Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Research to Practice: K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum Design (Part 1)

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan D. Hertel, Museum of Science; Christine M. Cunningham, Museum of Science; Gregory John Kelly, Pennsylvania State University; Cathy P. Lachapelle, Museum of Science

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

discipline-specific context. Our review ofliterature revealed that research focusing on how writing supports engineering learning is largelynonexistent. However, as a corollary body of work, much research has been done to examine thevalue of writing as discourse in science education and to scientific literacy3,4.In science, writing is a key method for building and distributing knowledge. The use ofnotebooks and other written inscriptions throughout the process of scientific investigation lead tofurther written documentation that become objects of discussion and peer review5. This is whyNorris and Phillips differentiate how to write and read in science, what they call the fundamentalsense of scientific literacy, from the knowledge of science (the

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Research

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Keith, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

untenured faculty member should (andlikely will) spend most of their time. Page 11.256.3Tip #1: “Invest In Yourself” – When you successfully defend your doctoral dissertation,you are one of the best in the world in your field of Topic X. Thus, you have the bestchance to make an immediate scholarly impact by: • writing one or two more papers in Topic X. This keeps your publishing record intact and shows you can publish papers on your own (usually a key “deliverable” of a national research grant) • making a “lateral move” into a new, but parallel field of research. When you submit a proposal for review, the reviewers of your proposal

Conference Session

Insights for Teaching ECE Courses - Session II

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alireza Kavianpour, DeVry University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

such a project, students will beinterviewed by peers and the instructor. All students will participate in a mock interview. Everystudent is responsible for writing at least one chapter of the final document (book).Example:The following project might be one possible choice for the students with Electrical and ComputerEngineering major:Name of the project: Automation of the appliances in a house. This project controls appliancessuch as: Radio, TV, Garage door, Shower, Coffee maker, Microwave, Telephone, Refrigerator, etc.Main Hardware: ZigBee or WiFi, IP gateway, Microcontroller.Main Software: Graphic User Interface (GUI) was written using a high level language (JAVA,C++, C#, VBNET).Every student will select one of the appliances for controlling

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #10

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Afsaneh Minaie, Utah Valley University; Reza Sanati-Mehrizy, Utah Valley University; Janis Raje

published.Writing Intensive Courses. The capstone courses are writing-intensive courses. This was not thecase when the LEAP project began but was initiated as UVU sought to incorporate more HIPsinto the curriculum. Each program was charged with designating two required courses as WritingIntensive Courses. The Writing Enriched Committee recommended that faculty of these coursesneed to intervene in students' writing processes by providing in-class instruction, guidingfeedback on plans and drafts, and engaging in one-to-one conversations with students aboutwriting. Key HIP characteristics of the writing intensive courses dovetail with the capstoneprojects but reinforce “interactions with faculty and peers about substantive matters” and“periodic, structured

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2A: Using Alternative Measurements to Look at Students and Their Success

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Andres Brake, Lamar University; James C. Curry

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

were assigned based on the total group and individual performance(assessed using peer evaluations). The topics covered in the course are summarized as follows:  Introduction to Civil Engineering  A Guide to Student Success in Engineering  Introduction to Microsoft Excel: Plotting, computations, optimization with solver  Introduction to Technical Writing: Investigative report and technical posters o Discussed formatting and content requirements of written investigative technical reports; provided sample reports and sample technical posters  Impact Force Attenuation: Wall barrier optimization o Assembled track and connected force sensors recorded impact

Conference Session

Tools and Strategies for Teaching Online Courses

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

primary motivation for writing this paper is that in 2020, because of the COVID-19, severalinstructors worldwide had to move their courses to online environments. My experience transitioningfrom teaching face-to-face to online learning environments two years before COVID-19 could help otherinstructors strengthen the skills and knowledge needed for succeeding in online teaching. Besides thetypical challenges related to being a subject matter expert and even a pedagogical expert tied toteaching any course, online teaching of large course environments offers additional challenges. Forexample, mentoring several undergraduate peer mentors (AKA undergraduate teaching assistants) anddeveloping strategies that engage students and retain students until

Collection

2018 Gulf Southwest Section Conference

Authors

Aaron T. Hill; Michael C. Campbell

requirement to write a memorandumThus, it is critical for engineering educators to improve the summarizing the results of each Design Review wasstagnant method of traditional teaching and learning. Small eliminated. This cooperative learning technique was usedmistakes in the engineering profession can lead to death or on six of seven homework assignments during the term andmillions of dollars in repair. on seven of nine homework assignments in their pre- For the fall 2018 semester, in the Design of Steel and requisite course. Student feedback was collected from bothWood Structures at the United States Military Academy at Likert Scale questions and open-ended questions. ThisWest Point, Civil

Conference Session

Recruiting and Retention

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janice Girouard, University of Hartford; Ivana Milanovic, University of Hartford; Natalie Segal, University of Hartford; Dr. Sallie 'Lee' Townsend

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

-2005. She is currently Program Director for Mechanical Engineering Technology in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering, Technology, and Architecture.Natalie Segal, University of Hartford Prior to her appointment as a full-time teacher of technical communications at S. I. Ward College of Technology at the University of Hartford, Assistant Professor NATALIE SEGAL worked for more than 20 years as a technical writer and taught technical writing part-time at Ward College for eight years. She holds her Bachelor's Degree in English Education from the University of Connecticut, a Master's Degree in English from Trinity College and a Master of Fine Arts in

Conference Session

Alternative Teaching Methods

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer A. O'Neil, Rochester Institute of Technology; Martin E. Gordon, Rochester Institute of Technology; Abigail Gordon, Clarence Central School District; Brian Scott Rice, Rochester Institute of Technology; Gary De Angelis, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

chunkin’ project. Students had to essentially repeat the marshmallow project,except in a larger team with a full-scale launcher that was capable of firing a five pound pumpkin100 yards.The concept of technical writing was frontloaded in Fundamentals of Engineering by scaffoldingthe content, as described below.  Project 1 required a one-page summary per team of three;  Students received a lecture on technical writing;  Project 2 required a full technical memo per team of six;  Students completed a peer-review process on their individual Project 3 reports; and  Project 3 required each individual to create a full technical memo.The final concepts frontloaded in Fundamentals of Engineering were the software programs taughtto

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Wronecki, East Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

methods contained within. Therefore, the main goal of this research paper is tosimply communicate the author’s approach towards teaching design. The results of thisexperimental research are by no means conclusive. Therefore, this paper neither substantiates norvalidates the systematic methods contained within. However, some measure of assessing student Page 12.1372.2performance when using the following methods can be ascertained by empirically peer reviewingexamples of student design projects at the paper’s presentation session.Design ProcessA seven stage design process organizes design projects and structures this paper. The stages inthe process

Conference Session

Design of Lab Experiments II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Russell, University of Hertfordshire

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

compares with only 69/297(~23%) that did not. The rest, 53/297 (~18%) indicated a neutral response.ConclusionLaboratory studies should be considered an integral component of any engineering curricula.They offer significant value in that they allow the students to gain both first hand and situatedknowledge of the subject domain. Two issues however are found to exist – both of which canbe countered by judicious use of technology.First the additional resource demands of laboratory studies and the attendant assessmentdemand can be offset using technology to help set, collect, mark and provide feedback.Second, the desire for students to disregard advice on how to write laboratory reports can becountered by using the learners as assessors. Peer

Conference Session

New Approaches in Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen T. Marosi, Bucknell University; Barbra Steinhurst, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

lasting supportive cohort of peers among the Backstage Bucknell participants. 2) Students greatly valued activities such as academic preparedness sessions in mathematics and physics as well as time management workshops that were geared toward helping them develop useful and necessary skills for success in their first semester. Meaningful instruction in writing was difficult to execute in this compressed time frame. 3) Nearly all participants felt that the program was of an appropriate length to achieve the goals of the Backstage Bucknell and would recommend the program in this format to another student. Gains in the three focus areas of the program were possible

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Patricia Brackin; Julia Williams

build consensus.Course activities are structured to help students acquire these skills. Activities include teambuilding, project management, team management and defining rubrics for evaluating team skills.Assessment of student performance includes peer evaluation, student self-assessment, andportfolio assessment.INTRODUCTIONStudents in ME 460, Machine Design, a senior level, required course have been working inteams on industrial sponsored projects for the past 10 years at Rose-Hulman Institute ofTechnology. Team projects are an integral part of students’ education. Mechanical Engineeringstudents begin working on teams during their freshmen year and are required to do so until theygraduate. During the 1997-98 academic year, Rose-Hulman

Conference Session

Capstone Courses in Construction

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jose L. Fernandez-Solis, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Construction

separate ranking isdone for the oral presentations. Grades are influenced by team rankings asdetermined by outside jurors. Students peer evaluate each other for performanceaccording to posted rubrics; student project grades are affected by the peerevaluation. This approach has been very successful in the past four years and thecurrent class of 23 attracted 1 landscape urban planning, 6 civil, 7 architecture,and 9 building construction students, resulting in a truly interdisciplinary classand team composition.The goal of this paper is to showcase the framework, structure, and logic forintegrating the two courses and compares the results in terms of grades andquality of the responses from the faculty and the jurors. All classes were asked tokeep

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Renetta G. Tull, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Autumn Marie Reed, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Pamela Petrease Felder, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; Shawnisha Hester LGSW, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Denise Nicole Williams, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Yarazeth Medina, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Amanda Lo, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Erika T. Aparaka, University of Maryland College Park; Patricia Ordonez, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Academic faculty members in your department on research/programmatic experiences projects that align you’re your research/career interests. They should participate in professional activities that are common for people who have completed their doctorate. - For example, do some peer reviewing, give conference talks, contribute chapters to books, demos, write or assist your advisor in writing grant proposals; take charge in planning a seminar, meeting, workshop within the department or outside; teach some classes in a course.3) Access to Mentors Some graduate

Conference Session

Improving the BME Classroom on the Ground and Virtually

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rucha Joshi, University of California, Davis; Jennifer H. Choi, University of California, Davis

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

backside of your concept map, please write down answers to : a) In your presentation, what about that concept was difficult to explain to peers? b) What ideas did you get from the group to understand this concept better?While concept map exercise was completed by all students when they came to the class wherediscussion activity was held, the self-reflection on concept maps was turned in by 46 students outof 86, for an extra credit. From student responses to prompt a), the difficulties students reportedin explaining to peers were thematically coded. The frequency of the concepts mentioned asdifficult to explain was also accounted for generating a word cloud. Student responses to promptb) were analyzed to get an insight

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arash Esmaili Zaghi P.E., University of Connecticut; Mark Tehranipoor, University of Florida; Caitlin Nichole O'Brien, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Engineering Students with ADHDAbstractStudents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) tend to experience thetraditional education system differently than their peers. The engineering education system hasyet to realize unique potential of these students and identify ways in which to handle thesedifferences in order to keep them engaged and successful. Published literature suggests thatindividuals with ADHD have the potential of strong divergent thinking skills and unparalleledrisk-taking. However, this group of students is significantly underrepresented in engineeringprograms; some work suggests that only 3% of college students with ADHD choose to studyengineering. The current design of engineering education largely fails to provoke the

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Programs

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Pluskwik, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

using Apple i-pad Pros toefficiently write feedback on student work using the Apple pencil. Giving feedback to studentsquickly is one of the primary roles of both faculty and facilitators in this program.Active, integrated learning includes a range of activities from field trips, conference presentations,peer to peer teaching, workshops and trainings in the fabrication lab and electronics lab, STEMoutreach events, as well as workshops on professional expectations. Online gamificationresources such as Kahoot [14], Quizlet [15], and Plickers [16] are regularly used. In Design,students email and meet with clients, vendors, and subject matter experts. Teams travel toindustry client locations in a program-provided vehicle.Written reflections

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Bahr, Washington State University

in with presentations from faculty around campus on their research activities) 2. Discussions of intellectual property, scientific integrity and ethics in research 3. Understanding the difference between popular, textbook, and peer reviewed literature 4. Selection of information sources and use of library resources 5. Making and presenting posters for research symposia 6. Improving technical writing skills 7. Improving laboratory notebook techniques 8. Developing time management skills 9. Long term career options for research, including how federal and state funding options impact research activities In the interests of providing a snapshot of the activities carried out it is instructive

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Rebecca Anne Hardesty, University of California, San Diego; Paul Andreas Hadjipieris, University of California, San Diego; Jace Hargis, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

in an interactive environment in which mistakesand confusion are encouraged, that in turn leads to a deeper path of learning and increasedstudent motivation.Motivation The final component of Bandura’s (1977) Memory Modelling System is motivation. Tobe able to model, recreate and reproduce knowledge successfully, students need to be motivatedto learn (Hargis, 1999). Emily McIntosh (2017) explores how peer assisted study sessionsengage and motivate students, and leads to improved retention. In addition, the development ofproblem solving and critical thinking skills improved student resilience (McIntosh, 2017). Inrespect to resilience and motivation, Claudia Muller and Caroll Dweck (1998) write that praisingstudents’ intelligence results

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michael Jason Babcock, Whatcom Community College; Tommaso Alessandro Vannelli, Whatcom Community College; Dan Hanley, Western Washington University; Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

(15.2%) compared to enrollment patterns in the general student population (21.7%). Disparitiesin enrollment are partnered with inequitable rates of course completion, with historicallyunderserved students completing 71% of these courses with a grade of C or better, compared toan 82% course success rate for their peers. These demographics mirror national demographictrends that indicate student access to degree and career opportunities in STEM offered by twoyear colleges disproportionately favors students who identify with hegemonic norms in STEM[2],[3]. The SEECRS project represents one institutions attempts at designing programming todismantle structures that reproduce these disparities.Beginning in 2018, Whatcom Community College started

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shannon L. Isovitsch Parks P.E., University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown; Laura J. Dietz, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

integrated extensive oral andwritten communication practice, including writing, presenting, interviewing and networking withprofessionals, along with traditional engineering design skills. In addition, classroom lectureswere supplemented with a combination of on-site industry tours, guest lecturers, peer review oforal presentations, and a team design project from an actual consulting firm project. Studentsatisfaction measures on the various classroom activities as well as industry professional andfaculty measures on end of term student communication skills are presented.MethodsA senior level, undergraduate, civil engineering/technology elective on water and wastewaterengineering was designed to integrate oral and written communication skills

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Entrepreneurship

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Bahram Roughani, Loyola University Maryland

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

skills such as working in teams, writing,programming, applying physics to solve interdisciplinary problems, designing and developingproducts, managing complex projects, and working with clients. This is an important factorconsidering approximately 95% of physics graduates go on to careers in the private sector orgovernment labs, yet most undergraduate physics programs prepare students primarily foracademic careers. In fact, a survey of 1,407 mid-career physics PhD recipients found that theyfrequently attributed career success to their skills and abilities outside of physics (e.g.,interpersonal, problem solving, computing, and analysis skills). Conversely, some of the mostfrequently mentioned career barriers among 1,321 respondents included lack

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #25992Board 57: Identifying and Disseminating Transformative Professional Devel-opment of STEM Undergraduates Who Perform Outreach: Progress in Year1Mr. Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Michael Alley is an associate professor of teaching in the College of Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. He is the author of The Craft of Scientific Writing (Springer, 2018) and The Craft of Scientific Presentations (Springer-Verlag, 2013). He is also founder of the popular websites Writing Guidelines for Engineering and Science (www.craftofscientificwriting.com) and the Assertion-Evidence

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Design

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Ken Alford

are peer-managed, and like theirreal world counterparts some projects are better managed than others. And like industry projects,resources are also constrained.The focus of the first lessons in CS407A is to understand system requirements. By the end of thethird week of the semester, instructors have covered the theory of information gathering andsystems analysis and have paired student teams with their clients so that they can immediatelyapply their newly acquired knowledge to their recently assigned research project. Instructorscheck their progress in an informal review, and then let students finish writing their requirementsspecification.Soon after being assigned to a project team, each student team is asked to identify severaltechnologies

Collection

1997 Annual Conference

Authors

Barbara Blake Bath

because of a well-known or well-liked client. Summer jobsdevelop out of some projects. Teams which enjoy working together can have a synergetic effecton the output.Schedule: On the first day, students meet in the morning to hear the ground rules, survey thevarious projects, to form teams and choose the project on which they want to work. In theafternoon, students meet with their client and begin work on their projects. They write apreliminary description of the problem to be solved. On the second morning, all students meetagain to present their preliminary requirements to the entire class. The class offers suggestionsand comments. Each team meets with the instructor to review the scope of their problem. Thenthe work begins. In general, teams work

Collection

1997 Annual Conference

Authors

Ravi Pendse; Everett L. Johnson

, we will report on different methods used to teach Digital Design to a typical freshmanstudent. The design team concept, which is emphasized throughout the semester, will bepresented in this paper. Different innovative ideas used in this class include, use of design teams,peer design team conferences, cost evaluation, and industry interfacing. All of these ideas will bepresented in this paper. Comments from students suggest that they find this course to be fun andchallenging. What makes this course fun and challenging? How is the design team conceptworking? Some possible answers to these questions are also presented.IntroductionAn informal poll of Engineering educators indicates that it is a great idea to teach designtechniques as early as

Conference Session

Potpourri

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Summer Dann Johnson, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge; John Scalzo, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge; Sarah Jones, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge; Kelly Rusch, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge; Warren Waggenspack, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, Yr 1 45 Participants 80/20% male: female 5 Peer Mentors 22% minority E2 Camp, Yr 2 84 Participants 82/18% male: female 18 Peer Mentors 6% minority ENGR 1050, Yr 1 56/ 3 sections 69/31% male: female 33% minority ENGR 1050, Yr 2 74 74/26% male: female 28% minority ERC, Yr 1 110

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel; Ronald W. Welch P.E., The Citadel; William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel; Deirdre D. Ragan, The Citadel; Jason Geathers, The Citadel

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

focused on underrepresented populations, specifically women and minorities, whileothers are implemented for the entire engineering student population. Mentoring efforts include:demographic-specific advisors, faculty advisors, peer mentors, faculty mentors, and engineeringindustry mentors. The School has taken a four-year approach to its mentoring efforts. Overallobjectives of the mentoring program are multifaceted: 1) to help new students transition to highereducation and identify with their particular program; 2) to help students who are struggling inupper level courses and in leadership positions or conducting undergraduate research; and 3) tohelp students with their transition to the engineering profession.This paper describes how one

Conference Session

Capstone and Design Projects

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammad Moin Uddin, East Tennessee State University; Keith V. Johnson, East Tennessee State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

mitigate the problem. It was anticipated that the students would learnabout international business environment, cross cultural elements of engineering problems, andsustainable solutions. Students learning outcomes were evaluated using pre and post survey,focus group’s evaluation, and peer evaluation. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted tojustify effectiveness of new learning outcomes. All students agreed that the course projectincreased their knowledge and skills to solve engineering problems in global settings. About92% students responded that the project increased their interest about different cultures andmulti-perspective analysis, and 72% students, up 52% from pre-survey, said that the project washelpful understanding engineering and