increase their odds of success by offering ”pre-signing” development – for which no fee is charged to the author, as publisher pays the fee. For Momentum Press, I recruit academic Collection Editors in Mfg. Processes, Mechanical, Industrial, Instrumentation, Design & Graphics Engineering; then collaborate with these CE’s to develop their Collections by seeking academic author ”experts” to write short (150- page) applied focused titles within larger subject areas – Collections overall are for engineering libraries; individual titles in both digital & paperback formats are for advanced Engr. & Engr. Tech student purchase (via adoption or single copy) for research & course study. Have set foot on over 1200
practicing engineers, many of them graduates of the University of Mainethemselves, effectively complete the transition from student to young engineer.Student grades are based on writing and performance evaluations by the instructors in all fourrespective courses, although there is considerable discussion of grading within each semester.There are assignments that are specific to only one course, such as written exams in ProjectManagement, and some assignments that are shared, such as the proposals. Teamwork andindividual contributions are based on written evaluations by both peer and instructor at severalpoints during each semester. Faculty advisors are not involved in grading, except on a voluntarybasis of the final design report presentations
parents are frequently unable to help them navigate their educational pathway. 2) Knowing the Rules or Ambiguity: LIATFG graduate students may be unclear about the expectations of graduate study. They may perceive that their peers know the “rules of the game” while they do not know what is expected or how to navigate the system. 3) Living in Two Worlds: Families of LIATFG students are often supportive of college, but may be less understanding of the value of graduate education. LIATFG students may not feel they fully belong to either their family/culture, or within academia. 4) Seeking Support: LIATFG students can have difficulty building the necessary support systems (whether they be social, academic and/or
TCC 101, projects included several individual writing assignments to improve style, grammar,punctuation, conciseness, word choice, topic sentences, critical analysis, and argumentation.Some of these were peer-reviewed and subsequently revised. One key early paper was to weighthe ethical aspects of the Dow Corning silicone breast implants controversy in light of scientific-technical knowledge. Students also received instruction in organizing and delivering oneindividual and two team oral presentations. Most class time was used for cooperative learningworkshops in which students discussed an issue, solved a problem, and/or gathered informationin groups of three or more and then shared their group's results with the rest of the class
students to write a summary of what has been covered in the lectureto asking them to collaboratively work on real-world problems and projects. The effectiveness of activelearning strategies compared to the traditional lecture approach, when implemented well, has beenempirically validated and documented in engineering education literature. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore engineering faculty’s use of active learning strategies in their teaching in aMidwestern university’s college of engineering context. Data sources included a survey about the facultyknowledge and use of active learning strategies and follow-up semi-structured interviews that aimed togather an in-depth understanding of their implementation of active learning
mid-semester and final oralpresentations provided additional insight. However, the peer-assessments were student biased,and so instructor’s evaluation involved some speculation. An additional teamwork assessment isrecommended in other classes. Also, a single final report was submitted by each group, and so itwas not possible to assess the individual performance for written communication. A more validapproach would be to assess writing skills for individual laboratory reports from other classesduring the senior year. The new rubrics would be much more effective if used in a variety ofcourses.ConclusionA pilot study has been conducted for three new rubrics to assess communication and teamworkskills. Results have been summarized and evaluated
A Case-Study of Assessment in Materials Laboratory Claudia Milz, Rufus L. Carter University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 / Marymount University, Arlington, VA 2220 Materials engineering students are often ill prepared to enter the workforce upongraduation. While students master the content knowledge they often lack critical skills forsuccess. Our industry feedback of internship students indicates weakness in the areas of:technical writing, critical thinking, professional attitude & teamwork, analysis, reasoning anddecision making. We have examined the effectiveness of new teaching and assessment methods in theMaterials
academic settings. Overall, this study seeks to answer the researchquestion: How do engineering faculty perceive student use of GAI assistance in undergraduatecourse completion?Preface on Grey LiteratureIn the study of new areas such as GAI in engineering education, non-peer-reviewed sources—think tank reports, white papers, and conference papers— are crucial in expanding ourunderstanding [17], especially when peer-reviewed articles are scarce [18], [19]. Peer-reviewedliterature remains the gold standard in academia for its rigor and reliability [20], [21]. However,including carefully selected grey literature is essential for a more thorough and nuancedunderstanding of the latest developments and perspectives in rapidly evolving fields, such
write favorable comments about the Lab, includingcomments for improvements. The feedback has been used to modify and strengthen severalportions of the Lab Projects and Lab Manual.BIBLIOGRAPHY[1] Caputi, M. J., DESIGN 15 Class Workbook & Lab Manual, Season 11 - Fall 2011. Hofstra Engineering Dept., 2012.[2] Hacker, M., Burghardt, D, Technology Education: Learning by Design. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.[3] Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing: Helping New Teams Perform Effectively, Quickly. http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_86.htm.[4] Hofstra University Peer Teacher Program Guidelines. http://www.hofstra.edu/About/Administration/Provost/prov_peerteacher_guidelines.html
. Higher Education, 57(4), 405-415.Rogers, P., & Freuler R.J. (2015). The “T-Shaped” Engineer, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, 2015. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.VALUE. (2009). Integrative and Applied Learning VALUE Rubric. Assessing Outcomes and Improving Achievement. Association of American Colleges and Universities.Wolfe, C. R., & Haynes, C. (2003a). Assessing interdisciplinary writing. Peer Review, 6(1), 12– 15.Wolfe, C. R., & Haynes, C. (2003b). Interdisciplinary writing assessment profiles. Issues in Integrative Studies, 21, 126–69.
differentresults. For example, the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) [19]–[21] includes25 elements grouped into “Classroom design and implementation”, “Content”, and “Classroomculture”, each rated on a scale from 0 (never occurred) to 4 (very descriptive). The TeachingDimensions Observation Protocol (TDOP) [22], [23] identifies observed activities every twominutes, using codes such as “Lecturing while writing” and “Lecturing from pre-made visuals”.The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) [24] was adaptedfrom TDOP, and includes Peer Instruction practices such as “individual thinking/problemsolving” and “discuss clicker question in groups”. The Science and Engineering ClassroomLearning Observation Protocol (SEcLO) [25
assist ASD students, however somestudents will sign up for this assistance, while others do not. Beyond the college resources theinstructor must fill in the gaps to ensure student success. First, the instructor must recognize theASD student’s learning style. The needs of the student and the learning styles vary by individual.For freshman year instructors it may be difficult to determine these needs in a timely manner,since most students do not self-disclose their disability. Observation and communication with thestudent are key in this step. Many first year engineering courses utilize individual and groupwork with both written assignments and “hands-on” projects including writing, drawing,problem solving, scheduling, budgeting, and craftsmanship
presenting it to the class. f. The Special Topic handout was sufficient to 3.22 prepare for the exam questions. g. Writing multiple choice questions that would be 3.39 used on the exam was a good approach to identifying key information with our topicCATME was used to pick teams and to provide student peer-to-peer feedback but the students didnot feel that was CATME was effective. Part of the disconnect lies with the author’s inexperiencewith the software and the lack of peer-to-peer comments. The peer-to-peer feature has since beenadded to the current version of CATME and will be used in the future. The introductory lessons assessment, shown in Table 2, did
publishingconcepts, mentored in designing and testing hypotheses, and then involved in two challengesrelated to self-driving and networked vehicles. Two teams of 4 designed, implemented, testedvarious self-drive and V2X algorithms using real vehicles on a test course, analyzed/evaluatedtest results, wrote technical reports, and delivered presentations. After the summer program wasover, the technical reports were published in peer reviewed conferences and journals.Survey results show that students attained significant & real-world computer science skills inautonomous vehicle development leveraging real vehicles available. The programs alsoProceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section ConferenceCopyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering
“somewhat successful” or “very successful” with theirimplementation. Those respondents who did not use active learning were unsure how to usethese methods in their specific class, believe that their teaching responsibilities did not allowthem to use these approaches, or did not feel as though active learning was necessary. Thispaper examines these responses further to determine whether or not their teachingresponsibilities, their confidence with a variety of teaching-related tasks (e.g., lesson planning,working with students, etc.), and use of teaching peer mentors influence their decisions toincorporate active learning into their teaching practice. Recommendations for faculty supervisorsand TA training program organizers are provided.1
Peer Self Student • Good use of textbook in • I use material in the • I actually used the class. textbook every lesson. textbook more in your I cite and write on the course than in others. chalkboard equation numbers and figures.Assign design teams. In the real world engineers do not get to pick and choose who they want towork with. The professor should assign the teams based on some parameter(s) (background ofcourses, surveyed skills, in-class observations, etc.).27 The assignment of
conceptual design in Deliv-erable 1, they were required to write a minimum one-page literature review on developments inAV technology related to their deployment on roads, with a specific requirement to cite five ormore references, which could be articles in magazines/websites, peer-reviewed journal articles,articles from conference proceedings, reports, or any other source. Successful completion of thistask would expose students to the variety of thoughts and approaches being used in research forAVs and setup a general set of assumptions that they would make about the performance of AVson roads. While wider public consultations was not possible within the limitations of this course,this task would also equip students to use feedback from such
an academic career. The GTFprogram currently being assessed was designed to combine elements from other successful Page 14.975.3programs into a holistic approach to graduate student training that focuses on the integration ofteaching, research and service. The research questions will be investigated using the concept of a community of practice11, 12 to address the mentoring and teaching communities, as well as the social and academicinteraction of the fellows with their mentors and peers. The final question concerning thepreparation of fellows for faculty careers will be addressed using the model of a “steward of thediscipline
bioengineering, service learning, universal design, tissue and protein engineering labs, bioengineering ethics, leadership, and capstone proposal writing and design. She is committed to enhancing diversity and inclusivity in en- gineering, and creating opportunities for undergraduate students to engage in K-12 educational outreach. Dr. Hendricks has over a decade of experience leading educational outreach and summer camp programs at both Duke University and the University of Washington.Dr. Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington Ken Yasuhara is an instructional consultant and assistant director at the Office for the Advancement of Engineering Teaching & Learning (ET&L) at the University of Washington. He completed an
least one of thesections. Some students might contribute to several sections. The instructor or students can checkother designs through a common Graphic User Interface. At the end of the term, based on aprepared job description for someone who will hire by a company to do such a project, studentswill be interviewed by peers and the instructor. All students will participate in a mock interview.Every student is responsible for writing at least one chapter of the final document (book).Example:The following project might be one possible choice for the students with Electronics/ComputerEngineering Technology major:Name of the project: Automation of the appliances in a houseThis project controls appliances such as: Radio, TV, Garage door, Shower
from the peer-reviewed literature. Case Study summary: Student teams prepare a written Case Study summary in both courses (Appendix A2, B2), along with a list of references, recommended readings, and discussion questions. Policy Memo: Students choose an issue of interest to them and they write fully documented 2- 3-page policy memos. Case Briefs: Students read reviews of U.S. Supreme Court cases and summarize the cases in a standard case brief, including details on the facts, issue, holding, rationale, and opinions.Promoting critical thinking skills Addressing wicked problems requires astute critical thinking skills for “actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered
as in AppendixTable A1. The original research at the East Carolina University in the US included 20 scenarios.For the German study, the last scenario (the use of online solution manuals or solution servicessuch as chegg.com) was dropped as analogous resources are not known to exist in Germanlanguage sources. It should also be noted that the translation was conducted without additionaloversight or verification of validity. Two of the instrument items are not dishonest actions andwere included as a kind of negative control on the pooled responses: Scenario 3:Writing-quotedwith citation and Scenario 14:YouTube to study. The remainder are designed to present gradationsof similar situations. This list includes shortened descriptor phrases to
about15 hours using a computer per week. Her career interests before attending the Game of Lifeworkshop included publishing and editing, since writing came naturally to her. She knewtechnology would be a part of her life in terms of email, word processing, correspondence, butshe had no desire “to work in front of a computer all day long”. She rated herself as average to abit higher than average when assessing her confidence in using technology before attending theworkshop as compared to her peers. She was also sure that college would be part of her future.She says, “Overall, my experiences with DO-IT were good, but I found many of the classes andactivities were not as useful to me as they could have been. The experiences of livingindependently in
startedbrainstorming, discussing, and researching new ideas. At a faculty retreat some peer-reviewexamples were presented that could be applicable. These came from instructor resources in achemistry writing textbook.10 A presentation by Leipold at the 2015 ASEE Annual conferencecontained quite a few innovative ideas that could apply to this lab.11 See Appendix C for ahandout from that presentation with one of the author’s scribbled notes. Additionally, ideascame from a lecture / lab format for an Engineering Physics course.12, 13The resulting modifications to the course are listed here and partially described in the syllabusexcerpt found in Appendix D:1. CATME software was introduced to create teams and to administer peer reviews for teamwork for each lab
happy! (U37).Many of these young women also question whether engineering is a profession that will providethe space and time to find a balance between work and family. A woman at Smith asks, “Is anengineer allowed to be in love, be attracted to anyone, or better still, even have the time toengage in such wonderful human relationships?” (S03). Her counterpart at MIT echoes the Page 22.1719.9concerns of her peers when she writes, All my life, I‟ve been encouraged to not let being a female limit what I do; women like Sally Ride and Marie Curie were held up as role models and I was always told to pursue what I like and what I
Self, University of Kansas c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Impact of Undergraduate Teaching Fellows Embedded in Key Undergraduate Engineering CoursesAbstractResearch has shown the positive impact of peer mentoring on student learning in STEM. Withthe goal of improving student learning and retention, the School of Engineering (SoE) hasundertaken a program in which Undergraduate Teaching Fellows (UGTFs) are utilized in keycourses across the School. The UGTFs support in-class activities, such as team-basedproblem-solving, hands-on activities and demonstrations. This program has grown from fourUGTFs in Spring 2015 to 28 UGTFs in Spring 2017, with UGTFs embedded in 13
, University of Washington Priti N. Mody-Pan is the Director of Evaluation at the Center for Workforce Development. Her responsibilities include overseeing funded projects related to the Global Alliance, writing and editing proposals, fundraising, conducting research projects on institutional best practices in diversity, writing reports, managing an international exchange program, conducting program evaluations, marketing, and working with international and national organizations. Ms. Mody-Pan received her Master of Public Administration (MPA) and Master of Arts in International Studies (MAIS) degrees from the University of Washington and her BA in Political Science and East Asian Studies
gender identities that have been historically underrepresented in engineering programs. Using participatory action research (PAR) and qualitative research methods, this study explores whether engaging students in a series of focus groups can help disrupt negative teamwork interactions and encourage inclusive student engagement with team projects in an Introduction to Mechanical Engineering class. All participants in this study are engineering students at a college of engineering in New England, and include 6 undergraduates in the focus groups and two undergraduates (one junior, one senior) who served as peer facilitators. This work-in-progress paper describes the process and challenges associated with recruiting participants, training student
self-evaluation. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159-172.Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1985). Peer models: Influence on children's self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 313.Sungur, S., & Güngören, S. (2009). The role of classroom environment perceptions in self- regulated learning and science achievement. Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 883- 900.Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of academic and self-regulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 125- 141.
evaluate whathas actually been accomplished we see that in this one semester students have been given a chanceto interact with industrial sponsors, with faculty advisors, then at the end of the semester with peers,friends, family, and high and middle school students. Communication has been practiced in manyforms – text production, oral presentations, and required listening. Within those forms the teammembers will write memos, progress reports, problem definitions, formal reports. They will createpowerpoint presentations and practice their speaking skills, skills that will be beneficial in theirengineering careers.The projects they have worked on will benefit many, both companies and people. Four of theprojects are summarized below.Product