reports. Details of the assessmentplan in addition to preliminary analyses will be presented with special attention on lessons forservice learning program development.1. MotivationNow more than ever, it is important for American engineering students to be exposed to andunderstand the engineering challenges facing the developing world. Not only are significantproblems confronting a vast number of people under-served by engineers, future technologyinvestments will be mainly outside the States1. Only with a keen understanding of globaldiversity can engineers develop effective solutions through innovation within the constraints ofavailable resources, cultural demands, and technological appropriateness. Additionally,considerable insight or potential
Mechanical Engineering in areas of analysis, design, manufacturing, andtesting of mechanical and thermal systems, while also including system integration, propulsionsystems, concurrent engineering, and other competitive manufacturing practices, leading to theBachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering. Based on the local demand, theprogram has two options: Manufacturing and Propulsion. The Mechanical EngineeringDepartment at AAMU is committed to prepare students in these options, to work efficiently forvarious industries and government.The Mechanical, Electrical and Civil Engineering programs at AAMU were successfullyaccredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)1, the last one inFall 2007. They also meet the
AC 2010-2032: THE COACH'S GUIDE: BEST PRACTICES FORFACULTY-MENTORED MULTIDISCIPLINARY PRODUCT DESIGN TEAMSR. Keith Stanfill, University of FloridaArif Mohsin, University of FloridaOscar Crisalle, University of FloridaSuleyman Tufekci, University of FloridaCarl Crane, University of Florida Page 15.1213.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 The Coach’s Guide: Best Practices for Faculty-mentored Multidisciplinary Product Design TeamsAbstractFaculty mentors, also known as coaches, have two overarching roles when mentoringindustrially sponsored capstone design projects: (1) ensure the team achieves the academic goalsof the course, and (2) keep
, and ASCE chapters) and a Summit gathering a subset of these advisors.This paper will present some of the main findings from the survey, an overview of the Summitstructure, and preliminary findings from that meeting.2. Faculty SurveyThe survey focused on two main topics, service learning in engineering education, and aspects ofbeing an advisor. Nearly 100 responses were gathered; response rates among EWB-USAadvisors were much higher than those for ASME and ASCE, 30% versus 6%, suggesting generalinterest in the subject. Among respondents, nearly 40% of engineering colleges have servicelearning courses (Figure 1); most engineering faculty though admit to using an informaldefinition of service learning, so these courses may better be described as
distributed between men andwomen. Among the general population (all ages), the use of online social networking is highlyprevalent, with the core age group of interest to most engineering programs, persons 18 to 29years of age, showing particularly heavy usage (see Figure 1). It should be noted that the chartsshown in Figure 1 represent the percentage of internet users reporting the use of socialnetworking sites, rather than the percentage of total persons surveyed. It is thus clear that the useof social networking sites is very heavy among college students. (A casual survey of studentcomputer screens, as seen from the back of many darkened lecture halls, would as easily identifythis trend.)A major advantage of social networking sites is the “pull
industry in theRegion.ReviewWhat does “design” mean in an engineering context? What are the qualifications of a designer?Can design be taught? And if so, who can teach it? These questions will be addressed in theparagraphs that follow.Relevant Definitions, Thoughts and Processes: Engineering design as stated by Dym et al. in2005 is: “a systematic, intelligent process in which designers generate, evaluate, and specifyconcepts for devices, systems or processes whose form and function achieve clients’ objectivesor users’ needs while satisfying a specified set of constraints” (1) . This definition presents designas a thoughtful process that depends on systematic, intelligent generation of design concepts andthe specifications that make it possible to
can pass on their experiential knowledge to the next.”More information about the wiki (including screen shots) is provided in the Appendix.Research Questions and Methodology Our work addresses the following questions: 1) In what ways do TAs use the website,and which of its parts are most helpful for TAs’ teaching and the improvement of their teaching?2) Is there any difference in website usage between the new TAs and the TAs who have alreadytaught the course? 3) What prompts TAs to add information to the wiki, and what inhibits themfrom adding information? Our research tools include online questionnaires for TAs, focus groups, and statisticsabout website usage. We gathered data from two semesters — winter 2009 (Jan.–Apr
moistair. It provide several examples demonstrating the efficiency of “Solver” and “Goal Seek” toolsof Excel in solving problems requiring iterative processes.Definitions and Basic Equations PsychrometricsThe following paragraphs provide the basic definitions and equations used in psychrometricanalysis.At low pressures a mixture of air and water vapor behaves as an ideal gas. Therefore, ideal gasequations can be used for thermodynamic analysis of moist air close to atmospheric pressures.The equation of state for ideal gases can be expressed in the following forms: PV ? nR T ? mRT (1)where, R is the universal gas constant, R ? R M , and M is the molecular weight of
trained.The Solution – A Competency Based Combined Crafts Apprenticeship ProgramModern manufacturing demands a workforce with postsecondary education credentials, and theadaptability to respond immediately to changing economic and business needs. The Mosaic/PSCcombination crafts apprenticeship program is meeting these demands though competency basedlearning and lifelong learning strategies that enable workers to advance their skills and remaincompetitive in the global economy. The final program outlined in Figure 1 and Table 1, creates afive unit program that provides the skills and knowledge needed for Mechanics / Millwrights andElectrical, Instrumentation & Automation Technicians. These five “program completion points”(PCPs) break the
tournaments and the College World Series two times andat the professional level (National League) a couple of times. Throughout this lengthy career, Igathered numerous stories to share (See Appendix A). Here are three abbreviated sample storiesused: 1. The pitching coach at WSU, while objecting to my strike zone, kicked dirt on the entire plate. He proceeded to uncover a two inch space down the middle of the plate and commented that was my strike zone! What percentage of the plate did he uncover? 2. While umpiring a major league game, Davey Johnson the manager of Cincinnati, questioned why a pitch was not called a strike which would have resulted in strike three. The batter hit the next pitch for a home
and growth opportunities. We will continue toimprove and monitor our progress while adapting to fit industry, collegiate and individual needs.Bibliography[1] Electric Power Engineering Education Resources 2005-2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society CommitteeReport. The Power Engineering Education Committee (PEEC) Task Force on Educational Resources. IEEETransactions on Power Systems, Vol 23, No.1, February 2008, pp. 1–24.[2] National Science Foundation. “Report of the National Science Foundation Workshop on the Future PowerEngineering Workforce (Held November 29-30, 2007).” September 2008. Available:http://ecpe.ece.iastate.edu/nsfws/Report%200f%20NSF%20Workshop.pdf.[3] Task Force on America’s Future Energy Jobs. National Commission on Energy
’ respective mentorships, a set of tips was generated from theadvice of experienced faculty and influential relevant works to aid other graduate studentinstructors in maximizing their effectiveness in teaching2, 3. The following is a list of the tips indecreasing order of perceived importance from faculty. 1. Focus on the students' learning of the material as opposed to the graduate student's performance as an instructor. 2. Teach the curriculum alongside a professor and use their feedback 3. Exhibit confidence to gain respect. 4. Become comfortable with content knowledge through lecture preparation, practice, and proven lesson plans. 5. Dress professionally. 6. Be comfortable with making mistakes. 7. Keep it
scientists are related but different, engineeringin the classroom demands a different style of instruction than may be effective in the science ormath classroom. Style of instruction aside, high school science and math courses rest on afoundation of relatively well-defined content; contrast this with Koen’s definition of theengineering method as “the strategy for causing the best change in a poorly understood situationwithin the available resources”1. Even retreating from this abstract definition and focusing onmore familiar territory such as electrical or mechanical engineering does not necessarilyilluminate the fundamental engineering content these disciplines share. An extensive NationalAcademies survey on the present state and future of K-12
anEFLC. Also, the strategies resulting in high yields for EFLC participation and course evaluationparticipation should be investigated for marketing and evaluating other retention interventions.Table 1. Math / Chemistry enrollments of Russ College freshmenMath Course All Russ College freshmen Fall Course EnrollmentAlgebra 14 %Pre-Calculus 42 %Calculus I 23 %Calculus II 15 %Other / No Math 5%General Chemistry 52 %Self-reported enrollments of the electronic survey respondents are in similar proportions to thosetypical of all Russ College freshmen (Table 1), suggesting that this small sample is notnecessarily atypical of the population. The electronic survey’s self-reported
question regarding perceived preparedness was quantified by coding responses asfollows: Strongly agree was assigned a 1, agree a 2, neutral a 3, disagree a 4, and stronglydisagree a 5. A one sample t test was performed on the differences in the ratings for individualdata. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was determined between the individual studentperformances for all eight questions and the individual student perceived perception ofunderstanding.ResultsThree students chose to not have their responses included in the study. Eight students did notcomplete or return all sections of the survey and their answers were not included in the analysis.That left thirty-nine students that were used for the analysis. Table 1 shows the proportion ofcorrect
diligently in both subjects. Sincestudents historically perform well in freshman engineering, the expected result, if this experimentis successful, would be improved grades in calculus.In this experiment, three joint projects were defined to illustrate the following math concepts:(1) functions, composition of functions, discrete and continuous variables; (2) exponentialgrowth and decay; and (3) rate of change, specifically focusing on Newton’s Law of Cooling.Each project presents a fictitious real world problem that puts the students in the context of beingthe consulting group that needs to develop the solution to the problem. The problem must beunderstood analytically (the part done in math recitation and continued for homework) as well
curriculum. Page 15.357.14Bibliography[1] Bacharach, Inc. 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.bacharach-inc.com/leakator-10.htm.[2] Barbir, Frano. PEM Fuel Cells. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press. 2005.[3] Chroma Ate Inc. 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.chromaate.com/product/63200_series_High_Power_DC_Electronic_Load.htm.[4] EG&G Technical Services, Inc., Fuel Cell Handbook (Seventh Edition). Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy. 2004. [Online] Available: http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/fuelcells/seca/refshelf.html.[5] Engineering Accreditation Commission. (Accreditation Board of Engineering Technology
a group of their peers that the application is commercially and ethically viable. Surveyresults were taken from three different classes using a 9-value Likert scale. The current researchwill explain the pedagogical basis for using competition in such presentations and a discussion oftrade-offs, observations of how to implement such presentations at different student levels, andtheir impact on student motivation.1. IntroductionIt is the role of every engineering degree-granting institution to make sure their students have asolid background in the core topics of their specific field as well as engineering in general. Asengineers, they must then be able to integrate this knowledge in order to utilize a more holisticview4 when designing
introductory course a part of their proposed STEM pathway.Qualified high school students will also be able to pick other existing four-year collegeSTEM offerings as concurrent credit or dual credit.The STEM course (or its adapted form) can be used to facilitate a three-tiered articulationthat also involves two-year programs (Fig. 1). With two-year programs, the problem liesin the inherent difficulty of determining university course equivalency for AAS technicalcourses; a dilemma not characteristic of Associate of Arts (AA) transfer initiatives. Whentransferring to a four-year program, direct equivalency is not always possible due toregulatory requirements; while our immediate focus is on the STEM course, in anoutcome-based culture, it should be
engineering students often failto appreciate critical interrelations between technical and nontechnical aspects of sanitation. Toaddress this deficiency, a case-study module on sanitation for the developing world wasimplemented in a senior/graduate level onsite water reclamation course. The goal was to increasestudent awareness of the interplay between technical and nontechnical complexities whendesigning and implementing sanitation systems in both the developed and developing world.Learning objectives included increasing student familiarity with (1) perceptions and treatmentoptions of sanitary waste in developing countries and (2) nontechnical constraints and issues(such as economic, social, cultural, political, and ethical) associated with
several successful Engineering Technology programs and a TechnologyEducation program within our department. In 2007, faculty these programs workedtogether to provide engineering education professional development experiences fornearly 400 teachers; who in turn have taught thousands of K-12 students. This wasfacilitated with the assistance of a $1.7 million grant, and visiting faculty from severalleading design centers in England. This conceptual framework is partially a result of thefindings of that project. Within our Technology Education program, this is ourframework for preparing technology teachers. These teachers promote technologicalliteracy and engineering. The four elements of the framework are 1) Design, 2) Living, 3) Productivity
The culture of education [0] [1]. Bruner proposed that a learning curriculum could be arranged sothat the central questions, or themes in a discipline, would be returned to again and again aslearners advance in their knowledge and intellectual capacity. A 7-step process is developed toimplement the spiral curriculum in the bioprocess engineering and details are presented in [2]and [3]. All workshop participants were introduced to the spiral curriculum process adopted bythe DLR project investigators in reformulating the curriculum of the bioprocess engineering. TheDLR project investigators have conducted spiral curriculum workshops at national andinternational sites [2]. In addition, a number of hands-on engineering learning activities
conventionalmachining [1]. These skills are vital for engineers to communicate design ideas, and a basicunderstanding of manufacturing technology helps enable students to consider how a design onpaper might be turned into a physical prototype. Faculty observations and student and alumnifeedback have indicated that these skills are vital for success in classroom design projects suchas senior design, as well as for careers in industry [2]. Page 15.482.2Within the biomedical engineering curriculum at Bucknell University, a fabrication andexperimental design course is integrated into a four course design sequence where two coursescomprise the senior capstone
ABET. The focus ofthis transition was on developing effective and sustainable assessment model that would positionthe program for meeting TAC ABET Accreditation requirements. Also presented are examplesof the templates developed for outcomes assessment and a description of the process theEngineering Technology faculty went through to adopt this current assessment plan.Moving the Existing Program to Outcomes-Oriented TC2K CriteriaThe original assessment model that had been used for previous accreditation reviews wasdeveloped based on MU’s Board of Higher Education recommendations and following themodels suggested by Sarapin11 and Strong et al12. The following was MU’s engineeringtechnology assessment model:Step 1 – Develop a mission
without a similar background a greater motivation to continue their own technical developmentPrior research and outreachThe research objectives of the TORCH program also rely heavily on four primary categories ofprior research: (1) engineering outreach models for females (2) engineering education outreachprograms and practices (3) the lack of formal K-12 engineering education and (4) persistence,mentoring and goal alignment. Again, the differences of program assessment and research areduly noted, however much of the literature is assessment in nature. We still refer to thesepublications as a baseline for developing the program and the research agenda.Engineering outreach models for femalesIn recent years several organizations, universities
persons with severe disabilities is increasing and will continue to grow as the population ages[1]. Many persons with disabilities benefit from an assistive technology device, an “item, pieceof equipment, product or system, whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, orcustomized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional capabilities of personswith disabilities. “[2]. In a 2005 survey by the U.S. Department of Education, National Instituteon Disability and Rehabilitation Research, 64% of respondents used some assistive technology.The most frequently used were devices that enhance mobility (canes, crutches, walkers, scootersand wheelchairs), hearing aids, and oxygen tanks. Most respondents who used AT said it
our lives, from enabling citizens to perform Page 15.1184.2 routine tasks to requiring that they be able to make responsible, informed decisions that affect individuals, our society, and the environment. Citizens of today must have a basic understanding of how technology affects their world and how they exist both within and around technology.”6While persuasive in general, there are many caveats to these propositions:1. It is not possible to be literate about all, or even most, technologies. For example, doctors,electrical engineers, material scientists, biotechnologists, and chemical engineers, typically livein mutually
responses.Why Use Clickers?The use of clickers or Classroom Performance System (CPS) devices is not a new application oftechnology. Previous studies have shown the effectiveness of the clicker technology to revealingconcept retention and evaluating short-term retention.1-3 However, the manner in which they canbe used is vast and may be seemingly appropriate for some engineering courses to stimulate thelearning environment and provide real-time assessment for both the students and instructor.Students can respond to multiple choice, yes/no, Likert scale, and true/false questions along withproviding numeric responses and even responses to questions posed "on the fly" by theinstructor. The CPS software enables the instructor to display the questions via
isabout “Fill-in Worksheets”, a tool that was developed to increase student engagement inclassroom and allows for incorporating PBL, AL and CL along with Peer Instruction (PI).The paper describes the steps and thought process that was used in developing the fill-inworksheets over the past several years. The worksheets have enabled the author toincrease student engagement, include AL, CL and implement PI in the classroom.Introduction“Educators, researchers and policy makers have advocated student involvement forsometime as an essential aspect of meaningful learning.”1 To engage students, educatorshave used techniques like active2 and cooperative learning3, 4, inquiry and problem basedlearning, team projects, service learning and undergraduate
. Moreover,increasing numbers of manufacturers are beginning to evaluate their products and even theirproduct packaging for sustainability, whether to meet mandatory retail initiatives or to reap someof the rewards associated with greater environmental stewardship. This shift in product designmeans that engineering education needs to produce engineers that can provide technologicalinnovation while protecting the environment. These demands also mean that universities acrossthe nation need to build bridges between undergraduate engineering education and sustainabilityengineering in both research and industry.1 This paper describes an approach to includesustainability engineering within an existing engineering program through 1) curriculumdevelopment