectives and will consider the parallel option as asolution to problems that they want to solve. Some argued that it should be offered as a seniorlevel required course. The last option will be harder to implement at our program, as it wouldrequire elimination of another core course in the existing curriculum. We believe that parallelismand concurrency are fundamental topics in computer engineering and should permeate thecurriculum. By adding the concepts slowly as modules to existing courses, we hope to encourageand motivate more students to pursue parallel and distributive computing in the senior level andchoose it as a future career. In 2019, we obtained an internal grant from the college to helpfacilitate our efforts. The remaining of the paper
will likely arise from this paradigm. Anapproach like this could be applied in a high-school technology career and technology education(CTE) classroom where students engage in these varied subjects. Students in an M3 based CTEcan engage in Making and production concepts in an applied setting, directly applying knowledgein the design, prototyping, and production of end-use products. Where students are lackingknowledge in a certain domain, students can seek solutions through their peers, mentors, or onlinecommunities. Such an applied approach of these varied subjects would need a horizontalapproach, where the focus isn’t necessarily depth in any one subject area (while the student oughtto have certain core competencies as to be literate in that
course are considering both future courses (design) and careers inindustry and research. 60 50 Percent of respondents 40 30 20 10 0 Sage on the stage Guide on the side Connect to other Prepare for the Convey courses future enthusiasmFigure 20. Categorized responses to "Describe your role in the class"Several faculty mentioned fun analogies as being particularly effective explanations. Someanalogies are listed below. • Making tea
and facilitates student and faculty training. She received her Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and her BSEE from the University of Miami.Onyinyechi Nwadiuto Agu, University of New Haven Onyinyechi Nwadiuto Agu is a Graduate student at the University of New Haven in West Haven, Con- necticut. She is studying Data science and is expected to graduate in December 2021. She aspires to further her education and professional career by obtaining her Ph.D in Data science. Her professional interest are in engineering education as well as Machine learning and Natural language processing. In addition to her academic pursuit, Onyinyechi currently occupies the position of
Beyerlein, S. W., 2004, “Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., pp. 1545– 1562.[18] Scheidt, M., and Lafayette, W., 2018, “Validity Evidence for the SUCCESS Survey : Measuring Non-Cognitive and Affective Traits of Engineering and Computing Students.”[19] Bessette, A., Okafor, V., and Morkos, B., 2014, “Correlating Student Motivation To Course Performance in Capstone Design,” International Design Engineering Technical Conference, pp. 1–12.[20] Benson L., Kirn A., and M. B., 2013, “‘CAREER : Student Motivation and Learning in Engineering,’” 120th ASEE Anuual Conf. Expo.[21] Kirn, A., Morkos, B., and Benson, L., 2012, “Work in Progress: How Differences in Student Motivation
was a technical communication course offered to Mechanical Engineering students. ENG 110 was the introductory course for the Mechanical Engineering program. The Engineering Librarian collaborated with these two courses during Fall 2018. Despite changes in instructors for both of these courses, progress has been made in adding a lesson plan to each course. In EGL 120, students were introduced to the literature of their discipline, specifically standards. In ENG 110, students were introduced to business and industry research as they begin considering future careers. • HUM 310 (Spring Senior Year). This was the engineering ethics course taken by all seniors in engineering programs. The
, ask questions, generate ideas, and design afuture of improved student experience, learning, and persistence in engineering. Theseoutcomes are particularly crucial in early-career engineering courses while also beingimportant across engineering programs. Although these measures may not dictate theoptimal or requisite responses, constant analysis of and reflection on data by educatorsestablishes the foundation for effecting positive change. Engaging in this work has thepotential to enhance outcomes for students and can prove to be particularlytransformative when combined with equity-minded analysis involving intentionality indisaggregating data [15]. Such an approach also provides a lens for understanding howstudents’ learning experiences
Enhanced Student LearningIntroductionWe are living in a continually evolving world. Globalization and advances in technology demandthe recent chemical engineering graduates be employed in fields that did not exist 10-20 yearsago, such as biotechnology, nanotechnology, product development, and sustainable practices [1].In response to the above challenges, besides gaining technological knowledge, the students alsoneed to be emphatic and critical thinkers to become leaders in solving multidisciplinary problems[2]. Therefore, the traditional teaching techniques need to be improved and upgraded to bridgethe gap between the existing chemical engineering curriculum and what the chemicalengineering graduates need to learn to succeed in their careers [3
most international students faced challenges during their firstsemester and that they were unsure how to seek help for these challenges. Students have alsoshared that ISST supported them with their career and academic challenges, but that they do notfeel ISST addressed their desire to connect with American students. Alongside the interviewresults, this paper will also present details of ISST and its offerings for students. This paper couldbe useful to colleges looking for manners in which they can fully support international students,specifically at the discipline-specific level.1. Introduction The transitional experience to college brings lots of firsts for all undergraduate students,as they are navigating a new educational system and
communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and
from one I grew up in;” “You grow so muchas a person, you push yourself out of your comfort zone, and you learn so many skills that willhelp you in the long run during your career;” and “I’m extremely thankful for this program andfor the lifelong memories and impact it has left me with. I know I will be a better student, friend,employee, and person because of this experience”.The CVEN Rome Program appears to benefit students, as manifested via a slight increase inGPA. An increase in GPA indicates classes following the program did not suffer from lack ofbase knowledge that would have been obtained on the trip. When asked about their experience,students provided highly enthusiastic responses with positive agreement to every Likert scalequestion
community nurses,” Nurse Education Today, vol. 46, pp. 109-114.[25] M. Estrada, A. Eroy-Reveles, and J. Matsui. 2018. “The influence of affirming kindness and community on broadening participation in STEM career pathway,” Social Issues and Policy Review, vol. 12 (1), pp. 258-297.[26] L. Flook, S.B. Goldberg, L. Pinger, and R.J. Davidson. 2015. “Promoting prosocial behavior and self- regulatory skills in preschool children through a mindfulness-based kindness curriculum,” Development Psychology, vol. 51 (1), pp. 44-51.[27] P. Gilbert, J. Basran, M. MacArthur, and J.N. Kirby. 2019. “Differences in the semantics of prosocial words: an exploration of compassion and kindness,” Mindfulness, vol. 10, pp. 2259-2271.[28] J.L. Kristeller, and
consultation with military and corporateleaders, have validated and developed the institution-specific leadership model [1] and itsassessment within courses. As shown in Table 1, The Citadel Leadership model seeks to developthe following seven aspirational behavioral characteristics, in alignment with its mission toproduce principled leaders across all career paths. Table 1: Characteristics of Principled Leaders [1] Leadership Attribute 1. Leads with humility; creates conditions for the team to succeed as a whole. 2. Embraces a true, authentic self; develops and leads according to a principle-based leadership philosophy. 3. Acts and speaks with courage; performs critical leadership functions to overcome
insights into how the pandemic affected faculty members from amental and emotional perspective [4]. A total of 1122 faculty members responded to the surveyfrom four-year and two-year universities. The analysis of the data highlights that the majority offaculty members are experiencing elevated levels of frustration, anxiety, and stress, as they arestruggling with increased workloads and a deterioration of work-life balance. This is especiallytrue for female faculty members. The survey also highlights that more than two-thirds of allfaculty members are discouraged enough to consider retiring or changing careers and leavinghigher education, with tenured faculty members even more likely to retire than others. Facultymembers faced a multitude of
Center. Dr. Andino earned a Bachelor of Science in Engineering Sciences from Harvard University and a PhD in Chemical Engineering from the California Institute of Technology. Prior to being recruited to ASU, she was on the faculty at the University of Florida, and also worked for 2 years at Ford Motor Company in both their Chemistry and Chemical Engineering departments. Prof. Andino is the recipient of the 2017 Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers STAR Educator of the Year award, a Fulbright US Scholar award in Renewable Energy (for work in the Republic of Panam´a during her sabbatical from ASU), and a National Science Foundation CAREER award, among many other local and regional awards. She is also a regis
Professor in Higher Education Counseling/Student Affairs at Califor- nia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. He is Lead Principal Investigator for the NSF-funded California State University Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) Alliance for Diversity and Strengths of STEM Faculty: A Culturally-Informed Strengths-Based Approach to Advance Early-Career Faculty Success. Dr. Almeida is also Co-Principal Investigator for the NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (S-STEM) grant, Engineering Neighbors: Gaining Access Growing Engineers (ENGAGE). Dr. Almeida’s graduate training is in Urban Education Policy – Higher Education from the University of Southern
next semester than peers. In another study [11],African American students who received the social-belonging intervention earned higher gradesthroughout the following 3-year period, halving the racial achievement gap. The interventionalso increased the percentage of African American students in the top 25% of the class. Inanother study [12], the social-belonging intervention increased the percentage of students whostayed full-time enrolled in college in their first year from 32% to 43% and increased thepercentage of ethnic-minority and first-generation college students who completed the first yearfull-time enrolled by 4%. In a recent study [13], the long-term effects of the intervention showedgreater career satisfaction and success in black
selected as a National Academy of Educa- tion / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions, specifically on design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Dr. Ardeshir Raihanian Mashhadi, University at Buffalo Dr. Ardeshir Raihanian is an assistant professor of teaching in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at University at Buffalo. His research interests include user-centric design, sus- tainable design, user behavior simulation and agent based modeling. He
in Chile. His interest in education led him to obtain a master’s degree in Higher Education Teaching from the University Andres Bello. He currently is a PhD candidate from the Doctorate in Education in the University Benito Juarez, Mexico. He teaches undergraduate courses for careers of Geology and Mining Engineering in several universities and is a professor of a Postgraduate program in Geomining. His research interests include the importance of soft skills in engineering students and the use of different methodologies in on-line teaching. He also is interest in training professors on topics related to on-line teaching.Dr. Mar´ıa Elena Truyol, Universidad Andres Bello Mar´ıa Elena Truyol, Ph.D., is full professor
infrastructure, protective structures, and engineering education.Dr. Brock E. Barry P.E., United States Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is the Director of the Civil Engineering Division and Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Tech- nology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional en
it is on their own. This hunger for knowledge, spurred by PBL and inclear support of ABET Student Outcome 7, establishes a crucial aspect of professionaldevelopment in young students that will serve them well as they progress through their careers[1].Student feedback from open-ended questions in the author survey agree that PBL improvesstudents’ ability to apply new knowledge to real-world problems. Students use all of theirknowledge, integrate them, in order to solve the problems. The COVID-19 also creates anenvironment that engineering students have to be more initiative to solve problems on their own.A remote learning education requires students to acquire new capabilities in, for example,technology, information collecting, etc. Thus
. The report highlightsthat remediation courses designed with the intent to help students succeed are, in fact, morelikely to prevent students from matriculating into college level courses, in part due to theadditional time and costs associated with taking the courses. Evidence suggests the negativeimpact of these remedial supports increases the equity gap and reduces participation and successin STEM-related careers for underserved and underrepresented student groups [6, 7]. Recentreform efforts have replaced extended developmental mathematics sequences with acceleratedcorequisite models [6].The corequisite approach has been found to be cost-effective and ensures better alignmentbetween the needed academic support and the requirements of
created by the previous instructorexplaining regression.Module 4 was on regression, and they were asked to download a data file from the web and performlinear regression. The linear regression content was taught through a video recorded by the previousinstructor.Finally, in module 5, students had to create PowerPoint slides for practicing interview skills. So they hadto come up with answers to possible interview questions like "tell us about yourself," or "why did youapply for this job position," "what type of position do you see yourself working five years from now?"Links to the Career Resource Center were provided.As you can see, the MS Office component was taught through Lynda.com, with low involvement of theinstructor on this topic. On the
instructors and students perceptions.” Journal of Mechanical Design. 129 (7). 2007. doi: 10.1115/1.2739569.[3] J. C. Blickenstaff, “Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?” Gender and Education, 17(4), pp. 369–386, 2005.[4] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study.” J Eng Educ.101(1):6-27. 2012. doi:10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2012.tb00039.x.[5] R. Suresh, “The relationship between barrier courses and persistence in engineering.” Journal of College Student Retention, 8(2), pp. 215–39, 2006/2007.[6] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press, CO, 1997.[7] J
areencouraged to meet with the Director, to talk through the program, expectations, and to provide ahint of context about the research component of the program (though extensive detail isn’tnecessary until later in the program.) The Director also discusses and reviews individualizedplans of study with students, identifying issues and recommending other courses the student maybe interested in as they relate to a student’s personal goals and career plans after the degree.There are seemingly small elements of Community of Practice theory at work in this design.Since students are often transitioning back into academia from industry, they often are notthinking about calling their professors by academic titles. While some professors do not mind
Paper ID #32443To File or Not to File Intellectual Property is Not the Only QuestionDr. Chad E. Kennedy, Arizona State University Professor Kennedy’s experience spans biomedical engineering research, project management, and ad- vanced technology application in industry. Mr. Kennedy’s expertise stems from spending the last 25+ years working in the field of engineering. His early career began working in various engineering de- sign, testing, and astronaut training capacities at NASA Johnson Space Center. After, Dr. Kennedy helped establish the Silicon Valley office and operations of VI Technology, Inc., an independent
, andpresented in labs for feedback. To assess the effectiveness of these changes, students weresurveyed before and after the project was changed. Overall, Rozelle found the new, more open-ended project to be a better way to teach engineering design. Students indicated they knew moreabout engineering design after the project, and were in greater agreement that students should learnabout engineering design early in their college career. Additionally, students expressed greaterinterest in the project, indicated finding it more fun and liking the project, but also found it slightlymore frustrating. Student comments, in particular, indicated they loved the freedom and creativityrequired by the project.Overall, the literature indicates that incorporating an
, W.F. Denetclaw, C.G. Gutiérrez, S. Hurtado, G.H. John, J. Matsui, R. McGee, C.M. Okpodu, T.J. Robinson, M.F. Summers, M. Werner-Washburne, & M. Zavala. “Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM.” CBE Life Sciences Education, vol. 15(3), pp. 1-10, 2016.[5] L.V. Garcia-Felix. “Latinos not engaging in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) careers.” Journal of Academic Perspectives. Vol 4, pp. 1-21, 2019.[6] D. Hernandez, S. Rana, A. Rao, & M. Usselman. “Dismantling stereotypes about Latinos in STEM.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, vol. 39(4), pp 436-451, 2017.[7] C. Peralta, M. Caspary, & D. Boothe. “Success factors impacting Latina/o